검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
Morphology and distribution of some marine diatoms, family Rhizosoleniaceae, genus Proboscia, Neocalyptrella, Pseudosolenia, Guinardia, and Dactyliosolen in Korean coastal waters
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
Morphology and distribution of some marine diatoms, family Rhizosoleniaceae, genus Proboscia, Neocalyptrella, Pseudosolenia, Guinardia, and Dactyliosolen in Korean coastal waters
KEYWORD
Dactyliosolen , diatoms , distribution , Guinardia , morphology , Neocalyptrella , Proboscia , Pseudosolenia , Rhizosolenia
  • INTRODUCTION

    Peragallo (1892) regarded the genera Dactyliosolen Castracane, Lauderia Cleve, Attheya T. West, Guinardia H. Peragallo, and Rhizosolenia Brightwell as members of Rhizosoleniees. Thereafter, Hustedt (1930) suggested that 23 marine and 4 freshwater species belonged to this family. He synonymized several species, as several ear-lier studies described variations of seemingly the same species.

    Sundstrom (1986) suggested that only those species with valves bearing an external process, otaria, claspers, and copulae perforated by loculate areolae should be included in the genus Rhizosolenia. According to Sund-strom (1986), the genus Proboscia Sundstrom and Pseu-dosolenia Sundstrom were separated from Rhizosolenia because they have external processes. The two species of R. calcar-avis Schultze and R. alata Brightwell were subsequently transferred to Pseudosolenia calcar-avis Sundstrom and Proboscia alata Sundstrom, respectively (Sundstrom 1986). R. robusta Norman was also trans-ferred to Neocalyptrella robusta Hernandez-Becerril and Meave (Hernandez-Becerril and Meave del Castillo 1996, 1997).

    More recently, the family Rhizosoleniaceae included Neocalyptrella, Pseudosolenia, Proboscia, and Urosolenia. Representatives of these genera are commonly found as solitary cells in marine environments, except Urosolenia, which is restricted to freshwater (Edlund and Stoermer 1993, Rott et al. 2006, Li et al. 2009). The genera Guinardia and Dactyliosolen have been allocated to the family Rhi-zosoleniaceae.

    In Korea, the genera Rhizosolenia, Guinardia, and Dac-tyliosolen were recorded by Shim (1994). Many authors (Moon and Choi 1991, Yoon et al. 1992, Chang and Shim 1993, Kim et al. 1993, Yoon and Koh 1994, 1995) and Lee (1995) added Pseudosolenia and Proboscia to his check-list. Additional studies on the family Rhizosoleniaceae in Korea have been conducted sporadically (Yun and Lee 2010, Yun et al. 2011), but species identification, synon-ymies, and the phylogeny the family Rhizosoleniaceae have been insufficiently investigated. The present study provides a detailed survey of marine diatoms belonging to the genera Proboscia, Pseudosolenia, Neocalyptrella, Guinardia, and Dactyliosolen from the coastal waters of Korea. This survey provides detailed light and scanning electron microscopy illustrations and a critical review of the taxonomical and distributional data.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Field samples were collected in Korean coastal waters from September 2008 to February 2010 (Table 1). Phyto-plankton was collected using a 20 μm mesh-sized net by vertical towing. Samples were immediately fixed in neu-tralized formalin (final concentration 4%), glutaraldehyde (final concentration 2%), and Lugol’s solution. Organic material in the samples was removed using the methods of Hasle and Fryxell (1970) and Simonsen (1974). The ma-terials were examined under a light microscope (Axios-kop 40; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany), photographed with a MRc5 camera (Carl Zeiss) and a scanning electron micro-scope (JSM-5600LV; Jeol, Tokyo, Japan). Sizes of cells were measured using image calculation software (AxioVision AC v. 4.5; Carl Zeiss).

    Terminology was from that recommended in the first report of the working Committee on Diatom Terminol-ogy (Anonymous 1975) from the third Symposium on Recent and Fossil Marine Diatoms, Kiel. Other terminol-ogy follows Ross et al. (1979), Sundstrom (1986), Round et al. (1990), Hernandez-Becerril (1995), and Hasle and Syvertsen (1996).

    RESULTS

    We identified 6 rhizosolenid genera, including Rhizo-solenia, Proboscia, Pseudosolenia, Neocalyptrella, Guinar-dia, and Dactyliosolen. We described five of these genera except Rhizosolenia. The morphological characters ob-served in the genera Proboscia, Neocalyptrella, Pseudoso-lenia, Dactyliosolen, and Guinardia species are shown in Table. 2-4. According to the system suggested by Sund-strom (1986), 9 phytoplanktonic diatom taxa represent-ing 1 order, 1 suborder, 1 family, 5 genera, and 9 species were identified in this study. The systematic accounts are as follows:

    Class Bacillariophyceae Haeckel 1878

    Order Centrales Hustedt 1930

    Suborder Rhizosoleniineae Simonsen 1979

    Family Rhizosoleniaceae De Toni 1890

    Genus Proboscia Sundstrom 1986

    Proboscia alata (Brightwell) Sundstrom 1986

    Proboscia indica (H. Peragallo) Hernandez-Becerril 1995

    Genus Neocalyptrella (Norman) Hernandez-Becerril & Meave 1996

    Neocalyptrella robusta Hernandez-Becerril & Meave 1996

    Genus Pseudosolenia Sundstrom 1986

    Pseudosolenia calcar-avis (Schultze) Sundstrom 1986

    Genus Guinardia H. Peragallo 1892

    Guinardia delicatula (Cleve) Hasle 1995

    Guinardia flaccida (Castracane) H. Peragallo 1892

    Guinardia striata (Stolterforth) Hasle 1995

    Genus Dactyliosolen Castracane 1886

    Dactyliosolen fragilissimus (Bergon) Hasle 1995

    Dactyliosolen phuketensis (Sundstrom) Hasle 1995

      >  Proboscia alata (Brightwell) Sundstrom 1986 (Fig. 1, A-H)

    Brightwell 1858, p. 95, Pl. 5, Fig. 8; Peragallo 1892, p. 115, Pl. 18, Fig. 11-20; Hustedt 1920, Pl. 317; Hustedt 1930, p. 600, Fig. 345; Cupp 1943, p. 90, Fig. 52A & B; Oku-no 1952, p. 353, Pl. 2, Fig. 5 & 6; Okuno 1960, p. 310, Pl. 1, Fig. 1; Hendey 1964, p. 146, Pl. 2, Fig. 2; Drebes 1974, p. 57, Fig. 39c & d; Navarro 1981, p. 430, Fig. 33 & 34 as R. alata; Sundstrom 1986, p. 99, Fig. 258-266; Jordan et al. 1991, p. 65, Fig. 1-9; Takahashi et al. 1994, p. 413, Fig. 2-7; Hernandez-Becerril 1995, p. 252, Fig. 2-4; Hasle and Syvertsen 1996, p. 159, Pl. 30; Sunesen and Sar 2007, p. 639, Fig. 82-88 & 98.

    Synonyms. Rhizosolenia alata Brightwell 1858, Rhizo-solenia alata f. gracillima (Cleve) Gran 1905.

    Cells are solitary or in pairs, narrow cylindrical, bilat-erally symmetrical, 3.3-13.3 μm in diameter, 270.0-485.7 μm long. Valve is sub-conoidal, the ventral part longer than the dorsal part and proboscis structure is slightly curved, tapering towards the apical part of the valve, cir-cular in cross section, 15.0-30.0 μm long. Apical surface of the proboscis is composed of variously sized spinules. Number of spinules is 7-16, 0.1-0.4 μm long. Contiguous area is convex towards the valve surface, distally limited by asymmetric claspers. The valve areolae are rounded, 52-90 in 10 μm, arranged in longitudinal striae, converg-

    [Table 1.] Sampling sites for the genera Proboscia, Neocalyptrella, Pseudosolenia, Guinardia, and Dactyliosolen of the family Rhizosoleniaceae

    label

    Sampling sites for the genera Proboscia, Neocalyptrella, Pseudosolenia, Guinardia, and Dactyliosolen of the family Rhizosoleniaceae

    ing towards the apex. Girdle segment areolae are loculate, arranged in columns, with the external velum perforated by central pores, and internal circular foramina, 25-62 in 10 μm. Interlocular pores are commonly surrounded by six loculi. Segment horizontal axis and perpendicular axis are 3.3-13.3 and 10.0-26.7 μm long, respectively.

    Distribution. Proboscia alata has frequently been re-ported in the Argentine Sea (Ferrario and Galavan 1989 as R. alata and R. alata f. gracillima). During this study, P. alata was frequently observed in September 2008 and June 2009 at the Wolsung coast, Jeju Island, and the Korea Strait.

    Remarks. Sundstrom (1986) did not share the biogeo-graphical limits of P. alata because synonyms were used for probably all taxa included in the genus. The specific

    [Table 2.] Morphological characteristics of the Proboscia species examined in this study

    label

    Morphological characteristics of the Proboscia species examined in this study

    [Table 3.] Morphological characteristics of the Pseudosolenia and Neocalyptrella species examined in this study

    label

    Morphological characteristics of the Pseudosolenia and Neocalyptrella species examined in this study

    [Table 4.] Morphological characteristics of the Dactylisolen and Guinardia species examined in this study

    label

    Morphological characteristics of the Dactylisolen and Guinardia species examined in this study

    limits of the taxa including Proboscia have been deter-mined by many authors (Jordan and Priddle 1991, Jordan et al. 1991, Takahashi et al. 1994, Jordan and Saito 1999, Jordan and Ito 2002, Jordan and Ligowski 2004, 2006). Takahashi et al. (1994) reported that the genus contains five modern species distributed from polar to temperate regions. Jordan and Ligowski (2004) stated that P. alata is not cosmopolitan, because it appears to be a com-plex cryptic species. Some P. alata representatives are commonly found in polar waters. However, Hernandez-Becerril (1995) found that P. alata is distributed from tropical to subtropical waters.

      >  Proboscia indica (Peragallo) Hernandez-Becerril emend. Jordan & Ligowski 1995 (Fig. 2, A-F)

    Hustedt 1930, p. 602, Fig. 346; Cupp 1943, p. 93, Fig. 52C; Hendey 1964, p. 147, Pl. 2, Fig. 4; Hernandez-Becerril 1995, p. 254, Fig. 5 & 6; Moreno et al. 1996, p. 15, Pl. 29, Fig. 6 & 7; Jordan and Ligowski 2004, p. 98, Pl. 4, Fig. 5-7; Gomez and Souissi 2007, p. 287, Fig. 4g-h; Sunesen and Sar 2007, p. 639, Fig. 89-97 & 99.

    Synonyms. Rhizosolenia indica H. Peragallo 1892, Rhi-zosolenia alata f. indica (Peragallo) Gran 1905.

    Cells are solitary or in pairs, cylindrical, bilaterally symmetrical, 25.0-125.0 μm in diameter, 193.4-764.2 μm long. Valve is sub-conoidal, the ventral part longer than the dorsal part. Proboscis structure is strongly curved, ta-pered towards the apical part in the valve, circular in cross section, 39.0-83.3 μm long. Apical surface of the proboscis is composed of varied sized spinules and the slit is pore shape situated below the apex. Spinule number is 8-13 and 0.2-0.5 μm long. Contiguous area is convex towards the valve surface, distally limited by asymmetric claspers. The valve areolae are rounded, 30-60 in 10 μm, arranged in longitudinal striae, converging towards the apex. Gir-dle segment areolae are loculate, arranged in columns, and the external velum is perforated by central pores and internal circular foramina. Interlocular pores are com-monly surrounded by four loculi. The horizontal axis of the segments is 25.0-125.0 μm and the perpendicular axis is 10.6-16.0 μm.

    Distribution. Hendey (1964) reported that P. indica is common in temperate and sub-tropical seas as R. alata var. indica. This species has been reported from Buenos Aires marine waters (Marques Da Cunha and Da Fonseca 1917, Balech 1964, 1971, 1979, Lange 1985 as R. alata var. indica). During the present study, P. indica was rare but distributed widely at Geoje Island, Daebu Island, Dae-cheon Harbor, the Yangyang coast, and the Yellow Sea from September 2008 to October 2009.

    Remarks. Proboscia indica and P. alata are fairly simi-lar species. However, P. indica differs from P. alata by the larger diameter of the frustule and valve morphology. The valve shape of P. indica is sub-conical, round, and tapers into a strongly curved proboscis. Additionally, the pat-tern of the interlocular pores also differs between the two species, similar to a feature previously described by Hasle (1975) and Takano (1990). P. indica have interlocular pores surrounded by four loculae, but the P. alata inter-locular pores are surrounded by six loculae, as observed by Sundstrom (1986).

      >  Neocalyptrella robusta (Norman) Hernandez-Becerril & Meave 1996 (Fig. 3, A-H)

    Pritchard 1861, p. 866, Pl. 8, Fig. 42; Peragallo 1892, p. 109, Pl. 14, Fig. 1; Hustedt 1920, Pl. 320, Fig. 1-3; Hustedt 1930, p. 578, Fig. 330; Cupp 1943, p. 83, Fig. 46; Okuno 1957, p. 105, Pl. 2, Fig. 1; Okuno 1968, Fig. 1(6), 10A, 17 & 18; Navarro 1981, p. 430, Fig. 43 & 45; Sundstrom 1986, p. 104, Fig. 289 & 290 as R. robusta; Hernandez-Becerril and Meave del Castillo 1996, p. 199, Fig. 1-20 as Calyptrella robusta; Hasle and Syvertsen 1996, p. 159, Pl. 30 as R. ro-busta; Gomez and Souissi 2007, p. 287, Fig. 4i; Sunesen and Sar 2007, p. 637, Fig. 62-67.

    Synonyms. Rhizosolenia robusta Norman in Pritchard 1861, Calyptrella robusta (Norman) Hernandez-Becerril and Meave 1996.

    Cells are solitary, large, bilaterally symmetrical, 108.3-190.6 μm in diameter, 413.3 μm long, elliptical in cross sec-tion, crescent shaped in lateral view and of sigmoid form in ventro-dorsal view. Valve is conoidal with a rounded or truncated apex and with longitudinal undulations. Pro-cess is a cylindrical external tube, straightened towards the distal part, merging with the calyptra structure and circular pore in the distal part of the tip, 6.7-7.3 μm long, 0.8-1.0 μm in diameter. Valve areolae, 13-16 in 10 μm, are arranged in regularly straight striations, with a secondary quincuncial pattern. Otaria, claspers, and contiguous ar-eas are absent. Girdle segments are oriented in a straight line and arranged in two dorsiventral columns. Segment areolae, 17-22 in 10 μm, are arranged in regular, straight striations, with a secondary quincuncial pattern, loculate areolae, with the velum perforated by slit-like pores and internal foramina, circular to subcircular. Horizontal axis and perpendicular axis of segments are 108.3-190.6 and 11.7-25.0 μm in length, respectively.

    Distribution. Neocalyptrella robusta is distributed from tropical to temperate waters (Hasle and Syvertsen 1996, Hernandez-Becerril and Meave del Castillo 1996). It has been reported to occur in littoral Argentinean wa-ters (Ferrario and Galavan 1989, as Rhizosolenia robusta). During this study, N. robusta was rare but observed in September 2008 and June 2009 at Geoje Island, the Korea Straight, the Wolsung coast, and the Yellow Sea.

      >  Pseudosolenia calcar-avis (Schultze) Sundstrom 1986 (Fig. 4, A-H)

    Schultze 1858, p. 339, Pl. 13, Fig. 5-10; Peragallo 1892, p. 113, Pl. 17, Fig. 9; Hustedt 1930, p. 592, Fig. 339 as R. cal-car-avis; Cupp 1943, p. 89, Fig. 51 as R. calar-avis; Navarro 1981, p. 430, Fig. 36 & 37 as R. calcar-avis; Sundstrom 1986, p. 95, Fig. 40-46 & 247-257; Hernandez-Becerril 1995, p. 254, Fig. 7-10; Hasle and Syvertsen 1996, p. 160, Pl. 30; Sunesen and Sar 2007, p. 637, Fig. 68-81.

    Synonym. Rhizosolenia calcar-avis Schultze 1858.

    Cells are usually solitary, elongated, of cylinder shape, bilaterally symmetrical, circular in cross section, 9.3-90.0 μm in diameter, 206.7-793.8 μm long. Valve is sub-conical, asymmetrical, with the ventral part slightly longer than the dorsal part. Contiguous area is a narrow groove, sig-moid, extended from the basal part of the process to the margin in the ventral part of the valve. Process is claw or screw shaped, slightly or strongly curved, and tapered towards the distal part, 10.7-51.4 μm long. Otaria and claspers are absent. Valve areolae are poroid, circular, 16-34 in 10 μm. Striations are regular and straight, with a secondary quincuncial pattern. Girdle segments are scale-shaped to rhomboidal, arranged in two or multiples of two columns, with a sub marginal seam-like structure close to the advalvar margin with entire hyaline edges. Horizontal axis and perpendicular axis of segments are 9.3-90.0 and 9.3-46.2 μm long, respectively. Segmented areolae are 21-38 in 10 μm in a secondary quincuncial pattern.

    Distribution. Pseudosolenia calcar-avis is a circum-globally distributed species (Sundstrom 1986) and occurs in warm waters and occasionally in temperate waters (Hasle and Syvertsen 1996). It has been reported several times in both oceanic and near-shore waters along the coastline of Argentina (Ferrario and Galavan 1989, as Rhizosolenia calcar-avis). In the present study, this spe-cies was rarely observed in September 2008 to September 2009 in the oceanic waters of Jeju Island and the Yellow Sea.

      >  Guinardia delicatula (Cleve) Hasle 1995 (Fig. 5, A & B)

    Cleve 1900, p. 28, Fig. 11; Hustedt 1930, p. 577, Fig. 328; Cupp 1943, p. 83, Fig. 44; Hendey 1964, p. 147, Pl. 4, Fig. 2; Drebes 1974, p. 49, Fig. 35a; Sundstrom 1986, p. 103, Fig. 272 & 273.

    Basionym. Rhizosolenia delicatula Cleve 1900.

    Cells form fairly straight chains and are bilaterally sym-metrical. Cells are 7.9-13.2 μm in diameter, 24.9-30.0 μm in length. Valve margins are round. External process is thin and short, and narrow, tube-shaped, and oblique to the pervalvar axis. External processes are 2.1-5.0 μm long. External process fits into a depression on the adjacent valve. Girdle segments are composed of open bands, with poroid areolae, and are not noticeable. Segment horizon-tal axes are 7.9-13.2 μm long.

    Distribution. Hasle and Syvertsen (1996) reported that G. delicatula is a cosmopolitan species in temperate and tropical waters. During the present study, this species was recorded in July 2009 and January 2010 in the coastal wa-ters of Sacheon, Incheon, and Mokpo.

      >  Guinardia flaccida (Castracane) H. Peragallo 1892 (Fig. 5, C-E)

    Castracane 1886, p. 74, Pl. 29, Fig. 4; Peragallo 1892, p. 107, Pl. 1, Fig. 3-5; Bergon 1903, p. 78, Pl. 2, Fig. 1-3; Hustedt 1930, p. 562, Fig. 322; Cupp 1943, p. 78, Fig. 40; Hendey 1964, p. 147, Pl. 5, Fig. 5; Drebes 1974, p. 58, Fig. 43a; Hasle 1975, p. 116, Fig. 64, 65 & 81-89; Navarro 1981,

    p. 430, Fig. 31 & 32; Takano 1990, pp. 260-261.

    Basionym. Rhizosolenia flaccida Castracane 1886.

    Cells are solitary or form fairly straight chains, and are bilaterally symmetrical. Cells are 14.0-42.5 μm in diame-ter, 50.0-125.0 μm in length. Valves are flat or slightly con-cave. External processes are short and tube-shaped. Short tube-shaped external processes are located on the exter-nal valve surface. External processes are 1.5-1.8 μm long. Girdle segments composed of open bands with poroid areolae. The segment horizontal axis and perpendicular axis are 14.0-42.5 and 1.3-5.0 μm in length, respectively.

    Distribution. Guinardia flaccida shows a cosmopoli-tan distribution except the two polar bodies of water (Hasle and Syvertsen 1996). During the present study, G. flaccida was frequently observed in September 2008 and August 2009 in the coastal waters of the Yellow Sea, Geoje Island, Namhae, Sacheon, Tongyeang, and Incheon.

      >  Guinardia striata (Stolterforth) Hasle 1995 (Fig. 5, F-H)

    Stolterforth 1879, p. 836, Fig. a & b; Peragallo 1888, p. 82, Pl. 6, Fig. 44; Peragallo 1892, p. 108, Pl. 13, Fig. 17 & 18; Bergon 1903, p. 57, Pl. 1, Fig. 1-8; Hustedt 1920, Pl. 320, Fig. 4 & 5; Hustedt 1930, p. 578, Fig. 329; Cupp 1943, p. 83, Fig. 45; Hendey 1964, p. 148, Pl. 4, Fig. 5; Drebes 1974, p. 49, Fig. 35b; Hasle 1975, p. 113, Fig. 66-73; Sundstrom 1980, p. 580, Fig. 2-4; Navarro 1981, p. 430, Fig. 48 as R. stolterforthii; Sundstrom 1986, p. 103, Fig. 274 & 275; Von Stosch 1986, p. 319, Fig. 13 & 14; Hernandez-Becerril 1995, p. 262, Fig. 53-56.

    Basionym. Rhizosolenia stolterforthii (Stolterforth) H. Peragallo 1888.

    Cells form curved chains, rarely spiraling chains, and are bilaterally symmetrical. Cells are 10.0-20.0 μm in diameter, and 50.0-120.0 μm in length. Valve flat and rounded at margin. External processes are thin, and hook-shaped to the pervalvar axis, and the external pro-cesses are 4.3-6.7 μm long. External process fits into a de-pression on the adjacent valve. Girdle bands composed of open bands with poroid areolae. Segment horizontal axis and perpendicular axis are 10.0-20.0 and 4.3-4.6 μm long, respectively.

    Distribution. Guinardia striata is cosmopolitan, but it does not occur in polar bodies of water (Hasle and Sy-vertsen 1996). During the present study, G. striata was rarely observed in September 2008 and August 2009 in the coastal waters of Namhae, Daebu Island, Incheon, and Yeongdeok.

      >  Dactyliosolen fragilissimus (Bergon) Hasle 1995 (Fig. 6, A-D)

    Bergon 1903, p. 49, Pl. 1, Fig. 9 & 10; Hustedt 1930, p. 571, Fig. 324; Cupp 1943, p. 80, Fig. 41; Drebes 1974, p. 48, Fig. 34b & c; Hasle 1975, p. 114, Fig. 61, 62 & 74-78; Navarro 1981, p. 430, Fig. 38 as R. fragilissima; Sundstrom 1986, p. 103, Fig. 268 & 269; Takano 1990, pp. 262-263.

    Basionym. Rhizosolenia fragilissima Bergon 1903.

    Cells are cylindrical with rounded marginal parts, forming straight chains. Cells are connected in loose fit-ting chains at the center of the valve surface. Cells are 8.3-20.0 μm in diameter, and 25.0-33.4 μm in length. Valves are flat or convex at the central part. External process is a thin, oblique tube in the central part of the valve. External processes are 1.1-4.3 μm long and fit into a depression on adjacent cells. Girdle bands composed of half bands with poroid areolae.

    Distribution. Dactyliosolen fragilissimus is probably cosmopolitan (Hasle and Syvertsen 1996) but was rarely observed in February 2010 in Goseong.

    Remarks. Cell length of Dactyliosolen fragilissimus varies from 30.0-80.0 μm (Gran and Angst 1931), 50.0-80.0 μm (Cupp 1943), 42.0-67.0 μm (Hendey 1964), and 42.0-300.0 μm (Hasle and Syvertsen 1996). During this study, D. fragilissimus was not observed with a length of pervalvar axis up to 100 μm.

      >  Dactyliosolen phuketensis (Sundstrom) Hasle 1995 (Fig. 6, E-G)

    Sundstrom 1980, p. 579, Fig. 1-3; Sundstrom 1986, p. 103, Fig. 270 & 271; Von Stosch 1986, p. 323, Fig. 15-17; Hernandez-Becerril 1995, p. 262, Fig. 50-52.

    Basionym. Rhizosolenia phuketensis Sundstrom 1980.

    Cells are cylindrical with a rounded marginal part, forming curved chains. Cells are connected in fairly fitting chains and are bilaterally symmetrical. Cells are 10.0-20.0 μm in diameter, and 31.3-129.2 μm long. Valves are flat or slightly convex. External process is usually an obtuse, short tube in the valve marginal part. External processes are 1.3-6.7 μm long and fit into a depression in adjacent cells. Girdle bands are composed of half bands with po-roid areolae. Segment horizontal axis and perpendicular axis are 10.0-20.0 and 1.3-6.6 μm in length, respectively.

    Distribution. Sundstrom (1986) reported that D. phuketensis occurs in warm water regions to temperate regions including the North Sea and Skagerrak. During this study, D. phuketensis was newly recorded in June 2009 and October 2009 from the coastal waters of Geoje Island, Sacheon, Tongyeang, Yeongduk, and the Yellow Sea.

    Remarks. Dactyliosolen phuketensis was recorded for the first time in Korean coastal waters, but this species was already observed a long time ago, resembling G. stri-ata. Although the two species belonged to different gen-era and were recorded in Korean coastal waters, they can be easily misidentified using the curved cell and colony shape as discriminating characters. The external process shapes are different between two taxa. The external pro-cesses of G. striata are hook shaped, whereas those of D. phuketensis are short external tubes. The position of the external process is not the same, and segment (band) shape also differs. Representatives of the genus Guinar-dia are composed of an open band, but the genus Dactyli-osolen is composed of a half band.

    DISCUSSION

    The family Rhizosoleniaceae includes Rhizosolenia, Proboscia, Pseudosolenia, Neocalyptrella, Guinardia, Dactyliosolen, and Urosolenia. The key morphological characters of the family Rhizosoleniaceae are cylindrical cells in solitary or chain form, unipolar and symmetrical valves, numerous chloroplasts, and a few resting spores. The genera within Rhizosoleniaceae are very common in the marine ecosystem and sometimes dominate the phytoplankton biomass in highly productive oceanic re-gions (Sundstrom 1986, Hernandez-Becerril and Meave del Castillo 1996, 1997). Some species of the family Rhi-zosoleniaceae are causative bloom organisms in various regions of the world (Jordan and Priddle 1991, Jordan et al. 1991, Takahashi et al. 1994). These species are very im-portant diatoms in marine environments.

    As shown in Table 2 of Yun and Lee (2010), Table 2 in Yun et al. (2011), and Table. 2-4 in the present study, we divided the 6 genera within the family Rhizosoleniaceae into two groups by morphological diagnostic characteris-tics including the shape of the external process and girdle segments in the column (Yun and Lee 2010, Yun et al. 2011). The first group had a conoidal valve and loculate areolae and was comprised of Proboscia, Pseudosolenia, Rhizosolenia, Neocalyptrella, and the second group had a flat or rounded valve and poroid areolae and was of Gui-nardia and Dactyliosolen. In the present study, 2 species belonged to Proboscia, 3 species to Guinardia, 2 species to Dactyliosolen, 1 species to Pseudosolenia, and 1 species belonged to Neocalyptrella.

    Cell diameters of Proboscia alata were 3.3-13.3 μm, but previous studies reported 7.0-18.0 μm (Cupp 1943 as Rhi-zosolenia alata), 8.5-11.5 μm (Sundstrom 1986), 2.5-42.0 μm (Jordan et al. 1991), 7.0-24.0 μm (Hernandez-Becerril 1995), 2.5-13.0 μm (Hasle and Syvertsen 1996), and 7.0-11.0 μm (Sunesen and Sar 2007). Cell diameters of P. indi-ca were 25.0-125.0 μm. Our specimens closely resembled those described previously (Cupp 1943, Hernandez-Becerril 1995, Jordan and Ligowski 2004), but their cell diameters were smaller (16.0-73.0 μm) than those of our specimens. Cell diameters of N. robusta (108.3-190.6 μm) and P. calcar-avis (9.3-90.0 μm) were smaller than those of Hasle and Syvertsen (1996) and Sunesen and Sar (2007), respectively.

    Cell diameters of G. delicatula were 7.9-13.2 μm, G. flac-cida were 23.3-42.5 μm, and G. striata were 10.0-20.0 μm. No differences were observed in the 3 species cell diam-eters compared with those of many studies (Cupp 1943, Hernandez-Becerril 1995, Hasle and Syvertsen 1996).

    Cell diameters of D. fragilissimus and D. phuketen-sis were 8.3-20.0 μm and 10.0-20.0 μm, respectively. Our specimens were similar to those of Hasle and Syvertsen (1996), but their cell diameters were wider than those of our specimens.

    External processes varied from short tube-shaped in N. robusta and D. phuketensis, claw or screw-shaped in P. calcar-avis, narrow tube-shaped in G. delicatula, slight hook-shaped in G. striata, and oblique tube-shaped in D. fragilissimus. The genus Proboscia was distinguished within the first group because the external processes were longer, and the valve was changed to a probosic structure. As the external process of Rhizosolenia was in the shape of a needle and tube, this genus is separated from other genera (Yun and Lee 2010, Yun et al. 2011). The external process of the family Rhizosoleniaceae is an important taxonomic key character.

    Areolae occurred in various forms on the external view; circular to sub circular pore-shaped in P. alata, P. indica, and N. robusta and circular to slightly oval pore-shaped in Pseudosolenia calcar-avis. We were unable to count the number of areolae in G. delicatula, G. striata, D. fragilis-simus, and D. phuketensis, but areolae of D. phuketensis are slit-like with a parallel to pervalvar axis (Hernandez-Becerril 1995).

    The number of areolae in the valves varied from 52-90 in 10 μm in P. alata, 30-60 in 10 μm in P. indica, 13-16 in 10 μm in N. robusta, and 16-34 in 10 μm in P. calcar-avis. Hasle and Syvertsen (1996) reported that N. robusta (as Rhizosolenia robusta) had 19-20 in 10 μm and 28-32 in 10 μm in P. calcar-avis. Sunesen and Sar (2007) reported that P. alata had 54 in 10 μm, 17 in 10 μm in N. robusta, and 23-32 in 10 μm in P. calcar-avis. No differences were observed from previous reports. The number of areolae in the seg-ments varied from 25-62 in 10 μm in P. alata, 17-22 in 10 μm in N. robusta, and 21-38 in 10 μm in P. calcar-avis. N. robusta has 24-26 in 10 μm (Hasle and Syvertsen 1996 as Rhizosolenia robusta), 22-23 in 10 μm in N. robusta, and 28-32 in 10 μm in P. calcar-avis (Sunesen and Sar 2007). Our specimens had a similar number of areolae in the segments compared with those of previous reports. We could not count number of areolae in P. indica, G. delicat-ula, G. flaccida, G. striata, D. fragilissimus, and D. phuke-tensis, because of delicate cells.

    Abundant distributions of G. flaccida and P. indica were found in Korean coastal waters. G. flaccida was widely distributed at 6 stations, and D. fragilissimus and N. robusta were sporadically found at 4 stations in Korean coastal waters. P. calcar-avis has been frequently found in the Korean coastal waters, and this species is a warm and temperate water species (Cupp 1943, Hendey 1964, Sundstrom 1986, Hernandez-Becerril 1995, Hasle and Sy-vertsen 1996). Dactyliosolen phuketensis was new to Ko-rean coastal waters.

참고문헌
  • 1. 1975 Proposals for a standardization of dia-tom terminology and diagnoses. [Nova Hedwigia Beih.] Vol.53 P.323-354 google
  • 2. Balech E 1964. El plancton de Mar del Plata durante el periodo 1961-62 (Buenos Aires Argentina). [Bol. Inst. Biol. Mar. Mar del Plata] Vol.7 P.1-49 google
  • 3. Balech E 1971 Microplancton de la campana oceanogra-fica Productividad III. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia’ e Instituto Nacional de Investigacion de las Ciencias Naturales. [Hi-drobiologia] Vol.3 P.1-202 google cross ref
  • 4. Balech E 1979 Dinoflagelados. Campana Oceanografica Argentina Islas Orcadas 06/75. [Servicio de Hidrografia Naval (Buenos Aires) H] Vol.655 P.1-76 google
  • 5. Bergon P 1903 Etudes sur la flore diatomique du bassin d’Arcachon et des parages de l’ Atlantique voisins de cette station. [Bull. Soc. Sci. Arcachon] Vol.6 P.39-113 google
  • 6. Brightwell T 1858. Remarks on the genus “Rhizosolenia” of Ehrenberg. [Q. J. Microsc. Sci.] Vol.6 P.93-95 google
  • 7. Castracane F 1886 Report on the Diatomaceae collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873-1876. Report of the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger 1873-1876 [Botany] Vol.2 P.1-178 google
  • 8. Chang M, Shim J. H 1993 A study on the phytoplankton of the Yellow Sea in Autumn 1984. [Ocean Res.] Vol.15 P.15-28 google
  • 9. Cleve P. T 1900 The plankton of the North Sea, the English Channel, and the Skagerak in 1898. [K. Svenska Vet. Akad. Handl.] Vol.32 P.1-53 google
  • 10. Cupp E. E 1943 Marine plankton diatoms of the west coast of North America. [Bull. Scripps Inst. Oceanogr. Univ. Ca-lif.] Vol.5 P.1-238 google
  • 11. De Toni G. B 1890 Osservazioni sulla tassonomia delle Bac-illariee (Diatomee): sequita da un prospetto dei generi delle medesime. [Notarisia] Vol.5 P.885-922 google
  • 12. Drebes C. G 1974 Marines phytoplankton: eine Ausw. d. Helgolaner plankton (Diatomeen Perideneen). P.186 google
  • 13. Edlund M. B, Stoermer E. F 1993 Resting spores of the freshwater diatoms Acanthoceras and Urosolenia. [J. Pa-leolimnol.] Vol.9 P.55-61 google cross ref
  • 14. Ferrario M. E, Galavan N. M 1989 Catalogo de las diato-meas marinas citadas entre los 36° y los 60° S con espe-cial referencia al Mar Argentino. [Publ. Inst. Antart. Ar-gent.] Vol.20 P.1-327 google
  • 15. Gomez F, Souissi S 2007 Unusual diatoms linked to cli-matic events in the northeastern English Channel. [J. Sea Res.] Vol.58 P.283-290 google cross ref
  • 16. Gran H. H 1905 Diatomeen. In Brandt K. & Apstein C. (Eds.) Nordisches Plankton: Botanischer Teil. Vol. 19. P.1-146 google
  • 17. Gran H. H, Angst E. C 1931 Plankton diatoms of Puget Sound. [Publ. Puget Sound Biol. Stn.] Vol.7 P.417-519 google
  • 18. Hasle G. R 1975 Some living marine species of the diatom family Rhizosoleniaceae. [Nova Hedwigia Beih.] Vol.53 P.99-153 google
  • 19. Hasle G. R, Fryxell G. A 1970 Diatoms: cleaning and mounting for light and electron microscopy. [Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc.] Vol.89 P.469-474 google cross ref
  • 20. Hasle G. R, Syvertsen E. E 1996 Marine diatoms. In To-mas C. R. (Ed.) Identifying Marine Diatoms and Dino-flagellates. P.5-385 google
  • 21. Hendey N. I 1964 An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Part 5: Bacillariophyceae (Diatoms). P.317 google
  • 22. Hernandez-Becerril D. U 1995 Planktonic diatoms from the Gulf of California and coasts off Baja California: the gen-era Rhizosolenia, Proboscia, Pseudosolenia, and former Rhizosolenia species. [Diatom Res.] Vol.10 P.251-267 google cross ref
  • 23. Hernandez-Becerril D. U, Meave del Castillo M. E 1996 The marine planktonic diatom Rhizosolenia robusta (Bacillariophyta): morphological studies support its transfer to a new genus, Calyptrella gen. nov. [Phycologia] Vol.35 P.198-203 google
  • 24. Hernandez-Becerril D. U, Meave del Castillo M. E 1997 Neocalyptrella, gen, nov., a new name to replace Calyp-trella Hernandez-Becerril et Meave. [Phycologia] Vol.36 P.329 google cross ref
  • 25. Hustedt F 1920 Atlas der Diatomaceenkunde. In Schmidt, A. (Ed.) Atlas der Diatomaceen-kunde. P.317-320 google
  • 26. Hustedt F 1930 Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands Osterrreichs und der Schweiz mit Beruckichtigung der ubrigen Lan-der Europas sowie der angrenzende Meeresgebiete. In Rabenhorst L. (Ed.) Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutsch-land, Osterreich und der Schweiz. P.1-920 google
  • 27. Jordan R. W, Ito R 2002 Observations on Proboscia spe-cies from Late Cretaceous sediments, and their possible evolution from Kreagra. In John J. (Ed.) Proc. 15th Int. Diatom Symp. A.R.G. P.313-329 google
  • 28. Jordan R. W, Ligowski R 2004 New observations on Pro-boscia auxospores, and validation of the family Probos-ciaceae fam. nov. [Vie et Milieu] Vol.54 P.91-103 google
  • 29. Jordan R. W, Ligowski R 2006 Observations on the auxospores, initial cells and vegetative cells of Probos-cia truncata (Bacillariophyta). [Nova Hedwigia Beih.] Vol.130 P.201-212 google
  • 30. Jordan R. W, Ligowski R, Nothig E. -M, Priddle J 1991 The diatom genus Proboscia in Antarctic waters. [Diatom Res.] Vol.6 P.63-78 google cross ref
  • 31. Jordan R. W, Priddle J 1991 Fossil members of the diatom genus Proboscia. [Diatom Res.] Vol.6 P.55-61 google cross ref
  • 32. Jordan R. W, Saito M 1999 The genus Proboscia from the Thalassiosira yabei Zone (Middle-Late Miocene) sediments of Hokkaido Japan. In Mayama S. Idei M. & Koizumi I. (Eds.) Proc. 14th Int. Diatom Symp. P.565-580 google
  • 33. Kim S. W, Lee J. H, Hong W. H 1993 Marine environ-ment on the view-point of plankton dynamics in coastal waters adjacent to Samcheonpo Thermal Power Plant, Korea. [Collected Thesis, Yongin Univ.] Vol.9 P.357-372 google
  • 34. Lange K. B 1985 Spatial and seasonal variations of diatom assemblages off the Argentinian coast (South Western Atlantic). [Oceanol. Acta] Vol.8 P.361-369 google
  • 35. Lee J. H 1995 Additional check-list of marine planktonic al-gae in the coastal waters of Korea. I. Bacillariophyceae. [J. Nat. Sci. Sangmyung Women’s Univ.] Vol.2 P.71-198 google
  • 36. Li Y, Cen J. -Y, Qi Y. -Z, Lu S. -H 2009 Morphological features observations of Urosolenia in Chinese freshwa-ters. [Acta Hydrobiol. Sin.] Vol.33 P.566-570 google cross ref
  • 37. Marques Da Cunha A, Da Fonseca O 1917 O microplanc-ton do Atlantico nas imediacoes de Mar del Plata. [Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz] Vol.9 P.140-142 google cross ref
  • 38. Moon C. -H, Choi H. -J 1991 Studies on the environmen-tal characteristics and phytoplankton community in the Nakdong River estuary. [J. Oceanol. Soc. Korea] Vol.26 P.144-154 google
  • 39. Moreno J. L, Licea S, Santoyo H 1996 Diatomeas del Golfo de California. P.275 google
  • 40. Navarro J. N 1981 A survey of the marine diatoms of Puerto Rico. I. Suborders Coscinodiscineae and Rhizosoleni-ineae. [Bot. Mar.] Vol.24 P.427-439 google cross ref
  • 41. Okuno H 1952 Electron microscopical study on antarctic diatoms (3). [J. Jpn. Bot.] Vol.27 P.347-356 google
  • 42. Okuno H 1957 Electron microscopical study on fine struc-tures of diatom frustules. XV. Observations on the genus Rhizosolenia. [Bot. Mag. Tokyo] Vol.70 P.101-107 google
  • 43. Okuno H 1960 Electron microscopical study on fine struc-tures of diatom frustules. XVIII. [Bot. Mag. Tokyo] Vol.73 P.310-316 google
  • 44. Okuno H 1968 Electron microscopical study on fine struc-tures of diatom frustules. XX. Observations on genus Rhizosolenia. [Bot. Mag. Tokyo] Vol.81 P.79-88 google
  • 45. Peragallo H 1888 Diatomees de la baie de Villefranche. [Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse] Vol.22 P.1-100 google
  • 46. Peragallo H 1892 Monographie du genre Rhizosolenia et de quelques genres voisins. [Diatomiste] Vol.1 P.1-39 google
  • 47. Pritchard A 1861 A history of infusoria including the Des-midiaceae and Diatomaceae, British and foreign. P.968 google
  • 48. Ross R, Cox E. J, Karayeva N. I, Mann D. G, Paddock T. B. B, Simonsen R, Sims P. A 1979 An amended termi-nology for the siliceous components of the diatom cell. [Nova Hedwigia Beih.] Vol.64 P.513-533 google
  • 49. Rott E, Kling H, McGregor G 2006 Studies on the diatom Urosolenia Round & Crawford (Rhizosoleniophycideae) part I. New and reclassified species from subtropical and tropical freshwaters. [Diatom Res.] Vol.21 P.105-124 google cross ref
  • 50. Round F. E, Crawford R. M, Mann D. G 1990 The dia-toms: biology and morphology of the genera. P.747 google
  • 51. Schultze M 1858 Innere Bewegungserscheinungen bei Di-atomeen der Nordsee aus den Gattungen Coscinodiscus, Denticella, Rhizosolenia. [Arch. Anat. Physiol. Wiss. Med.] Vol.1858 P.330-342 google
  • 52. Shim J. H 1994 Illustrated encyclopedia of fauna and flora of Korea vol. 34 Marine phytoplankton. P.487 google
  • 53. Simonsen R 1974 The diatom plankton of the Indian Ocean Expedition of R/V “Meteor” 1964-1965. [Meteor Forsch. Ergeb. Reihe D.] Vol.19 P.1-107 google
  • 54. Simonsen R 1979 The diatom system: ideas on phylogeny. [Bacillaria] Vol.2 P.9-71 google
  • 55. Stolterforth H 1879 On a new species of the genus Eucam-pia. [J. R. Microsc. Soc.] Vol.2 P.835-836 google cross ref
  • 56. Sundstrom B. G 1980 Rhizosolenia phuketensis sp. nov. and Rhizosolenia stolterforthii H. Peragallo (Bacillariophy-ceae). [Bot. Not.] Vol.133 P.579-583 google
  • 57. Sundstrom B. G 1986 The marine diatom genus Rhizoso-lenia: a new approach to the taxonomy. P.117 google
  • 58. Sunesen I, Sar E. A 2007 Marine diatoms from Buenos Aires coastal waters (Argentina). IV. Rhizosolenia s. str., Neocalyptrella, Pseudosolenia, Proboscia. [Phycologia] Vol.46 P.628-643 google cross ref
  • 59. Takahashi K, Jordan R, Priddle J 1994 The diatom genus Proboscia in subarctic waters. [Diatom Res.] Vol.9 P.411-428 google cross ref
  • 60. Takano H 1990 Diatoms. In Fukuyo Y. Takano H. Chihara M. & Matsouka K. (Eds.) Red Tide Organisms in Japan: An Illustrated Taxonomic Guide. P.162-331 google
  • 61. Von Stosch H. A 1986 Some marine diatoms from the Aus-tralina region, especially from Port Phillip Bay and tropi-cal north-eastern Australia. [Brunonia] Vol.8 P.293-348 google cross ref
  • 62. Yun S. M, Lee J. H 2010 Morphology and distribution of some marine diatoms, family Rhizosoleniaceae, in Korean coastal waters: a genus Rhizosolenia 1. [Algae] Vol.25 P.173-182 google cross ref
  • 63. Yun S. M, Lee S. D, Lee J. H 2011 Morphology and distri-bution of some marine diatoms, family Rhizosoleniace-ae genus Rhizosolenia, in Korean coastal waters. [Algae] Vol.26 P.141-152 google cross ref
  • 64. Yoon Y. -H, Koh N. -P 1994 Distribution of phytoplank-ton population in the coastal waters of Keumo Islands, southern Korea in summer. [Bull. Yosu Natl. Fish. Univ.] Vol.8 P.21-35 google
  • 65. Yoon Y. -H, Koh N. -P 1995 Studies on the environmental characteristics of the breeding ground in the Kogum-sudo southern part of Korean Peninsula I. Seasonal suc-cession of phytoplankton population. [J. Aquac.] Vol.8 P.47-58 google
  • 66. Yoon Y. H, Rho H. K, Kim Y. G 1992 Seasonal succes-sion of phytoplankton population in the Hamdok port, northern Cheju Island. [Bull. Mar. Res. Inst. Cheju Natl. Univ.] Vol.16 P.27-42 google
OAK XML 통계
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Table 1. ]  Sampling sites for the genera Proboscia, Neocalyptrella, Pseudosolenia, Guinardia, and Dactyliosolen of the family Rhizosoleniaceae
    Sampling sites for the genera Proboscia, Neocalyptrella, Pseudosolenia, Guinardia, and Dactyliosolen of the family Rhizosoleniaceae
  • [ Table 2. ]  Morphological characteristics of the Proboscia species examined in this study
    Morphological characteristics of the Proboscia species examined in this study
  • [ Table 3. ]  Morphological characteristics of the Pseudosolenia and Neocalyptrella species examined in this study
    Morphological characteristics of the Pseudosolenia and Neocalyptrella species examined in this study
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Proboscia alata. (A) A complete cell, light microscopy (LM). (B) A complete cell, scanning electron microcopy (SEM). (C) Apical part of the valve, noticeable clasper (arrow), LM. (D) Apical part of valve, noticeable clasper (arrow), SEM. (E) Details of proboscis structure varied spinule size, SEM. (F) Details of clasper (arrow) and contiguous area, SEM. (G) Girdle segments, LM. (H) Girdle segments, SEM. Scale bars represent: A & B, 50 μm; C, 20 μm; D, & H, 5 μm; E, 0.5 μm; F, 1 μm; G, 10 μm.
    Proboscia alata. (A) A complete cell, light microscopy (LM). (B) A complete cell, scanning electron microcopy (SEM). (C) Apical part of the valve, noticeable clasper (arrow), LM. (D) Apical part of valve, noticeable clasper (arrow), SEM. (E) Details of proboscis structure varied spinule size, SEM. (F) Details of clasper (arrow) and contiguous area, SEM. (G) Girdle segments, LM. (H) Girdle segments, SEM. Scale bars represent: A & B, 50 μm; C, 20 μm; D, & H, 5 μm; E, 0.5 μm; F, 1 μm; G, 10 μm.
  • [ Table 4. ]  Morphological characteristics of the Dactylisolen and Guinardia species examined in this study
    Morphological characteristics of the Dactylisolen and Guinardia species examined in this study
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Proboscia indica. (A) A complete cell, light microscopy (LM). (B) Apical part of valve, clasper (arrow) LM. (C) Apical part of the valve, clasper (arrow), scanning electron microcopy (SEM). (D) Details of Fig. 9, proboscis structure; longitudinal slit-like pore below the tip (arrow), SEM. (E) Details of the proboscis structure, varied spinule size, SEM. (F) Girdle segments, LM. Scale bars represent: A & B, 50 μm; C & F, 10 μm; D, 5 μm; E, 1 μm.
    Proboscia indica. (A) A complete cell, light microscopy (LM). (B) Apical part of valve, clasper (arrow) LM. (C) Apical part of the valve, clasper (arrow), scanning electron microcopy (SEM). (D) Details of Fig. 9, proboscis structure; longitudinal slit-like pore below the tip (arrow), SEM. (E) Details of the proboscis structure, varied spinule size, SEM. (F) Girdle segments, LM. Scale bars represent: A & B, 50 μm; C & F, 10 μm; D, 5 μm; E, 1 μm.
  • [ Fig. 3. ]  Neocalyptrella robusta. (A) A complete cell, light microscopy (LM). (B) Apical part of valve, external tube at the valve apex (arrow), LM. (C) Apical part of valve, valve with part of the cingulum, LM. (D) Apical part of valve, valve with part of the cingulum, scanning electron microscopy (SEM). (E) Striation at valve apex, SEM. (F) Valve apex showing calyptra structure and external tube, SEM. (G) Detail of cingulum; cingulum ends in an obtuse straight line, SEM. (H) Details of Fig. 3E loculate areolae, SEM. Scale bars represent: A, 100 μm; B & C, 20 μm; D, 50 μm; E & G, 10 μm; F, 0.5 μm; H, 2 μm.
    Neocalyptrella robusta. (A) A complete cell, light microscopy (LM). (B) Apical part of valve, external tube at the valve apex (arrow), LM. (C) Apical part of valve, valve with part of the cingulum, LM. (D) Apical part of valve, valve with part of the cingulum, scanning electron microscopy (SEM). (E) Striation at valve apex, SEM. (F) Valve apex showing calyptra structure and external tube, SEM. (G) Detail of cingulum; cingulum ends in an obtuse straight line, SEM. (H) Details of Fig. 3E loculate areolae, SEM. Scale bars represent: A, 100 μm; B & C, 20 μm; D, 50 μm; E & G, 10 μm; F, 0.5 μm; H, 2 μm.
  • [ Fig. 4. ]  Pseudosolenia calcar-avis. (A) A complete cell light microscopy (LM). (B) Complete cells, scanning electron microcopy (SEM). (C) Apical part of valve, internal structure of external process (arrow), LM. (D) Apical part of valve, claw or screw shaped external process (arrow), SEM. (E) Details of girdle segments, regularly straight striation, SEM. (F) Girdle segments, LM. (G) Apical part of valve, sigmoid contiguous area, SEM. (H) Screw shaped external process, SEM. Scale bars represent: A & B, 50 μm; C-E & H, 10 μm; F & G, 5 μm.
    Pseudosolenia calcar-avis. (A) A complete cell light microscopy (LM). (B) Complete cells, scanning electron microcopy (SEM). (C) Apical part of valve, internal structure of external process (arrow), LM. (D) Apical part of valve, claw or screw shaped external process (arrow), SEM. (E) Details of girdle segments, regularly straight striation, SEM. (F) Girdle segments, LM. (G) Apical part of valve, sigmoid contiguous area, SEM. (H) Screw shaped external process, SEM. Scale bars represent: A & B, 50 μm; C-E & H, 10 μm; F & G, 5 μm.
  • [ Fig. 5. ]  Guinardia delicatula. (A) Chain formed four cells, light microscopy (LM). (B) External process in valve marginal part (arrow), LM. (C-E) Guinardia flaccid. (C) A complete cells, LM. (D) Detail of girdle segments, LM. (E) Apical part of valve (arrow), LM. (F-H) Guinardia striata. (F) Chain formed two cells, LM. (G) External part of process, LM. (H) Girdle bands (arrow), LM. Scale bars represent: A-E, G & H, 10 μm; F, 20 μm.
    Guinardia delicatula. (A) Chain formed four cells, light microscopy (LM). (B) External process in valve marginal part (arrow), LM. (C-E) Guinardia flaccid. (C) A complete cells, LM. (D) Detail of girdle segments, LM. (E) Apical part of valve (arrow), LM. (F-H) Guinardia striata. (F) Chain formed two cells, LM. (G) External part of process, LM. (H) Girdle bands (arrow), LM. Scale bars represent: A-E, G & H, 10 μm; F, 20 μm.
  • [ Fig. 6. ]  Dactyliosolen fragilissimus. (A) Chain formed two cells light microscopy (LM). (B) Detail of external process in valve apex (arrow), LM. (C) Chain formed two cells, LM. (D) Detail of external process in valve apex (arrow), LM. (E-G) Dactyliosolen phuketensis. (E) Chain formed two cells, LM. (F) Apical part of valve, external process in valve marginal, LM. (G) Detailed girdle bands, half band, LM. Scale bars represent: A-D, F & G, 10 μm; E, 50 μm.
    Dactyliosolen fragilissimus. (A) Chain formed two cells light microscopy (LM). (B) Detail of external process in valve apex (arrow), LM. (C) Chain formed two cells, LM. (D) Detail of external process in valve apex (arrow), LM. (E-G) Dactyliosolen phuketensis. (E) Chain formed two cells, LM. (F) Apical part of valve, external process in valve marginal, LM. (G) Detailed girdle bands, half band, LM. Scale bars represent: A-D, F & G, 10 μm; E, 50 μm.
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.