Fish community structure in the Pyeongchanggang River was investigated from April to November 2009. About 900 individuals representing 24 species from eight families at six sites in the Pyeongchanggang River were collected. It was similar to the 2001’s survey and it was less than 2006’s survey. The Korean endemic species,Zacco koreanus was the most abundant, whereas subdominant species were native species, such as
Streams and rivers play an important role in our lives. They have great economic, social, cultural and environmental value and perform a number of ecological functions such as modulating streamflow, storing water, removing harmful materials from water, and providing habitat for aquatic and terrestrial plants and animals (Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group, 1998).
Monitoring the status and trends in freshwater biota and ecosystems is essential to quantify human impacts and evaluate the effectiveness of management actions (Allan and Castillo, 2007). The significance of monitoring fish assemblages is primarily to comprehend the characteristics of fish fauna, the understanding of which is necessary for effective conservation and management of fisheries resources (Friedlander and Parrish, 1998).
The Pyeongchanggang River which originates in Nodong-ri, Yongpyeon-myeon, Pyeongchang-gun, Gangwondo join with the Donggang River in Hasong-ri, Yeongwoleup,Yeongwol-gun, Gangwon-do and it is a total of 149 km extension. Year of river flow is abundant and the river is relatively well-maintained in the appearance of natural rivers.
Several studies on fish communities have been conducted on the Pyeongchanggang River. The distribution of fish species in Gangwon-do was investigated by Choi (1986), followed by an evaluation of biological habitat assessment by An et al. (2001). The most recent study concerned fish community and inhabitation of legally protected species by Lee et al. (2006).
The aim of this study was to investigate fish community structure and river health in the Pyeongchanggang River,South Korea, using the index of biological integrity (IBI).
Four sampling programs were conducted at six stations in the Pyeongchanggang River, located in Pyeongchang District,Gangwon-do, South Korea. The following stations were investigated for this study (Fig.1 ).
1. Nodong-ri, Youngpyeon-myeon, Pyeongchang-gun,Gangwon-do (Nodong-bridge).
2. Heujeong-ri, Bongpyeong-myeon, Pyeongchang-gun,Gangwon-do (Heungjeong-gegok).
3. Gaesu-ri, Daehwa-myeon, Pyeongchang-gun, Gangwondo(Gaesu-bridge).
4. Bangrim-ri, Bangrim-myeon, Pyeongchang-gun, Gangwon-do (Gupo-bridge).
5. Maji-ri, Pyeongchang-eup, Pyeongchang-gun, Gangwondo(Dodon-bridge).
6. Ongjeong-ri, Sa-myeon, Pyeongchang-gun, Gangwondo(Gwangjeon-bridge).
Fish were sampled from April-November 2009 (Apr 24-25;Aug 14-15; Oct 7-8; Nov 11-12). Fish sampling was conducted at the site using cast nets (mesh size, 7×7 mm) and hand nets (mesh size, 4×4 mm), according to the catch per unit effort method (Ohio Environmental Protection Agency,1989). Collected species were fixed in 10% formalin, identified and classified in the laboratory using the methods described by Kim and Park (2002) and Kim et al. (2005). Sensitive and tolerant species were classified with reference to previous studies. All fishes were examined for external deformities,erosion (skin, barbells), lesions (open sores, ulcerations)and tumors (DELT anomalies), based on the criteria of Sanders et al. (1999).
A dominance index was calculated using the Simpson’s dominance index (Simpson, 1949). Species diversity (H′) was calculated by Shannon and Weaver (1949) which is more sensitive to the presence of rare species, and, thus, to species richness. The evenness index (J′) was calculated using Pielou’s evenness index (Pielou, 1966), and the species richness index (R) was calculated using Margalef’s species richness(Margalef, 1958).
The eight-metric system was adopted for the IBI in Pyeongchang Stream, rather than the 12-metric system suggested by Karr (1981) due to the cost-effective strategy and difficulties evaluating the metrics of long-lived fish and water-column species.
As shown in Table 1, ratings of 5, 3 and 1 were assigned to each metric. The three ratings were evaluated by the maximum species richness line, which was developed by Rankin and Yoder (1999), Hugueny et al. (1996) and Karr (1981).The sum of those ratings (5, 3, and 1) provided an IBI value at each station of the Pyeongchanggang River.
Thus, we evaluated the sampling stations as four integrity classes of excellent (36-40), good (26-35), fair (16-25) and poor condition (0-15), as shown in Table .2The models were categorized into three major groups consisting of species composition, trophic composition and fish abundance and health (Table 1).
The following metric attributes were included for species composition: total number of native fish species (1), number of riffle benthic species (2), number of sensitive species (3),
and proportion of individuals as tolerant species (4). The following were included for trophic composition: proportion of individuals as omnivore species (5) and proportion of individuals as native insectivore species (6). The following were included for fish abundance and health: total number of individuals in sample (7), and proportion of individuals with disease,tumors, fin damage and other anomalies (8).
Overall, about 900 fish representing 24 species from eight families at six stations were collected in the Pyeongchanggang River (Table 3). Among these species, 16 were Korean
endemic species (relative abundance [RA], 67.2%), which was higher than the average of the Korean peninsula (RA 23%)(Nam, 1996).
Cyprinidae included approximately 66.7% (16 species) of the total species collected and about 92.1% of total abundance.Subdominant families were Cobitidae (two species,RA 1.6%).
The Korean endemic species,
Three endangered species were collected from the sampling area:
The month with the greatest overall catch of fishes was April (258 individuals), and the lowest was November (186 individuals).
Analysis of community index at each station
A comparison of the ecological indices at each station is shown in Fig. 3. Station 1 (two species, 34 individuals) had the lowest richness and diversity index scores (0.3 and 0.5)but the highest dominance index score (0.7).
Station 2 (5 species, 103 individuals) showed a high evenness score (0.7). The highest diversity value occurred at station 6 (1.8), whereas the lowest dominance index value was seen at station 5 (0.2).
Community index analysis for each season
A comparison of the monthly ecological indices from April-November 2009 is shown in Fig. .4The greatest number of
fish species was found in the April (20 species, 258 individuals).April also had the highest score for the richness, evenness and diversity indices.
The fewest fish were captured during the November, with the lowest evenness and diversity indices (186 individuals,0.6 and 1.8, respectively), whereas the lowest richness index
score occurred in October (2.9). October also showed the highest dominance index (1.7).
According to fish species composition,
The RA of the subdominant species P. herzi (RA 12.6%)did not vary monthly, unlike
Analysis of ecological indicator characteristics
According to the tolerance guild analysis, the relative proportion of tolerant species was 6.3% (57 individuals) during the survey, whereas the proportion of sensitive species was 65.9%(593 individuals) (Table 3).
The proportion of sensitive species ranged from 45 to 100%(Fig.5 ). At stations 1 and 2, the proportion of sensitive species was 100% but tended to decrease at stations 3-5. At station 6, the proportion of sensitive species was greater than
that at station 5. The proportion of tolerant species ranged from 8 to 11% and was only found at stations 4-6, whereas intermediate species were found at stations 3 (13%), 4 (11%),5 (47%), and 6 (35%).
The trophic guilds analysis revealed that insectivores dominated all sampling stations (Fig.6 ). The proportion of insectivores was 100% at stations 1 and 2, then tended to decrease at stations 3-5, ranging from 75 to 92%. At station 6, the proportion of insectivores was greater than that at station 5. Herbivores,such as
Carnivores were found at stations 4-6 with proportions ranging from 0.3 to 2%. The proportion of omnivores increased downstream, from 2% at station 3 to 25% at station 5. At station 6, the proportion of insectivores decreased to 19%(Fig.6 ).
The ecological stream health assessment, based on the IBI,indicated that health varied with location and month (Fig.7 ).
IBI values ranged from 24 to 32 during April and averaged 27 (n=6), indicating a “good condition.” The condition varied in other seasons: a “fair condition” for August (IBI average 23) and November (IBI average 25) and a “good condition”during the October (IBI average 26). The total IBI value for all months and stations during 2009 averaged 25 (n=24) and was considered “fair condition.”
Several fish community studies has been conducted on the Pyeongchanggang River. A fish species distribution in Gangwon-do was conducted by Choi (1986), followed by a biological habitat assessment by An et al. (2001). The most recent study concerned the fish community and inhabitation of legally protected species by Lee et al. (2006).
Choi (1986) reported about 35 fish species from nine families,followed by An et al. (2001) who found approximately 28 species from seven families. Lee et al. (2006) reported that approximately 35 species from 10 families were found in the Pyeongchanggang River.
The species investigated during 1986-2009 varied. Nineteen species from the current research (75%) were found in previous studies, including:
Species that were present in 2006 but did not occur in the present survey were:
Another endangered species,
Sixteen Korean endemic species (RA 67.2%) were collected during the study. The proportion of endemic Korean species was higher than the average RA (23%) of the entire endemic species of Korea (Nam, 1996), indicating that the proportion of endemic Korean species found in this study was higher than the normal proportion throughout the Korean peninsula. Exotic fish, which are introduced to a country outside of their natural range (Shafland and Lewis, 1984) were not found.
Twenty four species emerged in this study. It was similar to the 2001’s survey and it was less than 2006’s survey. I think by the survey area, timing and tool is shown in the difference.
Species diversity was relatively low at station 1, whereas stations 2-6 showed a medium level of diversity. Overall, fish species richness in the Pyeongchanggang River was low, but the evenness score could be classified as high (J′> 0.6).
The species evenness, richness and diversity indices decreased monthly from April to November. The evenness index varied from 0.6 to 0.8 and could be classified as high,whereas the richness index decreased from 3.4 to 3.3 and could be classified as low (R < 3.5). The species diversity index also showed a similar pattern with previous indices and scores decreased from April to November in the range from 2.3 to 1.8, which could be considered a medium level of diversity.
The ecological stream health assessment, based on the IBI,indicated that stream health varied depending on the location and sampling time. IBI values at each site and month ranged from 16 to 34 with an average of 25 (n=24), indicating a “fair condition.”
The results of this study suggest that the Pyeongchanggang River is one of the most important environmental resources for fish diversity and conservation, particularly for the endemic and endangered species of Korea.