검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
Redescription of Two Marine Ciliates (Ciliophora: Urostylida: Pseudokeronopsidae), Pseudokeronopsis carnea and Uroleptopsis citrina, from Korea
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
Redescription of Two Marine Ciliates (Ciliophora: Urostylida: Pseudokeronopsidae), Pseudokeronopsis carnea and Uroleptopsis citrina, from Korea
KEYWORD
Pseudokeronopsis carnea , Uroleptopsis citrina , marine ciliate , morphology , SSU rRNA gene , Korea
  • INTRODUCTION

    The genera Pseudokeronopsis and Uroleptopsis are included in the family Pseudokeronopsidae which was established by Borror and Wicklow (1983).

    The Pseudokeronopsis consists of 10 species and all mem-bers have frontal cirri arranged as a bicorona, which continue posteriorly to two midventral rows and marginal cirri on each side of the body (Borror and Wicklow, 1983; Berger, 2006; Song et al., 2006). Identification of species in the Pseudokeronopsis, however, is somewhat difficult because the diagnostic keys such as body shape, body colour, body size and ciliary pattern either are overlapped or similar among congeners (Song et al., 2006).

    Kahl (1932) established the genus Uroleptopsis due to the lack of transverse cirri in some species on classification in Holosticha (Keronopsis). Later, Berger (2004) redescribed Uroleptopsis citrina by its morphology and morphogenesis, and divided Uroleptopsis into the two subgenus, Uroleptopsis(Uroleptopsis) and Uroleptopsis (Plesiouroleptopsis), thro-ugh the presence of cirrus II/2 in the ordinary position, right of the undulating membranes.

    In this study, we described two marine ciliates new to Korea, P. carnea and U. citrina, based on live and protargol-impregnated specimens. Moreover, the sequences of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene from two species were determined and compared with those of known sequences obtained from the NCBI website.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

      >  Sample collection and identification

    The specimens of Pseudokeronopsis carnea were collected from Incheon harbor in the Yellow Sea ( salinity, 28.5‰; temperature, 15℃; 37? 26?N, 126? 35?E), Korea, in November 2010, and those of Uroleptopsis citrina were collected from Guryongpo, Pohang in the East Sea (salinity, 32.3‰; tempera-ture, 24.1℃; 35? 59?N, 129? 33?E), Korea, in September 2008.

    After collection and isolation, specimens were maintained in the laboratory, either as pure or raw cultures in Petri dishes and 50 mL tissue culture flasks (Greiner Bio-one, Fricken-hausen, Germany). Autoclaved seawater was supplied with putting rice grains as a substrate for bacterial growth (Jung et al., 2011). The living specimens were observed under a light microscope ( Leica DM2500; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) at 50-1,000 magnification. Protargol impregnation was applied according to Foissner (1991) to reveal the infraciliature.

    Terminology and classification are mostly according to Berger (2006) and Lynn (2008).

      >  DNA sequence determination

    A cell (single specimens of each species) was transferred to a 1.5 mL microtube with a minimum volume of water. Geno-mic DNAs were extracted using a RED-Extract-N-Amp Tis-sue PCR kit (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The nearly complete SSU rRNA genes were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the universal eukaryotic primers: New EukA (5?-CTG GTT GAT YCT GCC AGT-3?), modified from Medlin et al. (1988), and LSU rev3 (Sonnenberg et al., 2007) primers. The optimized conditions for this process were as follows: Denaturation at 94℃ for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of denatura-tion at 95℃ for 15 sec, annealing at 58℃ for 30 sec, extension at 72℃ for 4 min, and then a final extension step at 72℃ for 7 min. The PCR products were purified with the QIAquick® PCR Purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Three internal primers were used for sequencing: 18S+810 (5?-GCC GGA ATA CAT TAG CAT GG-3?) and 18S-300 (5?-CAT GGT AGT CCA ATA CAC TAC-3?) and 18S+1470(5?-TCT GTG ATG CCC TTA GAT GTC-3?). Sequencing in both directions was conducted by an ABI 3700 Sequencer(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

    The sequencing fragments of the SSU rRNA gene were combined via BioEdit (Hall, 1999) and were aligned using Clustal X 1.81 (Jeanmougin et al., 1998). Mega 4.0 (Tamura et al., 2007) was used to calculate genetic distance by applying the Kimura two-parameter distance method (Kimura, 1980).

    Korean name: 1*뚱뚱이홍색위각모충 (신칭)

    SYSTEMATIC ACCOUNTS

    Phylum Ciliophora Doflein, 1901

    Class Spirotrichea Butschli, 1889

    Order Urostylida Jankowski, 1979

    Family Pseudokeronopsidae Borror and Wicklow, 1983

    Genus Pseudokeronopsis Borror and Wicklow, 1983

    1*Pseudokeronopsis carnea (Cohn, 1866)

    Wirnsberger et al., 1987 (Table 1, Figs.1 A-D, 2)

    Oxytricha flava var. carnea Cohn, 1866: 288, 300.

    Holosticha (Keronopsis) rubra var. carnea (Cohn, 1866) Kahl, 1932: 573.

    Pseudokeronopsis carnea (Cohn, 1866) nov. comb. Wirns-berger et al., 1987: 79, fig. 9, Tables .1-3

    Pseudokeronopsis rubra sensu Shi and Xu, 2003: 23-30.

    Pseudokeronopsis pararubra Hu, Warren and Suzuki, 2004: 351-368.

    Pseudokeronopsis carnea (Cohn, 1866) Wirnsberger et al.,

    [Table 1.] Morphometric characterization of Pseudokeronopsiscarnea

    label

    Morphometric characterization of Pseudokeronopsiscarnea

    1987, Song et al., 2006: 271-287, figs.1 A-G, 2, 3, 9C, Tables .1-3

    Material examined. One population was obtained from In-cheon harbor on November 2, 2010.

    Description. Cell in vivo slender shape, 190-255×55-70 ㎛, usually 225×61.3 ㎛ (Figs.1 A, 2A); anterior end bluntly rounded (Fig.2 B); posterior end inconspicuously narrowed; both anterior and posterior ends round; dorsoventrally flattened. Contractile vacuole located on the left side usually in posterior 1/3-2/5 (Figs.1 A, arrowhead; 2C, arrow); reddish cortex due to underlying reddish-brown or orange-red in colour cortical granules, which are around both dorsal kine-ties and cirri (Fig.2 E; F, G, arrowhead); cortical granules colourless, blood cell shaped, scattered throughout the cell body (Fig.2F, G, arrow).

    The adoral zone of membranelles distinct, approximately 1/3 of the cell length, and composed of about 69 membran-elles(Fig.2 D, H). Bicorona of frontal cirri slightly enlarged,composed of about 8-12 cirral pairs, extending as a midven-tral complex consecutively. One buccal cirrus near the paro-ral membrane (Fig.2 H, arrow), whereas two frontoterminal cirri behind the distal end of the adoral zone (Fig.2 I, arrows); midventral complex distinctly separated rows (Fig.2 J), com-posed of 30-46 cirral pairs, terminating near transverse cirri; both posterior ends of marginal cirral rows not overlapped; 7-10 transverse cirri located between both posterior ends of the left and right marginal cirral rows (Fig.2 K). Almost no gap found between the midventral rows and the transverse cirri; from five to seven dorsal kineties (Figs.1 D; 2L, arrows).

    Distribution. North Sea, German, Denmark, Mediterranean,Yugoslavia, China and Korea (this study).

    Remarks. Cohn (1866) published Oxytricha flava var. carnea without any illustration. As the former species is almost iden-tical to P. flava, he classified it as a variety of Oxytricha flava.The derivation of the name was not given in the original description of P. carnea.The meaning of carnea in Latin is “fleshy.” In 1882, Kent transferred Oxytricha rubra to the genus Holosticha. Kahl (1932) classified Keronopsis as a subgenus of Holosticha.Then, Kahl named it Holosticha (Keronopsis) rubra var. carnea. Even after several taxono-mists recorded this species, they were considered it Pseudo-keronopsis rubra or P. flava in confusion. Entz (1884) con-sidered P. carnea as a transitional form between P. rubra and P. flava.The neotype of P. carnea was fixed by Wirns-berger et al. (1987) and until now, a Chinese population of P. carnea has been redescribed solely (Song et al., 2006).

    Eight species among the genus Pseudokeronopsis live in marine habitats. Because Pseudokeronopsis species are somewhat difficult to classify and identify among congeners, the colour as main diagnostic key is the critical factor disting-uishing P. carnea from the other congeners (Hu and Song, 2001). The orange-red colour of cortical granules is essen-tial for identifying P. carnea (vs. colourless, P. decolar and P. ovalis; yellow, P. flavicans and P. flava; brick-red, P.rubra; yellow-greenish, P. sepetibensis; brick-red and yellow, P. multinucleata). Moreover, with the exception of the colour of the cortical granules, the ciliary pattern and position of the contractile vacuole support species separation (Song et al., 2002; Berger, 2006). Like the name suggests, this species has the most plump body shape among the congeners. Alth-ough the anterior end is bluntly rounded, the posterior end is inconspicuously narrowed. This species can be separated from the other congeners by having: more cirral pairs in both the bicorona and the midventral rows; more transverse cirri; more dorsal kineties; a contractile vacuole in the posterior half of the cell, usually in the posterior 1/3-2/5; more conspi-cuous pigment granules, always dark red or orange-red. The number of adoral membranelles in this organism is also con-spicuously more than that of other congeners. In addition, the adoral zone of membranelles is relatively long compared to body length (ratio, 1 : 3), and almost no gap exists bet-ween the midventral rows and the transverse cirri.

    The Korean population, Pseudokeronopsis carnea, has a few differences from the Chinese population of P. carnea (Song et al., 2006) as follows: (1) dorsal kineties (5-7 vs. 7-8); and (2) transverse cirri (on average 8 vs. 8.6). In addition, we ascertained that the sequence was successfully amplified on the partial region of the SSU rRNA gene and the amplified se-quence length is 1,756 bp (GenBank accession no: JN714476) and shows 99.89% similarity with the Chinese population (GenBank accession no: AY881633).

    1*Genus Uroleptopsis (Uroleptopsis) Kahl, 1932

    2*Uroleptopsis citrina Kahl, 1932 (Table 2, Figs.1 E-H, 3)

    Uroleptopsis citrina Kahl, 1932: 543, fig.87 ; Kahl, 1933:107, fig. 1612.; Kudo, 1950: 672; Borror, 1972: 11; Berger, 2004: 99-121, 5-28, 35-42, table 1.

    Material examined. One population was obtained from Guryongpo, Pohang in September 2008.

    Description. Cell in vivo slender shape, 118-165× 45-55 ㎛, usually 130.2× 50 ㎛ (Figs.1 E, 3A, B); body shape elon-gate-elliptical; both anterior and posterior ends round and dorsoventrally flattened. Contractile vacuole difficult to recognize, located on the left side of usually slightly squeezed cells. Body colour is lemon-yellow due to cortical granules,

    which are around both dorsal kineties and cirri; cortical gra-nules colourless, blood cell shaped, scattered throughout the cell body (Figs.1F, 3E, F).

    The adoral zone of membranelles distinct; about 1/3 of cell length, and composed of about 40 membranelles (Fig.3 D, I), left anterior corner a minute process causing a break (Fig.3 C, D, arrowhead). Bicorona of frontal cirri slightly enlarged, composed of about 6-9 cirral pairs, extending as a midventral complex consecutively (Fig.3 I). Midventral complex distin-ctly separated rows, composed of 26-35 cirri containing anterior, single cirri (Fig.3 G, arrow) in middle portion, posterior portion. Two or three frontoterminal cirri behind the distal end of the adoral zone (Fig.3 I, arrows); invariably three dorsal kineties (Figs.1 H; 3C, arrows); of particular interest, there is no buccal cirrus and transverse cirri.

    Distribution. Adriatic Sea, and Korea (this study).

    Remarks. Kahl (1932) established the genus Uroleptopsis and described firstly U. citrina. Later, Berger (2004) rede-scribed U. citrina of the Adriatic Sea by its morphology and morphogenesis. Uroleptopsis citrina has a gap in the adoral zone and lacks transverse cirri. The loss of the transverse cirri is the main diagnostic character to separate U. citrina from other Pseudokeronopsidae species. This species has conspicuous differences from the congener U. ignea as fol-

    [Table 2.] Morphometric characterization of Uroleptopsis citrina

    label

    Morphometric characterization of Uroleptopsis citrina

    lows: presence of a buccal cirrus and the pattern of the mid-ventral complex. Circumstantially, U. citrina lacks a buccal cirrus in the ordinary position, right of the paroral, whereas is present in U. ignea. Also, the anterior and posterior portion of the midventral complex in this species primarily consist of ordinary midventral pairs; the middle portion is compos-ed only of the right cirri of the cirral pairs, whereas the an-terior portion of the midventral complex in U. ignea is com-posed of paired cirri, and the middle and posterior portion consist of non-paired cirri (Mihailowitsch and Wilbert, 1990). Yellow cortical granules and ring-shaped structures are under-neath the cell surface. Consequently, U. ignea is transferred to the subgenus Uroleptopsis (Plesiouroleptopsis) by Berger (2004).

    Also, U. citrina is a little different from Pseudokeronopsis flava in that the cell colour is yellow. However, P. flava has one buccal cirrus in the ordinary position, 2-4 transverse cirri, 3-4 dorsal kineties, and lacks a break in the adoral zone (Song et al., 2004).

    The Korean population, U. citrina, has a few differences from the Adriatic Sea population of U. citrina (Berger, 2004) as follows: (1) left marginal cirri (26-41 vs. 28-49); (2) right marginal cirri (29-53 vs. 34-63); and (3) single midventral cirri (on average 8 vs. 11). Additionally, we ascertained that the sequence was successfully amplified on the partial region of the SSU rRNA gene and the amplified sequence length is 1,754 bp (GenBank accession no: JN714477) and shows 99.88% similarity with that of Chinese population (GenBank accession no: GU437211). Unfortunately, no Adriatic Sea population sequence is available in GenBank.

참고문헌
  • 1. Berger H 2004 Uroleptopsis Kahl 1932 (Ciliophora : Hypotri-cha): morphology and cell division of type species redefini-tion and phylogenetic relationships. [Acta Protozoologica] Vol.43 P.99-121 google
  • 2. Berger H 2006 Monograph of the Urostyloidea (CiliophoraHypotricha). P.832-1001 google
  • 3. Borror AC 1972 Monograph of the Urostyloidea (Ciliophora Hypotricha). [Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology] Vol.19 P.1-23 google
  • 4. Borror AC, Wicklow BJ 1983 Revision of the order Hypotrichida (Ciliophora Protozoa). [Acta Protozoologica] Vol.22 P.97-126 google cross ref
  • 5. Cohn F 1866 Neue Infusorien im Seeaquarium. [Zeitschrift fur Wissenschaftliche Zoologie] Vol.16 P.253-302 google
  • 6. Entz G 1884 Uber Infusorien des Golfes von Neapel. [Mitteilun-gen aus der Zoologischen Station zu Neapel] Vol.5 P.359-364 google
  • 7. Foissner W 1991 Basic light and scanning electron microsco-pic methods for taxonomic studies of ciliated protozoa. [European Journal of Protistology] Vol.27 P.313-330 google
  • 8. Hall TA 1999 BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequencealignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. [Nucleic Acids Symposium Series] Vol.41 P.95-98 google cross ref
  • 9. Hu X, Song W 2001 Morphological redescription and morpho-genesis of the marine ciliate Pseudokeronopsis rubra (Cilio-phora: Hypotrichida). [Acta Protozoologica] Vol.40 P.107-115 google
  • 10. Hu X, Warren A, Suzuki T 2004 Morphology and morpho-genesis of two marine ciliates Pseudokeronopsis pararubra sp. n. and Amphisiella annulata from China and Japan (Protozoa: Ciliophora). [Acta Protozoologica] Vol.43 P.351-368 google
  • 11. Jeanmougin F, Thompson JD, Gouy M, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ 1998 Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X. [Trends in Biochemical Sciences] Vol.23 P.403-405 google
  • 12. Jung JH, Baek YS, Min GS 2011 New record of two Apokero-nopsis species (Ciliophora: Urostylida: Pseudokeronopsidae) from Korea. [Korean Journal of Systematic Zoology] Vol.27 P.115-122 google cross ref
  • 13. Kahl A 1932 Urtiere oder Protozoa I: Wimpertiere oder Ciliata(Infusoria) 3. Spirotricha. [Tierwelt Deutschlands] Vol.25 P.399-650 google cross ref
  • 14. Kahl A 1933 Urtiere oder Protozoa I: Wimpertiere oder Ciliata (Infusoria) 3. Spirotricha. [Die Tierweltder Nord- und Ostsee] Vol.23 P.29-146 google
  • 15. Kimura M 1980 A simple method for estimating evolutionaryrates of base substitutions through comparative studies ofnucleotide sequences. [Journal of Molecular Evolution] Vol.16 P.111-120 google
  • 16. Kudo R 1950 A simple method for estimating evolutionaryrates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. P.672 google
  • 17. Lynn D 2008 The ciliated protozoa: characterization classifi-cation and guide to the literature. P.1-605 google
  • 18. Medlin L, Elwood HJ, Stickel S, Sogin ML Springer The characteri-zation of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S-like rRNA-coding regions. [Gene] Vol.71 P.491-499 google
  • 19. Mihailowitsch B, Wilbert N 1990 Bakuella salinarum nov.spec. und Pseudokeronopsis ignea nov. spec. (Ciliata Hypo-trichida) aus einem solebelasteten Fliessgewasser des ostli-chen Munsterlandes BRD. [Archiv fur Protistenkunde] Vol.138 P.207-219 google cross ref
  • 20. Shi X, Xu R 2003 Morphology and infraciliature of Pseudoke-ronopsis rubra in Jieshi waters of south China sea. [Journalof Tropical Oceanography] Vol.22 P.23-30 google cross ref
  • 21. Song W, Sun P, Ji D 2004 Redefinition of the yellow hypotri-chous ciliate Pseudokeronopsis flava (Hypotrichida: Cilio-phora). [Journal of the Marine Biological Association of theUnited Kingdom] Vol.84 P.1137-1142 google
  • 22. Song W, Warren A, Roberts D, Wilbert N, Li L, Sun P, Hu X, Ma H 2006 Comparison and redefinition of four marine coloured Pseudokeronopsis spp. (Ciliophora: Hypotrichida) with emphasis on their living morphology. [Acta Protozoo-logica] Vol.45 P.271-287 google cross ref
  • 23. Song W, Wilbert N, Warren A 2002 New contribution to the morphology and taxonomy of four marine hypotrichous cili-ates from Qingdao China (Protozoa: Ciliophora). [Acta Proto-zoologica] Vol.41 P.145-162 google
  • 24. Sonnenberg R, Nolte AW, Tautz D 2007 An evaluation of LSUrDNA D1-D2 sequences for their use in species identification. [Frontiers in Zoology] Vol.4 google
  • 25. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S 2007 MEGA4: Mole-cular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. [Molecular Biology and Evolution] Vol.24 P.6-1599 google cross ref
  • 26. Wirnsberger E, Larsen HF, Uhlig G 1987 Rediagnoses ofclosely related pigmented marine species of the genusPseudokeronopsis (Ciliophora Hypotrichida). [EuropeanJournal of Protistology] Vol.23 P.76-88 google cross ref
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Table 1. ]  Morphometric characterization of Pseudokeronopsiscarnea
    Morphometric characterization of Pseudokeronopsiscarnea
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Morphology and infraciliature of Pseudokeronopsis carnea and Uroleptopsis citrina from live specimens (A B E F) and afterprotargol impregnation (C D G H). A-D Pseudokeronopsis carnea: A Ventral view of live specimen arrowhead in (A) denotes CV;B Two types of granules; infraciliature of the ventral (C) and dorsal (D) sides. E-H Uroleptopsis citrina: E Ventral view of livespecimen; F Two types of granules; infraciliature of the ventral (G) and dorsal (H) sides. AZM adoral zone of membranelles; BCbuccal cirri; CV contractile vacuole; DK dorsal kineties; EM endoral membrane; FTC frontoterminal cirri; LMR left marginal row;Ma macronuclei; MVR midventral row; PM paroral membrane; RMR; right marginal row; TC transverse cirri. Scale bars=100 μm.
    Morphology and infraciliature of Pseudokeronopsis carnea and Uroleptopsis citrina from live specimens (A B E F) and afterprotargol impregnation (C D G H). A-D Pseudokeronopsis carnea: A Ventral view of live specimen arrowhead in (A) denotes CV;B Two types of granules; infraciliature of the ventral (C) and dorsal (D) sides. E-H Uroleptopsis citrina: E Ventral view of livespecimen; F Two types of granules; infraciliature of the ventral (G) and dorsal (H) sides. AZM adoral zone of membranelles; BCbuccal cirri; CV contractile vacuole; DK dorsal kineties; EM endoral membrane; FTC frontoterminal cirri; LMR left marginal row;Ma macronuclei; MVR midventral row; PM paroral membrane; RMR; right marginal row; TC transverse cirri. Scale bars=100 μm.
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Morphology and infraciliature of Pseudokeronopsis carnea from live specimens (A-C E-G) and after protargol impregnation(D H-L). A B Ventral views of live specimen; C Dorsal views of live specimen arrow marks a contractile vacuole; E Cortical granulesaround dorsal kineties; Arrows in (F G) indicate ring-shaped hollow structures arrowheads show cortical granules; D H-K Ventraland (L) dorsal views of protargol-impregnated specimen; D General ciliature of the specimen; H Frontal (bicorona) arrow indicatesthe buccal cirrus; I Two frontoterminal cirri arrows indicate the cirri near the distal end of adoral zone; J Two midventral rows; KDenotes transverse ventral cirri; Arrows in (L) show the dorsal kineties. Scale bars=100 μm.
    Morphology and infraciliature of Pseudokeronopsis carnea from live specimens (A-C E-G) and after protargol impregnation(D H-L). A B Ventral views of live specimen; C Dorsal views of live specimen arrow marks a contractile vacuole; E Cortical granulesaround dorsal kineties; Arrows in (F G) indicate ring-shaped hollow structures arrowheads show cortical granules; D H-K Ventraland (L) dorsal views of protargol-impregnated specimen; D General ciliature of the specimen; H Frontal (bicorona) arrow indicatesthe buccal cirrus; I Two frontoterminal cirri arrows indicate the cirri near the distal end of adoral zone; J Two midventral rows; KDenotes transverse ventral cirri; Arrows in (L) show the dorsal kineties. Scale bars=100 μm.
  • [ Fig. 3. ]  Morphology and infraciliature of Uroleptopsis citrina from live specimens (A B E F) and after protargol impregnation (C DG-I). A B Ventral views of live specimen; C Dorsal and (D G-I) ventral views of protargol-impregnated specimen; C Arrows markthe invariable three dorsal kineties; C D Arrowheads point to gap in adoral zone; D General ciliature of the specimen; E F Arrowand arrowheads indicate the two kinds of granules respectively; G Anterior pairs and single cirri (arrow mark) on the midventralcomplex; H Indicates macronucleus; I Frontal cirri (bicorona); arrows show two frontoterminal cirri. Scale bars=100 μm.
    Morphology and infraciliature of Uroleptopsis citrina from live specimens (A B E F) and after protargol impregnation (C DG-I). A B Ventral views of live specimen; C Dorsal and (D G-I) ventral views of protargol-impregnated specimen; C Arrows markthe invariable three dorsal kineties; C D Arrowheads point to gap in adoral zone; D General ciliature of the specimen; E F Arrowand arrowheads indicate the two kinds of granules respectively; G Anterior pairs and single cirri (arrow mark) on the midventralcomplex; H Indicates macronucleus; I Frontal cirri (bicorona); arrows show two frontoterminal cirri. Scale bars=100 μm.
  • [ Table 2. ]  Morphometric characterization of Uroleptopsis citrina
    Morphometric characterization of Uroleptopsis citrina
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.