Protein profiles of a common mixotrophic dinoflagellate,
Marine dinoflagellates are ubiquitous and some genera are cosmopolitan (Smayda 1997, Jeong 1999). These organisms often dominate plankton assemblages and sometimes form red tides or harmful blooms (Jeong 1999). Marine dinoflagellates have three different major trophic modes, autotrophic, mixotrophic, and heterotrophic.Recently, many phototrophic dinoflagellates that had previously been thought to be exclusively autotrophic were found to be mixotrophic (Bockstahler and Coats 1993, Jacobson and Anderson 1996, Skovgaard 1996, Stoecker 1999, Jeong et al. 2005, Seong et al. 2006).The prey organisms that these mixotrophic dinoflagellates are able to feed on are quite diverse and include bacteria, diverse algae, other dinoflagellates, and heterotrophic protists (Stoecker 1999, Burkholder et al. 2008).
Although there have been many studies on the ecology and taxonomy of these mixotrophic dinoflagellates (Jeong et al. 2005), only a few have investigated their proteomics (Wang et al. 2009). When a culture of dinoflagellates is established by single cell isolation, all individual cells have the same genome; however, if a dinoflagellate grows in various nutritional modes (autotrophically or mixotrophically), their gene expression may change. Differences in gene expression depending on trophic mode imply that the expression of genes involved in feeding and photosynthesis may be switched on and off, which could influence the cost of producing proteins. Therefore, a comparative approach to developing protein profiles of mixotrophic dinoflagellates growing autotrophically and mixotrophically is very important.
Proteomics using large two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2-DE) allows multiple expressed proteins to be separated and mapped, providing a convenient and powerful method for monitoring variations at translational levels (Kim et al. 2008). Proteins identified using peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) ion searches can be separated and then analyzed by MS/MS. Proteomic technology is thus useful for investigating the correlation between expressed proteins and behavioral and physiological phenotypes during biological cycles (Akimoto et al. 2004). However, these techniques have seldom been used in the field of marine biology because of the poor reproducibility of the results caused by heavy polysaccharides contained in algae. Recently, a rapid progress has been made in 2-DE methodology for marine algae. Chan et al. (2002) first reported a method for the optimization of sample preparation for 2-DE and later conducted proteomic analysis for species recognition of several harmful bloom-related dinoflagellates (Chan et al. 2004, 2006). More recent studies have shown that 2-DE results are useful for analysis of the phylogenetic relationships among closely related species of algae (Kim et al. 2008).
To determine if the mixotrophic dinoflagellate
The mixotrophic dinoflagellate
The initial concentrations of
For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), predator and / or prey cells were fixed for 1.5-2 h in 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in culture medium. The cells were then centrifuged, after which the pellet was embedded in 1% agar (w/v). After several medium rinses, the cells were post fixed in 1% (w/v) osmium tetroxide with deionized water. Dehydration was accomplished using a graded ethanol series (i.e., 50 60 70 80 90 and 100% ethanol, followed by two 100% ethanol steps). The material was then embedded in Spurr’s low-viscosity resin (Spurr 1969). Sections were obtained using a RMC MT-XL ultramicrotome (Boeckeler Instruments Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) and post stained with 3% (w/v) aqueous uranyl acetate followed by lead citrate. The stained sections were viewed using a JEOL-1010 electron microscope (Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
Urea, thiourea, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammo-nio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), dithiothreitol (DTT), benzamidine, Bradford solution, acrylamide, iodoacetamide, bis-acrylamide, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), acetonitrile, trifluoroacetic acid, α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA), sodium bicarbonate, and ammonium bicarbonate were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Pharmalyte (pH 3.5-10) was purchased from Amersham Biosciences (Piscataway, NJ, USA) and IPG DryStrips (pH 4-10NL, 24 cm) were purchased from Genomine, Inc. (Pohang, Korea). Modified porcine trypsin (sequencing grade) was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA).
Experiment 1 was designed to determine if
For the autrotrophic condition, approximately 1 L of a dense culture of
For the mixotrophic condition, approximately 3 L of a dense culture of
For the mixotrophic-autotrophic transition condition, approximately 1 L of a dense culture of
Immobilized pH gradient (IPG) dry strips were equilibrated for 12-16 h with 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea containing 2% CHAPS, 1% DTT, and 1% pharmalyte and then loaded with 200 μg of sample. Isoelectric focusing (IEF) was conducted at 20°C using a Multiphor II electrophoresis unit and an EPS 3500 XL power supply (Amersham Biosciences) following the manufacturer’s instructions. For IEF, the voltage was linearly increased from 150 to 3,500 V over 3 h for sample entry followed by a constant 3,500 V, with focusing complete after 96 kVh. Prior to the second dimension, strips were incubated for 10 min in equilibration buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 6.8 containing 6 M urea, 2% SDS, and 30% glycerol), first with 1% DTT and then with 2.5% iodoacetamide. The equilibrated strips were inserted onto SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels (20 × 24 cm, 10-16%) and SDS-PAGE was performed using a Hoefer DALT 2-DE system (Amersham Biosciences) following the manufacturer’s instructions. 2-DE gels were run at 20°C for 1,700 Vh, then stained using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G 250.
Quantitative analysis of digitized images was conducted using the PDQuest version 7.0 software (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The quantity of each spot was normalized using the total valid spot intensity. Protein spots were considered to have significant expression when the variation deviated by more than two-fold when compared with the control or normal sample.
Protein spots were enzymatically digested in-gel in a manner similar to the method described by Shevchenko et al. (1996) using modified porcine trypsin (Promega modified). Gel pieces were washed with 50% acetonitrile to remove SDS, salt, and stain. Washed and dehydrated spots were then vacuum dried to remove the solvent and rehydrated with trypsin solution (8-10 ng μL-1) in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate at pH 8.7, after which they were incubated for 8-10 h at 37oC.
All MS and power spectral density (PSD) spectra were acquired in the positive ion mode using an Ettan MALDI-TOF (Amersham Biosciences) mass spectrometer equipped with a pulsed extraction source, a 337-nm pulsed nitrogen laser and a curved-field reflectron. The acceleration voltage was 20 kV. The CHCA matrix was prepared in 1 : 1 acetonitrile / water. A thin layer of the matrix was first applied onto the sample plate, after which 0.5 μL of sample and 0.5 μL of matrix were applied and the sample was allowed to dry at room temperature.
Experiment 2 was designed to identify the proteins. The fragment masses obtained from CAF-MALDI were submitted to Sonar in the Ettan MALDI-TOF software or similar protein identification search engines (e.g., Pepfrag). The mass of the native (non-derivatized) peptide and five fragment masses or more (depending on the protein) were used for protein identification. The amino acid sequence of the peptide can be obtained from the distances between consecutive peaks (y-ions) in the PSD spectrum. By submitting the amino acid sequence, the protein can be identified by a homology search using ProteinInfo™ (www.proteometrics.com), or with a BLAST search using the ExPASy Molecular Biology Server (www.expasy.ch).
Approximately 1,200 protein spots were observed in each 2-DE gel during the five trials using the same experimental setting (Fig. 2). Overall, 27 protein spots were differentially expressed consecutively in the two trophic modes (Fig. 3). Of these 27 spots, 12 that were observed under only the mixotrophic conditions had an isoelectric point below pI 5.0, while 15 protein spots that were observed in only the autotrophic conditions had a pI value above 5.0.
Eight protein spots that showed differences in quantity by trophic mode more than four times were selected for further analysis. Three proteins were only expressed in one trophic mode; 6404R under autotrophic conditions and 0133R and 1105R under mixotrophic conditions (Table 1). The profiles of the selected proteins in
Mixotrophic dinoflagellates are able to feed on prey and / or conduct photosynthesis (Stoecker 1999). Many proteins produced by these organisms are likely to be involved in photosynthesis and / or feeding as enzymes
[Fig. 1.] Epifluorescence and transmission electron micrographs of Rhodomonas salina and Prorocentrum micans. (A) P. micans has captured R. salina cell through the suture. (B) P. micans has engulfed approximately 1/2 of the body of R. salina cell. (C) P. micans contains two ingested R. salina cells. Arrows indicate R. salina cell. (D) Transversely sectioned R. salina cell. (E) Longitudinally sectioned P. micans cell. (F) P. micans cell with an ingested R. salina cell (dashed circle). (G) Enlargement from (F) showing the ingested R. salina cell inside the food vacuole of P. micans. Scale bars represent: A-C 10 μm; D 1.0 μm; E & F 5.0 μm; G 0.5 μm.
[Fig. 2.] Two dimensional electrophoresis gel images of Prorocentrum micans growing under autotrophic (A) mixotrophic (B) and mixotrophic-autotrophic transition conditions (C). IEF isoelectric focusing; SDS-PAGE sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
and some proteins are expected to be expressed differentially according to trophic modes. If photosynthesis stops during feeding, the mixotrophic condition is the same as a heterotrophic condition. There are five possibilities for gene expression with nutritional modes in mixotrophic dinoflagellates.
A dinoflagellate growing photosynthetically also produces the same proteins that it produces when growing
[Fig. 3.] Master diagram of the expression-proteome from 2-DE gel images of Prorocentrum micans growing in different trophic modes. Orange colored boxes indicate the protein spots expressed dominantly in mixotrophic isolates blue colored boxes indicate the protein spots appearing only in mixotrophic isolates purple colored boxes indicate the protein spots appearing dominantly in autotrophic isolates and the black box indicates a protein spot appearing only in an autotrophic isolate. 2-DE two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.
mixotrophically.In this case, there may be no switching on and off between nutritional modes and the cost of producing all proteins may be high because the dinoflagellate produces some proteins that do not function as well.
As an extreme case, a dinoflagellate growing photosynthetically does not produce any proteins that it produces when growing mixotrophically. Conversely, the dinoflagellate growing mixotrophically also does not produce any proteins that it produces when growing photosynthetically. In this case, there may be strong switching on and off in the expression of genes related to photosynthesis and feeding and digestion; thus, the cost of producing proteins may be minimal. In this case, the dinoflagellate completely stops photosynthesis while feeding on prey.
A dinoflagellate growing photosynthetically does not produce some proteins that it produces when growing mixotrophically. Conversely, a dinoflagellate growing mixotrophically does not produce some proteins that it produces when growing photosynthetically. In this case, there may also be moderate switching on and off in the expression of genes related to photosynthesis and feeding and digestion; thus, the cost of producing proteins may be moderate.
While a dinoflagellate growing mixotrophically produces all of the proteins that are produced when growing photosynthetically, the dinoflagellate growing photosynthetically does not produce several proteins that it produces when growing mixotrophically. In this case, there may be switching on and off in the expression of genes related only to feeding and digestion and thus the cost of producing proteins may be moderate. When this occurs, the dinoflagellate produces proteins involved in feeding and digestion only during feeding (i.e., under mixotrophic conditions). In addition, this dinoflagellate may conduct photosynthesis while feeding.
While a dinoflagellate growing photosynthetically produces all of the proteins that it produces when growing mixotrophically, during mixotrophic growth the proteins produced when growing photosynthetically are not produced. In this case, there may be switching on and off in the expression of genes related only to photosynthesis and thus the cost of producing proteins may be moderate. This type of dinoflagellate produces proteins involved in feeding and digestion when growing both photosynthetically and mixotrophically. However, this type of dinoflagellate may stop photosynthesis when feeding on prey.
The present results support the fourth scenario, because some protein spots were observed under only mixotrophic conditions, while other protein spots were observed under only autotrophic conditions. The protein spots observed under only mixotrophic conditions are likely to be involved in feeding and the digestion of prey. The presence of the spots observed under only autotrophic conditions suggests that the activity of some enzymes involved in photosynthesis is largely depressed or stopped under mixotrophic conditions. Moreover, the results of the analysis of the protein spots by Ettan MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry revealed that the quantity of many proteins is likely to change depending on the trophic modes. This evidence suggests that there may be switching on and off of the expression of certain genes of
It is important to note that most of the mixotrophy-specific proteins had isoelectric points below pI 5.0, while all of the autotrophy-specific proteins had pI values over 5.0. These findings suggest that the pH of the cytoplasm changes with the trophic mode, which could control the activity of specific proteins involved in different trophic modes.
Proteomics is a rapidly growing field for the detection, identification and comparison of protein profiles in different organisms, tissues and / or conditions. In the present study, we were able to maintain constant culture conditions, and the clonal culture ensured the consistency of genotypes between trails, as well as the easy exclusion of all of the prey cells using filtration minimized contamination of the protein profiles. Without these precautions, e.g., with field-collected samples, analysis would have been problematic.
For proteome analysis, the inconvenience of working with algal species, which are poorly represented in genomic and proteomic databases, lies mostly in the lack of information regarding the cellular functions of the proteins identified (Kim et al. 2008). Although we were able to identify five proteins specific to trophic modes by homology searches against the protein databases the true nature and function of the proteins is still uncertain because of the lack of genetic information regarding dinoflagellates. Three mixotrophy-specific proteins showed homology with hypothetical proteins that have completely unknown functions. Two autotrophy-specific proteins showed homology to certain known genes. One of these proteins (5211R) was homologous with catalase from
The process of protein solubilization is a critical step in 2-DE. The effectiveness of solubilization depended on the choice of the cell disruption method, protein concentration, choice of detergents, and composition of the sample solution. For this process, we used a modification of the process originally described by O’Farrell (1975). The solubilization of proteins improved when we washed the materials three times with distilled water before pulverization and used a lysis solution. Wong et al. (2006) reported that the phenol / chloroform protein extraction method gave better 2-DE resolution than the lysis buffer extraction for
The present data showed that comparative proteomics may be a useful tool for analysis of the mixotrophism of dinoflagellates. With more standardized methods of protein extraction and consistent culture conditions this new tool could have a profound influence on studies of the cellular responses of dinoflagellates to environmental changes.