검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
A 1.8 V 0.18-㎛ 1 GHz CMOS Fast-Lock Phase-Locked Loop using a Frequency-to-Digital Converter
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
A 1.8 V 0.18-㎛ 1 GHz CMOS Fast-Lock Phase-Locked Loop using a Frequency-to-Digital Converter
KEYWORD
Fast-lock , Phase-locked loop , Frequency-to-digital converter , Current integrator
  • I. INTRODUCTION

    Phase locked loops (PLLs) have been widely used for synchronous clock systems such as microprocessors and communication systems that have a high-speed chip-to-chip interface. In these systems, the PLL must satisfy many design requirements to ensure a high performance. These requirements include phase noise, sideband spur, power consumption, frequency locking range, voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO) gain, and locking time. Furthermore, PLLs for mobile applications should have a small lock time to support the power-saving mode and quick wake-up time. Generally, the lock time of a PLL is controlled by the bandwidth of the loop filter. Fig. 1 shows the waveforms of each control voltage for the VCOs of two PLLs, one with a wide-loop bandwidth of 5 MHz, and another with a narrow-loop bandwidth of 3 MHz. In practice, the waveforms are the results of the behavioral simulation for the analysis of a PLL. The PLL for this simulation has a reference clock frequency of 100 MHz and a divider ratio of 10. The results of the simulation shown in Fig. 1 indicate that the loop bandwidth of a PLL must be increased to reduce the lock time of a PLL. However, this solution deteriorates the performance of the noise filter against the external noise. To minimize the phase jitter of the output clock of a PLL, the bandwidth of the PLL must be narrow.

    To solve the issue, [1, 2] have demonstrated a variable-bandwidth scheme in which the loop bandwidth of a PLL is increased to reduce the initial transient time during the PLL locking process. After a PLL approaches the locked state, its loop bandwidth is switched to be narrow to minimize output phase jitter. However, because of its complex architecture, the design and implementation of a stable PLL is not easy.

    In this paper, a frequency-to-digital converter (FDC) that measures the frequency of the input reference clock is proposed for a fast-lock PLL. The proposed scheme is based on a conventional charge-pump PLL. The initial control voltage of a VCO is driven toward a reference voltage that is determined by the FDC during wake-up time. Section 2 describes the proposed fast-lock PLL using the FDC. Section 3 examines its implementation and measurement results. In section 4, concluding remarks are presented.

    II. PROPOSED FAST-LOCK PLL USING FDC

    In the general charge-pump PLL with the fixed-loop bandwidth, the lock time of the PLL is determined by the initial control voltage of the VCO. Fig. 2 shows the waveforms of the control voltage for the VCO of the PLL in the case of the initial voltages of 0.0, 0.4, 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 V. This simulation is achieved in the same environment as that of the behavioral simulator in Fig. 1. The results shown in Fig. 2 indicate that the lock time of the PLL is minimized when the control voltage of the VCO is initialized to the target control voltage for the phase lock.

    In this work, a PLL is proposed that can set the optimal initial control voltage to achieve the fast-lock time. Fig. 3 illustrates the block diagram of the proposed fast-lock PLL. It consists of the conventional charge-pump PLL and the proposed FDC & DAC.

    The conventional charge-pump PLL consists of a phase-frequency detector (PFD), a charge-pump (CP), a loop filter (LF), a divider, and a VCO. The PFD generates two pulse signals that are proportional to the phase difference between the two inputs. Two pulse signals are driven toward the CP to control the VCO through the LF. In this work, the frequency of the PLL output clock is targeted to be 1 GHz with a 1.8 V supply. This PLL also multiplies the frequency of the reference clock by 10 and generates the four-phase clock.

    The block diagram of the VCO is shown in Fig. 4a. It has four differential delay cells for a four-phase output clock and its architecture is based on a dual loop for high frequency operation [3]. Fig. 4b shows the circuit of the delay cell. It is based on two inverters that are cross-coupled for differential outputs. As the voltage level of VCONT increases, the strength of the cross-couple of the delay cell increases. Thus, the oscillation frequency of the VCO decreases. To reduce the power consumption in the initial mode for the fast lock scheme proposed in this work, the VCO in the forward path of the PLL is disabled by the control signal, denoted EN in Fig. 4b, until the loop filter is charged with the initial control voltage of the VCO by the FDC & DAC block in the initial mode.

    The simulation of the designed VCO was achieved for the three corners, FF, TT, and SS, as shown in Fig. 5. It includes the effect of parasitic capacitance. The simulation condition of the process, voltage, and temperature changes for each corner. The results of the simulation indicate that the designed VCO generates the clock signal with the target frequency, 1 GHz, under the three corners.

    The FDC & DAC block consists of the FDC and DAC, as shown in Fig. 6. The FDC measures the frequency of the input reference clock, and the DAC generates the initial control voltage of a VCO. For the speedy measurement of the frequency of the reference clock, an FDC is proposed with a parallel architecture that is similar to that of a flash analog-to-digital converter. According to the VCO transfer curve shown in Fig. 5, the reference voltages are chosen from 0.8 to 1.6 V for the target frequency. Moreover, as its architecture is similar to a flash ADC, there are five cases of a reference voltage with an increase of 0.2 V to reduce circuit overhead. The initial control voltage of a VCO is driven toward a reference voltage that is determined by the frequency of the input reference clock in the initial mode. The FDC & DAC block is disabled in the normal operation mode except for the initial mode to reduce the power consumption.

    The input reference clock frequency information (CLKREF_IN) is converted to the analog voltage (VREF_IN) generated by a frequency-to-voltage converter (FVC). The information on each reference voltage is converted to the information on the frequency via the VCO. In this work, a divider ratio of 10 is needed to replicate the feedback path of the PLL. The frequency information divided by 10 is converted to voltage by the FVC to compare its frequency with VREF_IN. By using the results obtained comparing the difference between voltages converted by the FVC, the reference voltage that is most similar to VREF_IN is selected for the initial control voltage of the VCO through the DAC. The selected reference voltage is driven toward the loop filter of the PLL.

    The FVC used in the FDC is designed simply by utilizing a current integrator, as shown in Fig. 7a. Fig. 7b shows the timing diagram of the clock generator to control the FVC. The simulation result of the FVC with a 100 MHz input clock frequency is shown in Fig. 7c. When CLK1 is high, the current is integrated by the input clock frequency (CLKIN) at node net1. Then, the integrated value at net1 is driven toward net2 by the source follower. The output signal of the FVC, VOFVC, is held at the falling edge of CLK2. When /CLK3 is low, the nodes of net1 and net2 are reset to the voltage levels of VDD and VDD?VTHN, respectively. This process for the FVC is repeated during the initial mode. Since CLK1 is divided by 2 from the input clock (CLKIN) to improve accuracy, it takes two periods of CLKIN to convert frequency to voltage. The conversion time could be reduced by not using the divider for CLK1.

    The output stage of the FDC & DAC consists of a comparator, two current sources, and two switches, as shown in Fig. 8a. The output of the comparator, which is denoted EN in Fig. 8a, is connected to the node of VCONT for the delay cells of the VCO in the proposed fast-lock PLL. Two current sources are used to reduce charge sharing between the two capacitors in the LF. Each current source is connected to the top plate of each capacitor and is controlled by each switch. The magnitude of each current source is proportional to the capacitance. Fig. 8b shows the timing diagram of the output stage of the FDC & DAC. The voltage level of VCONT is increased by two current sources until it is larger than the VDACO determined by the DAC. After it approaches the VDACO, two current sources are disabled by two switches, and the VCO is turned on for the normal operation of the PLL.

    The simulation of the output stage of the FVC was achieved with the loop filter designed for the PLL, as shown in Fig. 9. According to the simulation results, the slew rate of the output stage designed in this work is 66.7 mV/ns and the worst settling time is about 25.4 ns. The settling time can be reduced by increasing the magnitude of the current sources.

    Fig. 10 shows the simulated waveforms of the control voltage for the VCO of the designed PLL in the case of the initial voltages of 0.0, 0.8, and 1.2 V. This simulation is achieved by using HSPICE (Synopsys Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA). The PLL for this simulation has a reference clock frequency of 100 MHz, a divider ratio of 10, and a loop bandwidth of 3 MHz. It is locked when the control voltage of the VCO reaches a voltage of 1.32 V with a supply of 1.8 V.

    Fig. 11 shows the simulated PLL lock time in the case of the proposed PLL and the conventional PLL. The designed PLL generates a four-phase output clock of 1 GHz and can set the initial control voltage of the VCO controlled by the FDC & DAC. The designed PLL has a maximum lock time of 800 ns when the proposed fast-lock scheme is not used. The PLL was locked at the fastest time of 350 ns when the control voltage was initialized to 1.2 V by using an FDC & DAC. The simulation results show a reduction of up to 40%in the worst-case PLL lock time over the device operating conditions.

    Until VCONT approaches the determined initial reference voltage in the initial mode, the VCO of the proposed fast-lock PLL is disabled to reduce the power consumption. In addition, the FDC & DAC block is disabled to reduce the power consumption in the normal operation mode. Thus, the overall power consumption of the proposed PLL in the normal operation mode is the same as that of the conventional PLL.

    III. CHIP IMPLEMENTATION AND RESULT

    Fig. 12 shows a micrograph of the PLL fabricated in a 0.18-㎛ 1-poly 6-metal complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) process with a 1.8 V supply. The active area of the PLL occupies 400 × 450 ㎛2. The power consumption of the PLL with the output clock frequency of 1 GHz is 6 mW. The measured frequency range is from 800 MHz to 1.3 GHz. The root-mean-square (rms) and peak-to-peak jitter are 2.94 ps and 14 ps at 1 GHz, respectively, which are 0.294% and 1.4% of the output clock period, as shown in Fig. 13.

    Table 1 is the performance summary of the implemented PLL. Furthermore, Table 2 shows the performance comparison of this work with previous reports. The proposed fast-lock PLL reduces the lock time with a small area and low power consumption.

    [Table 1.] Performance summary of fast lock phase-locked loop

    label

    Performance summary of fast lock phase-locked loop

    [Table 2.] Performance comparison

    label

    Performance comparison

    IV. CONCLUSIONS

    A 1 GHz CMOS fast-lock PLL was implemented by using an FDC to measure the frequency of the input reference clock and a DAC to generate the initial control voltage of the VCO. The initial control voltage of the VCO is driven toward a reference voltage that is determined by the frequency of the input reference clock in the initial mode. The proposed PLL was fabricated by using a 0.18-㎛ 1-poly 6-metal CMOS process with a 1.8 V supply. The simulation results show a reduction of up to 40% in the worst-case PLL lock time over the device operating conditions. The rms jitter of the proposed PLL was measured as 2.94 ps at 1 GHz. The area and power consumption of the implemented PLL are 400 × 450 ㎛2 and 6 mW, respectively.

참고문헌
  • 1. Chiu W. H., Chan T. S., Lin T. H. 2007 "A 5.5-GHz 16-mW fast-locking frequency synthesizer in 0.18-㎛ CMOS," [Proceedings of IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference] P.456-459 google
  • 2. Yang C. Y., Liu S. I. 2000 "Fast-switching frequency synthesizer with a discriminator-aided phase detector," [IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits] Vol.35 P.1445-1452 google
  • 3. Park C. H., Kim B. 1999 "A low-noise, 900-MHz VCO in 0.6-㎛ CMOS" [IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits] Vol.34 P.586-591 google
OAK XML 통계
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Waveform of control voltage for the voltage-controlled oscillator of phase-locked loop (PLL) according to loop bandwidth.
    Waveform of control voltage for the voltage-controlled oscillator of phase-locked loop (PLL) according to loop bandwidth.
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Behavioral simulation results according to initial control voltage of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
    Behavioral simulation results according to initial control voltage of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • [ Fig. 3. ]  Block diagram of the proposed phase-locked loop. FDC: frequency-to-digital converter, DAC: digital-to-analog converter, CLK: clock, PFD: phase-frequency detector, CP: charge pump, VCO: voltagecontrolled oscillator, LF: loop filter.
    Block diagram of the proposed phase-locked loop. FDC: frequency-to-digital converter, DAC: digital-to-analog converter, CLK: clock, PFD: phase-frequency detector, CP: charge pump, VCO: voltagecontrolled oscillator, LF: loop filter.
  • [ Fig. 4. ]  (a) Block diagram of voltage-controlled oscillator, (b) circuit diagram of delay cell.
    (a) Block diagram of voltage-controlled oscillator, (b) circuit diagram of delay cell.
  • [ Fig. 5. ]  Simulation results of transfer curve of designed voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO).
    Simulation results of transfer curve of designed voltage-controlled oscillator (VCO).
  • [ Fig. 6. ]  Block diagram of proposed frequency-to-digital converter (FDC) & digital-to-analog converter (DAC). VCO: voltage-controlled oscillator, FVC: frequency-to-voltage converter.
    Block diagram of proposed frequency-to-digital converter (FDC) & digital-to-analog converter (DAC). VCO: voltage-controlled oscillator, FVC: frequency-to-voltage converter.
  • [ Fig. 7. ]  (a) Circuit diagram of frequency-to-voltage converter (FVC), (b) timing diagram of clock generator for FVC, (c) simulation results of 100 MHz input clock frequency.
    (a) Circuit diagram of frequency-to-voltage converter (FVC), (b) timing diagram of clock generator for FVC, (c) simulation results of 100 MHz input clock frequency.
  • [ Fig. 8. ]  (a) Circuit diagram of output stage of frequency-to-digital converter (FDC) & digital-to-analog converter (DAC), (b) timing diagram of output stage of FDC & DAC.
    (a) Circuit diagram of output stage of frequency-to-digital converter (FDC) & digital-to-analog converter (DAC), (b) timing diagram of output stage of FDC & DAC.
  • [ Fig. 9. ]  Simulation result of output stage of frequency-to-voltage converter.
    Simulation result of output stage of frequency-to-voltage converter.
  • [ Fig. 10. ]  HSPICE simulation results according to the initial control voltage of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
    HSPICE simulation results according to the initial control voltage of the voltage-controlled oscillator.
  • [ Fig. 11. ]  HSPICE simulation results of proposed phase-locked loop (PLL) and conventional PLL.
    HSPICE simulation results of proposed phase-locked loop (PLL) and conventional PLL.
  • [ Fig. 12. ]  Micrograph of manufactured phase-locked loop. VCO: voltage-controlled oscillator, FDC: frequency-to-digital converter, PFD: phase-frequency detector, CP: charge pump.
    Micrograph of manufactured phase-locked loop. VCO: voltage-controlled oscillator, FDC: frequency-to-digital converter, PFD: phase-frequency detector, CP: charge pump.
  • [ Fig. 13. ]  Measured jitter histogram of phase-locked loop (at 1 GHz with 1.8 V supply).
    Measured jitter histogram of phase-locked loop (at 1 GHz with 1.8 V supply).
  • [ Table 1. ]  Performance summary of fast lock phase-locked loop
    Performance summary of fast lock phase-locked loop
  • [ Table 2. ]  Performance comparison
    Performance comparison
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.