Fumaric acid is a structurally simple metabolic intermediate of all living cells now well recognized as a functionally important fixed carbon source of many terrestrial plants (Araújo et al., 2011; Chia et al., 2000). It was first isolated from a fumitory plant (Fumaria officinalis) during late 19^th century and the very first report of medicinal uses of its esters as anti-psoriatic agent appeared during late 1950s (Schweckendiek, 1959). Since then several clinical and numerous preclinical trials have consistently demonstrated therapeutic efficacies of fumaric acid esters against psoriasis and multiple sclerosis (Gkalpakiotis et al., 2014; Linker et al., 2011; Strassburger-Krogias et al., 2014). A comprehensive review on diverse therapeutic potentials of dimethyl fumarate (Meissner et al., 2012) and also a patent claiming potential medicinal uses of di-alkyl fumarates in therapy of autoimmune diseases and transplantation medicine have appeared during more recent years (U.S. Patent No. 20,130,004,526). Although fumaric acid and its esters have often been identified as therapeutically interesting bioactive constituents of numerous traditionally known medicinal plant extracts (Chatterjee et al., 2010; Jaberian et al., 2013), including those of Gongronema latifolium (Adeleye et al., 2011), Aloe vera (He et al., 2011), Tagetes minuta (Ickes et al., 1973), Sida cordifolia (Jain et al., 2011), Fumaria parviflora (Khalighi et al., 2005), Fumaria indica (Shakya et al., 2014) and Sarcandra glabra (Zheng et al., 2003), as yet little concentrated efforts have been made to define their roles in the diverse spectrums of their broad spectrums of therapeutically interesting pharmacological activity profiles.

Such is also the case for the Ayurvedic medicinal plant Fumaria indica Linn. (Syn: Fumaria parviflora, Fumariaceae) also known as ‘Pitpapara/ Parpata’, which is one of the more commonly used herb in the modern Indian system of medicine for treatments of blood ailments, and disorders of skin, digestive tract, and central nervous system (Gupta et al., 2012; Shakya et al., 2012; Srivastava and Choudhary, 2014). Although most reports on diverse therapeutically interesting bioactivities of the plant have concentrated mainly on its alkaloid contents (Rajopadhye and Upadhye, 2011; Rathi et al., 2008; Vrba et al., 2011), one of them has suggested that monomethyl fumarate is a hepatoprotective component of the plant (Rao and Mishra, 1998). Several observations made during our more holistic pharmacological studies with an ethanolic extract of Fumaria indica consistently suggested that fumaric acid and its conjugates could as well be its quantitatively major bioactive constituents involved in its broad spectrum of therapeutically interesting pharmacological activity profiles, which includes its central nervous system depressant (Singh and Kumar, 2010), anti-stress and adaptogenic (Singh et al., 2012a), anti-aggressive (Singh et al., 2012b), anti-anxiety and immune-modulatory (Singh et al., 2013a), anti-amnestic (Singh et al., 2013b), and analgesic and anti-inflammatory (Shakya et al., 2014) activities. Quantitative analysis of fumaric acid and its conjugates in the tested extract revealed though, that its free fumaric acid content was only 0.45%, and that of its total contents of hydrolysable fumaric acid conjugates were also only 0.35%. These observations, taken together with the fact the blood levels of fumaric acid do not significantly alter after oral intake of even fairly high doses of its hydrolysable esters, indicated that the primary pharmacological sites of actions involved in observed high efficacy of Fumaria indica extracts in their broad spectrums of brain function modulating and other bioactivities in animal models after its daily oral doses lies within the gastrointestinal tracts only (Shakya et al., 2014).

However, the question whether fumaric acid or its hydrolysable conjugates are the major bioactive constituents of medicinally used Fumaria indica extracts still remained open, or at best could be speculatively answered only. This is not only because such extracts contain numerous other bioactive phytochemicals which can modulate the efficacies of fumarates, but also due to differences between the bioavailability and bioaccessibility of fumaric acid and its hydrolysable conjugates. It has been reported, indeed that oral bioavailability of fumaric acid and its esters (i.e. easily hydrolysable conjugates of the acid) are not identical, and that blood levels of fumaric acid do not alter much even after fairly high oral doses of its mono- or di-alkyl esters (Dibbert et al., 2013; Rostami-Yazdi et al., 2010). Therefore, it was of interest to experimentally verify whether both fumaric acid and its hydrolysable conjugates are involved in the observed pharmacological activity profiles of Fumaria indica extracts, or not. For such purposes, dose response studies comparing the efficacies of fumaric acid, its easily hydrolysable mono- and di-methyl esters and of Fumaria indica extracts in rodent behavioural and other models are now being conducted in our laboratories. Results of some of the very first experiments conducted during such efforts are summarized and discussed in this communication. The experimental models and designs, and the doses and treatment regimens of the test agents used in these experiments were based on our earlier observations revealing that hydro alcoholic extracts of Fumaria indica possess anxiolytic like activities in rodent behavioural models, and indicating that central dopaminergic mechanisms are involved in their modes of actions (Singh et al., 2013a).

The standardized 50% methanolic extract of Fumaria indica (MFI) was generously supplied as well as analytically characterized by the Indian Herbs Research and Supply Co. Ltd. Saharanpur, India. Analytically estimated content of free fumaric acid in this extract was 0.59% (w/w) and that of conjugates of the acid was 0.48% (w/w). For such estimates, a well standardised quantitative high performance thin layer chromatographic (QHPTLC) technique was used. Hereupon the difference between the fumaric acid contents of the hydrolysed extract and that of the native extract was used for quantification of fumaric acid conjugates in the tested extract.

Fumaric acid (FA), mono-methyl fumarate (MMF) and di-methyl fumarate (DMF) were procured from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. All other chemicals and reagents used were obtained from local commercial sources and were of best commercial quality available in India.

Adult Charles Foster albino rats (150 ± 10 g) and Wistar mice (20 ± 5 g), of either sex, were housed in groups of six in polypropylene cages at an ambient temperature of 25℃ ± 1℃ and 45-55% relative humidity, with a 12 : 12 h light/dark cycle. Unless stated otherwise, the animals were always provided with commercial food pellets and water ad libitum. Behavioural experiments were conducted between 09.00 and 14.00 h, and the animals were acclimatized to laboratory conditions for at least one week before using them for the experiments. Principles of laboratory animal care (NIH publication 85 – 23, revised in 1985) guidelines were followed. Prior approval (Dean/11-12/CAEC/324 dated 30.11.2011) from the Central Animal Ethical Committee of Banaras Hindu University was obtained.

All test substances were suspended in 0.3% w/v carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC) for oral administrations. Application volumes in all cases were 10 ml/kg, and the control animals were always treated accordingly with 10 ml/kg of 0.3% w/v CMC. The very first daily doses of test agents, or of the vehicle, were administered one hour before the start of other experimental procedures, and the same experimental procedures were repeated after once daily oral treatments for five and ten consecutive days. The daily oral doses of FA, MMF, and DMF used in all tests were 2, 6, 18, and 54 mg/kg, whereas that of MFI were 60, 120, 240 and 480 mg/kg/day. For different tests, different groups of naive animals were used.

Transient hyperthermia is a global response to a stressful condition. Stress-induced hyperthermia test is often used as a model for quantifying anxiety state of rodents (Groenink et al., 2009). In this study, foot shock treatment was used as paradigm of stress, which causes transient as well as long term increases in core body temperature via involvement of hypothalamic process (Moreno, 2010). In this test, mice were placed in a black box (24 × 29 × 40 cm) with a grid floor for 1 min. Foot shock stress was delivered by electric shock through the grid floor (2 mA, 50 H of 2 ms duration), and five consecutive foot shocks of 2 mA at 10 s intervals were delivered after their 10 s stay in the cage. At the end of one minute stay of the animals in such cages, they were manually placed back in their home cages. Stress induced hyperthermia (∆T) in mice was quantified by subtracting their rectal temperatures measured just before subjecting them to footshock stress (BT), from their rectal temperatures measured 10 min after the footshock stress (FT) by using calibrated rectal thermometer (Van der Heyden et al., 1997; Vinkers et al., 2008; Zethof et al., 1994).

Apomorphine is a potent and specific agonist of dopaminergic receptor, and causes stereotype hyperactivity. Stereotyped cage-climbing behaviour induced by apomorphine was quantified according to the procedure reported by Protais et al. (1976) with some modifications (Davis et al., 1986). Apomorphine (0.50 mg/kg, dissolved in 0.1% sodium meta-bisulphite solution, s.c.) was administered after 60 min of test agents treatment, and immediately after this challenge a rat was individually put into a cylindrical cage of 20 cm in diameter and 40 cm high. The walls of the cages were made of vertical metal bars (2 mm in diameter) fixed 1 cm apart with a smooth upper metal ring. After a 5-min-period of exploratory behaviour, two consecutive observations were performed on each animal by a blind observer at 10 and 20 min after apomorphine injection and these two scores were averaged. Behaviours of the animals were scored as follows: 0 = behaviour indistinguishable from that of normal (vehicle alone) rats, 1 = increased locomotor activity, pacing, tail stiffening, some sniffing, 2 = addition of occasional intermittent clinging to the sides of the cage with forepaws, 3 = addition of intermittent clinging with hind paws as well as forepaws, 4 = intense, virtually uninterrupted clinging to the sides or top of the cage with all paws (Baldessarini et al., 1977).

The EPM model is the most commonly used rodent behavioural model for anxiety. Anxiety reduction in the plus-maze is indicated by an increase in time spent and number of entries in open arms and decrease in time spent and number of entries in enclosed arms. The method of Pellow and File (1986) was followed. The maze used in this study had two opposite arms, 50x10 cm, crossed with two enclosed arms of the same dimension but having 40 cm high walls. The arms were connected with a central square, 10x10 cm, giving the apparatus a shape of a plus sign. The maze was kept in a dimly lit room and elevated 50 cm above the floor. Naive rats were placed individually in the centre of the maze, facing an enclosed arm. Thereafter, number of entries and time spent on the open and enclosed arms was recorded during the next 5 min. An arm entry was defined when all four paws of the rat were in the arm. A neutral ‘blind’ observer made observations (Kumar et al., 2000).

Mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) were calculated for the observed values in each experimental group. Statistical analysis was performed by two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post tests, unless stated otherwise. GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA) was used for statistical analysis and calculating ED₅₀ values.

Mean rectal temperatures of different groups recorded immediately before foot shock exposures (BT) and after that (FT) recorded on days 1, 5 and 10 of the test are summarised in Table 1 and Fig. 1. It is apparent from these values that on the first day of the test no statistically significant effects of treatments on BT with any of the test doses of FA, MMF, DMF or MFI on basal core temperature were observed. Such were not the cases on the 5^th and 10^th days of the test. It was also interesting to note that BTs of the vehicle treated control group on these two days were somewhat higher than that recorded for the group on the first test day, whereas those of all test agents treated groups remained almost constant. These observations reveal that even the lowest tested doses (2 mg/kg/day) of FA, MMF, DMF, or of 60 mg/kg/day MMF completely suppress the long term elevations of basal rectal temperatures of mice subjected to one or two sessions of foot shock stress of 1 min duration on the first and fifth days of the experiments.

[Table 1.] Effects of single, five and ten daily oral doses of fumaric acid (FA), monomethyl fumarate (MMF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and methanolic Fumaria indica extract (MFI) on basal rectal temperatures (BT) and on rectal temperatures recorded 10 minutes after stress exposures (FT) in mice foot shock stress induced hyperthermia test.

Effects of single, five and ten daily oral doses of fumaric acid (FA), monomethyl fumarate (MMF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and methanolic Fumaria indica extract (MFI) on basal rectal temperatures (BT) and on rectal temperatures recorded 10 minutes after stress exposures (FT) in mice foot shock stress induced hyperthermia test.

[Fig. 1] Effects of fumaric acid (FA), monomethyl fumarate (MMF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and methanolic extract of Fumaria indica (MFI) on rectal temperature (℃) of mice in stress induced hyperthermia test recorded before (BT) and 10 minutes after (FT) stress exposure. Values are mean ± SEM, n = 6 animals in each group.

Despite higher BT values of the vehicle treated group on days 5 and 10 of the test, the magnitude of foot shock stress induced transient hyperthermia observed in this group remained almost constant on all the three test days. From the dose response curves shown in Fig. 2 it is apparent that all the four tested agents dose dependently inhibited the transient hyperthermic responses triggered by one minute duration of foot shocks on all the three observational days, Hereupon the efficacies of FA, MMF, and DMF on all the three observational days were almost identical, and their dose dependent efficacies increased somewhat with increasing numbers to treatment days. Statistically significant minimal effective doses of FA, MMF and DMF after their 10 daily oral doses were lower than 2 mg/kg/day, whereas that after their single oral doses on day 1 was about 4 mg/kg. Analogous were the observed effects of MFI. On day 1, statistically significant minimal effective dose of MFI was 120 mg/kg, whereas on days 5 and 10 this was 60 mg/kg. It is apparent from the Fig. 2a-c that dose dependent efficacies of all test agents in suppressing stress triggered transient hyperthermia on the first day of the experiments were always lower than those observed on the 5^th and 10^th days. ED₅₀ (effective dose which gives 50% effect to corresponding maximum response) values of single, 5 and 10 daily oral dose of FA, MM, DMF and MFI calculated by nonlinear regression using log dose vs. normalized response-variable slop Fig. 2 d-f by GraphPad Prism 5, are given in Table 2.

[Fig. 2] Dose dependant inhibitory effects of fumaric acid (FA), monomethyl fumarate (MMF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and methanolic extract of Fumaria indica (MFI) after their single (a), five (b), and ten (c) daily oral doses against foot shock stress triggered hyperthermic response in mice. Their dose response curves in the test on the 1st, 5th, and 10th experimental days are shown in (d), (e) and (f) respectively.

[Table 2.] Calculated ED50 values of pure fumaric acid (FA), monomethyl fumarate (MMF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and methanolic extract of Fumaria indica (MFI) for inhibiting foot shock stress triggered transient hyperthermia in mice. These values were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis using experimental data summarised in Table 1.

Calculated ED50 values of pure fumaric acid (FA), monomethyl fumarate (MMF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and methanolic extract of Fumaria indica (MFI) for inhibiting foot shock stress triggered transient hyperthermia in mice. These values were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis using experimental data summarised in Table 1.

Outcome of cage-climbing behaviour summarized in Table 3 reveal that apomorphine treated control animals had significantly higher scores than CMC treated control ones, and that no significant effects of the test agents were observed after their single oral doses. After 5 daily oral treatments significant inhibitory effects only of the highest dose of DMF (54 mg/kg/day, and of the two highest ones of the MFI (240 and 480 mg/kg/day) were observed. However, after 10 daily treatments, clear dose dependant inhibitory effects of all test agents were observed. Their dose response curves derived from the data summarized in Table 3 are shown in Fig. 3. It is apparent from these curves that the effects of FA, MMF and DMF treatments are almost identical on each of the three observational days, and that their statistically significant and dose dependant effects were detectable after their repeated daily doses only. Hereupon their efficacies on observed on the 10^th observational day were much higher than those recorded on the 5^th one. Quite analogous were also the observed effects of MFI in its tested dose range.

[Table 3.] Effects of single, five and ten daily oral doses of fumaric acid (FA), monomethyl fumarate (MMF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and methanolic extract of Fumaria indica (MFI) on apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg) induced climbing behaviour of rats in cage climbing test.

Effects of single, five and ten daily oral doses of fumaric acid (FA), monomethyl fumarate (MMF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and methanolic extract of Fumaria indica (MFI) on apomorphine (0.5 mg/kg) induced climbing behaviour of rats in cage climbing test.

[Fig. 3] Dose response curves of fumaric acid (FA), monomethyl fumarate (MMF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and methanolic extract of Fumaria indica (MFI) in apomorphine induced cage climbing test after a single (a), five (b) and ten (c) daily oral treatments.

Results of the experiments comparing the effects of FA, MMF, DMF and MFI in this test are summarised in Table 4, and for clarity sake dose response curves of their observed effects on the four parameters quantified are shown in Fig. 4-5. Dose and duration of treatment dependant anxiolytic efficacy of all the four test agents were observed. No statistically significant effects of FA on any of the quantified parameters were observed after its single oral doses, whereas single highest doses of MMF (54 mg/kg), DMF (54 mg/kg) and MFI (480 mg/kg) tested significantly increased the number of entries in the open arm of the maze. However, after their 5 and 10 daily oral doses statistically significant and dose dependant anxiolytics like efficacies of all the four test agents were observed. Like in other two other behavioural tests used in this pilot study, their efficacies in this test observed on the 5^th treatment days were also always lower than those observed after their 10 daily doses. Similarly, like in other two tests used, the dose response curves of FA, MMF, and DMF on all the three observational days were almost identical; they seem to be equi-effective brain function modulating agents. On all the three test days, the anxiolytic like efficacy of MFI observed after its tested dose range was always higher than those observed of the tested dose ranges of pure FA, MMF, and DMF.

[Table 4.] Effect of single, five and ten daily oral doses of fumaric acid (FA), monomethyl fumarate (MMF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and methanolic extract of Fumaria indica (MFI) on number of entries and time spent in open and enclosed arms in rat elevated plus maze test.

Effect of single, five and ten daily oral doses of fumaric acid (FA), monomethyl fumarate (MMF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and methanolic extract of Fumaria indica (MFI) on number of entries and time spent in open and enclosed arms in rat elevated plus maze test.

[Fig. 4] Dose response curve of fumaric acid (FA), monomethyl fumarate (MMF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and methanolic Fumaria indica extract (MFI) after a single (a), five (b) and ten (c) daily oral doses in EPM test for numbers of entries in enclosed arms, and those in open arms on the first (d), fifth (e), and tenth (f) observational days.

[Fig. 5] Dose response curve of fumaric acid (FA), monomethyl fumarate (MMF), dimethyl fumarate (DMF) and methanolic Fumaria indica extract (MFI) after a single (a), five (b) and ten daily oral doses in EPM test for time spent in enclosed arms, and those in open arms on the first (d), fifth (e), and tenth (f) observational days.

Observations reported in this communication not only add further experimental evidences in favour of the conviction that fumaric acid and its hydrolysable conjugates are the quantitatively the major adaptogenic constituents of hydro alcoholic Fumaria indica extracts. Moreover, they also suggest that regular consumption of even fairly low oral doses of fumaric acid could as well be an effective, save, and more affordable means for prevention of enviorenmental stress associated exaggerated anxiety and other mental health problems. According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR), anxiety is characterized by a feeling of persistent worry that hinders an individual’s ability to relax (Iverach et al., 2014). This can range from the transient anxiety of a person before surgery or a menstrual cycle to the pervasive feeling of nervousness that eventually leads to anxiety disorders (e.g. generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder and social phobia etc.). Comorbid anxiety has been also linked to a range of medical conditions such as illness severity, suicide attempts, lower quality of life, and physical ill-health (Stratford et al., 2015). Results of the pilot dose finding experiments with fumaric acid and its esters in SIH test in mice and EPM test in rats reported in this connection, suggest that they are primarily stress response modulating agents with anxiolytics like bioactivities and that in this respect they are almost equi-effective. Since in the same dose-ranges all of them dose-dependently antagonized apomorphine responses also, it seems reasonable to assume that their anti-stress efficacies are mainly due to their antagonistic actions against the functions of central dopaminergic neurons.

Although analogous activity profiles of MFI was observed in all the three tests, its daily oral dose dependant efficacy in the EPM test for anxiolytics cannot be explained by its analytically estimated contents of fumaric acid and its conjugates. The calculated daily oral doses of total fumarates (i.e. sum of the contents of free acid and its acid hydrolysable conjugates) administered with daily 60, 120, 240, and 480 mg/kg doses of the extract were 0.64, 1.28, 2.57, and 5.14 mg/kg respectively. Although dose dependant effects of all the three fumarates tested were observed, their efficacies observed in the test after their highest doses tested (54 mg/kg/day) were quantitatively almost equal to those observed after the lowest MFI doses (60 mg/kg/day), which delivered only 0.64 mg/kg daily doses of total fumarates. Since such differences were not observed in the apomorphine test, it could seems reasonable to assume that anti-dopaminergic and anxiolytic effects of the test agents are two independent effects and that MFI must have some other bioactive constituents with anxiolytic as well as anti-dopaminergic activities. However, further efforts will be necessary for more definitive inferences from the observation made during this pilot study.

Dysfunctions of central dopaminergic neurotransmission together with those of diverse others neurotransmitter systems are hall marks of diverse spectrums of mental health problems commonly associated with lifestyle and environmental stress triggered pathologies (Alghasham and Rasheed, 2014; Christmas et al., 2008; Furmark, 2009; Nikolaus et al., 2010). Since currently known psychoactive and other drugs have adverse effects and do not often meet the therapeutic demands of mentally ill patients, efforts are now being made in many laboratories to identify novel therapeutic leads from psychoactive and other plants. Although number of reports suggesting anxiolytic potentials of numerous plants have consistently increased during more recent years, as yet little concentrated efforts have been made to obtain analytically as well pharmacologically well standardised extracts necessary for further developments according to current concepts of evidence based medicine (Gelfuso et al., 2014; Lakhan and Vieira, 2010; Sharma et al., 2012). Prior knowledge of the bioactive constituents of plants, and their pharmacologically relevant

dose ranges and treatment regimen is an essential prerequisite for such ventures. Taken together with our earlier observations (Singh et al., 2012a, 2012b, 2013a), the ones reported in this communication reveal only that total contents of fumaric acid and its hydrolysable conjugates are bioactive secondary metabolite of the plant, and strongly suggest that brain function modulating effects of MMF and DMF are most probably due to their rapid hydrolysis (inside the gastrointestinal tract or elsewhere) to fumaric acid. These later mentioned inference, and a recent report revealing that DMF has protective effects against central dopaminergic toxicity (Jing et al., 2015), strongly suggest that some of the clinically observed beneficial effects of the di-ester in patients suffering from psoriasis or multiple sclerosis, could as well be due to its central dopaminergic effects, and that fumaric acid itself could be a better tolerated therapeutic option for health problems caused by central dopaminergic abnormalities.

Although several more recent reports continue to point out diverse therapeutic potentials of fumarates (Ellrichmann et al., 2011; Ermis et al., 2013; Gkalpakiotis et al., 2014; Seidel and Roth, 2013; Šilhavý et al., 2014; Strassburger-Krogias et al., 2014), most of them deal only with DMF, and as yet no reports on therapeutic potentials of repeated low oral doses of fumarates have appeared. Our observations revealing that even 2 mg/kg daily oral doses of fumaric acid and its esters afford protection again against transient as well as long term effects of stress triggered central thermoregulatory and dopaminergic processes, strongly suggest that low dose fumarates could be a therapeutic or preventive alternative against central sensitivity syndromes commonly associated with almost all chronic inflammatory disorders. They not only add further experimental evidences in support of our earlier analogous speculative suggestions (Shakya et al., 2014), and suggest that modulation of the functions of the gut-brain-functions involved in central regulation of central dopaminergic functions and stress responses.

Fumaria indica and numerous other plants of the Fumariaceae (fumitory) family are not only rich natural sources of fumaric acid, but also of numerous centrally acting protopine alkaloids with bactericidal, antiviral, antifungal, and diverse other medicinally interesting bioactivities (Shakya et al., 2012). During more recent years protopine like activities of numerous plants have been reported, and it has also been reported that protopine could be a structurally novel potential therapeutic lead for treatments of depression (Xu et al., 2006).Therefore, it could as well be that the higher anxiolytic like efficacy of MFI observed in this study is due to the presence of protopine or some other functionally analogous secondary metabolites of Fumaria indica. Efforts to clarify this possibility will not only be useful for better understanding of Ayurvedic pharmacology of the plant, but also for more rational uses of other traditionally known medicinal plants known to accumulate fumarates and protopine alkaloids.

In conclusion, the results of the presented pilot experiments reveal that fumaric acid as well its hydrolysable esters are stress response modulating agents and suggest that their daily intake could as well be useful for prevention of mental health problems accompanying almost all chronic diseases and illnesses. They also reconfirm that bioactive constituents other than fumarates are also involved in anxiolytic like efficacy of the tested Fumaria indica extract.