검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
Change in three dry rangeland species growth and soil properties by compost application
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
Change in three dry rangeland species growth and soil properties by compost application
KEYWORD
Atriplex , compost , Haloxylon , Saltwort
  • INTRODUCTION

    Atriplex (Atriplex lentiformis) is native to the southwest-ern United States and northern Mexico, where it grows in habitats with saline or sodic soil (Pearcy et al. 1977). Sev-eral researches have investigated the ecological aspect of Atriplex (Ranjbar 1991, Emami et al. 1999, Naseri 1999, Ansari 2000, Rahbar et al. 2004, Tajali 2008). Haloxylon or white saxaul (Haloxylon persicum) is a small tree and Salt-wort (Seidlitzia rosmarinus) is a halophyte plant, both of which belong to the Amaranthaceae family. Haloxylon is distributed in Middle and Central Asia, Iran, Turcomania, from Aralo-Caspian to Amu Darya, the lowland areas of Central Asia and China (Huang 2000). Haloxylon species, which grow in dry rangelands and deserts, were planted in Iran Central Falat for sand dune stabilization (Rad et al. 2006). Several earlier studies investigated the ecology of Haloxylon in Iran (Sabeti 1976, Rahbar 1987, Rad et al.2006). Saltwort is a perennial woody plant grown mostly along the banks of salt marshes and in soils with high sa-line water tables. It plays an important role in both soil preservation and maintenance (Hadi 2009).

    The above species are tree rangeland species that are widely present and cultivated in dry land world pastures. In this situation, composting, which has beneficial effects on water maintenance, can be helpful. Compost has been widely used as soil conditioners and soil fertilizers. This practice has been recommended, since soil fertility needs to be sustained (Irvine et al. 2010).

    Compost has several beneficial effects as a nutrient source for plant production and does not have deleteri-ous impacts on soil and plant (Hua et al. 2008). Compost contains many enzymes and hormones that can promote plant growth. The usefulness of different types of compost has been demonstrated and positive effects on the growth of crops have been reported such as wheat (Mantovia et al. 2005), barley (Renoux et al. 2007), rice (Rigi 2003), maize (Rezvantalab et al. 2008), sunflower (Anosheh et al. 2010), soybean, cowpea (Araujo et al. 2007), and lentil (Shahhos-seini et al. 2010). This effect was also reported for vegeta-tive plants, such as pepper, cauliflower (Casado-Vela et al. 2006), rapeseed and ryegrass (Renoux et al. 2007). Com-post also has a significant effect on soil properties. Several studies have documented the beneficial effects of the ap-plication of composting operation on several types of soil with proper amendment rate (Singh and Agrawal 2007). Also, it has been reported that composting can stabilize the organic matter and decrease the risks of heavy metals (Planquart et al. 1999).

    This study was conducted to better understand how dry rangeland species, such as Atriplex (Atriplex lenti-formis), Saltwort (Seidlitzia rosmarinus) and Haloxylon (Haloxylon persicum), respond to application of compost tea and solid compost or solid and liquid mixture (MX) and to examine and compare the effects of these compost types on soil properties and plant growth.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    A field study was carried out to examine the effects of different compost types on growth parameters of three dry rangeland species (Atriplex, Atriplex lentiformis; Salt-wort, Seidlitzia rosmarinus; Haloxylon, Haloxylon persi-cum) and soil properties. The experiment was performed in the Fars Province, Iran, during the year 2010. The site of the experiment was Neiriz (29°36′ N, 53°59′ E). The area has an arid climate. It was fenced in and thus kept from grazing livestock.

    The study was a factorial experiment based on a ran-domized complete block design with 3 replications. Compost applications included compost tea (CT), solid compost (SC), MX and no compost as the control. De-scriptions of the CT and SC preparations are given in Table. 1 and 2, respectively. Amounts of compost used in each replication for CT and the SC treatments were 2 and 5 kg, respectively. Quantities were 2 kg CT and 5 kg SC for the mixed compost treatments, and the control treatment did not contain any compost.

    Before the experiment was started, soil analysis was performed to determine soil properties. Soil samples were taken from a depth of 0-30 cm around the rhizosphere, using metal cylinders. The soil texture was sandy clay with pH 7.05, organic matter, electrical conductivity and total nitrogen 0.70%, 1.34 d/Sm, 0.06%, respectively.

    At the end of the study, measurements were taken to assess morphological traits; plant height, stem diameter, plant volume, length, width and area of the plant crown. Plant height was measured from the soil’s surface to the highest free standing point of the crown. Crown length was measured at its widest point, and the lower crown di-ameter was measured as the width of a plant’s crown. The area of the plant crown was calculated using Eq. 1 (Bon-ham 1989):

    CA = ? × r2 (1)

    where CA is the crown area, is the ratio between the circumference and the diameter of any given circle, it is

    [Table 1.] Characteristics of the solid compost that was used in the ex-periment*

    label

    Characteristics of the solid compost that was used in the ex-periment*

    [Table 2.] Characteristics of the liquid compost (compost tea) that was used in the experiment

    label

    Characteristics of the liquid compost (compost tea) that was used in the experiment

    equal to 3.14159, and r is calculated using Eq. 2 (Bonham 1989):

    image

    where r is the radius of the plant canopy, HD and LD are the higher and lower plant diameters. The average of HD and LD is considered as the diameter of a circle and its fraction divided by 2 is considered as the radius of a circle. Plant volume was defined and presented as the point of maximum cylindrical volume for each respective plant species and was calculated using Eq. 3 (Hock et al. 2006):

    PV = CA × h (3)

    where PV is the plant volume (cm3), CA is the area of each plant crown and h is plant height. Soil characteristics were determined by soil analysis, which included soil organic matter (according to methods described by Cambardella and Elliott 1992), soil pH level (based on description of Clark 1965), nitrogen, phosphorous, sodium, and potas-sium concentrations (using by atomic absorption, Nouri et al. 2009).

    Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and significant differences between the treatment means

    [Table 3.] Statistical analysis of the morphological traits of arid region species subjected to different compost applications

    label

    Statistical analysis of the morphological traits of arid region species subjected to different compost applications

    [Table 4.] Statistical analysis of the soil properties of arid region species subjected to different compost applications

    label

    Statistical analysis of the soil properties of arid region species subjected to different compost applications

    were determined using the least significant difference test at P < 0.01 probability level (PL) by the SAS ver. 9.1 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The correlation between the traits was assessed using MINITAB ver. 14.

    RESULTS

      >  Statistical analysis

    Results of ANOVA

    Data analysis of variance showed that the compost had significant effects on plant height (1%), stem diameter (5%), length, width, area and volume of canopy (1% PL), illustrated in Table 3. The effect of compost application on all growth characteristics (i.e., plant height, stem diame-ter, length, width, area, and volume of canopy) was found to be statistically significant at the 1% or 5% PL. There was no significant effect on morphological traits for interac-tions, except on canopy volume (Table 3).

    In relation to soil properties, plant species were signifi-cantly affected by soil nitrogen concentration at the 5% PL, and its effect on other soil traits was non-significant, as shown in Table 4. The effect of compost applications on soil organic matter (1% PL), soil nitrogen concentration (5% PL), and soil phosphorous amount (5% PL), soil po-tassium amount (5% PL) and soil sodium concentration (1% PL) was found to be statistically significant. Only soil nitrogen concentration was significantly affected by the interaction of compost with species (Table 4).

    Correlation results

    The correlation between the measured traits is shown in Table 5. All growth traits were positively correlated, but there was a significant correlation among some soil properties. Correlations among the growth traits and soil properties were different. Soil pH showed the low-est significant correlation and was correlated negatively with sodium (-0.171). However soil sodium concentration showed the highest significant correlation and was nega-tively correlated with all growth and soil traits.

    [Table 5.] Correlation between measured traits for both growth characteristics and soil properties

    label

    Correlation between measured traits for both growth characteristics and soil properties

      >  Growth characteristics

    Plant height

    Saltwort was a shorter plant (average, 45.75 cm) than Atriplex (average, 71.92 cm) and Haloxylon (average, 76.58 cm). This trend in all compost types was similar (Fig. 1). Compost application for any type of compost enhanced the plant height compared to the control treat-ment, and among composts, the CT had greatest effect on plant height. The effect of soil compost and mixed com-post were close together. Overall, the tallest plants grown in the experiment were Atriplex and Haloxylon in the SC treatment (Fig. 1a).

    Stem diameter

    The difference between stem diameter of Atriplex (av-erage, 2.3 cm) and Haloxylon (average, 2.1 cm) was non-

    significant and higher than Saltwort (average, 1.6 cm). Compost significantly increased stem diameter of each species when compared to the control treatment. There was no significant difference among the three compost types (CT, 2.28 cm; SC, 2.29 cm; and MX, 2.00 cm). In this respect, CT was the most effective on Atriplex and Hal-oxylon and SC was the best treatment for Saltwort. The thickest stem was observed in Atriplex treated with the CT (Fig. 1b).

    Canopy length and width

    Atriplex and Haloxylon had higher canopy lengths (66.8 cm and 70.0 cm, respectively) and widths (65.9 cm and 67.5 cm, respectively) than Saltwort (51.5 cm and 50.8 cm, respectively). Plant canopy length and width was increased by compost application. The effect of CT on canopy length was higher than that for the other compost types, but in terms of canopy width, there were no signifi-cant differences among the compost types.

    There were no significant differences between canopy length and width of plants treated with CT, but in other compost types, significant differences were observed (Fig. 2a and 2b). The better compost types for canopy length (Fig. 2a) and width (Fig. 2b) of Atriplex, Saltwort and Haloxylon were the mixed compost (MX), CT and mixed compost (MX), respectively. Atriplex had the highest can-opy length and width when treated with mixed compost (MX) when compared to other the compost treatments.

    Canopy area and volume

    Results of the effect of plant species and compost ap-plication on canopy area and volume were similar (Fig. 2c and 2d). Accordingly, higher canopy length and width were recorded in Atriplex and Haloxylon, which also had greater canopy areas (on average 1.4 m2 and 1.5 m2, re-spectively) and volume (on average 1.1 m3 and 1.2 m3, re-spectively) than Saltwort (on average 0.85 m2 and 0.42 m3, respectively). Compost application resulted in an increase in the area and volume of the canopy. In addition, mixed compost and SC had higher effects on canopy area (Fig. 2c) and volume (Fig. 2d), respectively, when compared to the others. Overall, the highest canopy area and volume was obtained in Atriplex treated with the mixed compost.

      >  Soil properties

    Soil pH

    There were no significant differences among plants and composts, in terms of soil pH levels (Fig. 3a). On aver-age, the soil pH for all treatments ranged from 7.3 to 7.6.

    Soil organic matter

    Organic matter concentrations in the soil of all three species were similar and there was no significant differ-ence. Compost application could increase soil organic matter and the CT plots had higher organic matter con-centrations. There was no significant difference between the SC (on average, 3.0%) and the mixed compost (on average, 2.9%) compost type. The responses of the three plant species to compost type did not show a clear trend (Fig. 3b); nonetheless, the mixed compost was the most effective compost for Atriplex and Haloxylon and the SC was the most effective for Saltwort.

    Soil nitrogen concentration

    Haloxylon plots had higher soil nitrogen concentra-tions (on average, 0.064%) than Saltwort and Atriplex (av-erage, 0.042% and 0.028% respectively without significant difference). But the SC plots had higher nitrogen contents than the controls (plots without compost application) and nitrogen concentration in the other compost types was similar to the control treatment. The differences among the response of plant species to compost application were remarkable, where the responses of Atriplex and Haloxy-lon to the SC was high and the response of Saltwort to the mixed compost was high (Fig. 4a). Haloxylon treated with SC had exceptionally high nitrogen content.

    Potassium and phosphorous concentrations

    There were no significant differences between the plant species in terms of soil phosphorous and potassi-um concentrations. Compost application could increase phosphorous (on average, 9.1 mg/kg vs. 4.3 mg/kg) and potassium concentration (on average, 363.1 mg/kg vs. 218.7 mg/kg) of the soil, but no significant differences was observed among the types of compost. Effects of in-teraction of plant species with compost applications on soil nutrition were not significant (Table 4) as were the re-sponses of the three plant species to compost types (Fig. 4b and 4c). Differences between phosphorous concentra-tions (Fig. 4b) in the three plants as a result of compost application were higher compared to the results for po-tassium (Fig. 4c).

    Soil sodium concentration

    There were no significant differences between the three plant species in any of the compost levels in terms of soil sodium concentration (on average Atriplex, 0.028%; Salt-wort, 0.042%; Haloxylon, 0.064%). Compost application decreased sodium concentration in the soil when com-pared to the control treatments, but there were no sig-nificant differences between the three types of compost. The soil in all three treatments of plant species had higher sodium concentrations than the control treatments (Fig. 4d).

    DISCUSSION

    Atriplex were first planted in Iran to improve and de-velop the rangeland about 35 years ago (Tajali 2008). Hal-oxylon establishes and survives under extremely hostile conditions that are intolerant to other plant species (Rah-bar 1987).

    In this study, the main effects of plant species and com-post application on all growth characteristics were signifi-cant and there was no significant interaction effect.

    For all of the growth characteristics (as shown Table. 3 and 4), Atriplex and Haloxylon had higher values than Saltwort and there were no significant differences be-tween these two plants. The greater canopy recorded for Atriplex could be attributed to its shape and size. It is a spreading, communal shrub reaching more than three meters in height and generally more than that in width (Pearcy et al. 1977). Furthermore, Haloxylon is a hardy tree that can grow in nutritionally poor soil and can toler-ate drought (Huang 2000); so its growth is not restricted by hostile conditions. In contrast, Saltwort is a halophyte plant that is very well adapted to grow in dry and salty desert soil (Hadi 2009) and it has a low canopy that does not produce dense forage.

    However, the composting operation increased the growth of all three species (see Figs. 1 and 2). The re-sponse of the plants to each of the tested compost types was similar, so for all plants, the results for growth (height) were highest (on average, 77.1 cm) and lowest (on aver-age, 47.0 cm) under solid composting and control con-ditions, respectively. The stem diameter of Atriplex and Haloxylon was higher when treated with CT but the most effective treatment for Saltwort was SC. In addition, the stem diameter of Atriplex and Haloxylon in all compost treatments increased when compared to the control. With respect to Eqs. 1 and 3, the canopy area and volume de-pended on canopy length and width. These results were in agreement with previous studies that reported enhanced the vegetative growth of Barley (Hordeum volgure L.) (Ku-mawat et al. 2006), Maize (Zea mays L.) (Jat and Ahlawat 2004), Papaya (Carica papaya L.) (Acevedo and Pire 2004), Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) (Cavender et al. 2003) and in Canola (Brassica napus) (de Freitas et al. 1997), Gram (Ci-cer arietinum) (Jat and Ahlawat 2004) and Sunflower (He-lianthus annuus L.) (Anosheh et al. 2010) after biofertil-izer application. Plant performance was also found to be considerably better due to compost application in a study by Wong et al. (1999).

    Responses of plants to different compost applications, in terms of canopy covering, were not similar, and the big-gest difference was demonstrated in CT. SC was the most effective treatment in regards to canopy length and width. Since compost application increases nitrogen availability (Inckel et al. 2005), this may be attributed to increased fo-liage due to plant growth. Furthermore, compost contains many nutrients that decompose and become available for plant use (Pattnaik and Reddy 2010). The effects of plant species on soil nitrogen concentration of compost application on organic matter, nitrogen concentration, phosphorous, potassium concentration and sodium con-centration of soil and the interaction effect of species and compost on soil nitrogen concentration was significant (Table 4). The soil pH level was unchanged when com-posting was used for all three plants, which was likely due to high soil buffering. The organic matter of plants treated with all types of compost was increased when compared to the controls. Organic matter is a key factor needed to improve the structure of soil. The highest organic matter was observed in CT for Atriplex and in SC for Saltwort and Haloxylon. There was no significant difference among the plants in the mixed compost (MX), in terms of organic matter.

    Inckel et al. (2005) demonstrated that compost ap-plication could enhance the organic matter in soil. The study asserted that organic matter contains a substantial amount of nutrition important for plant growth, and these improve the water maintenance capacity of soil. Thus, it is possible that the compost treatments that had higher or-ganic matter contents improved plant performance and soil properties. Compost increased soil nutrition, that is to say nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium, but the variation in nitrogen concentrations was higher than in phosphorous and potassium. Another study reported that nutrient availability increased incrementally according to composting application (Soumare et al. 2002) and treated plants performed better when compared to the controls.

    In terms of nitrogen, SC was recommended for use with Atriplex and Haloxylon and the mixed compost was the best for Saltwort. SC is ready for use after about six weeks. In terms of phosphorous and potassium, differences among compost types and plants were negligible. In this respect, Sundara et al. (2002), Soumare et al. (2002), Cavender et al. (2003), Jat and Ahlawat (2004) and many researchers hold the opinion that bio fertilizers, such as compost, improves soil characteristics and soil nutrition contents. The advantage of compost in terms of nutrition is that it facilitates the slow release of nutrients, which ex-tends the long term benefits of compost treatment (Inckel et al. 2005).

    In contrast to all earlier studies, compost treatment was shown to decrease soil sodium concentration; neverthe-less this reduction also benefits plant growth. Because of the high levels of sodium in the soil solution, a plant’s ability to uptake water is limited due to decreased soil water holding potential (Subbarao et al. 2003); therefore, this might cause plants to wilt. There were no significant differences among all treatments, except the three plants that were grown in the controls. Although there are ni-trogen, sodium, chlorides, and sulfate salts present in SC (Zhang et al. 1998), the amount of sodium was lower than the amount of the other elements. Higher soil sodium within the cytoplasm of the cells can lead to enzyme in-hibition, which may result in symptoms such as necrosis, chlorosis, and possible plant death (Pessarakli 2001). So, compost application could be used to combat the de-structive and harmful effects of sodium in soil.

    CONCLUSION

    Atriplex and Haloxylon spp. are dry rangeland species and there were no considerable differences in most of the physiological traits, although the demonstrated higher growth than Saltwort. A similar trend was demonstrated in soil properties. Compost application increased plant growth and improved soil properties, effects that facili-tated good plant performance. This can be attributed to the fact that compost is a ready decomposed material. The results of this study showed that all types of compost tested effectively enhanced the growth traits of all three species of plants in this study. Among the plants that were tested, Atriplex was the most affected by applications of compost. Compost treatment enhanced organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium concentrations of the soil. Furthermore, compost improved the physical properties of the soil; bulk density, soil structure, and soil water maintenance capacity. However, the soil pH level was unchanged and sodium concentrations decreased with compost application.

    These results demonstrate that compost application in soils, especially soil compost, was an effective method to supply nutritions for plant growth. Compost is used in combination with chemical fertilizers in advanced ag-ricultural systems. Finally, from the results of this study it can be recommended that the best compost applica-tion to increase growth and improve soil conditions were mixed compost (MX) for Atriplex and SC for Saltwort and Haloxylon.

참고문헌
  • 1. Acevedo IC, Pire R 2004 Effects of vermicompost as sub-strate amendment on the growth of papaya (Carica pa-paya L.). [Interciencia] Vol.29 P.274-279 google
  • 2. Anosheh HP, Emam Y, Ramin FJ 2010 Comparative effect of biofertilizers with chemical fertilizers on sunflower (He-lianthus annuus L.) growth, yield and oil percentage in different drought stress levels. [Agroecology] Vol.2 P.492-501 google
  • 3. Ansari V 2000 Auto-ecology Atriplex in Isfahan Province. google
  • 4. Araujo ASF, Monteiro RTR, Carvalho EMS 2007 Effect of composted textile sludge on growth, nodulation and ni-trogen fixation of soybean and cowpea. [Bioresour Tech-nol] Vol.98 P.1028-1032 google
  • 5. Bonham CD 1989 Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation. google
  • 6. Cambardella CA, Elliott ET 1992 Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. [Soil Sci Soc Am J] Vol.56 P.777-783 google
  • 7. Casado-Vela J, Selles S, Navarro J, Bustamante MA, Mataix J, Guerrero C, Gomez I 2006 Evaluation of composted sewage sludge as nutritional source for horticultural soils. [Waste Manag] Vol.26 P.946-952 google
  • 8. Cavender ND, Atiyeh RM, Knee M 2003 Vermicompost stimulates mycorrhizal colonization of roots of Sor-ghum bicolor at the expense of plant growth. [Pedobio-logica] Vol.47 P.85-89 google
  • 9. Clark JS 1965 The extraction of exchangeable cations from soils. [Can J Soil Sci] Vol.45 P.311-322 google
  • 10. de Freitas JR, Banerjee MR, Germida JJ 1997 Phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria enhance the growth and yield but not the phosphorous uptake of canola (Brassica na-pus L.). [Biol Fertil Soil] Vol.24 P.358-364 google
  • 11. Emami MA, Nikkhah A, Kordiyazi MA 1999 Determination of apparent digestion coefficients of nutrients and en-ergy of two Atriplex species using live animals. [The 3rd Feeding of Livestock and Poultry Conference] google
  • 12. Hadi MR 2009 Biotechnological potentials of Seidlitzia ros-marinus: a mini review. [Afr J Biotechnol] Vol.8 P.2429-2431 google
  • 13. Hock SM, Knezevic SZ, Martin A, Lindquist JL 2006 Soybean row spacing and weed emergence time influence weed competitiveness and competitive indices. [Weed Sci] Vol.54 P.38-46 google
  • 14. Hua L, Wang Y, Wu W, McBride MB, Chen Y 2008 Biomass and Cu and Zn uptake of two turfgrass species grown in sludge compost-soil mixtures. [Water Air Soil Pollut] Vol.188 P.225-234 google
  • 15. Huang PX 2000 No-irrigation Vegetation and Its Restora-tion in Arid Area. google
  • 16. Inckel M, de Smet P, Tersmette T, Veldkamp T 2005 The Preparation and Use of Compost. google
  • 17. Irvine G, Lamont ER, Antizar-Ladislao B 2010 Energy from waste: reuse of compost heat as a source of renewable energy. [Int J Chem Eng] Vol.2010 P.627930 google
  • 18. Jat RS, Ahlawat IPS 2004 Effect of vermicompost, biofer-tilizer and phosphorous on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by gram (Cicer arietinum) and their residual ef-fect on fodder maize (Zea mays L.). [Indian J Agric Sci] Vol.74 P.359-361 google
  • 19. Kumawat PD, Jat NL, Yadav SS 2006 Effect of organic ma-nure and nitrogen fertilization on growth, yield and eco-nomics of barley (Hordeum vulgare). [Indian J Agric Sci] Vol.76 P.226-229 google
  • 20. Mantovia P, Baldoni G, Toderi G 2005 Reuse of liquid, de-watered, and composted sewage sludge on agricultural land: effects of long-term application on soil and crop. [Water Res] Vol.39 P.289-296 google
  • 21. Naseri K 1999 Evaluation of some ecological effect of Atri-plex canesence in cultural conditions. google
  • 22. Nouri AS, Kalantari KHM, Sharifi M, Tahernezahd A, Mir-taj SM 2009 Study on copper and zinc content in soil and root of Mycorrhizal plants in some areas in Kerman province. [Iranian J Biol] Vol.22 P.237-248 google
  • 23. Pattnaik S, Reddy MV 2010 Nutrient status of vermicompost of urban green waste processed by three earth worm species: Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatus. [Appl Environ Soil Sci] Vol.2010 P.967526 google
  • 24. Pearcy RW, Berry JA, Fork DC 1977 Effects of growth tem-perature on the thermal stability of the photosynthetic apparatus of Atriplex lentiformis (Torr.) Wats. [Plant Physiol] Vol.59 P.873-878 google
  • 25. Pessarakli M 2001 Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology. google
  • 26. Planquart P, Bonin G, Prone A, Massiani C 1999 Distribu-tion movement and plant availability of trace metals in soils amended with sewage sludge composts: applica-tion to low metal loadings. [Sci Total Environ] Vol.241 P.161-179 google
  • 27. Rad MH, Korori SAA, Matinizadeh M 2006 Comparison be-tween natural and cultivated forests of Haloxylon sp. with respect to some ecological factors. [Iranian J For Poplar Res] Vol.14 P.29-38 google
  • 28. Rahbar A 1987 Duad Effect of Some Soil Physical Traits, Density and Rain on Growth of Haloxylon sp. google
  • 29. Rahbar A, Baghestani N, Danaei R 2004 Examine of Several Salt Resistance Species in Marginal Lands of Kavir Chah Afzal Ardakan. google
  • 30. Ranjbar FA 1991 Study of nutritional value of Atriplex ca-nesence and A. Lentiformis in different phonological stages. google
  • 31. Renoux AY, Rocheleau S, Sarrazin M, Sunahara GI, Blais JF 2007 Assessment of a sewage sludge treatment on cad-mium copper and zinc bioavailability in barley, rye-grass and earthworms. [Environ Pollut] Vol.145 P.41-50 google
  • 32. Rezvantalab N, Pirdashti H, Bahmanyar MA, Abasian A 2008 Study on yield and yield components of corn (Zea mays L.) response to different types and rates of organic and chemical fertilizers. [J Agric Nat Res] Vol.15 P.1-10 google
  • 33. Rigi MR 2003 Study of greenhouse effect on three types of vermicompost and nitrogen on yield and chemical com-position of corn and rice. google
  • 34. Sabeti H 1976 The Trees and Shrubs in Iran. google
  • 35. Shahhosseini GR, Zafarinia H, Sori MK, Pirasteh-Anosheh H 2010 Yield of Upland Lentil Affected by Bio-sulfur, Azo-tobacter and Superabsorbent. P.25-29 google
  • 36. Singh RP, Agrawal M 2007 Effects of sewage sludge amend-ment on heavy metal accumulation and consequent re-sponses of Beta vulgaris plants. [Chemosphere] Vol.67 P.2229-2240 google
  • 37. Soumare M, Demeyer A, Tack FMG, Verloo MG 2002 Chem-ical characteristics of Malian and Belgian solid waste composts. [Bioresour Technol] Vol.81 P.97-101 google
  • 38. Subbarao GV, Ito O, Berry WL, Wheeler RM 2003 Sodium: a functional plant nutrient. [Crit Rev Plant Sci] Vol.22 P.391-416 google
  • 39. Sundara B, Natarajan V, Hari K 2002 Influence of phospho-rous solubilizing bacteria on the changes in soil avail-able phosphorous and sugarcane and sugar yields. [Field Crop Res] Vol.77 P.43-49 google
  • 40. Tajali A 2008 The study of the effect of phonological stages and ecological condition on nutrition value of Atriplex canescense. [Plant Ecosyst] Vol.4 P.81-89 google
  • 41. Wong JWC, Ma KK, Fang KM, Cheung C 1999 Utilization of a manure compost for organic for farming in Hong Kong. [Bioresour Technol] Vol.67 P.43-46 google
  • 42. Zhang W, Han DY, Dick WA, Davis KR, Hoitink HAJ 1998 Compost and compost water extract-induced systemic acquired resistance in cucumber and Arabidopsis. [Phy-topathology] Vol.88 P.450-455 google
OAK XML 통계
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Table 1. ]  Characteristics of the solid compost that was used in the ex-periment*
    Characteristics of the solid compost that was used in the ex-periment*
  • [ Table 2. ]  Characteristics of the liquid compost (compost tea) that was used in the experiment
    Characteristics of the liquid compost (compost tea) that was used in the experiment
  • [ Table 3. ]  Statistical analysis of the morphological traits of arid region species subjected to different compost applications
    Statistical analysis of the morphological traits of arid region species subjected to different compost applications
  • [ Table 4. ]  Statistical analysis of the soil properties of arid region species subjected to different compost applications
    Statistical analysis of the soil properties of arid region species subjected to different compost applications
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Responses of Atriplex, Saltwort, and Haloxylon plant height (a) and stem diameter (b) to compost application. There were no significant differences between columns with similar letters. CT, compost tea; SC, solid compost; MX, mixture compost; Con, control.
    Responses of Atriplex, Saltwort, and Haloxylon plant height (a) and stem diameter (b) to compost application. There were no significant differences between columns with similar letters. CT, compost tea; SC, solid compost; MX, mixture compost; Con, control.
  • [ Table 5. ]  Correlation between measured traits for both growth characteristics and soil properties
    Correlation between measured traits for both growth characteristics and soil properties
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Responses of canopy length (a), width (b), area (c), and volume (d) of Atriplex, Saltwort, and Haloxylon to compost application. There were no significant differences between columns with similar letters. CT, compost tea; SC, solid compost; MX, mixture compost; Con, control.
    Responses of canopy length (a), width (b), area (c), and volume (d) of Atriplex, Saltwort, and Haloxylon to compost application. There were no significant differences between columns with similar letters. CT, compost tea; SC, solid compost; MX, mixture compost; Con, control.
  • [ Fig. 3. ]  Effect of compost application on the soil pH (a) and organic matter (b) of the soil on which Atriplex and mesquite with different compost treatments were grown. There were no significant differences between columns with similar letters. CT, compost tea; SC, solid compost; MX, mixture compost; Con, control.
    Effect of compost application on the soil pH (a) and organic matter (b) of the soil on which Atriplex and mesquite with different compost treatments were grown. There were no significant differences between columns with similar letters. CT, compost tea; SC, solid compost; MX, mixture compost; Con, control.
  • [ Fig. 4. ]  Effect of compost application on soil content element (a, nitroegn concentration; b, phosphorous; c, potassium; and d, sodium) on which Atriplex and mesquite with different compost treatments were grown. There were no significant differences between columns with similar letters. CT, compost tea; SC, solid compost; MX, mixture compost; Con, control.
    Effect of compost application on soil content element (a, nitroegn concentration; b, phosphorous; c, potassium; and d, sodium) on which Atriplex and mesquite with different compost treatments were grown. There were no significant differences between columns with similar letters. CT, compost tea; SC, solid compost; MX, mixture compost; Con, control.
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.