검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
Classification of tree species using high-resolution QuickBird-2 satellite images in the valley of Ui-dong in Bukhansan National Park
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
Classification of tree species using high-resolution QuickBird-2 satellite images in the valley of Ui-dong in Bukhansan National Park
KEYWORD
QuickBird , spectral characteristics , tree species classification , vegetation index
  • INTRODUCTION

    Forests account for over 60% of land area in South Ko-rea. However, city expansion plans and urban develop-ment projects have inevitably created more demands and increasing forest development. The Ministry of Environ-ment (ME)’s latest report on the time-series changes in the land cover map of the country shows significantly re-duced forest area: approximately 64% remained as of the end of 2000s from 66% at the end of the 1980s (Ministry of Environment 2010).

    Forests, as resources for human activities and wild life habitat, play an indispensible role in the environment and in the entire ecosystem. They require an organized system of forest survey and management to prevent dam-ages by indiscriminate development.

    The 1st National Natural Environment Survey kicked off in 1986, as part of ME’s nationwide natural environ-ment survey (as per Article 32 of the National Environ-ment Conservation Act) initiative to be carried out every 10 years. From the 2nd National Natural Environment Survey onwards, results and information collected were included in the GIS-DB building and then generated into an official report on the status of the eco-environment (published in April, 2007). Over 90% of the report con-cerns the results of the vegetation survey, in addition to covering various aspects of the ecosystem, including in-formation on the flora and the fauna (mammals, birds, amphibians and reptiles, insects, freshwater fish, and freshwater invertebrates) and topography (National Insti-tute of Environmental Research 2010).

    With the 2013 4th National Natural Environment Sur-vey, the survey interval is to be reduced to 5 years, rather than the aforementioned 10. Thus, devising an efficient vegetation survey master plan has become a matter of ur-gency, in anticipation of the significant increase in vegeta-tion survey area to be covered annually.

    Satellites have the merit of being able to obtain data for a large area. Since 1995, several countries have launched satellites that can obtain images with spatial resolution of equal to or less than 10 m. In addition, the QuickBird, launched October 2001, is a high-resolution satellite from Digital Globe. It offers high spatial resolution by simulta-neously acquiring 0.64-m panchromatic (PAN) and 2.50-m multispectral imageries and has four bands that simul-taneously record reflected or emitted radiation from the earth’s surface in the blue (band 1, 0.45 to 0.52 μm), green (band 2, 0.52 to 0.60 μm), red (band 3, 0.63 to 0.69 μm) and near-infrared (band 4, 0.76 to 0.90 μm) portions of the electromagnetic spectrum.

    Forest classification is important for forest ecosystem management and scientific research. Field ground sur-veys of plant species composition and forest classification are time consuming and provide incomplete information of forest polygon delineation. The techniques of plant species classification, from satellites with high resolution images, could be the most effective way to classify and as-sess large areas of forest (Martin et al. 1998, Franklin et al. 2001).

    Studies using IKONOS and QuickBird images have been used to identify trees (Ham et al. 2004, Katoh 2004, Kim 2008) and classify forest types (Chung et al. 2001, Lee 2001, Jayakumar et al. 2007) in forest stands with discern-ible crown diameter. However, it is difficult to distinguish among species in broadleaved forests, as they have the same tone in QuickBird images. The classification process of high resolution images, using spectral characteristics of bands and vegetative indices, needs to be developed.

    Therefore, the objectives of this study are to use the high-resolution QuickBird-2 satellite images to compare and analyze the spectral characteristics of the tree spe-cies within the study area, to automatically classify and perform an accuracy assessment of the tree species, using the images, and to address the question of feasibility of QuickBird-2 imagery-based tree species classification by providing the relevant databases.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

      >  Study site

    The study area was defined as the 122,500 m2 (350 m × 350 m) land located at 127°00′00″ E-127°00′15″ E longitude and 37°40′35″ N-37°40′50″ N latitude from the Bukhansan National Park office at Ui-dong, Gangbuk-gu, Seoul, Ko-rea (Fig. 1). The study forest is composed of broadleaved trees such as Quercus mongolica, Q. serrata, the conifer-ous tree Pinus densiflora, and the Robinia pseudoacacia plantation. The altitude ranges from 193 to 304 m above mean sea level. The study area includes steep slopes (63%) and gentle ones. The mean annual precipitation is 1,450.5 mm, and the mean annual temperature is 12.5℃. Table 1 was showed tree species condition in this study.

      >  Materials

    Satellite images obtained from Digital Globe’s Quick-Bird-2 were used as primary data for this study. These of-fer spatial resolution by simultaneously acquiring 0.64-m PAN and 2.50-m multispectral imageries. There are four bands that simultaneously record reflected or emitted ra-diation from the earth’s surface in the blue (band 1, 0.45 to 0.52 μm), green (band 2, 0.52 to 0.60 μm), red (band 3,

    [Table 1.] Tree species conditions in the study and their abbreviations

    label

    Tree species conditions in the study and their abbreviations

    0.63 to 0.69 μm) and near-infrared (band 4, 0.76 to 0.90 μm) portions of the electromagnetic spectrum. The digi-tal map, detail vegetation map, and boundary data of the Bukhan Mountain National Park were obtained at the courtesy of relevant institutions and authorities, and the digital elevation model (DEM) was produced hands-on, using the digital map for this particular study (Table 2).

      >  Methods

    The study was carried out in 3 major parts: field survey, image processing, and tree species analysis. Refer to Fig. 2 for a study process flow chart.

    The site map, produced from QuickBird-2 images, was used to carry out the field survey. The diameter at breast

    [Table 2.] List of materials used in the study

    label

    List of materials used in the study

    height (DBH) and the crown diameter of the tree species were measured, and the crown boundary was marked on the map, scanned, and geometrically corrected to build the GIS-DB with the crown boundary, DBH, and crown diameter information for each tree species.

    For image processing, rational polynomial coefficient data was provided at the purchase of images and was re-flected to remove internal errors. Ground control point and DEM were each marked and built on a digital map with a ratio scale of 1:5,000 for orthography correction of PAN (resolution 0.64M) and multispectral (resolution 2.50M) QuickBird images.

    Field survey results were used to compare and analyze the band patterns of the orthography-corrected images and the spectral characteristics of each vegetation index.

    Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were performed for a statistical significance assessment, and corresponding band combinations for tree species classification were set. Supervised classification, using the maximum likeli-hood classifier, was applied to the field survey area desig-nated as the training region.

    The final stage of the study consisted of comparing the results of supervised classification against the field survey findings for the final accuracy assessment necessary for

    [Table 3.] Transformation of vegetation indices

    label

    Transformation of vegetation indices

    determining the feasibility of image-based tree species classification and its proposal.

    Programs used for this study included: Arcview 3.2 and ArcGIS 9.2 for DEM construction; ERDAS 9.1 for image processing (ERDAS 1997). Also, QuickBird-2 images were used to produce and analyze a total of 7 vegetation indi-ces (Table 3).

      >  Statistical analysis

    Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for statis-tically significant differences among groups, using SPSS ver. 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and Tukey’s mul-tiple comparison test was then used (P < 0.001), as shown in Table 4. The classification accuracy was examined from a random selection of 800 pixels.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

      >  Comparison of the tree species derived from QuickBird-2 bands

    QuickBird-2 band analysis show lower digital num-bers (DNs) for conifers, Pinus densiflora and P. rigida, than broad-leaved trees in Band 4. This is consistent with the previous image-based study findings of Landsat TM (Katoh 1988, 1995) and IKONOS (Katoh, 2004) conifers showed lower DNs than wide-leaved trees. On the con-trast, Larix leptolepis, though a conifer, showed similar or higher DNs to wide-leaved trees. Such observations may be attributable to L. leptolepis which, being a deciduous conifer, was already showing a similar range of DNs at the time the images were taken in September (Fig. 3).

      >  Comparison of the tree species derived from vegetation indices

    A comparison of vegetation indices-based tree spe-cies spectral characteristics showed clear differences in the average DNs between tree species in the normalized

    [Table 4.] Tukey's multiple comparison test of the QuickBird-2 bands and vegetation indices with ANOVA analysis (N = 1450)

    label

    Tukey's multiple comparison test of the QuickBird-2 bands and vegetation indices with ANOVA analysis (N = 1450)

    difference vegetation index (NDVI), green vegetation in-dex (GVI), soil brightness index (SBI) and Biband. Such a distribution pattern was similar to the one obtained from image band spectral characteristics comparison (Fig. 4).

      >  Statistical significance assessment

    Tree species were classified into a-h groups, according to their spectral characteristics (Table 4). The group of trees with high DNs was designated as e, f, g and h. Oth-erwise, the group with low DNs was depicted as a and b.

    Using the significant differences in the QuickBird bands (Table 4), the group with high DNs included Pterocarya stenoptera and L. leptolepis; the next group included Al-nus hirsute, Prunus sargentii, Q. acutissima, Q. aliena, Q. mongolica, Q. serrata, R. pseudoacacia; and the group with the lowest DNs contained the conifers P. densiflora and P. rigida. For the vegetation indices (Table 4) that pro-duced significant differences, P. stenoptera and L. leptol-epis belonged to the group with high DNs; while P. densi-flora and P. rigida belonged to the group with low DNs. The QuickBird-2 bands and vegetation indices produced similar groups.

    A statistical significance assessment revealed varia-tions in the spectral characteristics among tree species in the PAN, Band 4, Biband, NDVI, SBI, and GVI. However, species’ signatures between Q. mongolica and Q. serrata were indistinguishable; both showed indiscernible differ-ences in QuickBird images and in DNs values for spectral characteristics.

      >  Classification

    Based on the results of the statistical significance test, images of 5 QuickBird-2 bands and vegetation indices were collected and the maximum likelihood classifier was applied for automatic classification. Biband, however,

    [Table 5.] Areas of each tree species in supervised classification

    label

    Areas of each tree species in supervised classification

    was excluded from automatic classification in order to prevent potential errors because it failed to show normal distribution, despite optimal results in the statistical sig-nificance assessment.

    Results of the classification, as shown in Fig. 5, revealed that the Quercus mongolica covered the largest area-20,700 m2 (Table 5).

      >  Accuracy assessment

    An accuracy assessment showed an overall accuracy of 74.1%. The three highest accuracy results were shown in Pterocarya stenoptera (89.5%), Larix leptolepis (88.9%), and the Prunus sargentii (74.4%). However, in 2 cases, spectral patterns did not show significant differences even within the same genus, resulting in them being clas-sified as the same species: between P. densiflora (47.9%) and P. rigida (60.4%), between Q, mongolica (57.3%) and Q. serrata (56.0%) (Table 6).

    CONCLUSION

    Using the results from a detailed vegetation survey, an area rich in tree species within the Bukhansan National Park was selected for tree species survey, QuickBird-2 image-based supervised classification, and accuracy as-sessment of the classification outcomes.

    Results of the DNs value analysis of tree species showed that Band 4 and PAN images were useful for tree species classification using image bands. Conifers showed lower DNs values than broad-leaved trees in Band 4, with the exception of the Larix leptolepis, which showed other-wise. L. leptolepis, a deciduous conifer, may have already begun shading at the time the images were taken (Sep-tember), showing similar DNs values as broad-leaved trees. The distribution of DNs values for each vegetation index was consistent with the differences/similarities in spectral characteristics obtained from image band obser-vation.

    A statistical significance assessment of tree species spectral characteristics, based on Tukey’s test, showed similar spectral patterns among trees of the same genus, namely between Pinus densiflora and P. rigida, and be-tween Quercus mongolica and Q. serrata. Hence, species differentiation was indiscrete.

    Q. mongolica showed the largest distribution in super-vised classification, followed by: Alnus hirsuta, Q. serrata, Robinia pseudoacacia, P. rigida, and the P. densiflora.

    The study area for this research was limited to the Ui-

    [Table 6.] Accuracy assessment of randomly selected pixels

    label

    Accuracy assessment of randomly selected pixels

    dong valley region and, thus, inevitable restrictions were imposed; a limited number of tree species, geographical signatures of the study area, and the season images were obtained, as variables in the study, and these were prone to affect the spectral characteristics of the tree species. Monthly or “all-season” image analysis in multiple areas is recommended for more reliable results.

참고문헌
  • 1. Chung KH, Lee WK, Lee JH, Kim KH, Lee SH 2001 Classifica-tion of forest type using resolution imagery of satellite IKONOS. [Korean J Remote Sens] Vol.17 P.275-284 google
  • 2. 1997 ERDAS Field Guide. google
  • 3. Franklin SE, Maudie AJ, Lavigne MB 2001 Using spatial co-occurrence texture to increase forest structure and spe-cies composition classification accuracy. [Photogramm Eng Remote Sens] Vol.67 P.849-855 google
  • 4. Ham BY, Lee WK, Chong JS, Lee JH 2004 Estimation of spa-tial distribution and occurrence probability of oak spe-cies using IKONOS satellite imagery and GIS. [Korean J For Meas] Vol.7 P.74-84 google
  • 5. Jayakumar S, Ramachandran A, Lee JB, Heo J 2007 Object-oriented classification and QuickBird multi-spectral im-agery in forest density mapping. [Korean J Remote Sens] Vol.23 P.153-160 google
  • 6. Jordan CF 1969 Derivation of leaf-area index from quality of light on the forest floor. [Ecology] Vol.50 P.663-666 google
  • 7. Katoh M 1988 Estimation of rates of the crown area in yezo spruce plantations with Landsat thematic mapper data. [Proceedings of the 16th ISPRS/IUFRO] P.23-29 google
  • 8. Katoh M 1995 Oct 17-21 The estimation of crown densities in todo-matsu plantations using Landsat thematic mapper data. [Proceedings and IUFRO on sustainable forest manage-ment] P.246-253 google
  • 9. Katoh M 2004 Classifying tree species in a northern mixed forest using high-resolution IKONOS data. [J For Res] Vol.9 P.7-14 google
  • 10. Kim C 2008 Use of crown feature analysis to separate the two pine species in QuickBird imagery. [Korean J Remote Sens] Vol.24 P.267-272 google
  • 11. Kriegler FJ, Malila WA, Nalepka RF, Richardson W 1969 Oct 13-16 Preprocessing transformations and their effects on mul-tispectral recognition. [Proceedings of the 6th Interna-tional Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment] P.97-131 google
  • 12. Lee JH 2001 A study on classification and spatial distribu-tion of forest types using IKONOS satellite imagery and GIS. google
  • 13. Martin ME, Newman SD, Aber JD, Congalton RG 1998 De-termining forest species composition using high spec-tral resolution remote sensing data. [Remote Sens Envi-ron] Vol.65 P.249-254 google
  • 14. 2010 Mapping of the Detailed-class Land Cover Map Using Satellite Images. Report. google
  • 15. 2010 Con-struction of GIS-DB for National Ecosystem Informa-tion. Report. google
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Table 1. ]  Tree species conditions in the study and their abbreviations
    Tree species conditions in the study and their abbreviations
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Map of the study area in Ui-dong valley in Seoul and training data of tree crowns derived from field survey on QuickBird PAN image. Ll Larix leptolepis; Pd Pinus densiflora; Pr Pinus rigida; Alh Alnus hirsute; Prs Prunus sargentii; Pts Pterocarya stenoptera; Qa Quercus acutissima; Qal Quercus aliena; Qm Quercus mongolica; Qs Quercus serrata; Rop Robinia pseudoacacia.
    Map of the study area in Ui-dong valley in Seoul and training data of tree crowns derived from field survey on QuickBird PAN image. Ll Larix leptolepis; Pd Pinus densiflora; Pr Pinus rigida; Alh Alnus hirsute; Prs Prunus sargentii; Pts Pterocarya stenoptera; Qa Quercus acutissima; Qal Quercus aliena; Qm Quercus mongolica; Qs Quercus serrata; Rop Robinia pseudoacacia.
  • [ Table 2. ]  List of materials used in the study
    List of materials used in the study
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Flow chart of the study. DBH diameter at breast height; RPC rational polynomial coefficient GCP ground control point DEM digital elevation model.
    Flow chart of the study. DBH diameter at breast height; RPC rational polynomial coefficient GCP ground control point DEM digital elevation model.
  • [ Table 3. ]  Transformation of vegetation indices
    Transformation of vegetation indices
  • [ Fig. 3. ]  Comparison of digital numbers values of tree species derived from QuickBird bands. PAN panchromatic; LI Larix leptolepis; Pd Pinus densiflora; Pr Pinus rigida; Alh Alnus hirsute; Prs Prunus sargentii; Pts Pterocarya stenoptera; Qa Quercus acutissima; Qal Quercus aliena; Qm Quercus mongolica; Qs Quercus serrata; Rop Robinia pseudoacacia.
    Comparison of digital numbers values of tree species derived from QuickBird bands. PAN panchromatic; LI Larix leptolepis; Pd Pinus densiflora; Pr Pinus rigida; Alh Alnus hirsute; Prs Prunus sargentii; Pts Pterocarya stenoptera; Qa Quercus acutissima; Qal Quercus aliena; Qm Quercus mongolica; Qs Quercus serrata; Rop Robinia pseudoacacia.
  • [ Table 4. ]  Tukey's multiple comparison test of the QuickBird-2 bands and vegetation indices with ANOVA analysis (N = 1450)
    Tukey's multiple comparison test of the QuickBird-2 bands and vegetation indices with ANOVA analysis (N = 1450)
  • [ Fig. 4. ]  Comparison of digital numbers values of tree species derived from vegetation indices. NDVI normalized difference vegetation index; TNDVI transformation NDVI; SBI soil brightness index; GVI green vegetation index; YVI yellow stuff vegetation index; WBI water band index; LI Larix leptolepis; Pd Pinus densiflora; Pr Pinus rigida; Alh Alnus hirsute; Prs Prunus sargentii; Pts Pterocarya stenoptera; Qa Quercus acutissima; Qal Quercus aliena; Qm Quercus mongolica; Qs Quercus serrata; Rop Robinia pseudoacacia.
    Comparison of digital numbers values of tree species derived from vegetation indices. NDVI normalized difference vegetation index; TNDVI transformation NDVI; SBI soil brightness index; GVI green vegetation index; YVI yellow stuff vegetation index; WBI water band index; LI Larix leptolepis; Pd Pinus densiflora; Pr Pinus rigida; Alh Alnus hirsute; Prs Prunus sargentii; Pts Pterocarya stenoptera; Qa Quercus acutissima; Qal Quercus aliena; Qm Quercus mongolica; Qs Quercus serrata; Rop Robinia pseudoacacia.
  • [ Table 5. ]  Areas of each tree species in supervised classification
    Areas of each tree species in supervised classification
  • [ Fig. 5. ]  Tree species classification map derived from QuickBird-2 data with maximum likelihood classifier. Alh Alnus hirsute; LI Larix leptolepis; Pd Pinus densiflora; Pr Pinus rigida; Prs Prunus sargentii; Pts Pterocarya stenoptera; Qa Quercus acutissima; Qal Quercus aliena; Qm Quercus mongolica; Qs Quercus serrata; Rop Robinia pseudoacacia.
    Tree species classification map derived from QuickBird-2 data with maximum likelihood classifier. Alh Alnus hirsute; LI Larix leptolepis; Pd Pinus densiflora; Pr Pinus rigida; Prs Prunus sargentii; Pts Pterocarya stenoptera; Qa Quercus acutissima; Qal Quercus aliena; Qm Quercus mongolica; Qs Quercus serrata; Rop Robinia pseudoacacia.
  • [ Table 6. ]  Accuracy assessment of randomly selected pixels
    Accuracy assessment of randomly selected pixels
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.