검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
조기낙엽에 따른 참다래 착과 유목의 당년 재발아와 익년 초기생장 Regrowth of Axillary Buds the Current Season and Early Growth and Development the Following Year in Fruiting Young Kiwifruit as Affected by Early Defoliation
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
조기낙엽에 따른 참다래 착과 유목의 당년 재발아와 익년 초기생장
BACKGROUND:

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of the unexpected early loss of leaves on a newly-bred kiwifruit on the regrowth of axillary buds the current season and the early growth and development the following year.

METHODS AND RESULTS:

The vines were defoliated on Jul. 18, Aug. 16, and Sep. 17 in 2012 and on Jul. 16, Aug. 13, and Sep. 12 in 2013. The vines were defoliated 0 (control), 50, and 100% of the total number of leaves on a vine. The regrowth of axillary buds at 30 days after defoliation increased in proportion to defoliation degrees regardless of the defoliated time. Defoliation the previous season did not influence percent budbreak the next season. Percentage of floral shoots of the control vines was 27.4%, each bearing 2-3 flowers. In those vines defoliated 100% in August and September, however, percent floral shoots and number of flowers significantly reduced.

CONCLUSION(S):

Defoliation in July, August, and September didnot affect percent budbreak the following year regardless of degrees of defoliation. A 100% defoliation in August and September significantly reduced flowering the following year compared to the control; that in August resulted in no floral buds at all.

KEYWORD
Budbreak , Defoliation , Floral shoot , Kiwifruit
참고문헌
  • 1. Brundell D. J. (1975) Flower development of the Chinese gooseberry (Actinidia chinensis Planch.), II. [Development of the flowering bud, New Zealand Journal of Botany] Vol.13 P.485-496 google cross ref
  • 2. Cheng L., Fuchigami L. H. (2002) Growth of young apple trees in relation to reserve nitrogen and carbohydrates. [Tree Physiology] Vol.22 P.1297-1303 google cross ref
  • 3. Hopping M. E. (1990) Floral biology, pollination, and fruit set, in: Warrington, I. J., Weston, G. C. (Eds.), Kiwifruit: Science and management P.71-96 google
  • 4. Kang S. M., Ko K. C. (1976) A study on cold hardiness, flowering and fruit bearing in ‘Okubo’ peach trees (Prunus persica) as affected by defoliation [Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology] Vol.17 P.1-11 google
  • 5. Kwack Y. B., Kim H. L., Chae W. B., Lee J. H., Lee E. H., Kim J. G., Lee Y. B. (2013) Regrowthof buds and flower bud formation in kiwifruit as affected by early defoliation [Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture] Vol.32 P.201-206 google cross ref
  • 6. Kwack Y. B., Kim H. L., Chae W. B., Kim S. H., Lee Y. B., Kim J. G. (2014) Carbohydrate reserves of non-fruiting young kiwifruit vines as affected by early artificial defoliation. [Horticulture Environmentand Biotechnology] Vol.55 P.462-470 google cross ref
  • 7. Linsley-Noakes G. C., Allan P. (1987) Effects of winter temperatures on flower development in two clones of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa (A. Chev.) CF Liang et AR Ferguson). [Scientia Horticulturae] Vol.33 P.249-260 google cross ref
  • 8. Lloyd D. A., Couvillon G. A. (1974) Effects of date of defoliation on flower and leaf bud development in the peach (Prunus persica L. Datsch). [Journal-American Society for Horticultural Science] Vol.99 P.514-517 google
  • 9. Loescher W. H., McCamant T., Keller J. D. (1990) Carbohydrate reserves, translocation, and storage in woody plant roots. [HortScience] Vol.25 P.274-281 google
  • 10. McCamant T. (1988) Utilization and transport of storage carbohydrates in sweet cherry. google
  • 11. McPherson H. G., Snelgar W. P., Manson P. J., Snowball A. M. (1997) Bud respiration and dormancy of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). [Annals of Botany] Vol.80 P.411-418 google cross ref
  • 12. Oliveira C. M., Priestley C. A. (1988) Carbohydrate reserves in deciduous fruit trees. [Horticultural Reviews] Vol.10 P.403-430 google
  • 13. Polito V. S., Grant J. A. (1984) Initiation and development of pistillate flowers in Actinidiachinensis. [Scientia horticulturae] Vol.22 P.365-371 google cross ref
  • 14. Snowball A. M., Walton E. F. (1992) Flowering in kiwifruit. New Zealand kiwifruit special publication, 4 P.25-28 google
  • 15. Titus J. S., Kang S. M. (1982) Nitrogen metabolism, translocation, and recycling in apple trees. [Horticultural Reviews] Vol.4 P.204-246 google
  • 16. Tromp J. (1983) Nutrient reserves in roots of fruit trees, in particular carbohydrates and nitrogen [Plant and Soil] Vol.71 P.401-413 google cross ref
  • 17. Worley R. E. (1979a) Pecan yield, quality, nutlet set, and spring growth as a response to time of fall defoliation. [Journal American Society for Horticultural Science] Vol.104 P.192-194 google
  • 18. Worley R. E. (1979b) Fall defoliation date and seasonal carbohydrate concentration of pecan wood tissue. [Journal American Society for Horticultural Science] Vol.104 P.195-199 google
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Axillary bud regrowth of a young, fruiting ‘Goldrush’ kiwifruit the current season as affected by different degrees of defoliation in July through September in 2012 and 2013. The vines were defoliated 0, 50, and 100% on each date. Percent regrowth, measured on 30 days after defoliation, was calculated with the number of buds regrown out of the total number of axillary buds per vine. Vertical bars indicate standard error of the means, and letters express differences among defoliation degrees (the Duncan test, P≤0.05).
    Axillary bud regrowth of a young, fruiting ‘Goldrush’ kiwifruit the current season as affected by different degrees of defoliation in July through September in 2012 and 2013. The vines were defoliated 0, 50, and 100% on each date. Percent regrowth, measured on 30 days after defoliation, was calculated with the number of buds regrown out of the total number of axillary buds per vine. Vertical bars indicate standard error of the means, and letters express differences among defoliation degrees (the Duncan test, P≤0.05).
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Budbreak of a young, fruiting ‘Goldrush’ kiwifruit the following spring as affected by defoliation treatments of the previous year. The vines were defoliated 0, 50, and 100% in 2012 and 2013. Vertical bars indicate standard error of the means, and letters express differences among defoliation degrees (the Duncan test, P≤0.05).
    Budbreak of a young, fruiting ‘Goldrush’ kiwifruit the following spring as affected by defoliation treatments of the previous year. The vines were defoliated 0, 50, and 100% in 2012 and 2013. Vertical bars indicate standard error of the means, and letters express differences among defoliation degrees (the Duncan test, P≤0.05).
  • [ Fig. 3. ]  Flowering of a young, fruiting ‘Goldrush’ kiwifruit the following spring as affected by defoliation treatments of the previous year.The vines were defoliated 0, 50, and 100% on each date in 2012. A, percent floral shoot is the number of shoots with flowers out of the total number of shoots grown per vine. B, flower number is the number of flowers per floral shoot. Vertical bars indicate standard error of the means of five replications, and letters express differences among defoliation degrees (the Duncan test, P≤0.05).
    Flowering of a young, fruiting ‘Goldrush’ kiwifruit the following spring as affected by defoliation treatments of the previous year.The vines were defoliated 0, 50, and 100% on each date in 2012. A, percent floral shoot is the number of shoots with flowers out of the total number of shoots grown per vine. B, flower number is the number of flowers per floral shoot. Vertical bars indicate standard error of the means of five replications, and letters express differences among defoliation degrees (the Duncan test, P≤0.05).
  • [ Fig. 4. ]  Vegetative growth of a young, fruiting ‘Goldrush’ kiwifruit, measured 30 days after budbreak the following year as affected by defoliation treatments of the previous year. The vines were defoliated 0, 50, and 100% on each date in 2013. Vertical bars indicate standard error of the means of five replications, and letters express differences among defoliation degrees (the Duncan test, P≤0.05).
    Vegetative growth of a young, fruiting ‘Goldrush’ kiwifruit, measured 30 days after budbreak the following year as affected by defoliation treatments of the previous year. The vines were defoliated 0, 50, and 100% on each date in 2013. Vertical bars indicate standard error of the means of five replications, and letters express differences among defoliation degrees (the Duncan test, P≤0.05).
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.