A redback system is a binary system composed of a pulsar and a main sequence star. The inverse Compton (IC) scattering between the stellar soft photons and the relativistic pulsar wind will generate orbital-modulating GeV photons. We look for these IC emissions from redback systems. A multi-wavelength observation of an unassociated gamma-ray source, 3FGL J2039.6-5618, by Salvetti et al. (2015) detected an orbital modulation with a period of 0.2 days in both X-ray and optical cases. They suggested 3FGL J2039.6-5618 to be a new redback candidate. We analyzed the gamma-ray emission of 3FGL J2039.6-5618 using the data from the Fermi large area telescope (Fermi-LAT) and obtained the spectrum in different orbital phases. We propose that the spectrum has orbital dependency and estimate the characteristic energy of the IC emission from the stellar-pulsar wind interaction.
The black widow and redback types are both compact pulsar binaries. In the black widow system, the companion star is a white dwarf with a mass of ~0.02-0.05
The
In this study, we used the gamma-ray data obtained from the data
2.1 Orbital-Phase-Dependent Test-Statistics Maps
The gamma-ray intensities of 3FGL J2039.6-5618 in two different orbital phases were analyzed. Test-statistics (TS) was used to quantify the source significance. Owing to the uncertainty in the period, we cannot use data from too long a time span; otherwise, the two orbital phases cannot feasibly be separated from one another. In this case, the events in the Pass 8 source class data between 2014 Feb 16 and 2015 Feb 11 were selected, with a span of 360 days. The corresponding instrumental response function is P8R2_SOURCE_V6. Using the period
A binned likelihood analysis was done using
Fig. 1 shows the resultant TS maps. At full energy and low energy levels, the TS value of 3FGL J2039.6-5618 in Phase 2 is stronger than that in Phase 1. However, at a high energy level, the TS values are similar. Thus, it is concluded that the enhancement in the gamma-ray emission is most obvious at the low energy limit. It was also found that similar enhancements exist in other years when we repeated the analysis using data from years other than 2014-15.
2.2 Orbital-Phase-Dependent Emission Spectra
Next, we computed the spectrum of 3FGL J2039.6-5618 in different orbital phases to study how the enhancement is developed. If we use the same dataset of one year as used in the previous section, although the spectrum can be generated, the uncertainties in the spectral energy distribution (SED) are quite large. Fig. 2 shows the spectrum that is computed from the data of one year. The spectrum indicates that the enhancement that occurs in Phase 2 has energy below GeV level. To confirm this, the uncertainties must be minimized. Thus, we selectively combined the data from seven years of data using the following method.
First, we treated the data from each year separately and located the segments of data that most likely described the emission in the period when the companion star is around the inferior conjunction (INFC). The timing model used is that used in the section on TS maps. Due to the uncertainty in the orbital period, it is natural that this INFC segment occurs at different phase intervals in different years. From the result in Fig. 2, the enhancement related to the orbital motion would carry energy below the GeV level. Therefore, we formulated light curves (flux versus orbital phase) for each year using only the data that are below the GeV level. Fig. 3 shows the resulting light curves for the seven years of data. This figure shows that the flux has some variations throughout an orbital phase. From the light curves, we set the INFC intervals as the time when the enhanced flux is greater than one sigma (the blue dashed line) from the mean flux (the red dashed line). The emissions from the remaining orbital phase intervals are believed to be radiated from the millisecond pulsar itself, and these are magnetospheric. Thus, we termed these intervals ‘magnetospheric’ (MGNT). It is also important that the location of INFC cannot be feasibly identified from the light curves in the fifth and seventh years. Therefore, to avoid ambiguity, the data from these two years were not used in the ensuing spectral analysis. As a result, two datasets were obtained; the ‘combine INFC’ dataset includes the INFC segments from the first to the fourth years and the sixth year, and the ‘combine MGNT’ dataset includes the MGNT segments from the first to the fourth years and the sixth year.
Next, we undertook a spectral analysis of the two datasets. It is expected that the ‘combine MGNT’ dataset would produce a pulsar-like spectrum. Therefore, the spectral form of the power-law-with-exponential-cutoff approach was used in the model to describe 3FGL J2039.6-5618 in this ‘combine MGNT’ dataset. On the other hand, the ‘combine INFC’ should contain the enhancement resulting from IC scattering between the pulsar wind and the stellar soft photon field, as well as the pulsar emission. Therefore, the spectrum is fitted with a power-law-with-exponential-cutoff (the magnetospheric component) approach plus a Gaussian (the IC component). Fig. 4 shows the resultant spectrum in the ‘combine INFC’ (blue) and in the ‘combine MGNT’ (red) datasets. It can be observed that the IC component appears at a low energy level and peaks at around 200 MeV. This component is the crucial difference between the emissions in the two datasets.
We attempt to explain the nature of this extra IC component which appears in the INFC of the orbit. In a redback system, the companion main sequence star orbits around a millisecond pulsar. The pulsar emits pulsar wind which is composed of charged particles. As the pulsar wind propagates, the energy of the electromagnetic wave is converted into the energy of the particles, and the particles are accelerated. This ratio between the magnetic energy density and the particle kinetic energy density defines the magnetization parameter (Kong et al. 2011; Takata et al. 2014), where