Relation of mortality to DBH and available area in naturally germinated Pinus densiflora populations

  • cc icon
  • ABSTRACT

    To elucidate whether small diameter at breast height correlates with tree death in an overcrowded tree population, we analyzed self-thinning occurring over the course of 37 years in naturally established Pinus densiflora populations in Sugadaira, central Japan. As trees grew, their diameters at breast height increased and the number of trees consequently decreased. Spatial distribution, which was initially clumped, changed accordingly, first becoming random and finally uniform. We calculated the “available area” of individual trees to elucidate the contribution of this parameter to tree mortality. Small diameter at breast height was strongly correlated with tree death, with a slight correlation observed between tree death and small available area of individual trees.


  • KEYWORD

    available area , diameter at breast height , Pinus densiflora

  • INTRODUCTION

    Spatial distribution of individual trees in an overcrowded population is initially random, and then becomes uniform as trees grow (Kenkel 1988). Because plants lack the ability to migrate, this uniform spatial distribution arises as a consequence of tree death. The dead trees are smaller individuals dying as a result of interactions with other trees (Silvertown and Charlesworth 2001, Gurevitch et al. 2006).

    Interactions between animals are easily observed. For example, competitive interactions associated with territorial defense are readily evidenced by aggressive behavior towards other animals. Because plants cannot move on their own, their interactions are less obvious; however, a dataset of measured diameter at breast heights (DBHs) and/or heights can be generated to estimate the interaction. In this study, we used such a dataset to detect competitive interaction manifested by lower-than-usual growth rates and/or deaths of trees. Because lower growth rates and/or death may arise from factors such as disease in addition to disturbance, however, plant population mortality is difficult to predict.

    Mithen et al. (1984) have reported that individuals of the herb Lapsana communis with small “available area” are likely to die, but it is unclear whether this observation is relevant to tree species. Bigler et al. (2004) found evidence of relatively low late-stage growth rates in growth patterns from dead trees, although those authors focused on Abies alba, a shade-tolerant (Rolland 1993), late-succession- stage tree (Kienast and Kuhn 1989).

    In the study reported here, we used data collected over a 37-year period to predict Pinus densiflora mortality based on DBH and available area. The analyzed data comprised a long-term dataset of DBHs recorded from two study plots of naturally established P. densiflora, a shade-intolerant pioneer species (Han et al. 2003), and position data (xy coordinates) of all the individual trees in one of the two plots.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

      >  Study area

    The study site is located on the campus of the Sugadaira Montane Research Center of Tsukuba University (SMRCT), Nagano Prefecture, Japan (36°31' N, 138°20' E) at 1,320 m above sea level. The study site is on a southwest- facing slope with an incline of 5°. According to the records of the SMRCT from 1971 until 2000, mean annual temperature is 6.5°C and mean annual precipitation is 1,190 mm. The site is snow-covered each year from November to April, with a mean snow depth cover of 48 cm in January, 74 cm in February, and 64 cm in March (Japan Meteorological Agency 2001). The top soil is derived from the Quaternary volcanic ash of Mt. Azumaya (Suzuki, personal communication). Before the campus was established in 1934, the land was an abandoned farm field or meadow. Monitoring was carried out in a P. densiflora stand that developed from a Miscanthus sinensis grassland by secondary succession. Permanent plot A (20 m × 20 m quadrat) was established in 1973 at the experimental site, and permanent plot B (40 m × 20 m) was set up in 1977. DBHs of the canopy trees in Plot A were measured in 1973, and then annually from 1976 to 2010; the same measurements were made annually in Plot B from 1977 to 2010. Hayashi (personal communication) measured positions (xy coordinates) of all individuals in Plot A in 1973.

      >  Calculations

    To evaluate spatial distribution of trees in Plot A, we used Ripley’s K function (Kenkel 1988). The K function is defined as follows:

    image

    where A is the area of the plot, n is the number of individual trees, f(i, j, r) is a function equal to 1 if the distance between trees i and j is equal or smaller than r, and 0 otherwise, w(i, j) is an edge-correction function, and r is a distance variable (Fortin and Dale 2005). We adopted the Ohser-Stoyan edge correction factor (Li and Zhang 2007), with w(i, j) accordingly defined as follows:

    image

    where a and b are plot length and width, and x is the distance between trees i and j. The K function was converted into an L function as follows:

    image

    If the distribution is completely random, L(r) is zero. To test the null hypothesis of spatial randomness, we computed a 95% confidence interval using the Monte Carlo method with 500 simulations. (Diggle 1983, Shimatani 2001).

    Calculation of available area—a polygon—of a tree was conducted by counting the number of points that were closer to that tree than to any other trees in the plot (Mithen et al. 1984). We applied a toroidal edge correction when calculating polygonal areas (Cherubini et al. 2002).

    To compare DBHs among different years, we converted them into relative DBHs (rDBHs) by dividing each DBH by the annual mean DBH (Luo and Chen 2011). We obtained relative areas (rAREAs) in a similar fashion, dividing each available area by the mean available area for that year.

    RESULTS

    The distribution of living and dead individual trees from 1976 to 2009 in 20 m × 20 m Plot A is shown in Fig. 1. As the number of trees decreased, their available areas became larger (Fig. 1a-1e). During the monitored period, the distribution pattern was clumped at first (in 1976). In 1979, it became random, and after 1989 was uniform (Fig. 2) (Kenkel 1988). DBH histograms of living and dead individuals in Plot A from 1976 to 2009 and in Plot B from 1977 to 2009 are shown in Fig. 3. DBHs of dead individuals (Plot A between 1976 and 1999, and Plot B between 1977 and 1989) were mainly small.

    The decline in tree density in plots A and B from 1973 to 2010 (Fig. 4) followed an exponential decay function. For Plot A, the decay function is:

    image

    where N(t) is density (trees/100 m2) of the plot and t is the number of years since 1973 (ANOVA F1, 34 = 277, P < 0.00001, R2 = 0.6734, SE = 22.29). The decline in density of Plot B followed a similar equation, with the coefficient and power equal to 43.83 and –0.0338, respectively (ANOVA, F1, 32 = 3,562, P < 0.001, R2 = 0.9419, SE = 0.7417).

    An available-area histogram of living and dead individuals in Plot A from 1977 to 2010 is displayed in Fig. 5. Between 1976 and 1989, we observed a strong tendency for trees with smaller available areas to have died. Between 1999 and 2009, there was a slight tendency for trees with smaller available areas to have died.

    Histograms of rDBH and rAREA of dead individuals are shown in Fig. 6. Although they have the same modal values, the range of rAREA is wider than that of rDBH. This figure suggests that small rDBH had a stronger effect on tree mortality.

    Small rDBH had a stronger effect on tree mortality than small rAREA (Fig. 7). Moreover, trees having both rDBH and rAREA not more than 0.5 had the highest mortality levels, while trees having rDBH and rAREA more than 1 had the lowest (Fig. 7).

    DISCUSSION

      >  Density-dependent death

    Based on our data, the density N (individuals / 100 m2) of plots A and B can be estimated from t (years since 1972) as follows:

    image
    image

    These two equations are of the form

    image

    Differentiating equation (7) with respect to t yields the following equation:

    image

    The left side of equation (8) is the probability of death at time t, and is proportional to the density N raised to the power of 1/b. The value of 1/b is greater than 0, indicating that density-dependent death is occurring in the studied populations. The spatial dispersion of individual P. densiflora trees changed from a random to a regular pattern over the course of the monitored period; this also suggests the occurrence of density-dependent mortality (Kenkel 1988, Miyata 1989, Kenkel et al. 1997).

      >  Probability of death

    As trees age, they die, and their available area becomes associated with that of adjacent living trees. Because the surviving trees cannot grow or extend woody branches into newly acquired available areas, some trees that die may be surrounded by relatively large available areas. A strong relationship was therefore not observed between smaller rAREA and tree mortality. On the other hand, an allometric relationship exists between DBH and tree height (Kato and Hayashi 2003), with individuals having smaller rDBHs typically characterized by smaller tree heights. Because P. densiflora is a shade-intolerant species (Han et al. 2003), shorter individuals have greater difficulty acquiring sunlight, leading to death.

    CONCLUSION

    During establishment period of naturally germinated P. densiflora populations, DBHs increased while number of individuals in the populations decreased. During self-thinning phase, density-dependent mortality occurred. The spatial dispersion of individual P. densiflora trees changed from a random to a regular pattern over the course of the monitored period. Smaller rDBH has a stronger influence on tree mortality than does smaller rAREA.

  • 1. Bigler C, Gri?ar J, Bugmann H, ?ufar K 2004 Growth patterns as indicators of impending tree death in silver fir [For Ecol Manage] Vol.199 P.183-190 google
  • 2. Cherubini P, Fontana G, Rigling D, Dobbertin M, Brang P, Innes JL 2002 Tree-life history prior to death: two fungal root pathogens affect tree-ring growth differently [J Ecol] Vol.90 P.839-850 google
  • 3. Diggle PJ 1983 Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns google
  • 4. Fortin MJ, Dale MRT 2005 Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists google
  • 5. Gurevitch J, Scheiner SM, Fox GA 2006 The ecology of plants google
  • 6. Han Q, Kawasaki T, Katahata S, Mukai Y, Chiba Y 2003 Horizontal and vertical variations in photosynthetic capacity in a Pinus densiflora crown in relation to leaf nitrogen allocation and acclimation to irradiance [Tree Physiol] Vol.23 P.851-857 google
  • 7. 2001 Normals for the period 1971-2000 google
  • 8. Kato J, Hayashi I. 2003 The determination and prediction of pine to oak forest succession in Sugadaira, Central Japan [Kor J Ecol] Vol.26 P.155-163 google
  • 9. Kenkel NC 1988 Pattern of self-thinning in Jack Pine: testing the random mortality hypothesis [Ecology] Vol.69 P.1017-1024 google
  • 10. Kenkel NC, Hendrie ML, Bella IE 1997 A Long-term study of Pinus banksiana population dynamics [J Veg Sci] Vol.8 P.241-254 google
  • 11. Kienast F, Kuhn N 1989 Simulating forest succession along ecological gradients in southern Central Europe [Vegetatio] Vol.79 P.7-20 google
  • 12. Li F, Zhang L 2007 Comparison of point pattern analysis methods for classifying the spatial distributions of spruce-fir stands in the north-east USA [Forestry] Vol.80 P.337-349 google
  • 13. Luo Y, Chen HYH 2011 Competition, species interaction and ageing control tree mortality in boreal forests [J Ecol] Vol.99 P.1470-1480 google
  • 14. Mithen R, Harper JL, Weiner J 1984 Growth and mortality of individual plants as a function of “available area.” [Oecologia] Vol.62 P.57-60 google
  • 15. Miyata I 1989 Analysis of dispersion structure in Japanese red pine populations with reference to topography [Mem Fac Sci Shimane Univ] Vol.23 P.89-98 google
  • 16. Rolland C 1993 Tree-ring and climate relationships for Abies alba in the internal Alps [Tree-Ring Bull] Vol.53 P.1-11 google
  • 17. Shimatani K 2001 Point process approach to statistical analysis and modeling for tree distribution maps [Jpn J Ecol] Vol.51 P.87-106 google
  • 18. Silvertown J, Charlesworth D 2001 Introduction to Plant Population Biology google
  • [] 
  • [] 
  • [] 
  • [Fig. 1.] Spatial distribution and available areas of individual trees in Plot A in (a) 1976, (b) 1979, (c) 1989, (d) 1999, and (e) 2009. Symbols are as follows: ○, one living tree; , more than one living tree; and , one dead tree. The symbols with letters A, B, and C in Fig. 1a and D in Fig. 1b represent three living trees, two living trees, one living tree and one dead tree, and three living trees, respectively.
    Spatial distribution and available areas of individual trees in Plot A in (a) 1976, (b) 1979, (c) 1989, (d) 1999, and (e) 2009. Symbols are as follows: ○, one living tree; , more than one living tree; and , one dead tree. The symbols with letters A, B, and C in Fig. 1a and D in Fig. 1b represent three living trees, two living trees, one living tree and one dead tree, and three living trees, respectively.
  • [Fig. 2.] Analysis of spatial distribution in Plot A using Ripley’s L function plotted against distance r. The solid line indicates the observed spatial distribution in Plot A for the indicated years, with the 95% confidence interval delimited by dashed lines.
    Analysis of spatial distribution in Plot A using Ripley’s L function plotted against distance r. The solid line indicates the observed spatial distribution in Plot A for the indicated years, with the 95% confidence interval delimited by dashed lines.
  • [Fig. 3.] Diameter-at-breast-height (DBH) histograms of Plot A (left side, from top to bottom, years 1976, 1979,1989,1999, and 2009) and Plot B (right side, from top to bottom, years 1977, 1979,1989, 1999, and 2009). The black bar corresponds to dead trees.
    Diameter-at-breast-height (DBH) histograms of Plot A (left side, from top to bottom, years 1976, 1979,1989,1999, and 2009) and Plot B (right side, from top to bottom, years 1977, 1979,1989, 1999, and 2009). The black bar corresponds to dead trees.
  • [] 
  • [Fig. 4.] Decline in densities of trees in Plot A (●) and Plot B (○).
    Decline in densities of trees in Plot A (●) and Plot B (○).
  • [Fig. 5.] Histogram of available area of living and dead individuals from 1977 to 2010 in Plot A. The black bar corresponds to dead individuals.
    Histogram of available area of living and dead individuals from 1977 to 2010 in Plot A. The black bar corresponds to dead individuals.
  • [Fig. 6.] Histogram of relative DBHs (rDBHs) and relative available areas (rAREAs) of dead individuals in Plot A. The black bar corresponds to dead trees.
    Histogram of relative DBHs (rDBHs) and relative available areas (rAREAs) of dead individuals in Plot A. The black bar corresponds to dead trees.
  • [Fig. 7.] Three-dimensional plot of death ratio, relative DBH (rDBH), and relative area (rAREA) in Plot A. Trees characterized by both rDBH ≤ 0.5 and rAREA ≤ 0.5 had the highest levels of death ratio.
    Three-dimensional plot of death ratio, relative DBH (rDBH), and relative area (rAREA) in Plot A. Trees characterized by both rDBH ≤ 0.5 and rAREA ≤ 0.5 had the highest levels of death ratio.
  • [] 
  • [] 
  • [] 
  • []