검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
Modelling and Simulation Resolution of Ground-Penetrating Radar Antennas
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
Modelling and Simulation Resolution of Ground-Penetrating Radar Antennas
KEYWORD
Antenna , FDTD , GPR , Modelling , Simulation , Resolution
참고문헌
  • 1. Daniels D. J. 2004 Ground Penetrating Radar. google
  • 2. Conyers L. B. 2004 Ground-Penetrating Radar for Archaeology. google
  • 3. Jol H. M. 2009 Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications. google
  • 4. Czaja K. 2012 "Application of electromagnetic field modelling in GPR investigations of an historic tenement," [Geology, Geophysics and Environment] Vol.38 P.395-410 google cross ref
  • 5. Perez-Gracia V., Di Capua D., Gonzalez-Drigo R., Caselles O., Pujades L. G., Salinas V. 2010 "GPR resolution in cultural heritage applications," [in Proceedings of 2010 13th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR)] P.1-5 google
  • 6. Rial F. I., Pereira M., Lorenzo H., Arias P., Novo A. 2009 "Resolution of GPR bowtie antennas: an experimental approach," [Journal of Applied Geophysics] Vol.67 P.367-373 google cross ref
  • 7. Cabrera R. A. 2007 GPR Antenna Resolution. google
  • 8. Perez-Gracia V., Gonzalez-Drigo R., Di Capua D. 2008 "Horizontal resolution in a non-destructive shallow GPR survey: an experimental evaluation," [NDT & E International] Vol.41 P.611-620 google cross ref
  • 9. Perez-Gracia V., Gonzalez-Drigo R., Di Capua D., Pujades L. G. 2007 "Experimental analysis of the resolution in shallow GPR survey," [in Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring, GIS Applications, and Geology VII] google
  • 10. Davis J. L., Annan A. P. 1986 "Machinations: high-resolution sounding using ground-probing radar," [Geoscience Canada] Vol.13 P.205-208 google
  • 11. Millard S. G., Shaari A., Bungey J. H. 2002 "Resolution of GPR bow-tie antennas," [in Ninth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar] google
  • 12. Benedetto A., Pajewski L. 2015 "Civil engineering applications of ground penetrating radar," [in Transactions Civil Environment Engineering] google
  • 13. Perez-Gracia V., Di Capua D., Gonzalez-Drigo R., Pujades L. G. 2009 "GPR resolution in NDT studies of structural elements: experimental methodology and examples," [in Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering (NDTCE’09)] P.1-8 google
  • 14. Alsharahi G., Driouach A., Faize A. 2015 "Simulation of ground penetrating radar imaging under subsurface," [in Proceedings of 2015 27th International Conference on Microelectronics (ICM)] P.130-133 google
  • 15. Alsharahi G., Driouach A., Faize A., Khamlichi A. 2015 "Effect of electrical conductivity and dielectric constant on the performance of ground penetrating radar," [International Journal of Microwave and Optical Technology] Vol.10 P.458-463 google
  • 16. Sandmeier K. J. 2016 REFLEXW: Program for the Processing of Seismic, Acoustic or Electromagnetic Reflection, Sandmeier Geophysical Research google
  • 17. Giannopoulos A. 2005 "Modelling ground penetrating radar by GprMax," [Construction and Building Materials] Vol.19 P.755-762 google cross ref
  • 18. Ishimaru A. 1991 Electromagnetic Wave Propagation, Radiation, and Scattering. google
  • 19. Rejiba F. 2002 "Modelisation de la propagation des ondes electromagnetiques en milieux heterogenes: application au radar sol," google
OAK XML 통계
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Table 1. ]  Physical properties of the materials
    Physical properties of the materials
  • [ Table 2. ]  Geometries and dimensions of 500, 800 and 1,000 MHz GPR antennas
    Geometries and dimensions of 500, 800 and 1,000 MHz GPR antennas
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Vertical and horizontal resolution diagram.
    Vertical and horizontal resolution diagram.
  • [ Table 3. ]  Effective pulse duration and central frequency for the 1,000, 800, and 500 MHz antennas
    Effective pulse duration and central frequency for the 1,000, 800, and 500 MHz antennas
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ ] 
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Relative field and power patterns of a short dipole antenna.
    Relative field and power patterns of a short dipole antenna.
  • [ Fig. 3. ]  Radargram simulation of vertical resolution at a 63-cm depth with a 1,000-MHz antenna. (a) Wooden bars simulation, 15 cm spacing; (b) metal bars simulation, 15 cm spacing; (c) wooden bars experiments, 20 cm spacing [6]; (d) metal bars experiments, 20 cm spacing [6]; (e) wooden bars buried in soil; and (f) metal bars buried in soil.
    Radargram simulation of vertical resolution at a 63-cm depth with a 1,000-MHz antenna. (a) Wooden bars simulation, 15 cm spacing; (b) metal bars simulation, 15 cm spacing; (c) wooden bars experiments, 20 cm spacing [6]; (d) metal bars experiments, 20 cm spacing [6]; (e) wooden bars buried in soil; and (f) metal bars buried in soil.
  • [ Fig. 4. ]  Radargram simulation of vertical resolution at a 74-cm depth and a 800-MHz antenna. (a) Wooden bars simulation, 20 cm spacing; (b) metal bars simulation, 20 cm spacing; (c) wooden bars experiment, 20 cm spacing [6]; (d) metal bars experiment, 20 cm spacing [6]; (e) wooden bars buried in soil; and (f) metal bars buried in soil.
    Radargram simulation of vertical resolution at a 74-cm depth and a 800-MHz antenna. (a) Wooden bars simulation, 20 cm spacing; (b) metal bars simulation, 20 cm spacing; (c) wooden bars experiment, 20 cm spacing [6]; (d) metal bars experiment, 20 cm spacing [6]; (e) wooden bars buried in soil; and (f) metal bars buried in soil.
  • [ Table 4. ]  Results of the vertical resolution (ΔV ) for the 1,000, 500, and 800 MHz antennas
    Results of the vertical resolution (ΔV ) for the 1,000, 500, and 800 MHz antennas
  • [ Fig. 5. ]  Radargrams of the 500 MHz antenna with bars at 85 cm depth. (a) Wooden bars gap at 30 cm; (b) metal bars gap at 33 cm; (c) wooden bars gap at 35 cm. (d) Metal bars gap at 40 cm; (e) wooden bars buried in soil; and (f) metal bars buried in soil.
    Radargrams of the 500 MHz antenna with bars at 85 cm depth. (a) Wooden bars gap at 30 cm; (b) metal bars gap at 33 cm; (c) wooden bars gap at 35 cm. (d) Metal bars gap at 40 cm; (e) wooden bars buried in soil; and (f) metal bars buried in soil.
  • [ Fig. 6. ]  Radargram simulation of detection for iron bar, 0.5 m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
    Radargram simulation of detection for iron bar, 0.5 m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
  • [ Fig. 7. ]  Radargram simulations of vertical resolution, spacing 10 cm and 0.5 m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
    Radargram simulations of vertical resolution, spacing 10 cm and 0.5 m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
  • [ Fig. 8. ]  Radargram simulation of vertical resolution, with a 16-cm spacing and a 0.5-m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
    Radargram simulation of vertical resolution, with a 16-cm spacing and a 0.5-m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
  • [ Fig. 9. ]  Radargram simulation of vertical resolution, spacing 32 cm and 0.5 m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
    Radargram simulation of vertical resolution, spacing 32 cm and 0.5 m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
  • [ Table 5. ]  Results of horizontal resolution (ΔH) for the 1,000, 800, and 500 MHz antennas
    Results of horizontal resolution (ΔH) for the 1,000, 800, and 500 MHz antennas
  • [ Fig. 10. ]  Radargrams simulation of horizontal resolution at a 91 cm depth with a 1,000-MHz antenna. (a) Wooden bars spacing 20 cm; (c) wooden bars spacing 32 cm; (e) wooden bars spacing 52 cm; (g) wooden bars experiments spacing 60 cm [6]; (b) metal bars spacing 20 cm; (d) metal bars spacing 32 cm; (f) metal bars spacing 52 cm; (i) metal bars experiments spacing 60 cm [6]; (m) wooden bars buried in soil; and (n) metal bars buried in soil.
    Radargrams simulation of horizontal resolution at a 91 cm depth with a 1,000-MHz antenna. (a) Wooden bars spacing 20 cm; (c) wooden bars spacing 32 cm; (e) wooden bars spacing 52 cm; (g) wooden bars experiments spacing 60 cm [6]; (b) metal bars spacing 20 cm; (d) metal bars spacing 32 cm; (f) metal bars spacing 52 cm; (i) metal bars experiments spacing 60 cm [6]; (m) wooden bars buried in soil; and (n) metal bars buried in soil.
  • [ Fig. 11. ]  Radargrams simulation of horizontal resolution at a 91 cm depth and with a-800 MHz antenna. (a) Wooden bars spaced at 37.5 cm; (c) wooden bars spaced at 60 cm; (e) wooden bars experiments spaced at 60 cm [6]; (b) metal bars spaced at 37.5 cm; (d) metal bars spaced at 60 cm; (f) metal bars experiments spaced at 60 cm [6].
    Radargrams simulation of horizontal resolution at a 91 cm depth and with a-800 MHz antenna. (a) Wooden bars spaced at 37.5 cm; (c) wooden bars spaced at 60 cm; (e) wooden bars experiments spaced at 60 cm [6]; (b) metal bars spaced at 37.5 cm; (d) metal bars spaced at 60 cm; (f) metal bars experiments spaced at 60 cm [6].
  • [ Fig. 12. ]  Radargrams of the 500 MHz antenna with bars at a depth of 143 cm. (a) Wooden bars with a gap of 98 cm; (b) metal bars with a gap of 97 cm; (c) experiment of wooden bars [6]; (d) experiment of metal bars [6]; (e) wooden bars buried in soil; and (f) metal bars buried in soil.
    Radargrams of the 500 MHz antenna with bars at a depth of 143 cm. (a) Wooden bars with a gap of 98 cm; (b) metal bars with a gap of 97 cm; (c) experiment of wooden bars [6]; (d) experiment of metal bars [6]; (e) wooden bars buried in soil; and (f) metal bars buried in soil.
  • [ Fig. 13. ]  Radargram simulation of horizontal resolution, with a spacing of 10 cm and a 0.5-m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
    Radargram simulation of horizontal resolution, with a spacing of 10 cm and a 0.5-m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
  • [ Fig. 14. ]  Radargram simulations of horizontal resolution, with a spacing of 16 cm and a 0.5-m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) time domain.
    Radargram simulations of horizontal resolution, with a spacing of 16 cm and a 0.5-m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) time domain.
  • [ Fig. 15. ]  Radargrams simulation of horizontal resolution, with a 20-cm spacing and a 0.5-m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
    Radargrams simulation of horizontal resolution, with a 20-cm spacing and a 0.5-m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
  • [ Fig. 16. ]  Radargram simulations of horizontal resolution, with a 48-cm spacing and a 0.5-m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
    Radargram simulations of horizontal resolution, with a 48-cm spacing and a 0.5-m depth at 800 MHz. (a) Schematic drawing of the targets buried; (b) radargram by GprMax2D; and (c) scattered electric fields from two targets in mode B-scan.
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.