검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
Enzyme-assisted extraction of Ecklonia cava fermented with Lactobacillus brevis and isolation of an anti-inflammatory polysaccharide
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
Enzyme-assisted extraction of Ecklonia cava fermented with Lactobacillus brevis and isolation of an anti-inflammatory polysaccharide
KEYWORD
anti-inflammatory , Ecklonia cava , enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE) , fermentation , Lactobacillus brevis , polysaccharide
  • INTRODUCTION

    The brown seaweed Ecklonia cava (Alariaceae) con-tains various biologically active compounds such as fu-coidan, alginate, fucan, laminarin, and phlorotannins (Guiry and Blunden 1991, Ahn et al. 2008a). Biological activity studies have shown that E. cava has anti-oxidant, anticancer, anticoagulant, immunomodulation, anti-inflammation, immune activation and matrix metal-loproteinase inhibition effects in vitro (Athukorala et al. 2006, 2009, Kim et al. 2006a, 2006b, Ahn et al. 2007, 2008a, 2008b, 2011). Additionally, the major compounds of E. cava are polysaccharides and phlorotannins, which have anti-inflammatory and / or immune activation capacity (Ahn et al. 2008a, Jung et al. 2009). Due to these beneficial capacities, food and cosmetic industries have been devel-oped related to the active ingredients in E. cava. However, when the active polyphenol and polysaccharide com-pounds were used in various industries, the industries using polyphenols suffered from non-water solubility, and high costs due to low extraction yields, compared to those using polysaccharides. Thus, isolating polysaccha-rides and improving their extraction efficiency can play an important role in the development of functional foods or products for the cosmetic industry.

    Fermentation is used in plant foods to increase the nutritional quality and remove undesirable compounds (Frias et al. 2005). Several microbial fermentation prod-ucts are also incorporated into food as additives and supplements such as antioxidants, flavors, colorants, pre-servatives, and sweeteners (Couto and Sanroman 2006). Microorganism-fermented foods play an important role, particularly in Asian countries, where the production process for many foods includes fungal fermentation (Geisen and Farber 2002). Microorganisms play a central role in the production of a wide range of primary and sec-ondary metabolites.

    In this study, we used enzyme-assisted extraction (EAE) followed by fermentation to improve extraction efficiency of the active polysaccharides in E. cava. Ap-plying EAE and fermentation improves nutritional and functional properties of foods by increasing extraction of active compounds such as polysaccharides and pep-tides. Indeed, previous reports have demonstrated that, the extraction yield of active compounds increase after EAE and fermentation, leading to antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects in vitro and in vivo (Link-Amster et al. 1994, Chen et al. 2008, Fernandez-Orozco et al. 2008, Matsushita et al. 2008).

    Murine macrophage cells such as RAW 264.7 cells play a central role in the inflammatory response and serve as an essential interface between innate and adaptive im-munity (Iontcheva et al. 2004). During the inflammatory process, large amounts of the proinflammatory media-tor nitric oxide (NO) are generated by inducible isoforms of NO synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) (Vane et al. 1994). Additionally, abnormal NO produc-tion can be deleterious and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of various inflammatory diseases (Yun et al. 1996). For these reasons, inhibiting NO production is important to reduce the pathogenesis of various inflam-matory diseases.

    Therefore, the present study documented whether co-applying EAE and fermentation would improve the extraction yield of polysaccharide contents from E. cava and to determine whether the isolated polysaccharides inhibited NO production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated RAW 264.7 cells.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

      >  Preparation of fermented E. cava (FE) samples

    E. cava was collected from the coast of Jeju Island, South Korea, washed with fresh water, freeze-dried, and pulverized into powder with a grinder. Then, the freeze-dried E. cava was applied for fermentation using three kinds of microorganisms, namely Lactobacillus brevis (LFE), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SFE), and Candida uti-lis (CFE) for 24 h. The fermentation process was carried out according to the method described by Ðorđevi? et al. (2010) with some modifications. Each 15 grams of LFE, SFE, CFE, and non-fermented E. cava (NE) were homog-enized with 300 mL of distilled water in a 1 L flask. Then, the mixture was autoclaved and allowed to cool before adding the microorganisms. The mixture was inoculated with 1% (v/v) of each microorganism separately, and the samples were allowed to ferment at 1,200 rpm and 30℃ for 24 h. After the fermentation, the samples were freeze-dried and used for experiments.

      >  Chemical composition analysis

    The chemical composition of all samples was analyzed by measuring the contents of carbohydrate, protein, ash, and / or lipid from the weight difference after drying sam-ples, according to the methods described by Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

      >  Preparation of aqueous extracts from NE, LFE, SFE, and CFE

    Aqueous extracts were prepared from NE, LFE, SFE, and CFE. One gram of freeze-dried sample was homog-enized in distilled water (100 mL). After 24 h, the samples were obtained and kept at -20℃ for further experiments.

      >  Preparation of the LFE enzymatic extracts

    LFE was used for EAE with several enzymes according to a previously reported method (Heo et al. 2005). Fifty grams of LFE was homogenized in distilled water (2 L) with 500 μL of 10 kinds of enzymes separately. Each re-actant was adjusted to the optimum pH and temperature range of the respective enzyme, and enzymatic reactions were performed for 24 h. Following digestion, the digest was boiled for 10 min at 100℃ to inactivate the enzymes. After centrifugation (3,000 rpm for 20 min at 4℃), the su-pernatant was adjusted to pH 7.0. The samples were kept at -20℃ for further experiments.

      >  Preparation of molecular weight fractions from the Viscozyme extract of LFE (VLFE)

    Extracts were applied to a lab-scale tangential flow fil-tration system (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) using an ul-tra-filtration membrane (30 kDa) to prepare different mo-lecular weight fractions Then, all fractions (whole extract, <30 kDa fraction, and >30 kDa fraction) were separately evaluated for their NO inhibitory effects.

      >  Isolation of a polysaccharide from the >30 kDa fraction of VLFE (VLFEP)

    VLFEP was isolated from a >30 kDa VLFEP by ethanol precipitation according to a slightly revised method from a previous study (Athukorala et al. 2009). The >30 kDa VLFE fraction (1 L) was mixed with 2 L of 99.5% ethanol for 24 h at 4℃. After centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 20 min at 4℃, crude polysaccharides were collected from the precipitant. Then, the crude VLFEP was freeze-dried and used for subsequent experiments.

      >  Analysis of mono-sugar and sulfate group contents

    VLFE, and the >30 kDa and <30 kDa fractions as well as VLFEP were hydrolyzed in a sealed glass tube with 4 M trifluoroacetic acid for 4 h at 100℃ to analyze neutral sugar content. The samples were digested using 6 N of HCl for 4 h to analyze mono-sugars. Then, the samples were separately applied to a CarboPac PA1 column (4.5 × 250 mm; Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with a CarboPac PA1 cartridge (4.5 × 50 mm), respectively. The column was eluted using 16 mM NaOH at a 1.0 mL min-1 flow rate. Each sugar was detected using an ED50 Dionex electro-chemical detector, and data were analyzed using Peak Net on-line software.

      >  Nitrite assay

    RAW 264.7 cells (murine macrophage cell line) were plated at a density of 1 × 105 cells well-1 in 96-well plates for 16 h. The cells were pre-treated with aqueous and 10 enzymatic extracts of LFE, <30 kDa, and >30 kDa frac-tions of VLFE and VLFEP for 2 h and then stimulated with LPS (1 μg mL-1) for 24 h. After the incubation, the culture media (100 μL well-1) was mixed with 100 μL Griess re-agent, an indicator of NO production (1% sulfanilamide in 2.5% phosphoric acid and 0.1% naphthylenediamine dihydrochloride in distilled water), for 10 min, and the absorbance of the mixture was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Pis-cataway, NJ, USA). The nitrite levels were obtained from a sodium nitrite standard curve. The experimental results represented one of three experiments and were expressed as the mean of triplicate determinations.

      >  Statistical analysis

    Data were analyzed using SPSS for Windows version 10 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Values are expressed as means ± standard errors. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

    RESULTS

    The three FEs showed plentiful carbohydrate and pro-tein content after fermentation (Table 1). In contrast, we identified three FE samples in which the carbohydrate content increased slightly, but their protein content in-creased markedly, compared to that of NE. Increased ex-traction yields were observed for aqueous extract of LFE (ALFE), aqueous extract of SFE (ASFE), and aqueous ex-tract of CFE (ACFE) (Table 2). Additionally, carbohydrate content increased markedly following fermentation. Among them, ALFE showed the highest carbohydrate content and extraction yield. Further study showed that ALFE, ASFE, and ACFE led to higher NO production in-

    [Table 1.] Chemical composition of NE, LFE, SFE, and CFE

    label

    Chemical composition of NE, LFE, SFE, and CFE

    hibitory effects in LPS stimulated RAW 264.7 cells com-pared to those treated with aqueous extract of NE (ANE) (Fig. 1A). However, the NO inhibitory effects were similar together. Therefore, we selected LFE for the next experi-

    [Table 2.] Chemical composition and extraction yield of ANE, ALFE, ASFE, and ACFE

    label

    Chemical composition and extraction yield of ANE, ALFE, ASFE, and ACFE

    ments, because it showed the highest extraction yield and carbohydrate content. In the next experiment, 10 LFE en-zymatic extracts were prepared using five carbohydrates and five proteases. Markedly increased extraction yields were obtained from all enzymatic extract treatments (Ta-ble 3). In addition, LFE enzyme extracts strongly inhibited the NO production induced by LPS stimulation in RAW 264.7 cells (***p < 0.005 vs. LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells) (Fig. 1B). Among them, celluclast extract of LFE, VLFE, neutrase extract of LFE, protamex extract of LFE, and ko-jizyme extract of LFE showed higher inhibitory effects on NO production induced by LPS stimulation in RAW 264.7 cells compared to those of ANE and ALFE (Fig. 1B). In particular, VLFE showed the highest inhibitory effect on NO production in LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells (p < 0.005 vs. the other LFE enzyme extracts and LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells). Moreover, VLFE dose-dependently decreased NO production at all concentrations from 25-200 μg mL-1 in comparison with that in LPS-treated cells (***p < 0.005 vs. LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells) (Fig. 2A).

    As shown in Fig. 2B, both fractions (<30 kDa fraction and >30 kDa fraction) decreased the NO production in-duced by LPS stimulation and, particularly, the >30 kDa fraction led to a markedly high inhibitory effect on LPS-induced NO production, as compared to that of the <30 kDa fraction at all concentrations (***p < 0.005 vs. LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells).

    The crude polysaccharide isolated from VLFE (VLFEP) showed the highest carbohydrate content among the oth-

    [Table 3.] Extraction yields of ANE and 10 enzymatic extracts pre-pared from LFE

    label

    Extraction yields of ANE and 10 enzymatic extracts pre-pared from LFE

    ers (Table 4). Additionally, fucose and mannose contents increased with the increase in carbohydrate content in VLFE. In particular, VLFEP showed the highest fucose

    [Table 4.] Mono-saccharide contents of ANE, VLFE, its >30 kDa fraction and VLFEP

    label

    Mono-saccharide contents of ANE, VLFE, its >30 kDa fraction and VLFEP

    content among VLFE and its >30 kDa fraction. Further-more, VLFEP was not cytotoxic at any concentration and dose-dependently induced a higher inhibitory effect on NO production caused by LPS stimulation in Raw 264.7 cells (***p < 0.005 vs. LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells) (Fig. 2C). Interestingly, the NO inhibitory effect of the samples in LPS-stimulated Raw 264.7 cells corresponded to the in-crease in fucose content.

    DISCUSSION

    Many researchers have reported that fermented mate-rials have immune response and oxidative stress activi-ties in vitro and in vivo (Xia et al. 1990, Fan et al. 2009, Joo et al. 2009, Kuo et al. 2009). In this study, three different microorganisms were used with EAE to improve the ex-traction efficiency of biologically active polysaccharides from the brown seaweed E. cava. However, the increase in relative protein content in the FE might have been caused by proliferation of the fungi or bacteria during fermenta-tion.

    Our previous studies reported that E. cava enzymatic extracts prepared using the EAE technique contain hy-drophilic polysaccharides and protein compounds (Heo et al. 2003, Ahn et al. 2011). Thus, we thought that the ac-tive compounds showing an NO inhibitory effect might be hydrophilic components, so we isolated the polysac-charide content from VLFE.

    An ultra-filtration system using a 30 kDa molecular weight cut-off membrane is another technique for isolat-ing specific hydrophilic compounds such as saccharides. In this study, we also applied an ultra-filtration process and obtained two molecular weight fractions from VLFE. Polysaccharides from natural sources are a class of macro-molecules that can profoundly affect the immune system and, therefore, have the potential to be immunomodula-tors with wide clinical applications (Tzianabos 2000). Pre-vious studies have indicated that various polysaccharides show beneficial antiinflammatory effects such as NO in-hibition (Cui et al. 2010, Jung et al. 2010). Our results sug-gest that VLFEP might be an active compound exhibiting NO inhibition effects in RAW 264.7 cells.

    Therefore, we first isolated a crude polysaccharide fraction from the >30 kD fraction. Then, we identified the chemical composition including protein, polyphenols, carbohydrates, and the mono-sugar content such as fu-cose, galactose, glucose, and mannose which are stan-dard components of polysaccharides.

    Our results demonstrated that co-applying fermen-tation, EAE, and an ultra-filtration membrane system improved extraction of fucose and lead to a decrease in NO production in LPS stimulated Raw 264.7 cells. Many studies have reported that NO is generated by iNOS and COX-2 during inflammatory processes, and that abnor-mal NO production causes the pathogenesis of various inflammatory diseases (Vane et al. 1994, Yun et al. 1996). Hence, inhibiting NO production is important to reduce the pathogenesis of various inflammatory diseases. NO, COX-2, and iNOS are regulated by a variety of inflamma-tory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor-α, inter-leukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6 in LPS-activated RAW 264.7 cells (Chang et al. 2005). Moreover, many researchers have demonstrated that the transcription and secretion of pro-inflammatory mediators and cytokines are mediated by activation of the IκB / nuclear transcription factor kappa-B (NFκB) signal transduction pathway in LPS-activated RAW 264.7 cells (Surh et al. 2001, Lappas et al. 2002). This suggest that the NO inhibition effects of VLFEP might be mediated by reducing pro-inflammatory mediators and cytokines via inhibition of the NFκB signal transduction pathway activated by LPS stimulation in RAW 264.7 cells. Therefore, further study about the biological mechanisms related with the NO inhibitory effect of VLFEP is required.

    Taken together, our results suggest that applying fer-mentation, EAE, and an ultra-filtration system improved the isolation of a polysaccharide component from E. cava, which contained plentiful fucose. The isolated polysac-charide showed profound NO inhibitory effects in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Thus, VLFEP might be useful as an anti-inflammatory agent to suppress macrophage activation.

참고문헌
  • 1. Ahn G, Hwang I, Park E, Kim J, Jeon Y. -J, Lee J, Park J. W, Jee Y 2008a Immunomodulatory effects of an enzymatic extract from Ecklonia cava on murine sple-nocytes. [Mar. Biotechnol.] Vol.10 P.278-289 google cross ref
  • 2. Ahn G, Park E, Kim D. S, Jeon Y. -J, Shin T, Park J. W, Woo H. -C, Lee W. -W, Jee Y 2008b Anti-inflamma-tory effects of enzymatic extract from Ecklonia cava on TPA-induced ear skin edema. [Food Sci. Biotechnol.] Vol.17 P.745-750 google
  • 3. Ahn G, Park E, Lee W. -W, Hyun J. -W, Lee K. -W, Shin T, Jeon Y. -J, Jee Y 2011 Enzymatic extract from Eck-lonia cava induces the activation of lymphocytes by IL-2 production through the classical NF-κB pathway. [Mar. Biotechnol.] Vol.13 P.66-73 google cross ref
  • 4. Ahn G. -N, Kim K. -N, Cha S. -H, Song C. -B, Lee J, Heo M. -S, Yeo I. -K, Lee N. -H, Jee Y. -H, Kim J. -S, Heu M. -S, Jeon Y. -J 2007 Antioxidant activities of phloro-tannins purified from Ecklonia cava on free radical scav-enging using ESR and H2O2-mediated DNA damage. [Eur. Food Res. Technol.] Vol.226 P.71-79 google cross ref
  • 5. Athukorala Y, Ahn G. N, Jee Y. -H, Kim G. -Y, Kim S. -H, Ha J. -H, Kang J. -S, Lee K. -W, Jeon Y. -J 2009 Anti-proliferative activity of sulfated polysaccharide isolated from an enzymatic digest of Ecklonia cava on the U-937 cell line. [J. Appl. Phycol.] Vol.21 P.307-314 google cross ref
  • 6. Athukorala Y, Jung W. -K, Vasanthan T, Jeon Y. -J 2006 An anticoagulative polysaccharide from an enzymatic hydrolysate of Ecklonia cava. [Carbohydr. Polym.] Vol.66 P.184-191 google cross ref
  • 7. Chang H. -P, Huang S. -Y, Chen Y. -H 2005 Modulation of cytokine secretion by garlic oil derivatives is associ-ated with suppressed nitric oxide production stimulated macrophages. [J. Agric. Food Chem.] Vol.53 P.2530-2534 google cross ref
  • 8. Chen I. -N, Ng C. -C, Wang C. -Y, Chang T. -L 2008 Lac-tic fermentation and antioxidant activity of Zingibera-ceae plants in Taiwan. [Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr.] Vol.60 P.57-66 google cross ref
  • 9. Couto S. R, Sanroman M. A 2006 Application of solid-state fermentation to food industry: a review. [Food En-gin.] Vol.76 P.291-302 google cross ref
  • 10. Cui Y. -Q, Zhang L. -J, Zhang T, Luo D. -Z, Jia Y. -J, Guo Z. -X, Zhang Q. -B, Wang X, Wang X. -M 2010 In-hibitory effect of fucoidan on nitric oxide production in lipopolysaccharide-activated primary microglia. [Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol.] Vol.37 P.422-428 google cross ref
  • 11. Ðorđevi? T. M, ?iler-Marinkovic S. S, Dimitrijevi?-Brankovi? S. I 2010 Effect of fermentation on anti-oxidant properties of some cereals and pseudo cereals. [Food Chem.] Vol.119 P.957-963 google cross ref
  • 12. Fan J, Zhang Y, Chang X, Saito M, Li Z 2009 Changes in the radical scavenging activity of bacterial-type dou-chi, a traditional fermented soybean product, during the primary fermentation process. [Biosci. Biotechnol. Bio-chem.] Vol.73 P.2749-2753 google cross ref
  • 13. Fernandez-Orozco R, Frias J, Munoz R, Zielinski H, Piskula M. K, Kozlowska H, Vidal-Valverde C 2008 Effect of fermentation conditions on the antioxidant compounds and antioxidant capacity of Lupinus angus-tifolius cv. Zapaton. [Eur. Food Res. Technol.] Vol.227 P.979-988 google cross ref
  • 14. Frias J, Miranda M. L, Doblado R, Vidal-Valverde C 2005 Effect of germination and fermentation on the antioxidant vitamin content and antioxidant capacity of Lupinus albus L. var. Multolupa. [Food Chem.] Vol.92 P.211-220 google cross ref
  • 15. Geisen R, Farber P 2002 New aspects of fungal starter cul-tures for fermented foods. [Appl Microbiol] Vol.2 P.13-29 google cross ref
  • 16. Guiry M. D, Blunden G 1991 Seaweed resources in Eu-rope: uses and potential. P.432 google
  • 17. Heo S. -J, Lee K. -W, Song C. B, Jeon Y. -J 2003 Anti-oxidant activity of enzymatic extracts from brown sea-weeds. [Algae] Vol.18 P.71-81 google cross ref
  • 18. Heo S. -J, Park E. -J, Lee K. -W, Jeon Y. -J 2005 Anti-oxidant activities of enzymatic extracts from brown sea-weeds. [Bioresour. Technol.] Vol.96 P.1613-1623 google cross ref
  • 19. Iontcheva I, Amar S, Zawawi K. H, Kantarci A, Van Dyke T. E 2004 Role for moesin in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated signal transduction. [Infect. Immun.] Vol.72 P.2312-2320 google cross ref
  • 20. Joo S. S, Won T. J, Nam S. Y, Kim Y. -B, Lee Y. C, Park S. -Y, Park H. Y, Hwang K. W, Lee D. I 2009 Therapeu-tic advantages of medicinal herbs fermented with Lac-tobacillus plantarum in topical application and its ac-tivities on atopic dermatitis. [Phytother. Res.] Vol.23 P.913-919 google cross ref
  • 21. Jung J. -S, Shin J. A, Park E. -M, Lee J. -E, Kang Y. -S, Min S. -W, Kim D. -H, Hyun J. -W, Shin C. -Y, Kim H. -S 2010 Anti-inflammatory mechanism of ginsenoside Rh1 in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated microglia: critical role of the protein kinase A pathway and hemeoxygen-ase-1 expression. [J. Neurochem.] Vol.115 P.1668-1680 google cross ref
  • 22. Jung W. -K, Heo S. -J, Jeon Y. -J, Lee C. -M, Park Y. -M, Byun H. -G, Choi Y. -H, Park S. -G, Choi I. -W 2009 Inhibitory effects and molecular mechanism of dieckol isolated from marine brown alga on COX-2 and iNOS in microglial cells. [J. Agric. Food Chem.] Vol.57 P.4439-4446 google cross ref
  • 23. Kim K. -N, Heo S. -J, Song C. B, Lee J, Heo M. -S, Yeo I. -K, Kang K. A, Hyun J. W, Jeon Y. -J 2006a Protec-tive effect of Ecklonia cava enzymatic extracts on hydro-gen peroxide-induced cell damage. [Process Biochem.] Vol.41 P.2393-2401 google cross ref
  • 24. Kim M. -M, Ta Q. V, Mendis E, Rajapakse N, Jung W. -K, Byun H. -G, Jeon Y. -J, Kim S. -K 2006b Phlorotan-nins in Ecklonia cava extract inhibit matrix metallopro-teinase activity. [Life Sci.] Vol.79 P.1436-1443 google cross ref
  • 25. Kuo C. -F, Chyau C. -C, Wang T. -S, Li C. -R, Hu T. -J 2009 Enhanced antioxidant and anti-inflammatory ac-tivities of Monascus pilosus fermented products by ad-dition of turmeric to the medium. [J. Agric. Food Chem.] Vol.57 P.11397-11405 google cross ref
  • 26. Lappas M, Permezel M, Georgiou H. M, Rice G. E 2002 Nuclear factor kappa B regulation of proinflammatory cytokines in human gestational tissues in vitro. [Biol. Re-prod.] Vol.67 P.668-673 google cross ref
  • 27. Link-Amster H, Rochat F, Saudan K. Y, Mignot O, Ae-schlimann J. M 1994 Modulation of a specific humoral immune response and changes in intestinal flora medi-ated through fermented milk intake. [FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.] Vol.10 P.55-63 google cross ref
  • 28. Matsushita H, Kobayashi M, Tsukiyama R, Fujimoto M, Suzuki M, Tsujii K, Yamamoto K 2008 Stimulatory effect of Shoyu polysaccharides from soy sauce on the intestinal immune system. [Int. J. Mol. Med.] Vol.22 P.243-247 google
  • 29. Surh Y. -J, Chun K. -S, Cha H. -H, Han S. S, Keum Y. -S, Park K. -K, Lee S. S 2001 Molecular mechanisms underlying chemopreventive activities of anti-inflam-matory phytochemicals: down-regulation of COX-2 and iNOS through suppression of NF-kappa B activation. [Mutat. Res.] Vol.480-481 P.243-268 google cross ref
  • 30. Tzianabos A. O 2000 Polysaccharide immunomodulators as therapeutic agents: structural aspects and biologic function. [Clin. Microbiol. Rev.] Vol.13 P.523-533 google cross ref
  • 31. Vane J. R, Mitchell J. A, Appleton I, Tomlinson A, Bishop-Bailey D, Croxtall J, Willoughby D. A 1994 Inducible isoforms of cyclooxygenase and nitric-oxide synthase in inflammation. [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.] Vol.91 P.2046-2050 google cross ref
  • 32. Xia D, Lin Z. B, Ma L, Li Z. L 1990 Effects of the poly-saccharides isolated from mycelium and fermentation fluid of Schizophyllum commune on immune function in mice. [Yao Xue Xue Bao] Vol.25 P.161-166 google
  • 33. Yun H. Y, Dawson V. L, Dawson T. M 1996 Neurobiology of nitric oxide. [Crit. Rev. Neurobiol.] Vol.10 P.291-316 google
OAK XML 통계
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Table 1. ]  Chemical composition of NE, LFE, SFE, and CFE
    Chemical composition of NE, LFE, SFE, and CFE
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Effects of aqueous extracts (A) those prepared from FE and NE, and 10 LFE enzymatic extracts (B) on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced nitric oxide (NO) production in RAW 264.7 cells. (A) After 24 h stimulation with LPS, the NO production inhibitory effects of ANE, ALFE, ASFE, and ACFE were identified by NO assay. (B) After 24 h of LPS stimulation NO production inhibitory effects of 10 LFE enzymatic extracts were measured by NO assay. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and data are expressed as mean ± standard error. FE, fermented Ecklonia cava; NE, non-fermented E. cava; LFE, Lactobacillus brevis-fermented E. cava; ANE, aqueous extract of NE; ALFE, aqueous extract of LFE; ASFE, aqueous extract of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-fermented E. cava; ACFE, aqueous extract of Candida utilis-fermented E. cava; AMGLFE, AMG extract of LFE; CeLFE, Celluclast extract of LFE; ULFE, Ultraflo extract of LFE; TLFE, termamyl extract of LFE; VLFE, Viscozyme extract of LFE; NLFE, Neutrase extract of LFE; PaLFE, papain extract prepared from LFE; PeLFE, pepsin of LFE; PLFE, Protamex extract of LFE; KLFE, Kojizyme extract of LFE. ***p < 0.005 vs. LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells, †p < 0.005 vs. the other enzyme extracts of LFE- and LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells.
    Effects of aqueous extracts (A) those prepared from FE and NE, and 10 LFE enzymatic extracts (B) on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced nitric oxide (NO) production in RAW 264.7 cells. (A) After 24 h stimulation with LPS, the NO production inhibitory effects of ANE, ALFE, ASFE, and ACFE were identified by NO assay. (B) After 24 h of LPS stimulation NO production inhibitory effects of 10 LFE enzymatic extracts were measured by NO assay. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and data are expressed as mean ± standard error. FE, fermented Ecklonia cava; NE, non-fermented E. cava; LFE, Lactobacillus brevis-fermented E. cava; ANE, aqueous extract of NE; ALFE, aqueous extract of LFE; ASFE, aqueous extract of Saccharomyces cerevisiae-fermented E. cava; ACFE, aqueous extract of Candida utilis-fermented E. cava; AMGLFE, AMG extract of LFE; CeLFE, Celluclast extract of LFE; ULFE, Ultraflo extract of LFE; TLFE, termamyl extract of LFE; VLFE, Viscozyme extract of LFE; NLFE, Neutrase extract of LFE; PaLFE, papain extract prepared from LFE; PeLFE, pepsin of LFE; PLFE, Protamex extract of LFE; KLFE, Kojizyme extract of LFE. ***p < 0.005 vs. LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells, †p < 0.005 vs. the other enzyme extracts of LFE- and LPS-treated RAW 264.7 cells.
  • [ Table 2. ]  Chemical composition and extraction yield of ANE, ALFE, ASFE, and ACFE
    Chemical composition and extraction yield of ANE, ALFE, ASFE, and ACFE
  • [ Table 3. ]  Extraction yields of ANE and 10 enzymatic extracts pre-pared from LFE
    Extraction yields of ANE and 10 enzymatic extracts pre-pared from LFE
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Effects of VLFE (A), <30 kDa and >30 kDa fractions of VLFE (B), and VLFEP (C) on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced nitric oxide (NO) production in RAW 264.7 cells. After 24 h of LPS stimulation, inhibitory effects of VLFE, the <30 kDa and >30 kDa fractions of VLFE and VLFEP on NO production were measured by NO assay. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and data are expressed as mean ± standard error. VLFE, Viscozyme extract of LFE; <30 kDa Fr., <30 kDa fraction of VLFE; >30 kDa Fr., >30 kDa fraction of VLFE; VLFEP, crude polysaccharide of VLFE. ***p < 0.005 vs. LPS-treated cells.
    Effects of VLFE (A), <30 kDa and >30 kDa fractions of VLFE (B), and VLFEP (C) on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced nitric oxide (NO) production in RAW 264.7 cells. After 24 h of LPS stimulation, inhibitory effects of VLFE, the <30 kDa and >30 kDa fractions of VLFE and VLFEP on NO production were measured by NO assay. Experiments were performed in triplicate, and data are expressed as mean ± standard error. VLFE, Viscozyme extract of LFE; <30 kDa Fr., <30 kDa fraction of VLFE; >30 kDa Fr., >30 kDa fraction of VLFE; VLFEP, crude polysaccharide of VLFE. ***p < 0.005 vs. LPS-treated cells.
  • [ Table 4. ]  Mono-saccharide contents of ANE, VLFE, its >30 kDa fraction and VLFEP
    Mono-saccharide contents of ANE, VLFE, its >30 kDa fraction and VLFEP
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.