Affecting more than half of menstruating women, dysmenorrhea is a cramp which causes abdominal or lower back pain just before or during a menstruation. In western medicine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are normally used to treat primary dysmenorrheal symptoms. Despite their rapidity in relieving pain, NSAIDs have many serious side effects on the liver, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract. Thai traditional medicines comprise many preparations for treating dysmenorrhea, especially Prasaplai preparation which has been listed in the Thai traditional common household drug list since 2006. The use of Prasaplai was originated about 100 years ago and is still being used in the present time to treat dysmenorrhea. This review focuses on the history of the preparation, active ingredients, and biological activities especially on cyclooxygenase inhibitor, artifacts occurred in the preparation, quantitative analysis, and clinical trial of Prasaplai formulation.
Prasaplai is a Thai traditional formula that is widely utilized by Thai traditional doctors for relieving primary dysmenorrheal symptoms and adjusting the menstrual cycle (Nualkaew et al., 2004). This formulation first appeared in Vechseuksa, a Thai traditional medicinal text book which was printed in 1908. The formulation comprises each of 8 parts of the pericarp of
Dysmenorrhea is the medical term for menstrual cramps which causes abdominal or lower back pain just before or during a menstrual period. It affects more than half of menstruating women. One of the major physiological changes that take place in adolescent girls is the onset of menarche, which is often associated with problems of irregular menstruation, excessive bleeding, and dysmenorrhea (Gagua et al., 2013). Dysmenorrhea can be classified into two types: primary and secondary dysmenorrhea. Primary dysmenorrhea results from elevated levels of prostaglandins (PGs), pro-inflammatory cytokines, interleukins, and tumor necrosis factor-α in peripheral blood (Kaplan et al., 2013). Severe myometrial contraction, vasoconstriction, uterine ischemia and pain are resulted from the release of these compounds. Furthermore, progesterone withdrawn before the beginning of menstrual cycle initiates the arachidonic acid release and more cytokine from this acid degradation. Higher cytokine level contributes to higher intensity of dysmenorrheal pain and associated symptoms (Chen et al., 2013).
In western medicines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are normally administered to treat primary dysmenorrheal symptoms. In spite of their quickness and effectiveness in relieving pain, NSAIDs have many serious side effects on the liver, kidney and gastrointestinal tract. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is an alternative way to treat primary dysmenorrhea. For example, YuanHu painkiller, which is composed of
>
Chemical constituents and anti-inflammatory activity of prasaplai preparation
Prasaplai usage as a preparation to treat primary dysmenorrhea and anti-inflammatory effect was pharmacologically confirmed by Waltenberger et al. (2011). The chemical constituents in each plant component of the preparation concerning cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and other inflammatory mediators have been summarized (Waltenberger et al., 2011).
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Oriental medicines, whether it is TCM or Ayurvedic medicines, often display a similar trend or philosophy in their formulation. Also in Thai traditional medicine, many medicinal plants are selectively and carefully combined for the treatment of diseases. Like TCM, a traditional prescription normally includes different parts, constituting four components - the principal (monarch), adjuvant (minister), auxiliary (assistant), and conductor (guide). The principal herb provides the main curative action; the adjuvant strengthens the principal activity; the auxiliary relieves side effects of the principal herb; while the conductor directs the actions of the principal and adjuvant herbs to the affected area. This preparation philosophy, combining with comprehensive knowledge and wisdom of medicinal herbs, also applies to the Prasaplai preparation.
Nualkaew et al. (2004) reported 3 artifacts originated during the storage of Prasaplai. Two artifacts, (E)-4-(3,4-dimethoxyphe-nyl)but-3-en-1-yl linoleate (1) and (E)- 4-(3,4-dimethoxy-phenyl)but-3-en-1-yl oleate (2) were new fatty acid esters. Another one was the known (E)-4-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl) but-3-en-1-yl palmitate (3) (Fig. 8). The artifacts were found after all the ingredients were mixed together on day 1. After investigating the origin of the artifacts by a systematic preparation of two component mixtures and subsequent High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis, they found that the artifacts occurred from the mixture of the rhizomes of
>
Study of artifacts formation versus time
A study was performed on artifacts formation versus time by mixing the powder of
On the other hand, the amount of compound D, ((E)-4-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)but-3-en-1-ol) which was the precursor of all the artifacts, dramatically decreased during the first 30 days after mixing. After that, the amount of compound D slightly decreased, inversely correlating to the amount of artifacts formation.
>
Mechanism of artifacts formation
It was studied the mechanism of the artifacts formation (Tangyuenyongwatana and Gritsanapan, 2008). The study was divided into two experiments. The first experiment was to denature enzymes by heating the rhizomes of
At first, a certain amount of water was added to the mixture of powdered rhizomes of
>
Biological activities study of artifacts
The cytotoxicity tests of artifacts against human cancer cell lines NCI-H187, KB, and BC demonstrated IC50 higher than 20 μg/ml for all tests while the positive controls using ellipticine and doxorubicin showed IC50 values at 0.332 and 0.037 μg/ml against NCI-H 187, 0.303, and 0.173 μg/ml against KB, and 0.052 and 0.083 μg/ml against BC cell lines.
For acute toxicity test of each artifact, the dose of 300 mg/kg, did not cause mortality or any sign of abnormalities in tested mice. LD50 values of all artifacts were higher than 300 mg/kg mice (Tangyuenyongwatana and Gritsanapan, 2007). This information ascertains the safety of the artifacts originated in the Prasaplai preparation which has been used as a traditional medicine for a long period of time.
The role of these fatty acid esters in the Prasaplai preparation is an interesting topic in the use of the preparation. One hypothesis is that the fatty acid esters may act as pro-drugs in order to increase the absorption of the parent compound, i.e. compound D. In this
The hydrolysis of compounds 1, 2, and 3 did not occur during the transport across Caco-2 cell monolayers. This may be due to the unusually long chain fatty acid structure and other factors such as the duration of the time contact with the enzyme during transport. However, the hydrolysis of the ester linkage in these compounds may occur in the blood circulation or in the liver because these compounds can be hydrolyzed by porcine liver esterase within ten minutes (Tangyuenyongwatana et al., 2009).
>
Quantitative analysis of active constituents in prasaplai
Tangyuenyongwatana and Gritsanapan (2009) reported the quantitative analysis of Prasaplai preparation. The recommended dose (1.0 g) of Prasaplai was separately extracted by exhaustive sonication with three different solvents, hexane, 40% ethanol and distilled water. The yields were 26.70 ± 0.11 mg (2.7% w/w), 33.96 ± 0.05 mg (3.40% w/w), and 49.83 ± 0.30 mg (4.98% w/w), respectively. The crude extracts were analyzed by HPLC for contents of the four major compounds, i.e (
For the thin-layer chromatography (TLC) - densitometric method, Tangyuenyongwatana et al. (2012) reported a TLC-densitometric method for the simultaneous quantification of DMPBD in the rhizome extracts of 30 varieties of
Both analytical methods were validated and are suitable for further research, such as the
Kamalashiran and Lekskulchai (2012) performed the comparative study of the efficiency and side effect of Prasaplai extract versus mefenamic acid on relieving primary dysmenorrhea. The study was done on clinical phase II trials. Using 64 volunteers and dividing into 2 groups, the first group (32 volunteers) was given Prasaplai while the second group (27 volunteers) was given mefenamic acid. The clinical trial lasted 3 months and the efficiency of Prasaplai in relieving pain in primary dysmenorrhea showed no significant difference to mefenamic acid during treatment (
Sriyakul et al. (2012) reported a comparative double-blinded randomized phase III clinical trials by using 207 subjects divided into 2 groups. For the control group (n = 104), the patients were given 2 capsules of mefenamic acid (250 mg/cap) which looked like Prasaplai capsules. The treatment group (n = 103) was given 2 capsules (200 mg/cap) of 70% alcohol extract of Prasaplai 3 times a day for 3 days starting at the onset of each menstrual period for 6 periods. In both groups, the severity of pain and other signs of side effects were evaluated and followed up every month. The results showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in degree of pain relieving. Also, both Prasaplai extract and mefenamic showed no severe side effect.
At the present time, many medical doctors who practice western medicines are interested in oriental medicines, especially Prasaplai. Clinical trials of this preparation have been conducted in many hospitals in Thailand and it is accepted as a potent drug formulation for relieving primary dysmenorrhea.
Prasaplai preparation, which is listed in the Thai traditional common household drug list, is a Thai traditional formula for the treatment of dysmenorrhea and adjustment of menstrual cycle. This preparation was first observed about 100 years ago and is still used until the present time. The active ingredients and biological activities especially on cyclooxygenase mostly come from