OA 학술지
In vitro antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of stem extract of Euphorbia trigona Miller
  • cc icon
  • cc icon

Antioxidative and free radical scavenging properties of different stem extracts of Euphorbia trigona were evaluated and correlated with its total phenolic content. Aqueous, acetone and methanolic extracts of shade dried stem were obtained and were concentrated in vacuo. The antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of stem extracts was determined by 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging assay, reducing power assay, deoxyribose degradation assay and Fe2+chelating assay. Total phenolic contents (TPC) were evaluated using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. The results confirmed that the plant is a rich source of polyphenolic compounds which are invariably higher compared to other herbs. All extracts showed TPC in the range of 146.6 – 168.6 mg/g gallic acid equivalents at 300 μg/ml of extract. Among the three extracts ME showed highest scavenging activity as evidenced by maximum scavenging of DPPH (83.2%), OHㆍ radicals (94.81%), Fe2+chelating activity (88.59%) and a high reducing power 0.623 at 300 μg/ml. Our results demonstrate that Euphorbia trigona, an unexplored xerophytic plant could be potential source of natural antioxidants and phytotherapeutic agents. The plant possess invariably high amount of polyphenolic compounds with a broad spectrum of antioxidant properties and could be further used for food, feed and pharmaceutical applications.

Xerophytic plant , phenolic compounds , antioxidants , Fe2+ chelation , reactive oxygen species

    The growing demand for herbal remedial products has led researchers to exploit hitherto lesser known plant species as a source of several active compounds with special therapeutic properties. These include polyphenols, flavonoids, tannis, resins, alkaloids and saponins with curative effect (Salar and Seasotiya, 2011). Globally, 80% of the population relies upon drugs originated from plant world (World Health Organization, 2008). Use of herbal drugs is an important component of the traditional system of Indian medicine. Ethnobotanical surveys reveal that xerophytic plants possess an array of active compounds which can be exploited for a wide range of health benefits (Khare, 2007).

    Owing to the intense demand of natural antioxidants to replace synthetic antioxidants in foods, a considerable interest have generated in the scientific community dedicated to research in the area of free radicals and antioxidants (Salar et al., 2011, 2012). Free radicals are molecules or molecular fragments containing one or more unpaired electrons in atomic or molecular orbitals (Halliwell and Gutteridge, 1999). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as well as reactive nitrogen species (RNS) are produced during normal cellular metabolism in living organisms. Overproduction of these reactive species cause potential biological damage termed as oxidative stress and nitrosative stress, respectively (Ridnour et al., 2005; Salar et al., 2013).

    The excess ROS/RNS can damage cellular lipids, proteins or DNA inhibiting their normal function (Valko et al., 2006). Because of this, oxidative stress has been implicated in a number of human diseases including cancer, malaria, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and many other ailments related to ageing (Honda et al., 2004). Living beings have developed a series of defense mechanisms against the deleterious effects of free radicals including (i) preventive mechanism, (ii) repair mechanism, (iii) physiological defenses, and (iv) antioxidant defenses. Antioxidant defenses include enzymatic (superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, catalase) and non-enzymatic antioxidants. The later are represented by ascorbic acid (Vit. C), - tocopherol (Vit E), glutathione (GSH), carotenoids, flavonoids etc. (Valko et al., 2007) which are present in plenty in the plant world.

    Euphorbia trigona Miller (Euphorbiaceae) commonly known as African Milk Tree, cathedral cactus, Abyssinian euphorbia and chaparall is a perennial xerophytic plant that originally comes from Central Africa and chiefly occurs in subtropical and warm temperate regions. The genus Euphorbia comprises about 1600 species, some of the species are even known to contain irritants and tumor-promoting constituents (Hecker, 1977). Three ingenol esters (17-O-Acetyl-3-O-[(Z)-2-methyl-2-butenoyl]-20-deoxy-17-hydroxy-ingenol;20-O-Acetyl-3-O-[(Z)-2-methyl-2-butenoyl]ingenol;5,17,20-O-Triacetyl-3-O-[(Z)-2-methyl-2-butenoyl]-17-hydroxyingenol) as piscicidal constituents and an ingol ester have been isolated from E. trigona (Tada and Seki, 1989). However, there is an increasing interest in antioxidants e.g. polyphelols, in medicinal plants, which might help to prevent oxidative damage (Ozsoy et al., 2008).

    Hence the aim of this study was to carry out the antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of sequential extracts of succulent stem of E. trigona employing various assays and to determine its total phenolic content.


      >  Plant material and extraction

    The stem of E. trigona was collected from local areas of Sirsa, Haryana, India. It was washed thoroughly with tap water and then with distilled water to removes any debris or dust particles and allowed to dry in shade. The dried plant material was ground into fine powder using pulverizer and stored in airtight containers for further use.

    Ten grams of dried powder was suspended in 100 ml of respective solvent (water [AqE], acetone [AE] and methanol [ME]) and kept on a rotary shaker for 24 h. The extract was filtered through eight layers of muslin cloth and centrifuged at 5000 g for 15 min. Supernatants were collected and the extracts were concentrated to make the final volume one-fourth of the original volume using rotary vacuum evaporator under reduced pressure at 40℃.

      >  Chemicals

    Folin-ciocalteu reagent and organic solvents used for extraction were of analytical grade and purchased from Fischer Scientific. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2-thibarbituric acid (2-TBA), deoxyribose, ferrozine, potassium ferricyanide, ferric chloride, EDTA, hydrogen peroxide, L-ascorbic acid, sodium hydroxide, trichloroacetic acid, sodium carbonate, phoaphate buffer, butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), ferrous chloride and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) were from Hi-media Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai.

      >  Total phenolic content (TPC) determination

    Total phenolic contents (TPC) of the extracts were determined using Folin-Ciocalteu (FC) reagent following Yu et al. (2002) with slight modifications. Briefly, 100 μl of extracts were mixed with 0.5 ml of FC reagent in a 10 ml volumetric flask. Then 1.5 ml aqueous solution (20%, w/v) of sodium carbonate anhydrous was added, vertexed and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. The flask was filled with distilled water to volume. The absorbance was read at 765 nm, subtracting the value of a control solution consisting of distilled water instead of extracts. The amount of TPC was calculated as gallic acid equivalents (GAE) from the standard calibration curve of gallic acid and expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents per gram of sample.

      >  DPPH scavenging assay

    The extracts were measured for hydrogen donating or radical scavenging ability using the stable DPPH radical according to the modified method of Yen and Chen (1995). The reaction mixture was prepared containing 300 μl of extract of varying concentration (50 - 300 μl/ml) and 2 ml of 100 μM DPPH (4 mg DPPH in 100 ml methanol). The absorbance of mixture was measured at 517 nm against the blank (containing solvent instead of extract) in a spectrophotometer after 10 min of incubation at room temperature. L-ascorbic acid was used as control. The percent DPPH inhibition was calculated by the equation:

    % inhibition= A0 - A1 / A0 × 100

    Where A0 was the absorbance of control and A1 was the absorbance of reaction mixture.

      >  Deoxyribose degradation assay (site specific)

    The site-specific deoxyribose assay was performed following Arouma et al. (1987) and Halliwell et al. (1987) with certain modifications. Briefly, the extracts (from 1 - 100 μg/ml) were mixed with a Haber-Weiss reaction buffer [10mM FeCl3, 1mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 10 mM H2O2, 10 mM deoxyribose, and 1mM L-ascorbic acid] and the final volume of all mixtures was made to 1.0 ml. The mixture was then incubated at 37℃ for 1h and heated at 80℃ for 30 min. with 1 ml of 2-TBA (0.5% 2-TBA in 0.025 M NaOH, 0.02% BHA) and 1ml of 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) in water bath for 45 min. After cooling, absorbance of the mixture was measured at 532 nm in a spectrophotometer. The percentage inhibition was calculated employing the formula as given for DPPH scavenging assay and was correlated with total phenolic content.

      >  Reducing power

    Reducing power of the extracts was determined following the method of Oyaizu (1986). Briefly, to varying concentrations of extract (1 ml) were added 2.5 ml phosphate buffer (0.2M, pH 6.6) and 2.5 ml potassium ferricyanide (1%). The reaction mixture was incubated at 50℃ for 20 min. Aliquots (2.5 ml) of trichloroacetic acid (10%) were added to the mixture and centrifuged at 9500 rpm for 10 min. The upper layer of solution (2.5 ml) was recovered and mixed with distilled water (2.5 ml) and 2.5 ml FeCl3 (0.1%) and the absorbance was recorded at 700 nm in a spectrophotometer. Increased absorbance of the reaction mixture indicated increasing reducing power of the extracts.

      >  Chelating effects on ferrous ions

    The chelating effect on ferrous ions was determined according to the method of Dinis et al. (1994). The extracts (0.25 ml) were mixed with 1.75 ml of methanol and 0.25 ml of 250 mM FeCl2. This was followed by the addition of 0.25 ml of 2 mM ferrozine, which was left to react at room temperature for 10 min. before determining the absorbance of the mixture at 562 nm. The chelating effect (%) was calculated from the formula as given for DPPH scavenging assay.

      >  Statistical analysis

    The mean values and the standard deviations were calculated from the data obtained from three independent experiments. Statistical differences at p < 0.05 were considered to be significant coefficient of determination (R2) to determine the relationship between two variables and were calculated using Microcal Origin 5.0 and Microsoft Excel. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s test was used to determine the significant difference (p < 0.05) between the means.


      >  Total Polyphenolic Content

    Phenolic compounds are aromatic secondary metabolites that have been extensively investigated in medicinal plants, fruits and vegetables (Djeridane et al., 2006). Phenolics are associated with colour, sensory qualities, nutritional and antioxidant properties (Robbins, 2003). The total phenolic contents of different extracts of E. trigona stem were evaluated using Folin-Ciocalteu method (Table 1). From the investigation, it was observed that TPC of various extract varied from 26.3 to 168.6 mg GAE/g of extracts. Methanolic extracts yielded highest amount of TPC followed by acetone and water extracts that may be responsible for imitation of high antioxidant activity.

      >  DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity

    DPPH is a stable free radical and is widely used to assess the antioxidant activity of natural extracts or pure compounds to act as free radical scavenger or hydrogen donors. In the present study, all the extracts depicted significantly higher tendency to scavenge the DPPH radicals in a dose dependent manner and steadily increased with increase in extract concentrations (Fig. 1). ME extracts showed strongest antiradical activity (83.25% at 300 μg/ml) which was even higher than the standard (L - ascorbic acid 81.30% at 300 μg/ml). Among the other extracts, AE also showed notably higher quenching ability of the DPPH radical, however AqE were less effective scavenger of the DPPH radical (Fig. 1). A good correlation (R2) between DPPH scavenging activity and TPC was obtained (Table 2) which indicates that phenolic compounds are directly responsible for antioxidant activity.

      >  Deoxyribose degradation activity

    The results obtained in deoxyribose degradation assay to prevent 2-deoxy-D-ribose oxidation mediated by OHㆍ radicals are shown in Fig. 2. The reduction ability of all tested extracts increased dependently with increasing concentrations in the site-specific assay. In general, it was observed that all the extracts displayed a protective effect depending on the concentration of the extract. Methanol extracts of E. trigona showed significantly higher (p < 0.01) activity (95.55% at 300 μg/ml) compared to control (L - ascorbic acid 74.29% at 300 μg/ml). However, the ability of AE and AqE to bind to Fe in site-specific assay was lesser as compared to control (Fig. 2). The antioxidant potential of all the extracts as displayed by deoxyribose degradation assay was found to be highly correlated with their total phenolic content and the correlation coefficient (R2) varied from 0.833 – 0.981 (Table 2).

      >  Reducing power activity

    Fig. 3 depicts the results of relative reducing power of all the extracts of E. trigona and L - ascorbic acid (standard antioxidant compound). It is clear from the results that ability of AE and AqE was comparable with standard (L – ascorbic acid) in reducing Fe3+ to Fe2+ and there was no significant difference of activity. The activities of water extracts (AqE) were inferior (0.391 at 300 μg/ml) to L - ascorbic acid (0.647 at 300 μg/ml) and were significantly (p < 0.01) lower. It was suggested that AqE were less effective reducing agent, however, the activity was found to be concentration dependent and was increased with increasing concentrations of extracts and standard antioxidant (Fig. 3). Further, the activity of all extracts correlated (R2) very well with the total phenolic contents of all the extracts (Table 2).

      >  Fe2+ chelating effect

    The ferrous state of iron can stimulate lipid peroxidation by the Fenton reaction and is the most powerful pro-oxidant among various species of metal ions. The results of chelating ability of various extracts of E. trigona towards ferrous ion are presented in Fig. 4. In this assay, ME showed significantly (p < 0.01) higher per cent chelating power (88.59% at 300 μg/ml) compared to the standard BHT (48.31% at 300 μg/ml) and was the most potent ferrous ion chelator at all concentrations (Fig. 4). It was also observed that all extracts depicted higher per cent chelating power compared to BHT (Fig. 4). The results also revealed that Fe2+-ion chelating activity of extracts did not significantly improved with increasing concentrations of the extracts. Furthermore, the antioxidant potential of acetone extracts evaluated by chelating power assay was also correlated (R2) with the total phenolic contents (Table 2) of extracts of E. trigona.


    Free radical scavenging activity of putative antioxidants may possibly result by the synergy between a number of mechanisms. These may include prevention of chain initiation, binding of transition metal ion catalysts, decomposition of peroxidises, prevention of continued hydrogen abstraction, reductive capacity and radical scavenging (Salar and Seasotiya, 2011; Shahat et al., 2014). Owing to complex nature of the phytochemicals present (Hall and Cuppett, 1997), the antioxidant activity of plant extracts cannot be evaluated by a single method. In order to explore these additional mechanisms, several antioxidant assays, namely DPPH, reducing power, deoxyribose degradation and chelating power assay were employed in the present investigation to evaluate antioxidant activity of E. trigona extracts and were correlated with their total phenolic contents. It is important to note that solvents such as acetone and methanol are better extractive agents as compared to water. In this study, the TPC varied between 26.3 to 168.6 mg GAE/g of herb for all the solvents. These values are higher than those reported by Sahat et al. (2014) for other herbal extracts. They reported values of phenolic compounds between 10.8 and 56.5 mg/ g DW of herb. Kumar et al. (2013) reported that the total phenolic content of Eulophia nuda in acetone and methanol extracts were higher than in aqueous extract. Our results also largely supported these conclusions. In general there was a significant (p < 0.01) difference in phenolic contents of AqE, AE, and ME.

    It is reported that the antioxidant activity of plants is attributed to the presence of phenolic compounds (Chizzola et al., 2008; Conde-Hernandez and Guerrero-Beltran, 2014; Salar and Dhall, 2010) which are generally very active in scavenging DPPH free radicals due to their fast electron transfer process, while hydrogen atom abstraction becomes a marginal reaction path (Foti et al., 2004). In the present study, four assays were employed to assess the antioxidant activity of E. trigona and to correlate the results with phenolic compounds. In DPPH assay, the per cent inhibition of stable DPPH free radical was highest in the ME and least in the AqE (Fig. 1) and mimic the inhibitory activity of standard antioxidant (L – ascorbic acid) in a concentration dependent manner.

    Hydroxyl radical (OHㆍ) is the most reactive ROS and attacks almost every molecule in the body resulting in peroxidation of cell membrane lipids and in formation of malondialdehyde, which is mutagenic and carcinogenic (Salar and Seasotiya, 2011). The results of site specific deoxyribose degradation assay in the present study have suggested that AE and AqE of E. trigona displayed a protective effect and were superior even to the standard antioxidant (L – ascorbic acid) (Fig. 2). However, ME despite having a good amount of TPC did not show high antioxidant activity and showed low correlation (R2 0.833) compared to other extracts (Table 2). The probable reason of high TPC of this sample might be due to colour reaction of proteins in the extract with Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, which leads to overestimation of total phenolic compounds (Surendraraj et al., 2013).

    Reducing property of extracts shows that antioxidant compounds are electron donors able to reduce the oxidized intermediates of lipid peroxidation process (Nagmoti et al., 2012). In the present investigation it is clear that the reducing power was a function of concentration and increased with increasing concentration of the tested extracts (Fig. 3), however, all extracts had less reducing power than ascorbic acid (standard) which showed a reducing power of 0.647 at 300 μg/ml. Further, there was a good correlation between phenolic compounds and reducing power of all extracts (Table 2) suggesting that polyphenols may be the principal constituents responsible for such properties.

    Transition metals viz., Fe2+ and Cu2+, can catalyze the generation of reactive oxygen species such as hydroxyl radical (OHㆍ) and superoxide anion (O2 ), (Stohs and Bagachi, 1995). In particular, Fe2+ generates ·OH by the Fenton reaction, which accelerate the lipid peroxidation chain reaction. In addition, Fe2+ catalyses the breakdown of lipid peroxides, that leads to the formation of volatile oxidation products responsible for offflavour development (Surendraraj et al., 2013). At the highest concentration tested (300 μg/ml), all extract exhibited Fe2+ chelating activity and were higher than the standard BHT. ME, however, showed highest Fe2+ chelating activity as compared to other extracts in a concentration dependent manner (Fig. 4). The higher Fe2+ chelating activity of ME in all concentrations tested may be due to the presence of specific phenolic compounds, which have been reported to be good chelating agents. Moreover, there was a good correlation (R2 0.959) between chelating power of phenolic compounds and methanolic extracts (Table 2).

    The results of this study demonstrated that the green succulent stem of E. trigona possess a high level of antioxidant compounds compared to other herbs. In general, a high total phenolic content correlated well with various antioxidant properties studied, indicating that polyphenols are one of the active compounds in the extracts. Further, the study suggested their use as potential natural antioxidant in functional foods and pharmaceuticals. Certain constituents of Euphorbia species may be promising lead compounds for drug development. However, further research is required for the characterization of other free, esterified, glycoside, and ester-bound phenolic compounds and flavonoids present in these extracts. Furthermore, studies of antioxidative effects of these extracts in real food systems and in in vivo studies are also crucial before their amalgamation in foods and pharmaceuticals.

  • 1. Aruoma OI, Grootveld M, Halliwell B 1987 The role of iron in ascorbate-dependent deoxyribose degradation. Evidence consistent with a site-specific hydroxyl radical generation caused by iron ions bound to the deoxyribose molecule [J Inorg Biochem] Vol.29 P.289-299 google doi
  • 2. Chizzola R, Michitsch H, Franz C 2008 Antioxidative properties of Thymus vulgaris leaves: comparison of different extracts and essential oil chemotypes [J Agr Food Chem] Vol.56 P.6897-6904 google doi
  • 3. Conde-Hernandez LA, Guerrero-Beltran JA 2014 Total phenolics and antioxidant activity of Piper auritum and Porophyllum ruderale [Food Chem] Vol.142 P.455-560 google doi
  • 4. Dinis TC, Madeira VM, Almeida LM 1994 Action of phenolic derivates (acetoaminophen, salycilate and 5-aminosalycilate) as inhibitors of membrane lipid peroxidation and as peroxyl radical scavengers [Arch Biochem Biophys] Vol.315 P.161-169 google doi
  • 5. Djeridane A, Yousfi M, Nadjemi B, Boutassouna D, Stocher P, Vidal N 2006 Antioxidant activity of some Algerian medicinal plants extracts containing phenolic compounds [Food Chem] Vol.97 P.654-660 google doi
  • 6. Foti MC, Daquino C, Geraci C 2004 Electron-transfer reaction of cinnamic acids and their methyl esters with the DPPH radical in alcoholic solutions [J Org Chem] Vol.69 P.2309-2314 google doi
  • 7. Hall CA, Cuppett SL, Aruoma OI, Cuppett SL 1997 Activities of natural antioxidants P.2-29 google
  • 8. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC, Aruoma OI 1987 The deoxyribose method: A simple “test-tube” assay for determination of rate constants for reactions of hydroxyl radicals [Analyt Biochem] Vol.165 P.215-219 google doi
  • 9. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC 1999 Free radicals in biology and medicine google
  • 10. Hecker E 1977 New toxic, irritant and cocarcinogenic diterpene esters from Euphorbiaceae and from Thymelaeaceae [Pure App Chem] Vol.49 P.1423-1431 google
  • 11. Honda K, Casadesus G, Paterson RB, Perry G, Smith MA 2004 Oxidative stress and redox iron in Alzheimer's disease [Ann N Y Acad Sci] Vol.1012 P.179-182 google doi
  • 12. Khare CP Indian Medicinal Plants: An Illustrated Dictionary google
  • 13. Khare CP 2007
  • 14. Kumar V, Lemos M, Sharma M, Shriramb V 2013 Antioxidant and DNA damage protecting activities of Eulophia nuda Lindl [Free Rad Antiox] Vol.3 P.55-60 google doi
  • 15. Marian V, Leibfritz D, Moncola J, Mark TD, Cronin MM, Joshua T 2007 Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease [Int J Biochem Cell Biol] Vol.39 P.44-84 google doi
  • 16. Nagmoti DM, Khatri DK, Juvekar PR, Juvekar AR 2012 Antioxidant activity and free radical-scavenging potential of Pithecellobium dulce Benth seed extracts [Free Rad Antiox] Vol.2 P.37-43 google
  • 17. Oyaizu M 1986 Studies on products of browning reaction: antioxidative activities of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine [Jpn J Nutr] Vol.44 P.307-315 google doi
  • 18. Ozsoy N, Cana A, Yanardag R, Akev N 2008 Antioxidant activity of Smilax excelsa L. leaf extracts [Food Chem] Vol.110 P.571-583 google doi
  • 19. Ridnour LA, Isenberg JS, Espey MG, Thomas DD, Roberts DD, Wink DA 2005 Nitric oxide regulates angiogenesis through a functional switch involving thrombospondin-1 [Proc Natl Acad Sci USA] Vol.102 P.13147-13152 google doi
  • 20. Robbins RJ 2003 Phenolic acids in foods: An overview of analytical methodology [J Agri Food Chem] Vol.51 P.2866-2887 google doi
  • 21. Salar RK, Certik M, Brezova V, Brlejova M, Hanusova V, Breierova E 2013 Stress influenced increase in phenolic content and radical scavenging capacity of Rhodotorula glutinis CCY 20-2- 26 [3 Biotech] Vol.3 P.53-60 google
  • 22. Salar RK, Certik M, Brezova V 2012 Modulation of Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Maize by Solid State Fermentation with Thamnidium elegans CCF 1456 [Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng] Vol.17 P.109-116 google doi
  • 23. Salar RK, Seasotiya L, Rohilla SK 2011 Evaluation of antioxidant activity and radical scavenging property of Ficus bengalensis L. applying various spectroscopic and spin-trapping methods [J Biol Active Prod Nat] Vol.1 P.248-261 google
  • 24. Salar RK, Seasotiya L 2011 radical scavenging activity, phenolic contents and phytochemical evaluation of different extracts of stem bark of Butea monosperma (Lam.) Kuntze [Front Life Sci.] Vol.5 P.107-116 google doi
  • 25. Salar RK, Dhall A 2010 Antimicrobial and free radical scavenging activity of extracts of some Indian medicinal plants [J Med Plant Res] Vol.4 P.2313-2320 google
  • 26. Shahat AA, Ibrahim AY, Elsaid MS 2014 Polyphenolic content and antioxidant activity of some wild Saudi Arabian asteraceae plants [Asian Pac J Trop Med] Vol.7 P.545-551 google doi
  • 27. Stohs SJ, Bagachi D 1995 Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions [Free Radic Biol Med] Vol.18 P.321-336 google doi
  • 28. Surendraraj KH, Sabeena F, Anandan R 2013 Antioxidant Potential of Water Hyacinth (Eichornia crassipes): In Vitro Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Composition [J Aquat Food Prod Technol] Vol.22 P.11-26 google doi
  • 29. Tada M, Seki H 1989 Toxic diterpernes from Euphorbia trigona (Saiunkaku: an indoor foliage plant in Japan) [Agric Biol Chem] Vol.53 P.425-430 google doi
  • 30. Valko M, Rhodes CJ, Moncol J, Izakovic M, Mazur M 2006 Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer [Chem Biol Interact] Vol.160 P.1-40 google doi
  • 31. 2008 Traditional medicine. Media centre google
  • 32. Yen GC, Chen HY 1995 Antioxidant activity of various tea extracts in relation to their antimutagenicity [J Agri Food Chem] Vol.43 P.27-32 google doi
  • 33. Yu L, Haley S, Perret J, Harris M 2002 Antioxidant properties of hard winter wheat extracts [Food Chem] Vol.78 P.457-461 google doi
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Table 1. ]  Total phenolic content (mg/g GAE) of various extracts of succulent stem of E. trigona
    Total phenolic content (mg/g GAE) of various extracts of succulent stem of E. trigona
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Percent inhibition of DPPH radical in the presence of different concentrations of extracts of E. trigona (n = 3). Note: Error bars represent the standard deviation (* significant at p < 0.05).
    Percent inhibition of DPPH radical in the presence of different concentrations of extracts of E. trigona (n = 3). Note: Error bars represent the standard deviation (* significant at p < 0.05).
  • [ Table 2. ]  Correlation coefficients (R2) for phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity relationship of different extracts of E. trigona.
    Correlation coefficients (R2) for phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity relationship of different extracts of E. trigona.
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Scavenging of hydroxyl radicals by various extracts of E. trigona in a site specific deoxyribose degradation assay. (n = 3). Note: Error bars represent the standard deviation (* significant at p < 0.05).
    Scavenging of hydroxyl radicals by various extracts of E. trigona in a site specific deoxyribose degradation assay. (n = 3). Note: Error bars represent the standard deviation (* significant at p < 0.05).
  • [ Fig. 3. ]  Relative reducing power of different extracts of E. trigona (n = 3). Note: Error bars represent the standard deviation (* significant at p < 0.05).
    Relative reducing power of different extracts of E. trigona (n = 3). Note: Error bars represent the standard deviation (* significant at p < 0.05).
  • [ Fig. 4. ]  Ferrous ion chelating power of various extracts of E. trigona (n = 3). Note: Error bars represent the standard deviation (* significant at p < 0.05).
    Ferrous ion chelating power of various extracts of E. trigona (n = 3). Note: Error bars represent the standard deviation (* significant at p < 0.05).
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.