검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
Natural production of alkane by an easily harvested freshwater cyanobacterium, Phormidium autumnale KNUA026
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
Natural production of alkane by an easily harvested freshwater cyanobacterium, Phormidium autumnale KNUA026
KEYWORD
algae-based fuel , alkane , cyanobacterium , heptadecane , Phormidium autumnale
  • INTRODUCTION

    In recognition of the current energy crisis, alternative energy sources are currently being explored and developed at an increasing pace; biofuels in particular have received a considerable amount of attention over the past few years. Conventional biofuels, such as bioethanol and biodiesel, are produced primarily from cereal crops and oil seeds. However, the mass production of crop-based biofuels has resulted in serious side effects, such as increases in food prices, deforestation, and carbon emissions (Sims et al. 2010). Thus, algae-based biofuels have been recognized as an attractive option, as they use minimal land resources (Chisti 2007) and do not compete with food production (Huang et al. 2010). Additionally, algaebased biofuels have several other advantages, including rapid growth rates (Schenk et al. 2008), higher lipid contents (Hu et al. 2008), and higher CO2 uptake rates (Jorquera et al. 2010) relative to other energy crops. Considering these advantages, microalgae biofuels have been recognized as the only current renewable source of liquid transportation fuel which is compatible with the existing engines and distribution systems (Schenk et al. 2008). Microalgae, including cyanobacteria, have been reported to generate a variety of lipids, hydrocarbons, fatty alcohols, and other complex oils (Metzger and Largeau 2005, Guschina and Harwood 2006, Schirmer et al. 2010, Tan et al. 2011). Although not all algal oils are suitable for biodiesel production, a number of microalgae have been suggested to be satisfactory for this purpose (Chisti 2007, Xin et al. 2010).

    However, there are still a number of technical barriers which must be overcome prior to their immediate application to the production of such fuels, and one of the major challenges remaining in algae biodiesel production is the reduction of the cost of lipid extraction, which accounts for up to 90% of the total energy consumption involved in the production of algae biodiesel (Lardon et al. 2009). Algal biodiesel is usually obtained by transesterifying algal oil triglycerides with an alcohol in the presence of an acidic or basic catalyst (Meher et al. 2006, Demirbas 2007, Johnson and Wen 2009). Methanol is the most commonly used alcohol in this process due to its low cost (Demirbas 2005), yet it has been reported that methanol was responsible for 47% of the total energy consumption in biodiesel production (De Souza et al. 2010). Recent work by Schirmer et al. (2010) showed that some cyanobacteria could naturally produce alkanes such as pentadecane (C15H32) and heptadecane (C17H36). As petroleum-based diesel is made up of a mixture of alkanes with 8 to 20 carbon atoms, these cyanobacteriaderived alkanes can be directly used as biodiesel without requiring any chemical conversion, and thus, may serve as a possible candidate for the replacement of fossil fuels.

    In this study, we isolated a filamentous cyanobacterium, Phormidium autumnale KNUA026 from puddles of icy water in Gyeongsan City, South Korea, and demonstrated its ability to autotrophically produce heptadecane as well as other algal biodiesel constituents.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

      >  Sample collection and isolation

    Samples were taken from puddles of icy water near rice paddies (35°50' N, 128°50' E) in Jillyang-eup, Geyongsan City, South Korea in January 2012. A few micrograms of cyanobacterial mats were used to inoculate 100 mL BG- 11(+) medium containing nitrate (Rippka et al. 1979) with 250 μg mL-1 cycloheximide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).

    [Table 1.] Result from BLAST search using the 16S rRNA sequence of Phormidium autumnale KNUA026

    label

    Result from BLAST search using the 16S rRNA sequence of Phormidium autumnale KNUA026

    The flasks were incubated on an orbital shaker (Vision Scientific, Bucheon, Korea) at 160 rpm and 15℃ under cool fluorescent lighting (approximately 70 μmol photons m-2 s-1), until growth was apparent. An aliquot of the brown-colored biomass was taken by pipetting, and was sonicated for approximately 3-5 s using an ultrasonic cell disruptor (Model 550; Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). The filaments were then transferred onto BG-11 agar plates containing 100 μg mL-1 of meropenem (Yuhan Pharmaceuticals, Ochang, Korea) and were incubated in the dark for 24 h to eliminate contaminating bacteria (Choi et al. 2008). The culture was then inoculated onto fresh BG-11 agar plates and incubated for 14 days under a light : dark cycle (16 : 8 h) at 15℃.

      >  Morphological and molecular identification

    The isolate was grown in BG-11(+) medium for 21 days. Live cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3,000 ×g for 5 min, washed with sterile distilled water, and inspected at 400× magnification with a Zeiss Axioskop 2 light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Standort Gottingen, Vertrieb, Germany) equipped with differential interference contrast (DIC) optics.

    For the amplification of 16S rRNA gene fragments, the primer set, CYA106F and CYA781R(a) and CYA781R(b), as described by Nubel et al. (1997) was used. Synthesis of the primers used in this work and DNA sequencing were performed at the Macrogen facility (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea). The DNA sequence obtained was submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database under the accession no. JX912716 (Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis was performed using the software package MEGA version 4.0 (Tamura et al. 2007), using the neighbor-joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987) with 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Felsenstein 1985).

      >  Physiological testing

    All the physiological tests were performed in 5-mL test tubes containing BG-11(+) medium in triplicate. Survival and growth of KNUA026 cells maintained at 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30℃ (at intervals of 5℃) were examined to identify

    the optimum temperature for culturing. An acidity tolerance test was carried out over a pH range from 6.0 to 12.0 (at intervals of pH 1.0 unit). Each test tube was homogenized by sonication for approximately 3-5 s on an ultrasonic cell disruptor, and the cyanobacterial density was then determined by measuring the turbidity at 400 nm on an Optimizer 2120UV spectrophotometer (Mecasys, Daejeon, Korea). Growth rates were expressed as μ = (ln N2 - ln N1)/(t2 - t1), where N2 and N1 are the value of optical density during the period of exponential growth at times t2 and t1, respectively.

      >  Lipid extraction and gas chromatography / mass spectrometry (GC / MS) analysis

    To simulate the commercial production of microalgaebased biofuels and to obtain sufficient biomass for analysis, strain KNUA026 was inoculated into 16 L of BG-11(+) medium in an 18-L transparent polycarbonate bottle in triplicate. The cultures were autotrophically grown at 25℃ with a flow of air bubbles at a rate of approximately 2 L min-1 under cool fluorescent lighting (approximately 70 μmol photons m-2 s-1) with a light:dark cycle of 16 : 8 h. After incubating for 21 days, cyanobacterial cells were harvested and the fatty acid composition was analyzed by GC/MS (GCMS-QP2010 ultra; Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) according to our previous publication (Yeo et al. 2011).

      >  Photobioreactor (PBR) optimization experiments

    To explore suitable PBR configurations for the largescale cultivation of P. autumnale KNUA026, three different PBR setups were tested, according to previous work by Esson et al. (2011). We usually grow both planktonic and benthic species in a PBR with one vertical tube (50 cm length) in the center of a PBR (Fig. 1A). In this study, we compared this configuration with PBRs using a coiled spiral tubing (150 cm length) (Fig. 1B) and loops of three tubes (50 cm length × 3) (Fig. 1C). Each PBR was prepared in triplicate, incubated under the same conditions as those stated above, and was harvested after 21 days for the purpose of comparison.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

      >  Identification of the isolated cyanobacterium

    The isolate was an unbranched and filamentous cyanobacterium (Fig. 2). Trichomes were straight, 3.0 to 7.0 μm wide, composed of cylindrical and slightly barrel- shaped cells and densely layered trichomes readily formed macroscopically visible mats up to several cm in diameter (Fig. 3). The cross walls were clearly visible, end cells were widely rounded, and cell contents were brownish.

    No heterocytes or akinetes were found. According to the 16S rRNA sequencing data (Table 1), the isolate had a 99% sequence homology with Phormidium autumnale VUW11 (GQ451408) and clustered together with P. autumnale cultures isolated from New Zealand rivers and lakes (Heath et al. 2010), as shown in Fig. 4. Overall, the 16S rRNA sequencing result and its morphological characteristics observed in the present study suggested that strain KNUA026 is a member of the species P. autumnale.

      >  Physiological properties of Phormidium autumnale KNUA026

    As shown in Fig. 5, strain KNUA026 showed good growth at 25-30℃ and the cells were able to grow and survive at 10 and 15℃, but delayed growth was observed when they were incubated at these temperatures. Even thoughUA026 was isolated from cold freshwater environments, its optimal growth was attained at 25℃. The cyanobacterium also grew well across a wide pH range (pH 6.0-12.0) (Fig. 6) while maximal growth was obtained around pH 9.0. Growth rates (μ) of the isolate at exponential phase are listed in Table 2.

      >  Lipid extraction and GC / MS analysis

    The total lipid content of the isolate was 14.0 ± 1.4% of dry weight and the GC / MS results showed that the KNUA026 strain produced hexadecadienoic acid (C16:2 ω4), hexadecenoic acid (C16:1 ω7), palmitic acid (C16:0), linoleic acid (C18:2 ω6), oleic acid (C18:1 ω9), and stearic acid (C18:0) as its major fatty acids (Table 3, Fig. 7). Interestingly, it was found that a C17 alkane, heptadecane (C17H36, molecular weight = 240) was autotrophically biosynthesized by strain KNUA026 (Fig. 8). The heptadecane content in P. autumnale KNUA026 was determined to be 0.13 ± 0.09 mg g-1

    dry weight. As heptadecane can be directly used as a biodiesel component without a transesterification step, this isolate may have potential as a cost effective source of biodiesel.

    [Table 2.] Growth rates (μ) of Phormidium autumnale KNUA026 over a range of incubation temperatures and pH values

    label

    Growth rates (μ) of Phormidium autumnale KNUA026 over a range of incubation temperatures and pH values

    [Table 3.] List of cellular components present in Phormidium autumnale KNUA026

    label

    List of cellular components present in Phormidium autumnale KNUA026

    [Table 4.] Biomass production from different photobioreactor (PBR) setup

    label

    Biomass production from different photobioreactor (PBR) setup

      >  PBR setup comparison

    Biomass productivity from each PBR setup was compared (Table 4). In this experiment, the highest biomass was achieved when cultured in the PBR composed of loops of three tubes, as it could provide additional growth surfaces to strain KNUA026. As the isolate grew attached to a surface and formed thick mats, this benthic cyanobacterial culture would be much easier to harvest than a suspended culture. Thus, the isolate may have potential advantages over planktonic species for commercial-scale applications. Future work could address more factors potentially affecting the biomass productivity of P. autumnale KNUA026.

    CONCLUSION

    In the present study, a South Korean domestic cyanobacterium, P. autumnale KNUA026 isolated from freshwater, was investigated as a potential feedstock for biodiesel production, and the capability of strain KNUA026, to autotrophically produce a C17 alkane, heptadecane, was demonstrated. As heptadecane is an alkane hydro-carbon known as one of the major components of petrodiesel (Knothe 2010), this cyanobacterium-derived alkane can be directly used as a biodiesel component without any chemical modification. Hence, the fuel-grade alkane biosynthesis by cyanobacteria could become an attractive and cost-effective process for fuel production. In addition, its ability to form thick mats due to the benthic nature of the isolate may reduce the cost of harvesting during commercial production. Future research should focus on the screening of alkane-producing genes, such as acyl-acyl carrier protein reductase and aldehyde decarbonylase, in this cyanobacterium. Heterologous expression of the genes in Escherichia coli and algal systems and quantitative analysis of recombinant hydrocarbons are needed to compare enzymatic efficiency of the Korean genes with other known genes. If the genes have potential for alkane biosynthesis, they would be valuable domestic genetic resources.

참고문헌
  • 1. Chisti Y. 2007 Biodiesel from microalgae. [Biotechnol. Adv.] Vol.25 P.294-306 google cross ref
  • 2. Choi G. -G., Bae M. -S., Ahn C. -Y., Oh H. -M. 2008 Induction of axenic culture of Arthrospira (Spirulina) platensis based on antibiotic sensitivity of contaminating bacteria. [Biotechnol. Lett.] Vol.30 P.87-92 google
  • 3. Demirbas A. 2005 Biodiesel production from vegetable oils via catalytic and non-catalytic supercritical methanol transesterification method. [Prog. Energ. Combust. Sci.] Vol.31 P.466-487 google cross ref
  • 4. Demirbas A. 2007 Recent developments in biodiesel fuels. [Int. J. Green Energy] Vol.4 P.15-26 google cross ref
  • 5. De Souza S. P., Pacca S., De Avila M. T., Borges J. L. B. 2010 Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance of palm oil biofuel. [Renew. Energy] Vol.35 P.2552-2561 google cross ref
  • 6. Esson D., Wood S. A., Packer M. A. 2011 Harnessing the self-harvesting capability of benthic cyanobacteria for use in benthic photobioreactors. [AMB Express] Vol.1 P.19 google cross ref
  • 7. Felsenstein J. 1985 Confidence limits on phylogenetics: an approach using the bootstrap. [Evolution] Vol.39 P.783-791 google cross ref
  • 8. Guschina I. A., Harwood J. L. 2006 Lipids and lipid metabolism in eukaryotic algae. [Prog. Lipid Res.] Vol.45 P.160-186 google cross ref
  • 9. Heath M. W., Wood S. A., Ryan K. G. 2010 Polyphasic assessment of fresh-water benthic mat-forming cyanobacteria isolated from New Zealand. [FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.] Vol.73 P.95-109 google
  • 10. Huang G., Chen F., Wei D., Zhang X., Chen G. 2010 Biodiesel production by microalgal biotechnology. [Appl. Energy] Vol.87 P.38-46 google cross ref
  • 11. Hu Q., Sommerfeld M., Jarvis E., Ghirardi M., Posewitz M., Seibert M., Darzins A. 2008 Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: perspectives and advances. [Plant J.] Vol.54 P.621-639 google cross ref
  • 12. Johnson M. B., Wen Z. 2009 Production of biodiesel fuel from the microalga Schizochytrium limacinum by direct transesterification of algal biomass. [Energy Fuels] Vol.23 P.5179-5183 google cross ref
  • 13. Jorquera O., Kiperstok A., Sales E. A., Embirucu M., Ghirardi M. L. 2010 Comparative energy life-cycle analyses of microalgal biomass production in open ponds and photobioreactors. [Bioresour. Technol.] Vol.101 P.1406-1413 google cross ref
  • 14. Knothe G. 2010 Biodiesel and renewable diesel: a comparison. [Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.] Vol.36 P.364-373 google cross ref
  • 15. Lardon L., Helias A., Sialve B., Steyera J. -P., Bernard O. 2009 Life-cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae. [Environ. Sci. Technol.] Vol.43 P.6475-6481 google cross ref
  • 16. Meher L. C., Vidya Sagar D., Naik S. N. 2006 Technical aspects of biodiesel production by transesterification: a review. [Renew. Sust. Energy Rev.] Vol.10 P.248-268 google cross ref
  • 17. Metzger P., Largeau C. 2005 Botryococcus braunii: a rich source for hydrocarbons and related ether lipids. [Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.] Vol.66 P.486-496 google cross ref
  • 18. Nubel U., Garcia-Pichel F., Muyzer G. 1997 PCR primers to amplify 16S rRNA genes from cyanobacteria. [Appl. Environ. Microbiol.] Vol.63 P.3327-3332 google
  • 19. Rippka R., Deruelles J., Waterbury J. B., Herdman M., Stanier R. Y. 1979 Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. [J. Gen. Microbiol.] Vol.111 P.1-61 google cross ref
  • 20. Saitou N., Nei M. 1987 The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. [Mol. Biol. Evol.] Vol.4 P.406-425 google
  • 21. Schenk P. M., Thomas-Hall S. R., Stephens E., Marx U. C., Mussgnug J. H., Posten C., Kruse O., Hankamer B. 2008 Second generation biofuels: high-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production. [Bioenerg. Res.] Vol.1 P.20-43 google cross ref
  • 22. Schirmer A., Rude M. A., Li X., Popova E., Del Cardayre S. B. 2010 Microbial biosynthesis of alkanes. [Science] Vol.329 P.559-562 google cross ref
  • 23. Sims R. E. H., Mabee W., Saddler J. N., Talyor M. 2010 An overview of second generation biofuel technologies. [Bioresour. Technol.] Vol.101 P.1570-1580 google cross ref
  • 24. Tamura K., Dudley J., Nei M., Kumar S. 2007 MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. [Mol. Biol. Evol.] Vol.24 P.1596-1599 google cross ref
  • 25. Tan X., Yao L., Gao Q., Wang W., Qi F., Lu X. 2011 Photosynthesis driven conversion of carbon dioxide to fatty alcohols and hydrocarbons in cyanobacteria. [Metab. Eng.] Vol.13 P.169-176 google cross ref
  • 26. Xin L., Hu H. Y., Ke G., Sun Y. X. 2010 Effects of different nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations on the growth, nutrient uptake, and lipid accumulation of a freshwater microalga Scenedesmus sp. [Bioresour. Technol.] Vol.101 P.5494-5500 google cross ref
  • 27. Yeo I., Jeong J., Cho Y., Hong J., Yoon H. -S., Kim S. H., Kim S. 2011 Characterization and comparison of biodiesels made from Korean freshwater algae. [Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.] Vol.32 P.2830-2832 google cross ref
OAK XML 통계
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Table 1. ]  Result from BLAST search using the 16S rRNA sequence of Phormidium autumnale KNUA026
    Result from BLAST search using the 16S rRNA sequence of Phormidium autumnale KNUA026
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Photobioreactor (PBR) configuration comparison. Phormidium autumnale KNUA026 was grown in the PBR with vertical tubing (A), coiled spiral tubing (B), and loops of three tubes (C).
    Photobioreactor (PBR) configuration comparison. Phormidium autumnale KNUA026 was grown in the PBR with vertical tubing (A), coiled spiral tubing (B), and loops of three tubes (C).
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Light microscope image of Phormidium autumnale KNUA026. Scale bar represents: 20 μm.
    Light microscope image of Phormidium autumnale KNUA026. Scale bar represents: 20 μm.
  • [ Fig. 3. ]  Benthic growth of Phormidium autumnale KNUA026.
    Benthic growth of Phormidium autumnale KNUA026.
  • [ Fig. 4. ]  The phylogenetic relationship of strain KNUA026 and its closely related species inferred from the 16S rRNA sequence data. The scale bar represents a 0.1% difference in nucleotide sequences. GenBank accession numbers are provided in parentheses.
    The phylogenetic relationship of strain KNUA026 and its closely related species inferred from the 16S rRNA sequence data. The scale bar represents a 0.1% difference in nucleotide sequences. GenBank accession numbers are provided in parentheses.
  • [ Fig. 5. ]  Growth curves for KNUA026 cells maintained at various temperatures.
    Growth curves for KNUA026 cells maintained at various temperatures.
  • [ Fig. 6. ]  Growth curves for KNUA026 cells maintained in different pH levels ranging from 6.0 to 12.0.
    Growth curves for KNUA026 cells maintained in different pH levels ranging from 6.0 to 12.0.
  • [ Table 2. ]  Growth rates (μ) of Phormidium autumnale KNUA026 over a range of incubation temperatures and pH values
    Growth rates (μ) of Phormidium autumnale KNUA026 over a range of incubation temperatures and pH values
  • [ Table 3. ]  List of cellular components present in Phormidium autumnale KNUA026
    List of cellular components present in Phormidium autumnale KNUA026
  • [ Table 4. ]  Biomass production from different photobioreactor (PBR) setup
    Biomass production from different photobioreactor (PBR) setup
  • [ Fig. 7. ]  Gas chromatography / mass spectrometry total ion chromatogram (TIC). 1, heptadecane (C17H36); 2, hexadecadienoic acid (C16:2 ω4); 3, hexadecenoic acid (C16:1 ω7); 4, palmitic acid (C16:0); 5, linoleic acid (C18:2 ω6); 6, oleic acid (C18:1 ω9); 7, hexadecenol (C20H40O); 8, stearic acid (C18:0).
    Gas chromatography / mass spectrometry total ion chromatogram (TIC). 1, heptadecane (C17H36); 2, hexadecadienoic acid (C16:2 ω4); 3, hexadecenoic acid (C16:1 ω7); 4, palmitic acid (C16:0); 5, linoleic acid (C18:2 ω6); 6, oleic acid (C18:1 ω9); 7, hexadecenol (C20H40O); 8, stearic acid (C18:0).
  • [ Fig. 8. ]  Electron impact mass spectrum of heptadecane (C17H36) produced by Phormidium autumnale KNUA026.
    Electron impact mass spectrum of heptadecane (C17H36) produced by Phormidium autumnale KNUA026.
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.