OA 학술지
Intelligent System based on Command Fusion and Fuzzy Logic Approaches - Application to mobile robot navigation 명령융합과 퍼지기반의 지능형 시스템-이동로봇주행적용
  • cc icon
  • cc icon

This paper propose a fuzzy inference model for obstacle avoidance for a mobile robot with an active camera, which is intelligently searching the goal location in unknown environments using command fusion, based on situational command using an vision sensor. Instead of using "physical sensor fusion" method which generates the trajectory of a robot based upon the environment model and sensory data. In this paper, "command fusion" method is used to govern the robot motions. The navigation strategy is based on the combination of fuzzy rules tuned for both goal-approach and obstacle-avoidance. We describe experimental results obtained with the proposed method that demonstrate successful navigation using real vision data.

본 논문은 능동카메라가 장착된 이동로봇의 장애물 회피를 위한 퍼지추론방법 제시하였다. 영상센서를 이용하여 상황적 판단에 근거한 명령융합을 사용하여 미지의 환경에서의 목적지까지의 지능적인 탐색을 수행하도록 하였다. 본 연구를 검증하기 위하여 환경모델과 센서데이터에 기반 한 이동로봇의 경로생성을 위한 물리적 센서융합을 시도하지 않고, 환경에 따른 각각의 로봇의 주행행동을 제어하기 위한 명령융합 적용하였다. 주행을 위한 전략으로는 목적지 접근과 장애물 회피를 수행할 수 있도록 퍼지규칙 조합을 통해 판단하도록 수행하였다. 제안한 방법을 검증하기 위하여 영상데이터를 사용한 성공적인 주행 실험 결과를 제시하였다.

mobile robot , navigation , obstacle avoidance , fuzzy inference , sensor fusion
  • Ⅰ. Introduction

    Autonomous mobile robot is intelligent robot that performs a given work with sensors by identifying the surrounded environment and reacts on the state of condition by itself instead of human. Unlike general manipulator in a fixed working environment [1], it is required intelligent processing in a flexible and variable working environment. And studies on a fuzzy-rule based control are attractive in the field of autonomous mobile robot. Robust behavior in autonomous robots requires that uncertainty be accommodated by the robot control system. Fuzzy logic is particularly well suited for implementing such controllers due to its capabilities of inference and approximate reasoning under uncertainty [2].

    This requires formulation of a large and complex set of fuzzy rules. In this situation a potential limitation to the utility of the monolithic fuzzy controller becomes apparent. Since the size of complete monolithic rule bases increases exponentially with the number of input variables [2, 3], multi-input systems can potentially suffer degradations in real-time response. This is a critical issue for mobile robots operating in dynamic surroundings. Hierarchical rule structures can be employed to overcome this limitation by reducing the rate of increase to linear [4].

    First, this paper briefly introduces the operation of each command and the fuzzy controller for navigation system in chapter 2. Chapter 3 explains about behavior hierarchy based on fuzzy logic. In chapter 4, experimental results to verify efficiency of system are shown. Finally, Section 5 concludes this research work and mentions possible future related work.

    Ⅱ. Fuzzy Controller Design

    The proposed fuzzy controller is shown as follows. We define three major navigation goals, i.e., target orientation, obstacle avoidance and rotation movement; represent each goal as a cost function. Note that the fusion process has a structure of forming a cost function by combining several cost functions using weights. In this fusion process, we infer each weight of command by the fuzzy algorithm that is a typical artificial intelligent scheme. With the proposed method, the mobile robot navigates intelligently by varying the weights depending on the environment, and selects a final command to keep the minimum variation of the cost function [5, 6].

       2.1. Command for navigation

    Seeking Goal command of mobile robot is generated as the nearest direction to the target point. The command is defined as the distance to the target point when the robot moves present with the orientation, 𝜃, the velocity, v, the desired position, (xd,yd), the current position (xc,yc). Therefore, a cost function is defined as Eq.(1).

    where, v is vmax −|𝜃c−𝜃| and represents the reduction ratio of rotational movement.

    Avoiding obstacle command is represented as the shortest distance to an obstacle based upon the sensor data in the form of histogram. The distance information is represented as a form of second order energy, and represented as a cost function by inspecting it about all 𝜃 as shown in Eq. (2).

    To navigate in a dynamic environment to the goal, the mobile robot should recognize the dynamic variation and react to it.

    Maintain heading command is minimizing rotational movement aims to rotate wheels smoothly by restraining the rapid motion. The cost function is defined as minimum at the present orientation and is defined as a second order function in terms of the rotation angle, 𝜃 as Eq. (3).

    The command represented as the cost function has three different goals to be satisfied at the same time. Each goal differently contributes to the command by a different weight, as shown in Eq. (4).

       2.2. Fuzzy Inference

    We infer the weights of the usual fuzzy if-then rule by means of fuzzy algorithm. The main reason of using fuzzy algorithm is that it is easy to reflect the human's intelligence into the robot control. Fuzzy inference system is developed through the process of setting each situation, developing fuzzy logic with proper weights, and calculating weights for the commands [6, 7].

    Fig. 2 shows the structure of a fuzzy inference system. We define the circumstance and state of a mobile robot as the inputs of fuzzy inference system, and infer the weights of cost functions. The inferred weights determine a cost function to direct the robot and decide the velocity of rotation. For the navigation control of the mobile robot, the results are transformed into the variation of orientation and angular velocities by the inverse kinematics of the robot .

    Fig. 3 shows the output surface of the fuzzy inference system for each weight fuzzy subsets using the inputs and the output. The control surface is fuzzy logic controller of seeing goal (a), fuzzy logic controller of avoiding obstacle (b), fuzzy logic controller of minimizing rotation (c), and fuzzy output (d).

    Ⅲ. Local Map Building

    A mobile robot moves by selecting a more secure path after recognizing the environment to navigate using image information. When we estimate the environments from the conditions of camera’s actuator[4, 8], there are many uncertainties. That is, environment informations estimated from the errors of camera angle 𝛼, 𝛽, link parameters l1, l2 and l3 of camera actuator, and calculating process, all of them have uncertain informations. In this paper, therefore, we propose the method of making probability map from image information, considering these uncertainties. Let j, k resulted in image processing have uncertainties(Δj, Δk) of Eq. 5.

    where Δj, Δk are 2 jointly gaussian random variables with probability density function(PDF) as shown in Eq. 7. and 𝜎Δj=𝜎Δk=0, mΔj=mΔk=0, ρΔjk=0.

    Image information j, k mapped real distance information x, y respectively by translation equation as follows

    Uncertainty of images, therefore, represented that of real distance information X, Y. PDF which presented uncertainty of X, Y about a transformation of Eq. 7 is given by

    Where fJ(x,y), fK(x,y) are the relation of transformation that represented mapping relation between real coordinate x, y and camera image. fJK(x,y) is the jacobian matrix as follows

    and |fJK(x,y)| is the determinant of a jacobian matrix and is in the following form

    Fig. 4 shows the simulation results about uncertainties between image plane and real space plane on condition that 𝛼=15°, 𝛽=0°, j=160 and k=180. The longer X, Y image distance, PDF of x, y is lower. It meant that long distance information has lower trust.

    Ⅳ. Experimental Results

    This navigation method that includes the proposed algorithm is applied for mobile robot named as TurtleBot that has been developed in the laboratory for Intelligent Robotics as shown in Fig, 5.

    This modified TurtleBot robot had to be fast, flexible and offer real time image processing capabilities for navigation, so we applied Controller Area Network(CAN) to Pioneer-DX. CAN is a serial bus system especially suited for networking “intelligent” devices as well as sensors and actuators within a system or sub-system [9].

    With the proposed method, we make an experiment on building environmental map. Parameter values used for experiment are shown in Table 1.

    Fig. 6(a) is the image used on the experiment; Width of corridor is 2m and Joint angle parameter α, β of active camera are 11° and 0° respectively. After capturing the image, The ‘LOG’ operator is utilized to extract the edge elements. It is suitable for detecting edge element at corridor that appear noises (e.g.: Patterns of the bottom, wall) sensitively because it is difficult for edge detection in case of other edge operators which has the characteristic of high-pass filter.

    The essential information to map building is edge information that meets with the bottom in the edge information extracted from LOG operation. Fig. 6(b) shows the image that the points meet with the bottom through the matching after LOG operation. We construct probability map by this informations [10].

    Fig. 7(a) shows the map including the experimental environment. We exclude the information over 6m because that has low probability. Because we can estimate the reliability through the probability approach, the better map can be acquired.

    Fig. 7(b) is the values resulted from matching after image processing which shows the estimated map over front 6m. The brightness presents the probability, and through the transformation, in case of having the area of the same distance in the image, the farther the point is, the smaller the probability is. Therefore the information which extracted image has low truth because it has wide probability density.

    Fig. 7(b) shows that maximum matching error is within 4% of the dash-line area in Fig 7(a). Therefore, it can be seen that above vision system is proper to apply to navigation. The mobile robot navigates along a corridor with 2m widths and without obstacles and with some obstacles, respectively, as shown in Fig. 8. The real trace of the mobile robot is shown in Fig. 8(a).

    Fig. 8 illustrates the navigation–obstacle avoidance strategy by proposed method. The experimental results exhibit that the mobile robot can start moving from an initial point, avoids the box-like obstacles, and reaches a goal point. Fig. 8(a) shows the case study of three obstacles. Based on the evaluation qualitative method of the obstacles configuration from the information of the vision sensor, the mobile robot succeeds to reach the goal point in an environment cluttered with obstacles.

    It demonstrates that the mobile robot avoids the obstacles intelligently and follows the corridor to the goal. In Fig. 8(b) the mobile robot performs a wall following mission in a narrow dead-end corridor. In the extreme situation at the end of the corridor accurate control response is required to avoid collision. When approaching the two corners corridor, the frontal vision sensors detect the wall, doors and the mobile robot performs a fast right turn and left turn, respectively. The robot’s velocity is reduced accordingly (see Fig. 8(c)).

    Finally, it should be pointed out that command fusion based fuzzy inference prove to be a satisfactory control strategy and has shown a good degree of robustness face to a large variability and uncertainty in the parameters. Overall, this project this project has served as a platform of a whole work dealing with mobile manipulation, where separation of tasks is considered.

    Ⅴ. Conclusions

    A fuzzy control algorithm for both obstacle avoidance and path planning has been implemented in experiment so that it enables the mobile robot to reach to goal point under the unknown environments safely and autonomously.

    First, a theoretical development of a navigation procedure of a mobile robot with active camera in unknown environment with obstacle has been described.

    Second, we showed an architecture for intelligent navigation of mobile robot which determine robot's behavior by arbitrating distributed control commands, seek goal, avoid obstacles, and maintain heading. Commands are arbitrated by endowing with weight value and combining them, and weight values are given by fuzzy inference method. Arbitrating command allows multiple goals and constraints to be considered simultaneously. To show the efficiency of proposed method, real experiments are performed.

    To show the efficiency of proposed method, real experiments are performed. The experimental results show that the mobile robot can navigate to the goal point safely under unknown environments and also can avoid moving obstacles autonomously.

  • 1. Er M.J., Tan T.P., Loh S.Y. 2004 “Control of a mobile robot using generalized dynamic fuzzy neural networks,” [Microprocessors and Microsystems] Vol.28 P.491-498 google doi
  • 2. Nair D., Aggarwal J.K. 1998 “Moving Obstacle Detection from a Navigation Robot,” [IEEE Transaction on robotics and automation] Vol.14 P.404-416 google doi
  • 3. Beom H.R., Cho H.S. 1995 “A sensor-Based Navigation for a Mobile Robot Using Fuzzy Logic and Reinforcement Learning,” [IEEE Transaction on system, man, and cybernetics] Vol.25 P.464-477 google doi
  • 4. Ohya A., Kosaka A., Kak A. 1998 “Vision-Based Navigation by a Mobile Robot with Obstacle Avoidance Using Single-Camera Vision and Ultrasonic Sensing,” [IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation] Vol.14 P.969-978 google doi
  • 5. Tunstel E. 2000 “Fuzzy-behavior synthesis, coordination, and evolution in an adaptive behavior hierarchy,” google
  • 6. Cherroun L., Boumehraz M. 2012 “Intelligent systems based on reinforcement learning and fuzzy logic approaches-Application to mobile robotic,” [Proceeding of 2012 International Conference on Information Technology and e-Services (ICITeS)] P.1-6 google
  • 7. Leng G., McGinnity T.M., Prasad G. 2005 “An approach for on-line extraction of fuzzy rules using a self-organizing fuzzy neural network,” [Fuzzy Sets and Systems] Vol.150 P.211-243 google doi
  • 8. Nishina T., Hagiwara M. 1997 “Fuzzy inference neural network,” [Neurocomputing] Vol.14 P.223-239 google doi
  • 9. Jin T.S., Lee J.M. 2004 “Trajectory Generation of a Moving Object for a Mobile Robot in Predictable Environment,” [International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing] Vol.5 P.27-35 google
  • 10. Wang D.S., Zhang Y.S., Si W.J. 2011 “Behavior-based hierarchical fuzzy control for mobile robot navigation in dynamic environment,” [Proceeding of 2011 Chinese Control and Decision Conference(CCDC)] P.2419-2424 google
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ 그림 1. ]  명령융합알고리즘의 구조
    명령융합알고리즘의 구조
  • [ 그림 2. ]  퍼지추론시스템의 구조
    퍼지추론시스템의 구조
  • [ 그림 3. ]  가중치 추론시스템의 멥버쉽함수 (a) ω1의 멥버쉽함수 (b) ω2의 멥버쉽함수 (c) ω3의 멥버쉽함수 (d) 입력 멥버쉽함수
    가중치 추론시스템의 멥버쉽함수 (a) ω1의 멥버쉽함수 (b) ω2의 멥버쉽함수 (c) ω3의 멥버쉽함수 (d) 입력 멥버쉽함수
  • [ 그림 4. ]  가중치 추론시스템의 멥버쉽함수 (a) 영상평면상의 불확실성 (b) 실제 영상평면상의 불확실성
    가중치 추론시스템의 멥버쉽함수 (a) 영상평면상의 불확실성 (b) 실제 영상평면상의 불확실성
  • [ 그림 5. ]  TurtleBot 이동로봇
    TurtleBot 이동로봇
  • [ 표 1. ]  실험에 대한 파라미터 값
    실험에 대한 파라미터 값
  • [ 그림 6. ]  영상시스템의 실험결과 (a) 입력영상 (b) 매칭결과
    영상시스템의 실험결과 (a) 입력영상 (b) 매칭결과
  • [ 그림 7. ]  주행환경과 확률맵
    주행환경과 확률맵
  • [ 그림 8. ]  실내환경에서의 로보주행 (a) 장애물 환경에서의 로봇주행 결과 (b) 주행경로 (c) 로봇주행에 따른 방향 및 속도값
    실내환경에서의 로보주행 (a) 장애물 환경에서의 로봇주행 결과 (b) 주행경로 (c) 로봇주행에 따른 방향 및 속도값
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.