We classified the streamside plant community by phyto-sociological method and analyzed the relationship between environment factors and vegetation structure by using the classification and ordination method. We found that twenty one plant communities were classified according to dominant species at the natural streamside valley forest with surveying the 65 quadrats (10 m × 10 m). From the survey results, the hardwood plant communities were classified as streamside valley forest and the softwood plant communities as riparian forest according to the degree of flooding. The valley forest had a distribution of 17 plant communities which was 65% (42 quadrats) of 65 quadrats: Maackia amurensis community, Betula davurica community, Quercus variabilis community, Pinus densiflora community, Q. serrata community, Prunus sargentii community, and Meliosma oldhamii community etc. The riparian forest had a distribution of four plant communities which was 35% (23 quadrats) of 65 quadrats: Salix koreensis community, S. rorida community, S. purpurea var. japonica community, and S. glandulosa community, etc. From the two-way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) analysis, we found indicator species Oplismenus undulatifolius and Lindera obtusiloba for the streamside valley forest and Humulus japonicus, Phragmites japonica, and S. koreensis for the riparian forest. From the results of the canonical correspondence analysis (CCA), coordinates, altitude, and stream structure showed low correlation to the distribution of the plant community. Therefore, it seemed that valley forest and riparian forest were distinguished by the stream gradient and waterway width which determined by the stream water level.
Generally, a stream is defined as a water mass that flows with steady waterway which has a gradient regardless of its size (Lee et al. 1996). Streams have continuity (Vannote et al. 1980, Hauer and Lamberti 1996) and they are an important element of landscape responsible for the structural and functional interaction and connection (Lee 2004). Streams have very high biological productivity and species diversity because not only do they connect hyporheic zone and the central area of the water flow but they also connect terrestrial ecosystem which includes surrounding vegetation zone (Odum 1983).
The stream ecosystem has a lot of changes in the species diversity depending on geographical characteristics and environmental variables. The physical property such as water depth and chemical properties such as pH, salinity, and eutrophication are directly related to the change. In addition, it is said that water discharged from the streams also affects species diversity which creates a unique ecosystem (Lee et al. 2003).
The distribution pattern of the plants in the stream ecosystem is determined by the strategy and competition amongst plant species to one another if there are any physical or chemical changes in the soil due to the water flow (Hupp and Osterkamp 1996). The streamside vegetation has plant communities that are affected by regular or permanent flooding in the area close to the water and they are located in the transition zone between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystem. The vegetation of the stream ecosystem performs diverse functions such as sustaining the diversity of plant species, hydrologic control, water purification, streamside protection, and enhancement of scenic quality (Cho et al. 2001).
Furthermore, the streamside vegetation is the primary producer and it is used as an index to measure changes in water quality, stream flow discharge, and environmental factors in the basin (Lee et al. 2005). Recently, riparian vegetation was used in aquatic ecosystem health evaluation: biological quality assessment, spatio-temporal change analysis, and in assessing the effect of environmental disturbances (National Institute of Environmental Research 2014).
The plants form a community when a plant species repeatedly appear in similar site environment and likewise it is the classification of plant community which temporally and spatially determines the boundaries of a plant community (Lee et al. 2000).
The streamside forest is classified into hardwood or softwood forest depending on the level of flooding. The trees that are heavy and hard with less than 30 days of flooding period a year are classified as hardwood forest and trees that are light and soft with flooding period of 30~150 days a year are classified as softwood forest (Bittmann 1965). The hardwood forests develop mainly in the upper stream of the valley and softwood forests develop in the section below the mid-upper stream (Lee 2004).
The research on stream vegetation development was carried out in order to restore streams and flood plains in the first world countries as they recognized the importance of stream vegetation for the maintenance of healthy streams. In Germany, the streams are classified into high mountain and mountain streams, hill and plain streams, and lowland streams according to the stream classification and they suggest potential natural vegetation for the each category (Kim et al. 2008). On the contrary, we don’t have streamside vegetation research results and we really need to know the type and characteristics of stream forests which are used as the basic data for the restoration of streams and flood plains.
The purpose of this research is to classify the plant community of natural streams that are not damaged or have minimal damaged by using the phytosociological classification of Braun-Blanquet and to analyze the correlation between streamside plant community and environmental factors by using classification and ordination methods. Also, we are to provide appropriate plant species for restoring river vegetation structure.
This research was firstly determined by using the aerial photographs and the research site was finalized after visiting the sites in person. Thirteen sites were selected as the research site from eight streams in total which seemed to have had minimal human contact from June to September 2009. Five quadrats were installed at each site and 65 quadrats were researched in total. The detailed information about its naturalness and artificial disturbance intensity on the research site can be referred to Han et al. (2013).
The vegetation research was performed by using phytosociological classification method (Braun-Blanquet 1964) of ZM school. The selection of a community at each research site was done in the areas which are affected or have been affected by water. The presence of influence by the water was confirmed by observing the flooding by the root of the dominant species or by checking the traces of flooding. The size of each quadrat was 10 m × 10 m. The appearing species were listed starting from the upper layer and the coverage of appearing species at each layer was measured and listed for the vegetation structure. The other environmental information of the research site (cardinal direction, stream gradient, longitude and latitude coordinates, altitude above sea level, stream width, waterway width, stream structure, and etc.) was measured using instruments such as GPS (Colorado 300; Garmin, Olathe, Kansas, USA) and inclinometer (DWL-80E; Digi-Pas, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan). The species were identified by using the ‘Coloured Flora of Korea (Lee 2003)’ and species which could not be identified on the field were identified in our laboratory after collecting.
>
Classification and ordination methods
We used the phytosociological classification method by Braun-Blanquet which focused on the composition of plant species and two-way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) which was a quantitative analysis as the most typical methods for classifying the plant communities. These two vegetation classification methods were generally shown similar trends (Kim 1992, Jang et al. 1997), they were very complement each other (Lee et al. 2000), and the TWINSPAN method for the characteristic species analysis could automatically and simultaneously classify the correlation between plant species and stands (Hill 1979, Glavac 1996). We also used canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) as one of multivariate analysis and CCA generally was used to analyze the relationship between the plant community and environmental factors. CCA was the combination of correspondence analysis (CA) and multiple regression analysis which could show the relationship between the plant community and environmental factors well (Ter Braak 1986).
The analysis package PC-ORD 5.0 (MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon USA) program was used for TWINSPAN and CCA. Our vegetation data were converted to median value (5, 87.5; 4, 62.5; 3, 37.5; 2, 15; 1, 2.5; +, 0.99) of dominance scale from dominance class for the statistical analysis and only the species that were shown more than 10% appearance rate were used.
The plant communities in the 65 quadrats were classified into 21 plant communities by using dominant species as the criteria and appearing plant communities were classified into two types (Table 1).
[Table 1.] Name of plant communities and quadrat number in studied sites
Name of plant communities and quadrat number in studied sites
The hardwood forest that develops mainly in the upper stream with flooding period less than 30 days a year was classified as valley forest and softwood forest that develops below mid-upper stream with flooding period of 30-150 days a year was classified as riparian forest (Bittmann 1965, Lee 2004). The valley forest was distributed around the section that has stream width of 10-170 m and waterway width of 8-120 m whereas the riparian forest was distributed around the section that has stream width of 65-230 m, waterway width of 30-150 m.
The valley forest which falls under the classification of hardwood forest occupied 65% (42 quadrats) of 65 quadrats and it included 17 plant communities as follows:
The riparian forest which falls under the classification of softwood forest occupied 35% (23 quadrats) of 65 quadrats and it included 4
The riparian forest can have herbaceous community or woody community form not only in mid·down stream but also on the sand alluvium of the slip off slope in the upper stream (Ahn et al. 2001, Lee et al. 2003, Song 2008). However, in this research, there were no vegetations on the sand alluvium of the research sites due to their poor water-holding capacity. It appears that this is due to short germinability (1 month) of
The features of
The habitat of
>
Community type by classification method
The result of TWINSPAN which was done in five phases using all the layers in order to analyze the community type of 21 plant communities examined from 65 quadrats (Fig. 1). In the first phase, plant communities had the eigenvalue of 0.7050. It was classified into two groups by
There were 18 communities in group I as follows:
There were six communities in group II as follows:
In the second phase, group I with eigenvalue of 0.3511 was classified into valley forest I which had indicator species,
In the third phase, valley forest I with eigenvalue of 0.4133 was classified into
The groups are classified up to five phases but rest of the phases were not interpreted as groups because subdividing the groups even further will lose the purpose and meaning of classification.
>
Correlation between plant communities and environmental factors
The group I (valley forest I, II), such as
The plant communities researched in the streamside was distributed according to nine environmental factors. The upper side of axis 1 seemed to be influenced by coverage of the tree layer, height of the tree layer, stream gradient, stream width, and waterway width but the lower side seemed to be influenced only by number of appearing species. It was found that the right side of the axis 2 was influenced by coverage of the tree layer, gradient, and number of appearing species but left side was influenced by stream width and waterway width (Fig. 2).
It was clear that there is a correlation between environmental factors and distribution of plant communities by looking at the correlation from axis 1 and 2 produced by CCA results and environmental factors. The forests were classified as valley forest and riparian forest depending on the site environment in this research and the environmental factors that influenced the distribution of plant communities were number of appearing species, coverage of the tree layer, height of the tree layer, gradient, stream width, and waterway width. However, coordinates, altitude, and stream structure showed low correlation to the distribution of the plant community (Table 2).
[Table 2.] Correlations for 9 environmental variables
Correlations for 9 environmental variables
Generally, the ordination of stand has tendency of being controlled by the water and topographical factors such as altitude and slope (Eom et al. 2004). An important environmental factor that influenced the distribution of vegetation was topography and altitude above sea level in the research conducted by Song et al. (1992) and Yun and Hong (2000). It seems that reason for this is because the species composition differs in the forest vegetation depending on the altitude but species composition differs according to number of flooding days in the stream vegetation.
Lee and Cho (2000) stated that factors which affect spatial distribution of forest vegetation in the temperate deciduous forest are topographical factors (altitude, gradient), thickness of litter layer, soil moisture and relative luminosity. Lee et al. (2001) stated that environmental factors that affect the distribution of
In conclusion, the features of natural streamside valley forests are high gradient, high coverage of tree layer, high height of tree layer, and high number of appearing species whereas the features of riparian forests are wide stream width and wide waterway width.