Mechanical interfacial adhesion of carbon fibers-reinforced polarized-polypropylene matrix composites: effects of silane coupling agents

  • cc icon
  • ABSTRACT

  • KEYWORD

    carbon fibers , polarized-polypropylene , silane coupling treatment , mechanical interfacial adhesion

  • Thermoplastic composites are used in a variety of applications such as mass transit, automotive parts, and military structures [1-6]. Their appeal compared to conventional materials such as aluminum, steel, and thermoset composites for these applications lies in their high specific strength, corrosion resistance, superior impact resistance, high toughness, and ease of recycling [1-7].  In recent years, carbon fibers (CF) have been widely used as reinforcing materials in high performance composites. CF present several advantages, including high modulus and strength, good stiffness, and creep resistance [8-10]. Despite these advantages, the CF/thermoplastic composites have unsatisfactory mechanical properties because CF have poor interfacial adhesion with most thermoplastic polymers due to their non-polar surface.  The interfacial adhesion between reinforcing fibers and polymer matrices in composites is the controlling factor in obtaining optimum mechanical properties of composites [11-13]. To achieve good interfacial adhesion between CF and thermoplastic matrices, it is necessary to increase the surface polarity. In this light, increasing the surface polarity for van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding can improve the interfacial adhesion.  In efforts to increase the surface polarity of CF, various surface treatment techniques have been applied, including plasma treatment, anodic oxidation, metal plating, and coupling treatment [14,15]. Among the various treatments, coupling treatment is known to be a very effective method for improving the interfacial adhesion between the fibers and the thermoplastic matrices [16].  The role of coupling agents in improving the interfacial adhesion between polymers and inorganic surfaces has been widely documented [17,18]. However, the effects of different coupling agents on interfacial adhesion between CF and polar-modified thermoplastic matrices have yet to be explicitly identified.  Therefore, the first objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of sizing treatments by silane-based coupling agents on the interfacial adhesion properties between the fibers and the thermoplastic matrix. Another objective is to investigate the effects of the presence of surface functional groups containing silane-oxygen groups on the mechanical properties of carbon fiber-reinforced maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene.  The CF used in this work were polyacrylonitrile based high strength fibers, T-700SC-13000 (12K unidirectional fabric; Toray, Tokyo, Japan). The average diameter of these CF was around 7 μm. A highly polarized polypropylene sheet prepared by maleic anhydride grafting (Homan Petrochemical Co, Seoul, Korea) was used as a matrix.  The reagents used for the coupling treatments were vinyltriethoxy silane (VTES), 3-amino propyl triethoxy silane (APS), and 3-methacryloxy propyl trimethoxy silane (MPTS; Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), denoted as VTES, APS, and MPTS, respectively. The acid and silane treatments of the CF were carried out by the following procedure. For the acid treatments, the CFs were immersed in acid solution (3 mol of HNO3) at room temperature and refluxed for 30 min in order to introduce hydroxyl groups on the CFs.  The silane solution (2 wt%) was prepared by adding the silanes to a mixture of ethanol or methanol (95%), and distilled water (5%). The pH of the solutions was adjusted to 4.0-5.0 by addition of acetic acid. Acetic acid initiates the formation of silanol structures. The solutions were stirred for 1 h to allow for hydrolysis and silanol formation. The acid treated CF were then immersed into each sizing solution for 40 min. In this step, the hydroxyl groups on the CFs can react with the hydrolyzed silanes, resulting in the formation of silanol groups on the CFs. The silane-treated CF were then rinsed with distilled water to eliminate the unreacted silane agents and dried at 80℃ for 12 h.  The composites were prepared by a well-known laminate method. Unidirectional carbon fabric laminates were prepared using commercial unidirectional fabric and polarized polypropylene sheets, with 50 vol% of CF. The composite manufacturing process by hot compression molding was carried out in a steel mold with dimensions of 50 × 150 mm. The composite laminates were heated to 150℃ at 5℃/min, held for 10 min, and pressed under 200 kgf/cm2. They were subsequently heated to 210℃ at 5℃ /min, pressed under 100 kgf/cm2, and held for 10 min.  The surface properties of CF, before and after silane treatments, were characterized by several techniques. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) spectra of treated CF were recorded on a FT-IR spectrophotometer (Nicolet-is10; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The scan range was from 400 to 4500 cm−1. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed as it is a useful analytical technique to evaluate the surface composition of the fibers [19-21]. An XPS experiment was performed with a VG Scientific ESCA LAB MK-II spectrometer equipped with an Mg-Kα X-ray source. The base pressure in the sample chamber was controlled in a range of 5 × 10−8 torr.  The contact angle of the fibers is generally recognized as an important parameter to determine the wetting performance and surface free energy of treated CF [22,23]. Contact angle measurements of treated fibers were performed using a Krüss Processor Tension meter K-100. Two wetting liquids were used for calculating the surface free energy by the modified Washburn equation (1):    where m is the mass of the wetting liquid; t is the flow time; ρ is the density of measuring liquid; η is the viscosity of wetting liquid; γL is the surface free energy of wetting liquid; θ is the contact angle; and c is the packing factor [24]. The wetting liquids used were ethylene glycol (γs: 47.70 mN/m, mN/m, γsd: 21.80 mN/m, γsp: 50.00 mN/m), and diiodomethane (γs: 50.80 mN/m, γsd: 50.42 mN/m, γsp: 0.38 mN/m). Contact angles were measured 10 times for the calculation of the surface energetics with a standard deviation of less than 1°.  Interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) was measured by the three-point short beam bending test method to evaluate the interfacial adhesion between the CF and the polypropylene matrix. The three-point bending test was performed with an Instron Model Lloyd LR-5K mechanical tester according to the ASTM D-2344. The span-to-depth ratio and cross-head speed used were 4:1 and 2.0 mm/min, respectively. The ILSS of the composites was calculated by the following equation:    where F is the load (N) at the moment of break, b the width (m) of the specimen, and d the thickness (m) of the specimen.  Silane coupling treatments are mainly used for inorganic fillers in composites to improve the adhesion strength between the fillers and the polymer matrix. The silane coupling agent undergoes chemical transformation during hydrolysis and drying. During hydrolysis of the silane, the Si-O-R groups are changed to active Si-OH. Normally, the silanol group of coupling agents reacts with the hydroxyl groups of carbon fiber surfaces and forms a covalent bond, and untreated silanol groups are condensed by a self-reaction with silanol from other silane coupling agents. The silane treatment mechanism is schematically illustrated in Fig. 1a.    Fig. 1.    (a) A schematic diagram of the silane coupling treatment mechanism for methacryloxy propyl trimethoxy silane (MPTS) on acid-treated carbon fibers and (b) Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy spectra of carbon fibers before (unsized) and after silane coupling treatment (MPTS).        The FT-IR transmittance spectra of the CF before and after silane coupling treatments are shown in Fig. 1b. The oxygen functional group (-COOH, C=O) at 1600-1800 cm−1, the hydroxyl group (−OH) at 3450 cm−1, and the hydrocarbon group (−CH) at 2980 cm−1 are increased after silane coupling treatments. Meanwhile, organic groups of silane (Si-O-C) at 1380 cm−1 and Si-OSi at 1073 cm−1) increased predominantly as the oxygen functional groups are increased. This demonstrates that the silane coupling treatment efficiently stimulated the oxygen functional ingroup formation on the carbon fiber surfaces.  The XPS wide-scan spectra of silane-treated and untreated CF are shown in Fig. 2a, and their chemical information is listed in Table 1. The spectra show distinct oxygen, carbon, and silicon peaks of the samples. It was found that the O1S (BE = 532.8 eV) and Si2P (BE = 102.6 eV) peaks of the silane-treated CF were higher than those of the untreated CF. In contrast, the intensity of C1S (BE = 284.5 eV) was diminished. The enhancement of the O1S and Si2P peaks on the carbon fiber surface is attributed to the effect of the silane coupling treatments on the chemical composition and surface structures, stemming from the introduction of oxygen containing functional groups (C=O, COOH, and C-O) and organic groups of silane (Si-O) on the CF.    Fig. 2.    X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results of carbon fibers (CF) before and after silane coupling treatments; (a) XPS spectra of CF, (b) High resolution of the O1S peak of the unsized CF and (c) MPTS-CF. VTES, vinyltriethoxy silane; APS, amino propyl triethoxy silane; MPTS, methacryloxy propyl trimethoxy silane.          Table 1.    Chemical composition of carbon fibers as a function of silane coupling agents        VTES, vinyltriethoxy silane; APS, amino propyl triethoxy silane; MPTS, methacryloxy propyl trimethoxy silane. a)Real increased content of O1S after silane coupling treatments. b)Real increased content of Si2P after silane coupling treatments. c)Acid-treated carbon fiber before silane coupling treatments.      Table 1 shows the chemical composition of silane-treated CF. It is found that the surface composition of the CF changed substantially after silane treatments. The carbon content on the surface of CF was significantly decreased after the silane coupling treatments. Meanwhile, the oxygen and silicon content increased. Most notably, the oxygen content of the MPTS sample showed predominant enhancement. In order to confirm the actual increase in the amounts of oxygen and silicon content, R-O1S and R-Si2P, the real increased content of each element was calculated by subtracting the values of unsized CFs from those of silane-treated CFs. It was found that R-O1s and R-Si2P of MPTStreated CFs were dramatically enhanced compared to those of other silane-treated CFs. As confirmed by the R-O1S/R-Si2P ratio, one silane atom introduced two oxygen atoms to MPTS-treated CFs whereas contributed only one oxygen atom. In the case of the R-C1S/R-Si2P ratio, the value of MPTS-treated CFs was three or four times higher than those of other CFs. This indicates that polar surface groups on MPTS-treated CFs was actively formed, resulting in high surface polarity and functionality of the carbon fiber surfaces.  Fig. 2 shows the high resolution O1S curve fit spectra for untreated (Fig. 2b) and silane-treated CF (MPTS) (Fig. 2c). Each functional group gives rise to a signal in the XPS spectrum with a particular range of binding energy. The O1S spectra of the non-treated CF reveal the presence of three peaks. Peak 1 corresponds to the hydroxyl groups (-OH), peak 2 corresponds to the carbonyl groups (C=O), and peak 3 corresponds to the C-O group. The O1S spectra of the silane treated CF reveal the presence of four peaks corresponding to the Si-O-Si group (BE = 530.7 eV), C-Si-O groups (BE = 531.9 eV), C=O groups (BE = 532.7 eV), and C-O groups (BE = 533.6 eV).  It is interesting that two peaks (Si-O-Si and C-O-Si) were newly formed and the hydroxyl group peak was diminished or significantly weakened. This indicates that hydroxyl groups were weakened or mixed with Si-O-Si peaks, due to the condensation reactions between Si-OH and the hydroxyl group of CF.  The surface free energy (γs) of a solid can be calculated by the sum of two components: a London dispersive component of nonpolar interaction and a specific component describing all other type of interactions, such as Debye, Keesom, hydrogen bonding, and other polar effects; that is [25,26],    The results of surface free energy measurements of the CF are summarized in Table 2. It is observed that the polar components of fiber surfaces are highly increased by silane coupling treatments. On the other hand, the dispersive component was slightly enhanced. This shows that the silane efficiently increased the surface free energy due to the enhancement of polar and dispersive components. From the surface energetic point of view, it is predicted that an increase of the surface free energy plays a crucial role in improving the degree of interfacial adhesion strength between the polarized polypropylene matrix and the silane treated CF.    Table 2.    Surface energetics and thermodynamic WA of carbon fibers with P-PP before and after sizing reatments        WA, work of adhesion; P-PP, polarized polypropylene; CF, carbon fibers; VTES, vinyltriethoxy silane; APS, amino propyl triethoxy silane; MPTS, methacryloxy propyl trimethoxy silane.      The dispersive components in surface free energy can be determined as a result of the molecular volume of the silane coupling agents due to the different chemical structure. The dispersive component can be calculated by the Lorentz-Lorenz-Debye equations [27].    Here, n is the refractive index, M is the relative molecular mass, ρ is the molecular density, and ε0 is the permittivity of the vacuum. The dispersive component (α0) is a function of M/ρ, which represents the specific molecular volume. Among silane coupling agents, MPTS has a large molecular volume compared to APS and VTES. This result shows that the large molecular volume by silane treatments can be attributed to the high dispersive component, which results in enhancement of the surface free energy of the silane treated CF.  The thermodynamic work of adhesion (WA) determines the energy required to separate two phases reversibly from their equilibrium when in contact with each other. According to the Fowkes and Harkins [28]-equation, the WA can be calculated using the surface free energy obtained from the contact angle. The following equation holds:        where the superscripts L and SP refer to the London dispersive and specific components, respectively, and the subscripts S and L represent the solid and liquid phases, respectively.  The calculated work of adhesion of CF before and after silane treatments are shown in Table 2. It is observed that the work of adhesion of silane-treated CF showed higher adhesion strengths than that of the non-treated fibers. It was also found that the MPTS-treated carbon fiber sample showed the highest work of adhesion. As seen in Table 2, MPTS-treatments yielded the highest surface free energy due to the highly enhanced polar and dispersive components. The enhanced surface free energy of CF can be attributed to the increase in work of adhesion, which results in increased interfacial adhesion strength between the CF and the polarized polypropylene matrix.  The mechanical interfacial properties of fiber reinforced composites depend strongly on the degree of adhesion between the fibers and the matrices. The degree of adhesion at the interface between a fiber and a matrix can be measured by the ILSS for the mechanical interfacial behaviors.  From the ILSS results shown in Fig. 3, the presence of silane coupling agents leads to improved ILSS values of the carbon fiber reinforced polarized polypropylene composites. Furthermore, the optimum strength was found with MPTS treatment. Notably, the ILSS results support the reliability of the data, since the tendencies in the ILSS values are very similar to those of the XPS data and surface free energy. This shows that the oxygen functional groups and surface free energy values can determine the resulting adhesion strengths of the carbon fiber/polarized polypropylene matrix in this system.    Fig. 3.    Interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) of carbon fiber/polarized polypropylene matrix composites before and after various silane coupling treatments. VTES, vinyltriethoxy silane; APS, amino propyl triethoxy silane; MPTS, methacryloxy propyl trimethoxy silane.        Practically, the well-known ring-opening crosslinking reaction between amino-silane coupling agents (APS) and polypropylene-co-maleic anhydride can dramatically enhance the mechanical interfacial strength [29-34] of a composite. However, we used partially polarized polypropylene (Ma0.2-PP99.8) as a matrix. It indicates that the maleic anhydride structures of the matrix will not significantly react with the silane-treated CF. This indicates that the effects of the cross-linking reaction between the silane coupling agents and P-PP on the final mechanical interfacial properties of the composites are negligible in this system.  To sum, we evaluated the effects of various silane coupling agents on the mechanical interfacial strength of carbon fiberreinforced polarized-polypropylene composites. Small effects of cross-linking reactions are ignored, and all mechanisms for the enhancement of mechanical interfacial properties of the composites involve physical interlocking between fillers and matrices.  In this work, silane treatments of CF were carried out to improve the interfacial adhesion between CF and polarized polypropylene. As a result, it was found that the interfacial adhesion of the carbon fiber/polarized polypropylene matrix increased with the polar component of surface free energy, and oxygen functional groups increased after silane treatment, leading to improved mechanical performance of the composites. These results indicate that the silane treatments on the CF surface play an important role in improving the degree of adhesion at the interface in a polarized polypropylene matrix composite system.

  • 1. Vaidya UK, Samalot F, Pillay S, Janowski GM, Husman G, Gleich K (2004) Design and manufacture of woven reinforced glass/polypropylene composites for mass transit floor structure [J Compos Mater] Vol.38 P.1949 google doi
  • 2. Ning H, Janowski GM, Vaidya UK, Husman G (2007) Thermoplastic sandwich structure design and manufacturing for the body panel of mass transit vehicle [Compos Struct] Vol.80 P.82 google doi
  • 3. Ning H, Vaidya U, Janowski GM, Husman G (2007) Design, manufacture and analysis of a thermoplastic composite frame structure for mass transit [Compos Struct] Vol.80 P.105 google doi
  • 4. Oya N, Hamada H (1997) Mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic laminates [Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf] Vol.28 P.823 google doi
  • 5. Bartus SD, Vaidya UK, Ulven CA (2006) Design and development of a long fiber thermoplastic bus seat [J Thermoplast Compos Mater] Vol.19 P.131 google doi
  • 6. Jacobs MJN, Van Dingenen JLJ (2001) Ballistic protection mechanisms in personal armour [J Mater Sci] Vol.36 P.3137 google doi
  • 7. Ning H, Pillay S, Vaidya UK (2009) Design and development of thermoplastic composite roof door for mass transit bus [Mater Des] Vol.30 P.983 google doi
  • 8. Donnet JB, Bansal RC (1990) Carbon Fibers google
  • 9. Yosomiya R, Morimoto K, Nakajima A, Ikada Y, Suzuki T (1990) Adhesion and Bonding in Composites google
  • 10. Meng L, Fan D, Zhang C, Jiang Z, Huang Y (2013) The effect of oxidation treatment by KClO3/H2SO4 system on intersurface performance of carbon fibers [Appl Surf Sci] Vol.268 P.225 google doi
  • 11. Mader E (1997) Study of fibre surface treatments for control of interphase properties in composites [Compos Sci Technol] Vol.57 P.1077 google doi
  • 12. Park SJ, Kim MH, Lee JR, Choi S (2000) Effect of fiber: polymer interactions on fracture toughness behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy matrix composites [J Colloid Interface Sci] Vol.228 P.287 google doi
  • 13. Deng S, Zhou X, Fan C, Lin Q, Zhou X (2012) Release of interfacial thermal stress and accompanying improvement of interfacial adhesion in carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin composites: Induced by diblock copolymers [Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf] Vol.43 P.990 google doi
  • 14. Jang J, Kim HS (1996) Performance improvement of glass fiber-poly(phenylene sulfide) composite [J Appl Polym Sci] Vol.60 P.2297 google doi
  • 15. Walker PL, Thrower PA (1973) Chemistry and Physics of Carbon google
  • 16. Park SJ, Jin JS, Lee JR (2001) Enhancement of interfacial adhesion of glass fibers-reinforced unsaturated polyester matrix composites: effect of gamma-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxy silane treatment containing gamma-aminopropyltriethoxy silane [J Korean Ind Eng Chem] Vol.12 P.143 google
  • 17. Kaynak C, Orgun O, Tincer T (2005) Matrix and interface modification of short carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy [Polym Test] Vol.24 P.455 google doi
  • 18. Lee JH, Rhee KY, Park SJ (2011) Silane modification of carbon nanotubes and its effects on the material properties of carbon/CNT/epoxy three-phase composites [Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf] Vol.42 P.478 google doi
  • 19. Bismarck A, Kumru ME, Song B, Springer J, Moos E, Karger-Kocsis J (1999) Study on surface and mechanical fiber characteristics and their effect on the adhesion properties to a polycarbonate matrix tuned by anodic carbon fiber oxidation [Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf] Vol.30 P.1351 google doi
  • 20. Qian X, Wang X, Ouyang Q, Chen Y, Yan Q (2012) Effect of ammoniumsalt solutions on the surface properties of carbon fibers in electrochemical anodic oxidation [Appl Surf Sci] Vol.259 P.238 google doi
  • 21. Yuan H, Wang C, Zhang S, Lin X (2012) Effect of surface modification on carbon fiber and its reinforced phenolic matrix composite [Appl Surf Sci] Vol.259 P.288 google doi
  • 22. Van Oss CJ (1994) Interfacial Forces in Aqueous Media google
  • 23. Peng Q, Li Y, He X, Lv H, Hu P, Shang Y, Wang C, Wang R, Sritharan T, Du S (2013) Interfacial enhancement of carbon fiber composites by poly(amido amine) functionalization [Compos Sci Technol] Vol.74 P.37 google doi
  • 24. Washburn EW (1921) The dynamics of capillary flow [Phys Rev] Vol.17 P.273 google doi
  • 25. Fowkes FM (1962) Determination of interfacial tensions, contact angles, and dispersion forces in surfaces by assuming additivity of intermolecular interactions in surfaces [J Phys Chem] Vol.66 P.382 google doi
  • 26. Fowkes FM (1963) Additivity of intermolecular forces at interfaces: I. Determination of the contribution to surface and interfacial tensions of dispersion forces in various liquids 1 [J Phys Chem] Vol.67 P.2538 google doi
  • 27. Park SJ, Kim BJ, Seo DI, Rhee KY, Lyu YY (2009) Effects of a silane treatment on the mechanical interfacial properties of montmorillonite/epoxy nanocomposites [Mat Sci Eng A] Vol.526 P.74 google doi
  • 28. Fowkes FM, Harkins WD (1940) The state of monolayers adsorbed at the interface solid: aqueous solution [J Am Chem Soc] Vol.62 P.3377 google doi
  • 29. Kim KW, Lee HM, Kim BS, Hwang SH, Kwac LK, An KH, Kim BJ (2015) Preparation and thermal properties of polyethylene-based carbonized fibers [Carbon Lett] Vol.16 P.62 google doi
  • 30. Karsli NG, Aytac A (2011) Effects of maleated polypropylene on the morphology, thermal and mechanical properties of short carbon fiber reinforced polypropylene composites [Mater Des] Vol.32 P.4069 google doi
  • 31. Szpieg M, Giannadakis K, Asp LE (2011) Viscoelastic and viscoplastic behavior of a fully recycled carbon fiber-reinforced maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene modified polypropylene composite [J Compos Mater] Vol.46 P.1633 google doi
  • 32. Wong KH, Mohammed DS, Pickering SJ, Brooks R (2012) Effect of coupling agents on reinforcing potential of recycled carbon fibre for polypropylene composite [Compos Sci Technol] Vol.72 P.835 google doi
  • 33. Gao Y, Xu W, Gao J, Liang D, Fu Q, Zhang Q, Li Z (2013) Highly efficient load transfer in polypropylene/vapor grown carbon fiber rnanocomposites [Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf] Vol.45 P.35 google doi
  • 34. Kim KW, Lee HM, An JH, Kim BS, Min BG, Kang SJ, An KH, Kim BJ (2015) Effects of cross-linking methods for polyethylene-based carbon fibers: review [Carbon Lett] Vol.16 P.147 google doi