검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
Two-mode Fiber with a Reduced Mode Overlap for Uncoupled Mode-division Multiplexing in C+L Band
  • CC BY-NC
  • CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT

We proposed a two-mode fiber (TMF) design that can effectively reduce the mode overlap between LP01 and LP11 modes by using a W-shaped index profile core structure, which is a primary concern in uncoupled mode division multiplexing (MDM). TMF has a three-layered core structure; central circular core, inner cladding, and outer ring core. We confirmed that in an optimal structure the LP01 mode was highly confined to the central core while the LP11 mode was guided along the outer ring core to result in a minimum overlap integral. We used a full-vectorial finite element method to estimate effective index, differential group delay (DGD), confinement loss, chromatic dispersion, and mode overlap controlling the parameters of the W-shaped structure. The optimized W-profile fiber provided optical characteristics within the ITU-T recommended standards over the entire C+L band.


KEYWORD
Optical fiber communication , Mode-division multiplexing , Two-mode fiber
  • I. INTRODUCTION

    Rapid data traffic increase along a conventional single mode fiber (SMF) communication network quickly exhausts the current fiber optic transmission capacity and various methods are being intensively investigated to accommodate the data increase [1-3]. Among these methods, mode division multiplexing (MDM) based on few-mode fibers (FMFs) has recently been reported by major telecom research laboratories and fiber manufacturers [4-6]. In contrast to multi-core fibers for space division multiplexing [7], the MDM based on FMF can be a practical solution to increase the transmission capacity, because of low connection loss between FMF and SMFs, mass production capability for FMFs, and relatively easier solutions for optical amplification along FMFs.

    MDM is utilizing individual orthogonal modes in FMF as separate carriers and there have been two contrasting methods experimentally demonstrated. In the first method [8, 9], the mode coupling among the modes is compensated by electronically using multiple input multiple output (MIMO) processing at the receiver. The other method [10, 11] minimizes the mode coupling along FMF in order to optically separate each mode at the receiver.

    Therefore, FMF structure should be optimized depending on its usage, and especially the coupling or cross talk between the propagating modes would be very contrasting issue in FMF design. In addition to the general requirements for such as low attenuation, large effective area, and a low bending loss, FMFs should have either a low DGD, or a low coupling between the adjacent modes [4, 5]. Low DGD is required in the first MDM method to reduce the signal processing burden in MIMO. On the while, low mode coupling between the modes is a mandatory requirement in the second MDM method and this might also reduce MIMO processing burden in the first method.

    In the meantime, overall chromatic dispersion should be optimized to enable dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) even in FMF. In order to meet the requirements in both the low inter-symbol interference penalty and the low four-wave mixing impairments in DWDM, non-zero dispersion shifted fiber (NZDSF) has been developed and being widely used in long-haul applications, where the dispersion value within the transmission band was maintained at a non-zero low value [12]. Despite of its importance, non-zero dispersion value has not been fully addressed in prior FMF research.

    In this study, we focus on FMF design for the uncoupled MDM, such that a new waveguide was designed to provide a minimum coupling along with a large effective index difference between two adjacent LP01 and LP11 modes. In order to achieve this goal we need to consider two key waveguide properties: the difference between the guided modes and their spatial mode overlap. It has been reported that the effective index difference (Δneff) between the adjacent propagation modes can play an important role in suppressing the crosstalk when Δneff is larger than ~10-4 [13]. In the coupled mode theory [14], the overlap integral of two adjacent modes is known to be directly proportional to the mode coupling strength, and it should be minimized by optimal waveguide design. In order to use spatial filtering MDM at the receiver side, the overlap integral between LP01 and LP11 should be minimized for securing proper level of bit error rate [15, 16]. Despite the high importance in FMF design, detailed parametric analyses to reduce the overlap integral between the two modes have been very scarce in prior reports. Efforts to expand the operating spectral range of MDM to cover both C and L bands have been limited as well. We also optimized the chromatic dispersion of the two modes such that both of them satisfy the NZDSF requirements.

    In this paper, a new TMF structure is proposed which is composed of the three-layered core; the central core, inner cladding layer, and the outer ring core as shown in Fig. 1 (a). This waveguide structure provides an efficient reduction of the modal overlap by confining the fundamental LP01 mode into the central core while separating it from the LP11 mode along the outer ring core as schematically shown in Fig. 1(b). Numerical modal analyses were performed by using full-vectorial finite element method (FEM) with the perfect matched layer (PML) boundary condition [17]. Optical properties of guided modes were optimized to satisfy ITU-T requirements in C+L band, for the first time to the best knowledge of the authors [18]. Relatively simple step index profile in the proposed waveguide could be easily mass-producible using the state of art fiber manufacturing technology and it can find practical applications in high capacity DMD.

    II. PROPOSED WAVEGUIDE AND STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS

    Cross section of the proposed two-mode fiber (TMF) is shown in Fig. 1(a). The inner cladding and outer cladding material is pure silica, whose optical dispersion was calculated using a Sellmeier equation for vitreous silica glass [19]. In reference to silica, the central core of radius a has an index difference Δn1, whose optical property was calculated by using a Sellmeier equation for GeO2 doped silica glass [20]. The outer ring core has the inner radius b, the outer radius c, and the index difference Δn2. Δn2 was also assumed to be raised by GeO2 doping in silica. The inner cladding layer between the two cores acted as an optical barrier separating the two modes to reduce the modal overlap. The structural parameters of our TMF are summarized in Fig. 1(b).

    By using vectorial FEM with the PML condition, the modal analyses were carried out for our TMF. The magnetic field propagating along the z-direction in the fiber can be expressed as:

    image

    where β is the propagating constant and ω is the angular frequency. Eq. (2) shows an eigenvalue equation for magnetic field in the steady-state with a refractive index distribution, n.

    image

    where k0 is given by ω/c and c is the speed of light. The Sellmeier equation was used to evaluate wavelength dependent refractive index for silica cladding and GeO2-doped silica core regions to account for correct material dispersion. By using FEM, Eq. (2) is solved with triangular meshes to find β. Subsequently the effective mode index neff, of the guided mode was obtained by taking the real part of β/k0, while confinement loss was obtained from its imaginary part [21]. In the analysis, boundary conditions for the inner elements were set to satisfy the continuity conditions and the outer boundary was set to be continuous with the PML [21].

    Figure 2 briefly describes the role of triple-layered core in reducing the overlap integral and subsequently the mode coupling between LP01 and LP11 modes, illustration of normalized mode power overlap of the LP01 and LP11 modes in single core TMF (a) and our designed TMF (b). Inset shows the transverse electrical fields of LP01, and LP11. Normalized modal intensity profiles at the wavelength of λ = 1550 nm are compared for (a) the single core step index fiber with the core radius of 6 μm and Δn = 0. 36%. In Fig. 2(b), our TMF has the structural parameters: a = 4.1 μm, b = 6 μm, c = 8.2 μm, Δn1 = 0.36%, and Δn2 = 0.31%. It is clearly shown that the spatial overlap between LP01 and LP11 modes is significantly reduced almost by a factor of two in our proposed TMF, which confirms the unique role of three-layered core to spatially separate the two modes LP01 and LP11.

    III. MODAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TMF

       3.1. Two Mode LP01 and LP11 Guidance

    In order to confirm that our proposed waveguide structure allows two-mode guidance we numerically calculated the effective indices of LP01, LP11 and LP21 modes and investigated their cut-off behavior. In the calculations, we fixed parameters for the central core; a = 4.1 μm and Δn1 = 0.36%, which will allow a low connection loss with commercial SMF [22]. Figures 3 and 4 show effective mode index of each mode, LP01, LP11, and LP21, as a function of waveguide parameters b, c, and Δn2. We choose the wavelength 1530 and 1625 nm, the shortest wavelength of the C-band and the longest wavelength of the L-band [23]. If the two-mode condition is satisfied at these two wavelengths, it would be valid in the entire wavelength in C+L band. As shown in Figs. 3(a) and 4(a), the effective indices of the LP01, and LP11 modes were found to be higher than the silica cladding index for the given ranges of b, c, and Δn2, which ensured that the two modes are guided along the proposed TMF. Figs. 3(b) and 4(b) show the effective index of the LP21 mode and it should be lower than the silica cladding index to satisfy the two-mode guidance condition [20]. Based upon the modal guidance analyses in Figs. 3 and 4, we obtained the reference structural parameters a = 4.1 μm, b = 6 μm, c = 8.2 μm, Δn1 = 0.36%, and Δn2 = 0.31% satisfying the two-mode condition and they are summarized in Table 1.

       3.2. Effective Index Difference between the LP01 and LP11 Modes

    It is wellknown that a large effective index difference Δneff between the adjacent propagation modes can suppress the mode coupling between propagated modes [26]. One of previous works [13] has shown that Δneff larger than ~10-4 can efficiently suppress the crosstalk between the modes. Figure 5(a) shows the effective indices of the LP01, and LP11 modes. In the optimized TMF design, we obtained a large effective index difference between LP01 and LP11 with Δneff = ~2 × 10-3 in the entire C+L band, which is an order of magnitude larger than the required value. In addition, Fig. 5(b) shows that effective index of the LP21 mode in the given parameters of Table 1, which confirmed that this mode was not guided in our TMF.

    [TABLE 1.] Optimized parameters of designed TMF

    label

    Optimized parameters of designed TMF

       3.3. Effective Mode Area

    The effective mode area Aeff of the LP01 and LP11 modes was calculated using the following equation:

    image

    Figure 6 shows the Aeff of the LP01 and LP11 in our designed fiber. Aeff of the LP01 mode monotonically increased from 112 μm2 to 126 μm2 in the C+L band. Aeff of the LP11 increased from 383 μm2 to 431 μm2. It is noted that Aeff of the LP01 mode in our TMF was comparable to those of previous reports [27, 28], while Aeff of the LP11 mode in our TMF was larger by a factor of two. Large effective area in our TMF ensures reduction of nonlinear effects and high optical power capacity in MDM applications.

       3.4. Mode Overlap Integral

    The overlap integral between the LP01 and LP11 modes can be expressed as:

    image

    where I01, and I11 are the intensities of the LP01 and LP11 modes, respectively. In this study we used the normalized mode intensities to investigate the mode coupling along TMF.

    In comparison to the single core step index fiber which has 53.9% overlap integral with the core radius of 6 μm and Δn = 0.36%. The overlap integral of the proposed fiber is estimated about 27.6% at λ = 1550 nm, which corresponds to a half the single core step index fiber as shown in Fig. 2. We further investigated the change of the overlap integral in the C+L band and the results are summarized in Fig. 7. The overlap integral monotonically increased from 27.45% to 27.94%. This low overlap integral can efficiently suppress the mode coupling in our TMF providing less difficulty in separating guided modes at the receiver side [16].

       3.5. Dispersion and Differential Group Delay Properties

    Chromatic dispersion of the LP01 and LP11 modes in our TMF was calculated as a function of wavelength using the real part of neff and Eq. (5).

    image

    The results are summarized in Fig. 8. Both the LP01 and LP11 modes showed negative dispersion owing to the triple layered core structure. Their values were between 3.5 and 5.5 ps/km/nm over the entire C+L band. These chromatics dispersion values are suitable for NZDSF for dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) fiber optical networks and satisfy the requirement of ITU-T NZDSF recommendations [29] for the chromatic dispersion range. Utilizing these properties, it is further applicable not only for MDM but also for WDM.

    Low DGD is important for relaxing the complexity of MIMO processing [24]. We defined the DGD between LP01 and LP11 as follows:

    image

    where neff,01 and neff,11 is the effective index of the LP01, and LP11 mode, respectively. Here c is the speed of light. In Fig. 8(b), DGD of our TMF is plotted over the C+L band and the value was about ~4 ps/m, which is very comparable to prior step-index few mode fibers [25].

       3.6. Confinement Loss Estimation

    In order to further confirm that the proposed TMF guides the two modes, we calculated the confinement loss α using full vector FEM analyses with PML condition in dB/km from the imaginary part of the propagation constant, β [21].

    image

    In order to properly guide a mode along a fiber, the confinement loss should be lower than 10-4 dB/km in the spectral range of interest. Figure 9(a) shows the confinement loss of the LP01, and the LP11 mode and it was lower than 10-4 dB/km for both modes. We could confirm that our proposed TMF would provide sufficient guidance for both the LP01 and the LP11 modes. In contrast, the confinement loss of the LP21 was as large as few dB/km as shown in Fig. 9(b), which confirms that our TMF indeed guides only two modes, LP01 and LP11.

    IV. CONCLUSION

    We have designed a new TMF for uncoupled MDM applications. Our proposed TMF waveguide was based on a three-layered core composed of a central core, an inner cladding, and an outer ring core. We successfully reduced the modal overlap by confining the LP01 mode to the central core and the LP11 mode to the outer ring core. Using a full vectorial finite element method, we optimized the TMF structural parameters so that it can guide the LP01 and the LP11 modes with a large effective index difference Δneff = ~2 × 10-3 in the entire C+L band spectral range, which is an order of magnitude larger than the normally required value. The proposed TMF provided a low modal overlap between the LP01 and the LP11 mode of less than 27.9%, which could be a strong indicator to suppress the modal coupling. Additionally, the proposed TMF showed a low DGD (4.4~4.6 ps/m), a large Aeff of the LP01 (112~126 μm2) and LP11 (383~431 μm2), and an appropriate chromatic dispersion (3.5~5.5 ps/km/nm) in Table 2, which confirmed the proposed waveguide structure is viable, and practical MDM applications.

    [TABLE 2.] Modal characteristics at 1550 nm for the designed TMF

    label

    Modal characteristics at 1550 nm for the designed TMF

참고문헌
  • 1. Schares L., Lee B. G., Checconi F., Budd R., Rylyakov A., Dupuis N., Petrini F., Schow C. L., Fuentes P., Mattes O. 2014 A throughput-optimized optical network for data-intensive computing [IEEE Micro] Vol.34 P.52-63 google cross ref
  • 2. Essiambre R.-J., Kramer G., Winzer P. J., Foschini G. J., Goebel B. 2010 Capacity limits of optical fiber networks [J. Lightw. Technol.] Vol.28 P.662-701 google cross ref
  • 3. Ma L., Tsujikawa K., Hanzawa N., Aozasa S., Nozoe S., Yamamoto F. 2016 Design and fabrication of low loss hole-assisted few-mode fibers with consideration of surface imperfection of air holes [J. Lightw. Technol.] Vol.34 P.5164-5169 google cross ref
  • 4. Gruner-Nielsen L., Sun Y., Nicholson J. W., Jakobsen D., Jespersen K. G., Lingle R., Palsdottir B. 2012 Few mode transmission fiber with low DGD, low mode coupling, and low loss [J. Lightw. Technol.] Vol.30 P.3693-3698 google cross ref
  • 5. Sillard P., Bigot-Astruc M., Molin D. 2014 Few-mode fibers for mode-division-multiplexed systems [J. Lightw. Technol.] Vol.32 P.2824-2829 google cross ref
  • 6. Ho K.-P., Kahn J. M. 2013 Mode coupling and its impact on spatially multiplexed systems [Opt. Fiber Telecommun. VI] Vol.17 P.1386-1392 google
  • 7. Marom D. M., Blau M. 2015 Switching solutions for WDM-SDM optical networks [IEEE Commun. Mag.] Vol.53 P.60-68 google
  • 8. Ryf R., Randel S., Gnauck A. H., Bolle C., Sierra A., Mumtaz S., Esmaeelpour M., Burrows E. C., Essiambre R.-J., Winzer P. J. 2012 Mode-division multiplexing over 96 km of few-mode fiber using coherent 6 × 6 MIMO processing [J. Lightw. Technol.] Vol.30 P.521-531 google cross ref
  • 9. Koebele C., Salsi M., Sperti D., Tran P., Brindel P., Mardoyan H., Bigo S., Boutin A., Verluise F., Sillard P. 2011 Two mode transmission at 2 × 100 Gb/s, over 40 km-long prototype few-mode fiber, using LCOS-based programmable mode multiplexer and demultiplexer [Opt. Express] Vol.19 P.16593-16600 google cross ref
  • 10. Hanzawa N., Saitoh K., Sakamoto T., Matsui T., Tomita S., Koshiba M. 2011 Demonstration of mode-division multiplexing transmission over 10 km two-mode fiber with mode coupler [Proc. Optical Fiber Communication Conference] P.OWA4 google
  • 11. Sillard P., Astruc M., Boivin D., Maerten H., Provost L. 2011 Few-mode fiber for uncoupled mode-division multiplexing transmissions [Proc. European Conference and Exposition on Optical Communications] P.Tu. 5 google
  • 12. Kumano N., Mukasa K., Sakano M., Moridair H. 2002 Development of a non-zero dispersion-shifted fiber with ultra-low dispersion slope [Furukawa Rev.] Vol.22 P.1-6 google
  • 13. Riesen N., Love J. D., Arkwright J. W. 2012 Few-mode elliptical-core fiber data transmission [IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.] Vol.24 P.344 google cross ref
  • 14. Snyder A. W. 1972 Coupled-mode theory for optical fibers [J. Opt. Soc. Am.] Vol.62 P.1267-1277 google cross ref
  • 15. Nakajima K., Sillard P., Richardson D., Li M.-J., Essiambre R.-J., Matsuo S. 2015 Transmission media for an SDM-based optical communication system [IEEE Commun. Mag.] Vol.53 P.44-51 google
  • 16. Jung Y.-M., Alam S.-U., Richardson D. J. 2015 All-fiber spatial mode selective filter for compensating mode dependent loss in MDM transmission systems [Proc. Optical Fiber Communication Conference] P.W2A. 13 google
  • 17. Lee Y. S., Lee C. G., Jung Y., Oh M.-K., Kim S. 2016 Highly birefringent and dispersion compensating photonic crystal fiber based on double line defect core [J. Opt. Soc. Korea] Vol.20 P.567-574 google cross ref
  • 18. 2012 Characteristics of a Cut-Off Shifted, Single-Mode Fibre and Cable, ITU-T Std. G.654 google
  • 19. Brixner B. 1967 Refractive-index interpolation for fused silica [J. Opt. Soc. Am.] Vol.57 P.674-676 google cross ref
  • 20. Oh K., Paek U.-C. 2012 Silica optical fiber technology for devices and components: design, fabrication, and international standards google
  • 21. Park M., Arabi H. E., Lee S., Oh K. 2011 Independent control of birefringence and chromatic dispersion in a photonic crystal fiber using two hollow ring defects [Opt. Commun.] Vol.284 P.4914-4919 google cross ref
  • 22. Corning SMF-28 optical fiber product information google
  • 23. Bands O., Laurent B., Drak G. 2008 From O to L: The future of optical-wavelength bands P.83-85 google
  • 24. Ferreira F., Fonseca D., Silva H. 2013 Design of few-mode fibers with arbitrary and flattened differential mode delay [IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.] Vol.25 P.438-441 google cross ref
  • 25. Kasahara M., Saitoh K., Sakamoto T., Hanzawa N., Matsui T., Tsujikawa K., Yamamoto F. 2014 Design of three-spatial-mode ring-core fiber [J. Lightw. Technol.] Vol.32 P.1337-1343 google cross ref
  • 26. Zhao J., Tang M., Oh K., Feng Z., Zhao C., Liao R., Fu S., Shum P. P., Liu D. 2017 Polarization-maintaining few mode fiber composed of a central circular-hole and an elliptical-ring core [Photon. Res.] Vol.5 P.261-266 google cross ref
  • 27. Bigot-Astruc M., Provost L., Krabshuis G., Dhenry P., Sillard P. 2011 125 μm glass diameter single-mode fiber with Aeff of 155 μm 2 [Proc. Optical Fiber Communication Conference] P.OTuJ2 google
  • 28. Takenaga K., Sasaki Y., Guan N., Matsuo S., Kasahara M., Saitoh K., Koshiba M. 2012 Large effective-area few-mode multicore fiber [IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett.] Vol.24 P.1941-1944 google cross ref
  • 29. 2009 Characteristics of a non-zero dispersion-shifted single-mode optical fibre and cable, ITU-T G.655 google
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ FIG. 1. ]  Schematic cross section (a) and index profile (b) of proposed TMF.
    Schematic cross section (a) and index profile (b) of proposed TMF.
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ FIG. 2. ]  Illustration of normalized mode power overlap of the LP01 and LP11 modes in single core TMF (a) and our designed TMF (b). Inset shows the transverse electrical fields of LP01, and LP11.
    Illustration of normalized mode power overlap of the LP01 and LP11 modes in single core TMF (a) and our designed TMF (b). Inset shows the transverse electrical fields of LP01, and LP11.
  • [ FIG. 3. ]  Variation of the effective index of (a) LP01, and LP11 modes (b) LP21 as a function of b, c, and Δn2 at 1530 nm the shortest wavelength of C-band. Here we set a = 4.1 μm, b = 6 μm, c = 8.2 μm, Δn1 = 0.36%, and Δn2 = 0.31%. Dashed red line indicates the silica cladding index and structural parameters are set for neff of LP21 is located below the dashed line. This means that the LP21 mode is not guided.
    Variation of the effective index of (a) LP01, and LP11 modes (b) LP21 as a function of b, c, and Δn2 at 1530 nm the shortest wavelength of C-band. Here we set a = 4.1 μm, b = 6 μm, c = 8.2 μm, Δn1 = 0.36%, and Δn2 = 0.31%. Dashed red line indicates the silica cladding index and structural parameters are set for neff of LP21 is located below the dashed line. This means that the LP21 mode is not guided.
  • [ FIG. 4. ]  Variation of the effective index of (a) LP01, and LP11 modes (b) LP21 as a function of b, c, and Δn2 at 1625 nm the longest wavelength of L-band. Here we set a = 4.1 μm, b = 6 μm, c = 8.2 μm, Δn1 = 0.36%, and Δn2 = 0.31%. Dashed red line indicates the silica cladding index and it shows that two-mode conditions is satisfied.
    Variation of the effective index of (a) LP01, and LP11 modes (b) LP21 as a function of b, c, and Δn2 at 1625 nm the longest wavelength of L-band. Here we set a = 4.1 μm, b = 6 μm, c = 8.2 μm, Δn1 = 0.36%, and Δn2 = 0.31%. Dashed red line indicates the silica cladding index and it shows that two-mode conditions is satisfied.
  • [ TABLE 1. ]  Optimized parameters of designed TMF
    Optimized parameters of designed TMF
  • [ FIG. 5. ]  Effective indices of (a) the LP01 and the LP11 mode and (b) the LP21 mode in C+L band. The LP21 mode index is lower than cladding index from 5 × 10-6 to 4.5 × 10-5. This indicates that LP21 modes is not a guided mode in designed fiber.
    Effective indices of (a) the LP01 and the LP11 mode and (b) the LP21 mode in C+L band. The LP21 mode index is lower than cladding index from 5 × 10-6 to 4.5 × 10-5. This indicates that LP21 modes is not a guided mode in designed fiber.
  • [ ] 
  • [ FIG. 6. ]  Effective mode area of LP01 and LP11 modes in C+L wavelength range.
    Effective mode area of LP01 and LP11 modes in C+L wavelength range.
  • [ ] 
  • [ FIG. 7. ]  Overlap integral between LP01 and LP11 modes over the C+L band spectral range.
    Overlap integral between LP01 and LP11 modes over the C+L band spectral range.
  • [ ] 
  • [ FIG. 8. ]  (a) Chromatic dispersion of the LP01 and the LP11 modes in C+L band spectral range. (b) Differential group delay between the LP01 and the LP11 modes in C+L band spectral range.
    (a) Chromatic dispersion of the LP01 and the LP11 modes in C+L band spectral range. (b) Differential group delay between the LP01 and the LP11 modes in C+L band spectral range.
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ FIG. 9. ]  Confinement loss of (a) the LP01 and the LP11 modes and (b) the LP21 mode in the C+L band spectral range.
    Confinement loss of (a) the LP01 and the LP11 modes and (b) the LP21 mode in the C+L band spectral range.
  • [ TABLE 2. ]  Modal characteristics at 1550 nm for the designed TMF
    Modal characteristics at 1550 nm for the designed TMF
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.