Performance of AllOptical Multihop RoFSO Communication System over GammaGamma Atmospheric Turbulence Channels
 Author: Zong Kang, Zhu Jiang
 Publish: Current Optics and Photonics Volume 19, Issue5, p437~443, 25 Oct 2015

ABSTRACT
In this paper, we analyze the performance of the alloptical multihop radio over a free space optical (RoFSO) communication system with amplifyandforward (AF) relays under varying weather conditions. The proposed channel model considers the propagation loss, attenuation and atmospheric fading modeled by the GammaGamma (GG) distribution. Both the amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise in the alloptical relays and the background noise projected onto receiver apertures have been considered in the analysis. The lower bound analytical expressions for the endtoend bit error rate (BER) and outage probability are derived for the multihop system employing the alloptical relays with the full channel state information (CSI). Meanwhile, the exact results for BER and outage probability are obtained via Monte Carlo simulation. Results indicate the performance of the proposed system will be improved by the multihop transmission technology. For a fixed number of relays, the BER and outage probability will be increased with the deterioration of the weather conditions.

KEYWORD
Alloptical relays , Radio over freespace optical communication , Atmospheric channel , Amplified spontaneous emission noise

I. INTRODUCTION
Recently, transmission of radio frequency (RF) signals over free space optical (FSO) link, which is also referred to as radio over FSO, has gained a lot of research attention. It has been proposed as one of the solutions for lastmail applications [1, 2]. Compared with the RF system, FSO is less affected by snow and rain, but can be severely affected by atmospheric turbulence and fog. RoFSO communication systems can transfer radio signals with high transmission capacity, unlicensed spectrum, ease of deployment, low cost and high security [3]. However, the performance of RoFSO can be degraded by various atmospheric conditions such as fog, snow, smoke, and turbulence, which result in attenuation and intensity fluctuation of the laser beam at the receiver side. Experimental results showed that dense fog can cause an extinction coefficient of up to 270 dB/km [4]. Additionally, the optical power attenuation due to thick fog, snow and haze is wavelength independent [5]. To achieve the over 99.9% availability requirements of the telecom industry in a dense foggy environment, the FSO link is limited to about 500 m, where sufficient link margin is available [6]. For longer transmission link range under dense fog, a complementary RF link at lower data rate can be used to back up the FSO link.
In clear atmosphere with a typical attenuation coefficient of 0.43 dB/km, an FSO link of over 1 km is achievable. However, the major challenge for FSO in clear atmosphere is the turbulence induced irradiance fluctuation, especially for the link range beyond 1 km [7]. The irradiance fluctuation, also referred as scintillation, is caused by the inhomogeneities in the temperature and pressure of the atmosphere along the propagation path, which causes random variations of refractiveindex [8]. Scintillation could result in deep signal fades that lasts for ~ 1100 µs [9]. For example, a link operating at 1 Gbps could result in a loss of up to 10^{5} consecutive bits. To fully understand and predict FSO performance, a number of models have been developed to describe the statistical distribution of atmospheric turbulence. The most widely reported is the lognormal channel model, which is mathematically convenient and tractable [7]. For longer link range where multiple scatterings exist, the incident wave becomes increasingly incoherent and the lognormal model becomes invalid. The GG turbulence model is based on the assumption that the irradiance fluctuation of a light beam propagating through the turbulent atmosphere consists of small scale (scattering) and large scale (refraction) effects [7]. The GG statistic distribution of irradiance fluctuation is valid for all turbulence scenarios from weak to strong.
To mitigate the weather effects, a number of schemes have been proposed, such as coding techniques [10, 11], adaptive techniques [1214] and space diversity techniques [8, 15, 16]. Additionally, multihop FSO systems employing both amplifyandforward (AF) and decodeandforward (DF) relaying schemes have been studied [17]. Unlike in RF communications, the smallscale fading statistics of FSO communications are distance dependent. Therefore, the multihop technique not only improves the pathloss compared to direct transmission, but also mitigates the smallscale fading statistics [18]. Most of the existing work reported multihop FSO systems employing electrical amplification, where the received optical signal at each relay was converted into an electrical signal by a photodetector, amplified and then converted back into an optical signal by a laser [17, 19]. In [17], the outage probability of multihop FSO link using AF and DF relaying was investigated in lognormal fading, where the noise at the relays and the destination is dominated by the shot noise modeled as an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) model. The closedform expressions for the outage probability and the average BER of binary modulation schemes for multihop FSO employing AF relaying under a GG turbulence channel have been presented [19].
The main objective of this paper is to use alloptical AF relays employing erbiumdoped fiber amplifiers (EDFAs) for amplification, which avoids the complexities associated with opticaltoelectrical (OE) and electricaltooptical (EO) conversion. EDFAs are a mature technology, which has a widespread use in optical fiber communications as a preamplifier or an inline amplifier in the 1550 nm range [18]. The application of EDFAs in FSO AF relays has been recently proposed in [2022]. However, results in [22] only included the amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise and shot noise caused by background radiation without considering the weather conditions in the FSO system. In this paper, we consider an alloptical multihop RoFSO communication system with AF relays, particularly the CSI technique. The lower bounds for BER and outage probability have been derived considering the ASE noise and the background noise at each set of relays under different channel conditions. The proposed channel model takes into account the propagation loss, atmospheric attenuation and turbulence induced fading. The GG statistic distribution has been used to describe the atmospheric turbulence.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section Ⅱ, the alloptical multihop RoFSO communication system is introduced. The endtoend SNR and lower bound expressions for BER and outage probability of the multihop FSO system are derived in Section III. Results discussions are presented in Section IV. Finally, some conclusions are given in Section V.
II. SYSTEM AND CHANNEL MODEL
2.1. System Model
We consider an alloptical multihop RoFSO communication system employing the IM/DD, as shown in Fig. 1 [17]. The source node
S transmits the optical signal modulated by RF signals to the destination nodeD viaN −1 alloptical relays in series. So, letL _{i},i = 1,…,N andh _{i}(t ),i = 1,…,N be the distance and channel gain betweenR _{i−1} andR _{i} whereR _{0} andR _{N} represent the source nodeS and the destination nodeD . The received optical signals are filtered and amplified by relays employing the EDFAs without OE or EO convertors, as shown in Fig. 2 [21]. Therefore, the background noise and ASE noise are filtered by the optical filter. The amplification gain of the relays is variable by assuming the full CSI is available. In this paper, we assume the noise sources at relays are mainly the ASE noise and the background radiation. The background noise projected onto thei th receiver aperture is expressed asn _{bi}(t ),i = 1,…,N . We assumeG _{i} andn _{i}(t ) fori = 1,…,N −1 to be the amplification gain and the ASE noise of thei th relay.In this work, we assume the source node
S transmits the optical signal modulated bys (t ) wheres (t ) is binary phase shift keying (BPSK) signal. So, the received light intensity of the relayR _{i} can be expressed asI _{1}(t ) =I _{0}h _{1}(t )(1+ξs (t ))+n _{b1}(t ) whereI _{0} represents the intensity of optical signal transmitted by the source nodeS andξ is the modulation index [8]. In order to ensure that the optical transmitter operates within its dynamic range and avoids overmodulation induced clipping, the condition ｜ξs (t )｜≤1 must be satisfied. For thei th (i = 2,…,N ) relay, the received light intensity is expressed asI _{i}(t ) =h _{i}(t )(G _{i−1}I _{i−1}(t ) +n _{i−1}(t )) +n _{bi}(t ). Here, the intensity of optical signal at the destination nodeD can be written as:where
G _{N} = 1,h _{N+1}(t ) = 1 is assumed for ease of notation. The instantaneous photocurrenti _{r}(t ) after the OE convertor in the destination nodeD is given as:where
R is the responsivity of the OE convertor. The DC component in the instantaneous photocurrent is filtered out by the band pass filter. So we can get the electrical signal given as:In Eq. (3), the first term is the signal transmitted by source node
S , the second term is the background noise received by the receiver apertures and the ASE noise produced by the relays.2.2. Channel Model
The channel gain
h _{i}(t ),i = 1,N includes the attenuation, propagation loss and fading. Soh _{i}(t ) can be written aswhere
h _{l} is the propagation loss,h _{p} is the atmospheric attenuation andh _{sc}(t ) is the fading caused by atmospheric turbulence. The propagation lossh _{l} for an FSO link can be expressed as [1]:where
D _{TX} andD _{RX} are the diameter of the transmitter aperture and the receiver aperture measured in m, respectively.θ andL are the divergence of the transmitted laser beam measured in mrad and the distance of the FSO link measured in km. In this paper, we assume the relays are placed with the same distance L. The atmospheric attenuationh _{p} can be written as [1]:where
α is the atmospheric attenuation coefficient. Here,where
V is the visibility,λ is the wavelength of the optical signal and the exponentq is given byThe fading
h _{sc}(t ) caused by atmospheric turbulence is a random variable which can be described by the GG distribution. Its probability density function (PDF) can be expressed as [7]:where Γ(⋅) is the Gamma function,
K _{n}(⋅) is the modified Bessel function of the second kind of ordern . Assuming plane wave propagation and considering the impact of the apertureaverage,α andβ are given byHere, where
L _{p} is the propagation path length.σ_{R} ^{2} =1.23C _{n}^{2}k ^{7/6}L _{p}^{11/6} is the Rytov variance whereC_{n} ^{2}(m ^{−2/3}) is the refractive index structure parameter,k = 2π /λ is the optical wave number andλ is the wavelength of the optical signal.III. PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
3.1. Endtoend SNR
The BPSK modulation scheme will be considered in this paper. The BPSK signal can be transferred without changing its format by the RoFSO system, which avoids the adaptive threshold required by the OOKmodulated FSO systems [23]. The endtoend electrical SNR before the RF demodulator according Eq. (3) can be expressed as:
where
P _{ni}(t ) andP _{bi} represent the power of the ASE noise and the background noise at thei th relay, respectively.A is the amplitude of the BPSK signals (t ).P _{ni} can be expressed as [24]:where
ħ is the Planck’s constant,ω _{0} is the center frequency of the optical signal,n _{sp} is the ASE parameter andB _{0} is the bandwidth of the optical filter. In this paper, we can assume thatP _{bi} =N _{b}B_{o} ,i = 1,…,N , whereN _{b} is the power density of the background noise radiation which follows an AWGN distribution.Assuming the maximum output power
P _{t } of each relay is the same, we can getwhere
P _{ri} =h ^{2}_{i}(t )P _{t} +P _{bi }is the power of the received optical signal at thei th relay. Note that when the channel goes through a deep fading, the gain of the relay will increase. Meanwhile the background noise will be amplified, which deteriorates the performance of the system. Therefore, the instantaneous amplification gain can be written as:As the CSI changes slowly compared to the transmitted RF signal, the amplification gain is slowly variable.
In a practical FSO system, the power density of the background radiation can be
N _{b} = 2 × 10^{−15}W/Hz and the ASE parameter can ben _{sp} = 5 [22]. Compared to the background noise, the ASE noise can be neglected in Eq. (12). Here, we can assume the transmission power of the source nodeS is the same as the power of relays. So the Eq. (12) can be simplified as:where represents the SNR in the ideal channel when no atmospheric fading and attenuation exist.
3.2. BER Performance and Outage Probability
In this section, we derive the lower bound expression for BER and outage probability of the alloptical multihop RoFSO communication system. Since the PDF of the endtoend SNR expression given by Eq. (16) is difficult to derive, the upper bound for Eq. (16) can be derived using the similar approach as in [19]. Using the inequality
where the equality holds when
h _{1}(t ) =h _{2}(t ) = ⋯ =h _{n}(t ). Assuming , the PDF of Y is given by [19]where
α _{i} andβ _{i} are the distribution parameters at thei th relay,G is the Meijer Gfunction. In Eq. (18), Ξ_{i} andc _{(2N)} are given byFrom Eq. (17), the lower bound for BER of the alloptical multihop RoFSO communication system using BPSK signaling format can be given by
The outage probability is another important metric to evaluate the performance of multihop FSO system in fading channels. The instantaneous BER will significantly rise at a certain moment because of the deep fading for a communication system with an adequate average BER. The outage probability is defined as the probability that the instantaneous SNR of the system falls below the threshold SNR. The outage probability is defined as [25]:
where SNR_{th} is the threshold SNR for a given BER. Using the PDF given in Eq. (18), the lower bound of outage probability is expressed as:
where
y _{th} = SNR_{th} /SNR _{0}.IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this section, we present the simulation results for the BER performance and outage probability of the alloptical multihop RoFSO communication system in GG fading channel. The results are obtained via Monte Carlo simulations based on Eq. (16). The lower bound curves for BER and outage probability are plotted based on Eq. (21) and Eq. (23). In this paper, we assume the multihop AF RoFSO system with
λ = 1550 nm operating under various weather conditions and visibilities. The simulation parameters of the proposed RoFSO system are shown in Table 1. The exact results and lower bounds for the BER and outage probability againstSNR _{o} withN −1 relays are shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4. In Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, we set the visibilityV to be 20 km for clear weather. The direct transmission link is also considered withN = 1 for comparison purposes. As shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, the difference between the exact results and the lower bounds becomes larger with the increments ofSNR _{o}.In Fig. 5 the exact endtoend BER is plotted against
SNR _{o} using different numbers of relays under various visibilities. In this paper, we assume the visibilityV to be 20 km, 2 km and 0.6 km for clear weather, light fog and moderate fog respectively. As clearly seen from Fig. 5, the BER performance of the system improves as the number of relays increases. However, the BER performance will be deteriorated due to low visibility. Particularly, for a BER of 10^{−5}, we observe performance improvements of ~6.5 dB, ~11.1 dB and ~14.3dB forN =2, 3 and 4 with respect to the direct transmission under the visibilityV =20. Additional power gain can be achieved by using extra relays. The BER performances using different numbers of relays under various weather conditions are shown in Table 2. For a fixed number ofN , the BER performance deteriorates as the visibility becomes worse. This is because the average received optical power is affected by the weather conditions, such as atmospheric attenuation.The exact endtoend outage probability of the alloptical multihop RoFSO system is plotted against
SNR _{0} withN −1 relays under various visibilities in Fig. 6. In Fig. 6, SNR_{th} = 12.6 dB is required to achieve an average BER of 10^{−5}. The performances of outage probability of the system improve as the number of relays or the visibility is increased in Fig. 6. For an outage probability of 10^{−5}, we observe performance improvements of ~7.1 dB, ~14.6 dB and ~19.1 dB forN = 2, 3 and 4 with respect to the direct transmission under clear weather. The performances of outage probability using different number of relays under various visibilities are shown in Table 2. For a fixed value ofN , the performances of outage probability will be increased as visibility becomes worse.V. CONCLUSION
In this paper, we have studied the performances of the alloptical multihop RoFSO system using AF relays. Both the BER performance and outage probability have been analyzed using different numbers of relays under various weather conditions. The proposed system employs the alloptical AF relays which eliminate the OE/EO conversions and have a variable gain with the fullCSI. Results demonstrate the performance of the proposed system will be improved by using additional relays. The BER performance improves ~6.5 dB, ~11.1 dB and ~14.3 dB for
N = 2, 3 and 4 with respect to the direct transmission under clear weather for a BER of 10^{−5}. For a fixed value ofN , the BER and outage probability will be reduced with higher values of visibility. The novel system model proposed in this paper can provide a guideline so that the optimum number of relays can be chosen to achieve the optimal performance when the visibility is known.

[FIG. 1.] An alloptical multihop RoFSO communication system with AF relays.

[FIG. 2.] Block diagram of an alloptical variable gain relay.

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[]

[TABLE 1.] System parameters

[FIG. 3.] BER of alloptical multihop RoFSO system with N？1 relays under the visibility V=20.

[FIG. 4.] Outage probability of alloptical multihop RoFSO system with N？1 relays under the visibility V=20.

[FIG. 5.] BER of alloptical multihop RoFSO system with N？1 relays under different visibilities.

[Table 2.] Improvements (dB) at BER and outage probability of 10？5

[FIG. 6.] Outage probability of alloptical multihop RoFSO system with N？1 relays under different visibilities.