검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
Fabrication and Cell Culturing on Carbon Nanofibers/ Nanoparticles Reinforced Membranes for Bone-Tissue Regeneration
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
Fabrication and Cell Culturing on Carbon Nanofibers/ Nanoparticles Reinforced Membranes for Bone-Tissue Regeneration
KEYWORD
composite membrane , scaffold , periodontal ligament cell , bone tissue regeneration , simulated body fluid , biocompatibility
  • 1. Introduction

    Biomedical materials play a key role in modern medicine. Material scientists have tried various techniques and different components to fabricate biomedical materials according to specific clinical requirements. To achieve successful regeneration of damaged tissues, artificial substrates that can mimic certain features of the natural extracellular matrix have shown their advantages. Fibrous structures have been identified as being more favorable for cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, owing to their similarity to biological structures [1-3]. Bone-tissue regeneration membranes have recently attracted extensive interest because a considerable number of teeth can be preserved from prospective extraction due to periodontal diseases through bone-tissue regeneration therapy [4-7]. Bone tissue is composed of collagen nanofibers and hydroxyapatite (particularly carbonated hydroxyapatite) nanocrystals. Thus, the electrospun collagen/hydroxyapatite (HA) [3,8] and gelatin/HA [4] composite fibers have been reported on intensively as being effective in repairing bone defects and mimicking the composition and structure of natural bone tissue. It has been found that electrospun composite fibrous scaffolds, including poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA)/collagen (or gelatin) [9,10], polycaprolactone (PCL)/collagen (or gelatin) [11,12], and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA)/collagen [13,14], can maintain their original patterns with little change in fiber morphology and interfiber distances after being crosslinked. The reason for this is the presence of a hydrophobic polyester component that prevents fiber swelling and conglutination.

    HA, a major inorganic component of bone, has been used for biomedical implant applications and bone regeneration due to its bioactive, biodegradable, and osteoconductive properties [15- 17]. Being similar to the mineral component of natural bone, this substance has showed good osteoconductivity and bone bonding ability [18]. However, whether used in block or granular forms, pure HA cannot degrade in the human body. To combine the osteoconductivity of calcium phosphates and the biodegradability of polymers, polymer/ceramic composites have been developed for bone tissue engineering either by direct mixing or by biomimetic approaches [19,20]; especially, HA ceramics were also improved by mixing with tough polymers. The nano size of the inorganic component (mainly bone-like apatite) in natural bone is considered to be important for the mechanical properties of the bone [21]. Recent studies in this field have also suggested that better osteoconductivity would be achieved if synthetic HA could resemble bone minerals more in composition, size, and morphology [22,23]. In addition, nanosized HA may have other special properties due to its small size and huge specific surface area. Webster et al. [24] have shown significant increase in protein adsorption and osteoblast cell adhesion on the nanosized ceramic materials compared to traditional micron-sized ceramic materials.

    PLLA is now being used in biomedical fields due to its good biodegradability; however, this material requires some modifications in terms of biocompatibility and medical properties for its extension to certain applications. Thus many researchers have studied the modification of the biocompatibility of polymer composites with inorganic materials for tissue engineering [25,26]; among such materials, composites of HA have been used clinically in various forms, such as spheres, films, or scaffolds [27- 29]; these composites have been shown to improve the bone-cell response in vitro and bone-forming ability in vitro, in comparison with the performance of natural polymers alone [30,31].

    The electrospinning technique was invented in 1934 and can be used to produce polymer fibers with nanometer to micrometer diameter size [32]. Recently, this technique has been introduced to the field of tissue engineering [33]. Numerous materials have been spun into nanofibers by static electric forces; these new materials possess a microscopic three-dimensional porous structure and are shown macroscopically to be membranes. It has been reported that such membranes show good biocompatibility [34-36].

    Carbon nanofibers (CNFs) show good mechanical properties, chemical stability, high aspect ratio, and surface properties that allow easy functionalization with more biocompatible hydrophilic groups; these materials have attracted considerable attention for both fundamental scientific understanding and their potential biomedical applications [37,38]. In order to have sufficient bonding between CNFs and juxtaposed bone, and to minimize motion-induced damage to surrounding tissue in situ, a combination of CNFs with biomaterials is a very effective approach. It is generally believed that β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) has a chemical composition close to that of bone and can be gradually degraded in tissue and interstitial fluids [39,40].

    Cell culture data has proved that coelectrospun polyester/col-lagen (or gelatin) composite fibrous scaffolds show potential in tissue reconstitution and regeneration [13,41]. Various kinds of simulated body fluids (SBF) have been used by different authors to deposit Ca-P minerals on polymeric scaffolds in various forms, including solid-walled [42] and fibrous scaffolds [43]. Periodontal ligament stem cells are stem cells found near the periodontal ligaments of the teeth. They are involved in adult regeneration of the periodontal ligament, alveolar bone, and cementum. The cells are known to express STRO-1 and CD146 proteins. Osteoblast cells are the large cells responsible for the synthesis and mineralization of bone during both initial bone formation and later bone remodeling. Osteoblasts form a closely packed sheet on the surface of the bone, from which cellular processes extend through the developing bone. They arise from the differentiation of osteogenic cells in the periosteum, the tissue that covers the outer surface of the bone, and in the endosteum of the marrow cavity. This cell differentiation requires a regular supply of blood, without which cartilage-forming chondroblasts, rather than osteoblasts, are formed. The osteoblasts produce many cell products, including the enzymes alkaline phosphatase, and so on.

    In this paper, we review the processing methods of various nanofiber/nanoparticle reinforced PLLA composite membranes and cell (periodontal ligament cell [PDLC], gingival epithelial cell [GEC], osteoblast-like MG 63) culturing on membranes for bone tissue regeneration

    2. Experimental

       2.1. Fabrication of PLLA, PLLA/HA, PLLA/ MWNTs/HA membrane [35]

    Fig. 1 shows a schematic diagram of the PLLA/multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWNTs)/HA membrane fabrication process.

    MWNTs were first modified by anodic oxidation; then, MWNTs/ HA nanoparticles were in situ synthesized by a wet method with Ca(NO3)2?4H2O and (NH4)2HPO4 (Ca/P = 1.67) by using an ultrasonic vibrator. The prepared nanoparticles were repeatedly washed with 1, 4-dioxane to remove water; particles were then dispersed again in 1, 4-dioxane to form a suspension. Dichloromethane and PLLA particles were added to the suspension until a weight ratio of MWNTs/HA to PLLA of 1:9 was achieved. The suspension was kept in a 50℃ oven for 12 h in order to obtain a mixed solution. Before electrospinning, ultrasonic stirring of the solution was maintained for 1 h. The solution was electrospun continuously with a programmable syringe pump (Top 5300, Japan) from a 20 mL syringe with a steel needle (inner dia. 0.5 mm) at a rate of 0.7 mL/h. Voltage (15 kV) was applied to the tip of the needle by use of a high-voltage supply when the fluid jet was ejected.

       2.2. Fabrication of PLLA/TFE membrane [44]

    Fig. 2 shows schematic views of the PLLA/trifluoroethanol (TFE) nanofibrous membrane fabricated by electrospinning. To obtain randomly arranged PLLA nanofibrous membranes, a metal plate (20 × 25 cm2) was used as a collector at a distance of 18 cm from the tip of the needle. To obtain parallel PLLA nanofibrous membranes, a cylindrical drum, which rotated at a surface linear rate of 12 m/s, was used as a collector at a distance of 18 cm from the tip of the needle. To achieve hyperparallel PLLA nanofibrous membranes, the membranes were cut into 6 cm lengths along the fiber orientation; cuttings were 5 cm in width. The membranes were fixed on a stretching set, as shown in Fig. 2c, and drawn by using a 300 g weight at 100℃ for 5 min along the fiber axial direction. Before cell culturing, all PLLA nanofibrous membranes were exposed to a vacuum oven at room temperature for 2 weeks to remove residual solvent.

       2.3. Fabrication of PLLA/gelatin membrane [36]

    PLLA and gelatin (1:1 in weight ratio) were weighed and dissolved in 2,2, 2-TFE (99%). After being stirred overnight at

    room temperature, a viscous solution with a concentration of 10 wt% was obtained. The solution was loaded into a syringe fixed with a stainless steel needle (inner dia. 0.37 mm) and electrospun. The desired flow rate was set at 0.4 mL/h. The applied voltage was kept at 12 kV. A flat aluminum plate, 20 cm away from the needle tip, was used as the collector.

       2.4. Fabrication of β-TCP/CNFs membrane [40]

    Fig. 3 shows a schematic diagram of the β-TCP/CNFs membrane fabrication process. Triethyl phosphate (TEP, 2.28 mL) was mixed with 10 mL distilled water, with stirring at 353 K for 48 h, to obtain a hydrolyzed TEP solution. Calcium nitrate tetrahydrate (CN, 4.72 g) was dissolved into the hydrolyzed TEP solution, and solution was stirred at room temperature for 120 h to generate a calcium-phosphorous complex. Then, 1 mL of the prepared solution was added to 10 mL N, N-demethylformamide (DMF, >99, 5%) containing 10 wt% polyacrylonitrile (PAN), and stirred for 6 h at room temperature to obtain a homogeneous solution. Electrospinning and fabrication of the β-TCP/CNFs membrane followed the method in the previous report [35].

       2.5. Characterization of membranes [35,45]

    The electrospun PLLA, PLLA/HA, and PLLA/MWNTs/HA membranes were gold ?coated using sputter coating in order to observe the surface morphology and average diameter by scanning electron microscope (SEM). An energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis was carried out to confirm the extent of P and Ca elements and the distribution of HA particles in the membranes. A Raman spectrum analysis was conducted to confirm the existence of MWNTs in the PLLA/MWNTs/HA membranes. Membranes were cut into rectangles (20 × 20 × 0.05 mm) for an in vitro degradation test. The structural properties of membranes, such as surface area, pore volume, and average pore size, were investigated from nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms using a surface area analyzer. Mechanical properties were tested with an Instron (Model 1121) at 20 mm/min crosshead speed with 10 mm gauge length at room temperature.

       2.6. PDLCs culture on membranes [35]

    PDLCs were obtained from healthy teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons. Informed consent was obtained from the patients before the extractions. The midmost of the periodontal ligament attached

    to the root surface was removed with a curette, cut into small pieces, and cultured in a tissue culture medium. An α-modification of Eagle’s medium (α-MEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics was used to culture the cells. After reaching 80% confluence, the cells were passaged with 0.25% trypsin/0.02% ethylene diaminotetraacetic acid (EDTA). The cells between the third and the fifth passages were used in the following studies. PDLCs were harvested with 0.25% trypsin/0/02% EDTA and transferred to an osteogenic differentiation medium. After 7 days culturing, PDLCs were transfected using a recombinant adenovirus containing green fluorescent protein at a ratio of 1:20 for 2 h. A flow cytometer was used to determine the ratio of transfection. Membranes were cut into a round shape, 10 mm in diameter, to fully cover the bottoms of wells of tissue culture plates; membranes were then fixed. PDLCs were seeded into different kinds of membranes and tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS: control group) at a density of 5000 cells/well and cultured in an osteogenic differentiation medium. After 1, 3, 5, and 7 days culturing, cells were detached with 0.25% trypsin/0/02% EDTA at 37℃ for 10 min, repeatedly pipetted, centrifuged, and resuspended. The number of suspended cells was counted using a hemocytometer under an inverted fluorescence microscope. The number of viable cells was also determined with MTT assay, which has previously been described [46].

       2.7. Human GECs culture on membranes [35]

    GECs were obtained from the gingival tissue of systematic healthy individuals removed during periodontal surgery. The explants were treated with 6 mg/mL of Dispase in 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) buffered saline at 4℃ to separate the epithelium from the underlying fibrous connective tissue. The epithelium was then removed and incubated at 37℃ in 0.25% trypsin/0.02% EDTA for 10 min and repeatedly pipetted to prepare a single-cell suspension. Further experiments were followed by PDLC culture.

       2.8. Osteoblast cell culture on membranes [45]

    PLLA and PLLA/HA hybrid membranes were added into Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) and incubated at 37℃ for 24 h. Then, membranes were removed and the extracts were stored at 4℃ for further use. Osteoblast cells (MG-63) were cultured in DMEM with or without the extracts for 24, 72, and 120 h. The number of viable cells was measured by MTT assay. After sterilization, the hybrid membranes were transferred into 24 well plates and held by a metal ring. Osteoblast cells in 1 mL DMEM were plated on the membranes. After 1 h, each membrane was topped up with enough culture medium and incubated for 2 more days. Then, the constructs were washed with phosphate buffer solution to remove nonadherent cells, were fixed with 4% glutaraldehyde for 1 h at room temperature, were dehydrated through a series of graded alcohol, and were air dried overnight. These dry constructs were gold-coated and cell adhesion on membranes was observed using SEM.

    3. Results and Discussion

    Fig. 4 shows the characteristics of PLLA, PLLA/HA, PLLA/ MWNTs/HA membranes [35]. The diameters of the three kinds

    of electrospun fibers were about 1 μm, and three dimensional porous structures were obtained. The incorporation of HA or MWNTs/HA nanoparticles resulted in fibers that were more irregular in diameter and more beaded in morphology than those derived using pure PLLA fibers. EDX analysis shows the presence of elemental P and Ca in the membranes. The Raman spectra confirmed the presence of MWNTs in the membranes. A crystalline carbon apex and an amorphous carbon apex, which are the two unique apexes of MWNTs, were also found in the PLLA/MWNTs/HA membrane.

    Fig. 5 shows SEM images of electrospun membranes with different fiber arrangements. The random PLLA nanofibers showed isotropic fiber alignments with average fiber diameter of 450 nm. The parallel and hyperparallel fibers exhibited anisotropic alignments with average diameters of 325 and 275 nm. Especially, the hyperparallel group showed a higher order of fiber arrangement than that of the parallel group due to the hot stretching of the membrane.

    Fig. 6 provides SEM images of as-electrospun (a) PLLA, (b) PLLA/gelatin, and (c) gelatin fibers, having smooth surface and 1 μm diameter [36]. After crosslinking, severe morphological deformation and conglutination had occurred on the gelatin fibers, causing damage to the porous structure, while the PLLA/ gelatin composite fibers maintained their original structure. The three kinds of fibrous scaffolds showed different levels of hydrophilicity. Hydrophobic PLLA fibrous scaffolds showed surface water contact angles around 123° during the whole monitoring time, while the contact angle of pure gelatin fibrous scaffolds leveled off at 42°. However, a water drop was detected soaking

    into the PLLA/gelatin fibrous scaffolds within 20 s and a final contact angle of 0° resulted.

    Fig. 7 shows SEM, transmission electron microscope (TEM), and macroscopic images of β-TCP/CNFs [40]. β-TCP/CNFs emerge as an ultra-thin black web with a thickness ~30 μm; these structures exhibit a millimeter-length scale fibrous morphology with a partial alignment along the rolling direction

    and an average diameter of 120 nm. Some nanoparticles were exposed on the surface of the CNTs (Fig. 6B). TEM affiliated energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) indicated that the content of β-TCP/CNF nanocrystalline structures in the CNFs was about 15 wt%. An HR-TEM image of a typical CNF distinctly shows that it emerges in a disordered lattice structure with a low degree of crystallization.

    Fig. 8 shows X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the CNFs and β-TCP/CNFs carbonized at 1373 K in N2 [40]. The broad and weak diffraction peaks at 2θ = 24.7 and 44.5° were indexed as the (002) and (101) reflections of graphitic carbon. However, (B) exhibits a series of sharp characteristic diffraction peaks at 2θ = 16.9, 25.7, 27.7, 30.9, and 34.3°, corresponding to the rhombohedral β-TCP crystal planes of (110)), (1010), (214), (0210), and (220), respectively. These well defined peaks demonstrate the distinct formation and crystallization of the β-TCP

    nanoparticles from the calcium-phosphorous complex through high temperature carbonization.

    Fig. 9 shows mass loss and pH change of three kinds of membranes during in vitro degradation [35]. The weights of all membranes were found to continuously decrease due to the degradation of fibers. However, the incorporation of HA or MWNTs/HA nanoparticles slowed down the degradation of PLLA because the dissolving alkaline HA particles acted as a physical barrier that was able to block the entry of water. The pH of the solution decreased continuously for the PLLA membrane. On the other hand, the pH of the PLLA/HA and PLLA/MWNTs/HA membranes decreased in the beginning step, but, 4 weeks later, it slowly increased due to HA’s releasing of OH- after degradation, which neutralized the acid resulting from PLLA degradation [47].

    Fig. 10 shows tensile stress-strain curves of PLLA nanofibrous scaffolds with random, parallel, and hyperparallel fiber arrangement in the scaffolds. As the orientation increased, the PLLA nanofibrous scaffold, especially the hot-stretched portion, showed a significantly increased tensile strength and modulus.

    Fig. 11 shows the PDLC culture on three kinds of membranes [35]. The density of the PDLCs on the PLLA/MWNTs/HA membrane was the highest among those of the three membranes. The cells spread over the membrane fibers, linked with fibers by cytoplasmic extension. PDLCs were more actively extended on the PLLA/HA membrane than on the other two membranes during the same culturing time. However, the PLLA/MWNTs/HA membrane was the most suitable for human PDLC adhesion and proliferation. Wutticharoenmongkol et al. [48] reported that hydroxyapatite nanoparticles introduced nanofibrous scaffolds that showed excellent tissue regeneration. Chen et al. [49] reported that the fiber diameter in the scaffolds played an important role in tissue regeneration.

    Fig. 12 shows the effect of the membranes on the adhesion and proliferation of PDLCs and GECs, which processes were examined by cell counting and MTT assay [35]. The PDLC number was similar at 1 day for the three test and control groups, while the most active proliferation was observed on the PLLA/ MWNTs/HA membrane, showing a level almost 3 times that of the initial seeding cells and 30% larger than that of the PLLA/ HA membrane or that of the control group for the 7 day culture. On the other hand, fewer human GECs were found to attach to the PLLA/MWNTs/HA membrane, resulting in the inhibition of GECs.

    Fig. 13 shows histological examinations of osteoblast cells/ membranes implanted into immunodeficient mice [35]. It was observed that residual electrospun fibers could be clearly identi-

    fied; no obvious inflammation was found in the implant areas. Bonelike tissues were formed with round or irregular shapes and were stained into homogeneous pink by hematoxylin/eosin; osteoblast-like cells were well arranged around the bonelike tissues. Calcium deposits were confirmed in the newly-formed bonelike tissue by alizarin red staining. It is notable that abundant blood vessels were grown in the newly-formed tissues. Osteocalcin, which was stained in brown, was detected in the cytoplasm and outside the cells. The results indicated that the PLLA/

    MWNTs/HA membrane was of good biocompatibility in vivo during the 4 week period, and human PDLCs seemed to func-

    tion well on the membrane. The three dimensional porous structures of the implanted membranes may be helpful to guide the ingrowth of blood vessels, which ingrowth plays an important role in tissue regeneration. Commercially available guided tissue regeneration (GTR) membranes such as Bio-Gide (collagen type I and III) and Guidor (PLLA, Guidor AB) employ a twolayer design [5,50]. A three-layer nanocarbonated hydroapatite/ collagen/PLGA composite membrane was introduced for GTR and showed an enhanced protein content of osteoblastic cells cultured on the membrane [6,7].

    Fig. 14 provides SEM images of the PLLA and PLLA/gelatin membranes, which were immersed in 5 x SBF for 3-24 h [36]. A large amount of apatite minerals were deposited on the scaffolds. PLLA/gelatin composite fibrous scaffolds kept their original porous structure without obvious fiber swelling, although there was a presence of a hydrophilic gelatin component [51]. In the first few hours (3-6 h), inorganic depositions could hardly be seen on the fiber surface. As the biomineralization proceeded, sheet-like mineralites appeared on the scaffolds. The fibers were totally covered by the apatite layer after they were soaked in 5 x SBF for 18-24 h. Different from the remaining sheet-like deposition on the PLLA scaffolds, the sheet-like deposition on the PLLA/gelatin composite fibers transformed into spherical mineralites at 24 h. The sheet-like and spherical mineralites coexisted at all times on the composite scaffolds, as shown in Figs. 12f-j.

    Fig. 15 shows CLSM images of the PDLCs cultured on (a) CNF and (b) β-TCP/CNF membranes for 24 h. PDLCs can be adhered favorably on both membranes with proliferating preference along the aligned longitudinal direction of the nanofibers. Figs. 13c-f shows the proliferation of PDLCs and the deposition of the extra-cellular matrix on the membranes. For the 1 day culture, PDLCs were well adhered along the fiber direction and were interlinked with nanofibers by cytoplasmic extensions. The oriented proliferations of PDLCs confirm the good physiochemical compatibilities of the CNFs and β-TCP/CNFs; this result coincided well with the aforementioned confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). After 7 days of culturing, the cells obviously proliferated on the membrane surfaces with increasing coverage areas, and PDLCs were more actively extended on the β-TCP/CNFs membrane. Ogose et al. [39] also reported the effect of β-TCP as bone substitution material after excision of bone tumors.

    Fig. 16 shows the proliferation rates of MG-63 cells on PLLA nanofibrous scaffolds. Cell density increased from the 1 day to the 7 day culturing in all groups, although there was no statistical difference among the random and parallel scaffolds and the TCP group. The hyperparallel group exhibited a significant lower cell density than that of other groups.

    Fig. 17 shows the morphologies of the MG-63 cells cultured on the PLLA nanofibrous scaffolds with random, parallel, and hyperparallel alignment. For all scaffolds, MG-63 cells adhered and grew well, and the cells appeared to interact and associate with the surrounding fibers. The cells cultured on the random scaffold showed polygonal forms with no obvious orientation, while for both the parallel and the hypoparallel aligned scaffolds the cells showed polarized forms with orientation along the fiber direction. Notably, it could be seen that more filopodia like extensions and filament like structures extended from the MG-63 cells on the random PLLA fibers than on the parallel and hyperparallel fibers (Figs. 8b’, d’, f’). Ko et al. [52] reported on the biological behavior of MG-63 cells on hydroxyapatite surfaces.

    4. Conclusions

    In this paper, we have reviewed the fabrication and cell culturing of various CNF/nanoparticle reinforced PLLA related membranes. Electrospinning is a recommendable technique to obtain favorable membranes. Human cells such as PDLCs, osteoblast-like cells that can be effectively used for bone-tissue regeneration, were well adhered and proliferated on the membranes. On the other hand, GECs, which are bad for humans, were successfully inhibited on the membranes.

참고문헌
  • 1. Sequeira SJ, Soscia David A, Oztan B, Mosier Aaron P, Jean-Gilles R, Gadre A, Cady Nathaniel C, Yener B, Castracane J, Larsen M. (2012) The regulation of focal adhesion complex formation and salivary gland epithelial cell organization by nanofibrous PLGA scaffolds. [Biomaterials] Vol.33 P.3175 google cross ref
  • 2. Jang JH, Castano O, Kim HW. (2009) Electrospun materials as potential platforms for bone tissue engineering. [Adv Drug Del Rev] Vol.61 P.1065 google cross ref
  • 3. Beachley V, Wen X. (2010) Polymer nanofibrous structures: fabrication, biofunctionalization, and cell interactions. [Prog Polym Sci] Vol.35 P.868 google cross ref
  • 4. Kim HW, Song JH, Kim HE. (2005) Nanofiber generation of gelatin?hydroxyapatite biomimetics for guided tissue regeneration. [Adv Funct Mater] Vol.15 P.1988 google cross ref
  • 5. Hillmann G, Steinkamp-Zucht A, Geurtsen W, Gross G, Hoffmann A. (2002) Culture of primary human gingival fibroblasts on biodegradable membranes. [Biomaterials] Vol.23 P.1461 google cross ref
  • 6. Owen GR, Jackson J, Chehroudi B, Burt H, Brunette DM. (2005) A PLGA membrane controlling cell behaviour for promoting tissue regeneration. [Biomaterials] Vol.26 P.7447 google cross ref
  • 7. Liao S, Wang W, Uo M, Ohkawa S, Akasaka T, Tamura K, Cui F, Watari F. (2005) A three-layered nano-carbonated hydroxyapatite/collagen/ PLGA composite membrane for guided tissue regeneration. [Biomaterials] Vol.26 P.7564 google cross ref
  • 8. Song JH, Kim HE, Kim HW. (2008) Electrospun fibrous web of collagen? apatite precipitated nanocomposite for bone regeneration. [J Mater Sci Mater Med] Vol.19 P.2925 google cross ref
  • 9. Kim HW, Yu HS, Lee HH. (2008) Nanofibrous matrices of poly(lactic acid) and gelatin polymeric blends for the improvement of cellular responses. [J Biomed Mater Res A] Vol.87 P.25 google cross ref
  • 10. An K, Liu H, Guo S, Kumar DNT, Wang Q. (2010) Preparation of fish gelatin and fish gelatin/poly(l-lactide) nanofibers by electrospinning. [Int J Biol Macromol] Vol.47 P.380 google cross ref
  • 11. Chong EJ, Phan TT, Lim IJ, Zhang YZ, Bay BH, Ramakrishna S, Lim CT. (2007) Evaluation of electrospun PCL/gelatin nanofibrous scaffold for wound healing and layered dermal reconstitution. [Acta Biomater] Vol.3 P.321 google cross ref
  • 12. Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Prabhakaran MP, Morshed M, Nasr-Esfahani M-H, Ramakrishna S. (2008) Electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone)/ gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering. [Biomaterials] Vol.29 P.4532 google cross ref
  • 13. Meng ZX, Wang YS, Ma C, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng YF. (2010) Electrospinning of PLGA/gelatin randomly-oriented and aligned nanofibers as potential scaffold in tissue engineering. [Mater Sci Eng C] Vol.30 P.1204 google cross ref
  • 14. Jose MV, Thomas V, Dean DR, Nyairo E. (2009) Fabrication and characterization of aligned nanofibrous PLGA/Collagen blends as bone tissue scaffolds. [Polymer] Vol.50 P.3778 google cross ref
  • 15. Lee TM, TM CY, Chang E, Tsai RS. (2004) Comparison of plasmasprayed hydroxyapatite coatings and zirconia-reinforced hydroxyapatite composite coatings: in vivo study. [J Biomed Mater Res A] Vol.71 P.652 google cross ref
  • 16. Auclair-Daigle C, Bureau MN, Legoux JG, Yahia LH. (2005) Bioactive hydroxyapatite coatings on polymer composites for orthopedic implants. [J Biomed Mater Res A] Vol.73 P.398 google cross ref
  • 17. Gomez-Vega JM, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ. (2000) Bioactive glass coatings with hydroxyapatite and Bioglass? particles on Ti-based implants. 1. Processing. [Biomaterials] Vol.21 P.105 google cross ref
  • 18. LeGeros RZ. (2002) Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphates. [Clin Orthop Relat Res] Vol.81 google
  • 19. Liu Q, Wijn JR, Bakker D, Blitterswijk CA. (1996) Surface modification of hydroxyapatite to introduce interfacial bonding with polyactiveTM 70/30 in a biodegradable composite. [J Mater Sci Mater Med] Vol.7 P.551 google cross ref
  • 20. Kikuchi M, Suetsugu Y, Tanaka J, Akao M. (1997) Preparation and mechanical properties of calcium phosphate/copoly-L-lactide composites. [J Mater Sci Mater Med] Vol.8 P.361 google cross ref
  • 21. Rho JY, Kuhn-Spearing L, Zioupos P. (1998) Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. [Med Eng Phys] Vol.20 P.92 google cross ref
  • 22. Du C, Cui FZ, Zhu XD, de Groot K. (1999) Three-dimensional nano-HAp/ collagen matrix loading with osteogenic cells in organ culture. [J Biomed Mater Res] Vol.44 P.407 google cross ref
  • 23. Du C, Cui FZ, Feng Feng, Zhu XD, de Groot K. (1998) Tissue response to nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen composite implants in marrow cavity. [J Biomed Mater Res] Vol.42 P.540 google cross ref
  • 24. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. (2000) Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. [J Biomed Mater Res] Vol.51 P.475 google cross ref
  • 25. Ueyama Y, Ishikawa K, Mano T, Koyama T, Nagatsuka H, Suzuki K, Ryoke K (2002) Usefulness as guided bone regeneration membrane of the alginate membrane. [Biomaterials] Vol.23 P.2027 google cross ref
  • 26. Kikuchi M, Koyama Y, Takakuda K, Miyairi H, Shirahama N, Tanaka J. (2002) In vitro change in mechanical strength of β-tricalcium phosphate/copolymerized poly-L-lactide composites and their application for guided bone regeneration. [J Biomed Mater Res] Vol.62 P.265 google cross ref
  • 27. Chen F, Wang ZC, Lin CJ. (2002) Preparation and characterization of nano-sized hydroxyapatite particles and hydroxyapatite/chitosan nano-composite for use in biomedical materials. [Mater Lett] Vol.57 P.858 google cross ref
  • 28. Kasuga T, Maeda H, Kato K, Nogami M, Hata K, Ueda M. (2003) Preparation of poly(lactic acid) composites containing calcium carbonate (vaterite). [Biomaterials] Vol.24 P.3247 google cross ref
  • 29. Deng X, Hao J, Wang C. (2001) Preparation and mechanical properties of nanocomposites of poly(d,l-lactide) with Ca-deficient hydroxyapatite nanocrystals. [Biomaterials] Vol.22 P.2867 google cross ref
  • 30. Kim HW, Kim HE, Salih V. (2005) Stimulation of osteoblast responses to biomimetic nanocomposites of gelatin?hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering scaffolds. [Biomaterials] Vol.26 P.5221 google cross ref
  • 31. Yamauchi K, Goda T, Takeuchi N, Einaga H, Tanabe T. (2004) Preparation of collagen/calcium phosphate multilayer sheet using enzymatic mineralization. [Biomaterials] Vol.25 P.5481 google cross ref
  • 32. Formhals A. (1934)
  • 33. Matthews JA, Wnek GE, Simpson DG, Bowlin GL. (2002) Electrospinning of collagen nanofibers. [Biomacromolecules] Vol.3 P.232 google cross ref
  • 34. Xu CY, Inai R, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. (2004) Aligned biodegradable nanofibrous structure: a potential scaffold for blood vessel engineering. [Biomaterials] Vol.25 P.877 google cross ref
  • 35. Mei F, Zhong J, Yang X, Ouyang X, Zhang S, Hu X, Ma Q, Lu J, Ryu S, Ryu X. (2007) Improved biological characteristics of poly(Llactic acid) electrospun membrane by incorporation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes/hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. [Biomacromolecules] Vol.8 P.3729 google cross ref
  • 36. Cai Q, Xu Q, Feng Q, Cao X, Yang X, Deng X. (2011) Biomineralization of electrospun poly(L-lactic acid)/gelatin composite fibrous scaffold by using a supersaturated simulated body fluid with continuous CO2 bubbling. [Appl Surf Sci] Vol.257 P.10109 google cross ref
  • 37. Shi X, Hudson JL, Spicer PP, Tour JM, Krishnamoorti R, Mikos AG. (2006) Injectable nanocomposites of single-walled carbon nanotubes and biodegradable polymers for bone tissue engineering. [Biomacromolecules] Vol.7 P.2237 google cross ref
  • 38. Bhattacharyya S, Guillot S, Dabboue H, Tranchant JF, Salvetat JP. (2008) Carbon nanotubes as structural nanofibers for hyaluronic acid hydrogel scaffolds. [Biomacromolecules] Vol.9 P.505 google cross ref
  • 39. Ogose A, Hotta T, Kawashima H, Kondo N, Gu W, Kamura T, Endo N. (2005) Comparison of hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate as bone substitutes after excision of bone tumors. [J Biomed Mater Res B] Vol.72 P.94 google cross ref
  • 40. Liu H, Cai Q, Lian P, Fang Z, Duan S, Ryu S, Yang X, Deng X (2010) The biological properties of carbon nanofibers decorated with β-tricalcium phosphate nanoparticles. [Carbon] Vol.48 P.2266 google cross ref
  • 41. Kim H-W, Yu H-S, Lee H-H. (2008) Nanofibrous matrices of poly(lactic acid) and gelatin polymeric blends for the improvement of cellular responses. [J J Biomed Mater Res A] Vol.87 P.25 google cross ref
  • 42. Murphy WL, Kohn DH, Mooney DJ. (2000) Growth of continuous bonelike mineral within porous poly(lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds in vitro. [J Biomed Mater Res] Vol.50 P.50 google cross ref
  • 43. Madurantakam PA, Rodriguez IA, Cost CP, Viswanathan R, Simpson DG, Beckman MJ, Moon PC, Bowlin GL. (2009) Multiple factor interactions in biomimetic mineralization of electrospun scaffolds. [Biomaterials] Vol.30 P.5456 google cross ref
  • 44. Wang B, Cai Q, Zhang S, Yang X, Deng X. (2011) The effect of poly (L-lactic acid) nanofiber orientation on osteogenic responses of human osteoblast-like MG63 cells. [J Mech Behav Biomed Mater] Vol.4 P.600 google cross ref
  • 45. Sui G, Yang X, Mei F, Hu X, Chen G, Deng X, Ryu S. (2007) Poly-Llactic acid/hydroxyapatite hybrid membrane for bone tissue regeneration. [J Biomed Mater Res A] Vol.82 P.445 google cross ref
  • 46. Wataha JC, Craig RG, Hanks CT. (1992) Precision of and new methods for testing in vitro alloy cytotoxicity. [Dent Mater] Vol.8 P.65 google cross ref
  • 47. Zhang R, Ma PX. (1999) Poly(α-hydroxyl acids)/hydroxyapatite porous composites for bone-tissue engineering. I. Preparation and morphology. [J Biomed Mater Res] Vol.44 P.446 google cross ref
  • 48. Wutticharoenmongkol P, Pavasant P, Supaphol P. (2007) Osteoblastic phenotype expression of MC3T3-E1 cultured on electrospun polycaprolactone fiber mats filled with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. [Biomacromolecules] Vol.8 P.2602 google cross ref
  • 49. Chen M, Patra PK, Warner SB, Bhowmick S. (2007) Role of fiber diameter in adhesion and proliferation of NIH 3T3 fibroblast on electrospun polycaprolactone scaffolds. [Tissue Eng] Vol.13 P.579 google cross ref
  • 50. Wang HL, Miyauchi M, Takata T. (2002) Initial attachment of osteoblasts to various guided bone regeneration membranes: an in vitro study. [J Periodont Res] Vol.37 P.340 google cross ref
  • 51. Isikli C, Hasirci V, Hasirci N. (2012) Development of porous chitosan? gelatin/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for hard tissue-engineering applications. [J Tissue Eng Regener Med] Vol.6 P.135 google cross ref
  • 52. Ko YH, Seo DS, DS JK. (2011) Biological behavior of MG63 cells on the hydroxyapatite surface. [Bioceram Develop Appl] Vol.1 P.D101126 google cross ref
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Schematic diagram of PLLA/MWNTs/HA membrane fabrication process [37]. PLLA: poly-L-lactic acid, MWNTs: multiwalled carbon nanotubes, HA: hydroxyapatite.
    Schematic diagram of PLLA/MWNTs/HA membrane fabrication process [37]. PLLA: poly-L-lactic acid, MWNTs: multiwalled carbon nanotubes, HA: hydroxyapatite.
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Schematic views of poly-L-lactic acid nanofibrous membrane fabrication by electrospinning: (a) metal plate collector, (b) rolling drum collector, and (c) membrane hot-stretching device.
    Schematic views of poly-L-lactic acid nanofibrous membrane fabrication by electrospinning: (a) metal plate collector, (b) rolling drum collector, and (c) membrane hot-stretching device.
  • [ Fig. 3. ]  Schematic diagram of poly-L-lactic acid/carbon nanotubes membrane fabrication process [42].
    Schematic diagram of poly-L-lactic acid/carbon nanotubes membrane fabrication process [42].
  • [ Fig. 4. ]  Characterization of three kinds of membranes: (a-c) represent scanning electron microscope images of PLLA, PLLA/HA, and PLLA/MWNTs/HA membrane, (d) represents energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mapping of PLLA/HA and PLLA/MWNTs/HA membranes for elemental Ca and P, (e) represents Raman spectra of MWNTs (upper), PLLA/HA (middle), and PLLA/MWNTs/HA membrane (lower), respectively [37]. PLLA: poly-L-lactic acid, MWNTs: multiwalled carbon nanotubes, HA: hydroxyapatite.
    Characterization of three kinds of membranes: (a-c) represent scanning electron microscope images of PLLA, PLLA/HA, and PLLA/MWNTs/HA membrane, (d) represents energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mapping of PLLA/HA and PLLA/MWNTs/HA membranes for elemental Ca and P, (e) represents Raman spectra of MWNTs (upper), PLLA/HA (middle), and PLLA/MWNTs/HA membrane (lower), respectively [37]. PLLA: poly-L-lactic acid, MWNTs: multiwalled carbon nanotubes, HA: hydroxyapatite.
  • [ Fig. 5. ]  Scanning electron microscope images and diameter distributions of three electrospun poly-L-lactic acid nanofibrous membranes with different fiber arrangements: (a,b,g) random, (c,d,h) parallel, and (e,f,i) hyperparallel aligned.
    Scanning electron microscope images and diameter distributions of three electrospun poly-L-lactic acid nanofibrous membranes with different fiber arrangements: (a,b,g) random, (c,d,h) parallel, and (e,f,i) hyperparallel aligned.
  • [ Fig. 6. ]  Scanning electron microscope images of as-electrospun (A) poly- L-lactic acid (PLLA), (B) PLLA/gelatin, (C) gelatin fiber, and crosslinked (D) and (E). (F-H) Water drop images on each membrane [38].
    Scanning electron microscope images of as-electrospun (A) poly- L-lactic acid (PLLA), (B) PLLA/gelatin, (C) gelatin fiber, and crosslinked (D) and (E). (F-H) Water drop images on each membrane [38].
  • [ Fig. 7. ]  (A) Scanning electron microscope, (B) transmission electron microscope (TEM), and (C) macroscopic images of β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)/carbon nanofibers (CNFs). HR-TEM images and selected area electron diffraction patterns (inset) of (D) carbon nanotubes and (E) β-TCP nanoparticles in the β-TCP/CNFs membrane [42].
    (A) Scanning electron microscope, (B) transmission electron microscope (TEM), and (C) macroscopic images of β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)/carbon nanofibers (CNFs). HR-TEM images and selected area electron diffraction patterns (inset) of (D) carbon nanotubes and (E) β-TCP nanoparticles in the β-TCP/CNFs membrane [42].
  • [ Fig. 9. ]  Characteristics of three kinds of membranes during in vitro degradation: (a) and (b) represent changes of mass and pH [37].
    Characteristics of three kinds of membranes during in vitro degradation: (a) and (b) represent changes of mass and pH [37].
  • [ Fig. 8. ]  X-ray diffraction patterns of (A) carbon nanofibers (CNFs) and (B) β-tricalcium phosphate/CNFs carbonized at 1373 K in N2 for 2 h [42].
    X-ray diffraction patterns of (A) carbon nanofibers (CNFs) and (B) β-tricalcium phosphate/CNFs carbonized at 1373 K in N2 for 2 h [42].
  • [ Fig. 10. ]  Typical tensile stress-strain curves of poly-L-lactic acid nanofibrous scaffolds with different fiber orientations [42].
    Typical tensile stress-strain curves of poly-L-lactic acid nanofibrous scaffolds with different fiber orientations [42].
  • [ Fig. 11. ]  Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of periodontal ligament cell (PDLC) cultured membranes: (a-c) show confocal laser microscope images of PDLCs on PLLA, PLLA/HA, and PLLA/MWNTs/HA membranes, respectively. (d-f ) show SEM images of PDLCs on PLLA, PLLA/HA, and PLLA/MWNTs/ HA membranes at low magnification, and (g-i) provide high magnification images. PLLA: poly-L-lactic acid, MWNTs: multiwalled carbon nanotubes, HA: hydroxyapatite.
    Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of periodontal ligament cell (PDLC) cultured membranes: (a-c) show confocal laser microscope images of PDLCs on PLLA, PLLA/HA, and PLLA/MWNTs/HA membranes, respectively. (d-f ) show SEM images of PDLCs on PLLA, PLLA/HA, and PLLA/MWNTs/ HA membranes at low magnification, and (g-i) provide high magnification images. PLLA: poly-L-lactic acid, MWNTs: multiwalled carbon nanotubes, HA: hydroxyapatite.
  • [ Fig. 12. ]  Effect of membranes on the adhesion and proliferation of periodontal ligament cells and gingival epithelial cells: (a) and (c) represent cell number, (b) and (d) represent the MTT assay [37]. PLLA: poly-L-lactic acid, MWNTs: multiwalled carbon nanotubes, HA: hydroxyapatite, TCPs: tricalcium phosphates.
    Effect of membranes on the adhesion and proliferation of periodontal ligament cells and gingival epithelial cells: (a) and (c) represent cell number, (b) and (d) represent the MTT assay [37]. PLLA: poly-L-lactic acid, MWNTs: multiwalled carbon nanotubes, HA: hydroxyapatite, TCPs: tricalcium phosphates.
  • [ Fig. 13. ]  Histologic examinations of cell/membranes implanted into immunodeficient mice: (a-c) show newly formed bonelike tissues with round or irregular shapes (white arrow); osteoblast-like cells were well arranged around bonelike tissues. Abundant blood vessels were found in the implanted area. In (c), alizarin red staining confirmed calcium deposits in newly-formed bonelike tissues; in (d), osteocalcin, which was stained in brown, was detected in the cytoplasms outside the cells [37].
    Histologic examinations of cell/membranes implanted into immunodeficient mice: (a-c) show newly formed bonelike tissues with round or irregular shapes (white arrow); osteoblast-like cells were well arranged around bonelike tissues. Abundant blood vessels were found in the implanted area. In (c), alizarin red staining confirmed calcium deposits in newly-formed bonelike tissues; in (d), osteocalcin, which was stained in brown, was detected in the cytoplasms outside the cells [37].
  • [ Fig. 14. ]  Scanning electron microscope images of (A-E) poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), and (F-J) PLLA/gelatin membranes in 5 x simulated body fluid-a solution for different times: (A, F) 3 h, (B, G) 6 h, (C, H) 12 h, (D, I) 18 h, and (E, J) 24 h.
    Scanning electron microscope images of (A-E) poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), and (F-J) PLLA/gelatin membranes in 5 x simulated body fluid-a solution for different times: (A, F) 3 h, (B, G) 6 h, (C, H) 12 h, (D, I) 18 h, and (E, J) 24 h.
  • [ Fig. 15. ]  Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of periodontal ligament cells (PDLCs) cultured on (A) carbon nanofibers (CNFs) and (B) β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)/CNFs membrane (red: actin, blue: cell nucleus), stained by TRITC-phalloidin and Hoechst 33342; scanning electron microscope images of PDLCs cultured on (C) CNFs and (D) β-TCP/ CNFs membrane for 1 day, (E) and (F) for 7 days. The arrows indicate the longitudinal direction of the nanofibers [42].
    Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of periodontal ligament cells (PDLCs) cultured on (A) carbon nanofibers (CNFs) and (B) β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)/CNFs membrane (red: actin, blue: cell nucleus), stained by TRITC-phalloidin and Hoechst 33342; scanning electron microscope images of PDLCs cultured on (C) CNFs and (D) β-TCP/ CNFs membrane for 1 day, (E) and (F) for 7 days. The arrows indicate the longitudinal direction of the nanofibers [42].
  • [ Fig. 16. ]  MG-63 cell proliferation on poly-L-lactic acid nanofibrous scaffolds with different fiber orientations after 1,3,5, and 7 days culture [47].
    MG-63 cell proliferation on poly-L-lactic acid nanofibrous scaffolds with different fiber orientations after 1,3,5, and 7 days culture [47].
  • [ Fig. 17. ]  Scanning electron microscope images of MG-63 cells cultured on poly-L-lactic acid nanofibrous scaffolds with different surface topographies: (a) random, 1 day, (b) random, 2 days, (c) parallel, 1 day, (d) parallel, 2 days, (e) hyperparallel, 1 day, (f ) hyperparallel aligned, 2 days. (b’), (d’), and (f’) are higher magnification images of (b), (d), and (f ).
    Scanning electron microscope images of MG-63 cells cultured on poly-L-lactic acid nanofibrous scaffolds with different surface topographies: (a) random, 1 day, (b) random, 2 days, (c) parallel, 1 day, (d) parallel, 2 days, (e) hyperparallel, 1 day, (f ) hyperparallel aligned, 2 days. (b’), (d’), and (f’) are higher magnification images of (b), (d), and (f ).
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.