Integral Transforms in Electromagnetic Formulation
 Author: Eom Hyo Joon
 Organization: Eom Hyo Joon
 Publish: Journal of electromagnetic engineering and science Volume 14, Issue3, p273~277, Sep 2014

ABSTRACT
In this research, integral transform technique for electromagnetic scattering formulation is reviewed. Electromagnetic boundaryvalue problems are presented to demonstrate how the integral transforms are utilized in electromagnetic propagation, antennas, and electromagnetic interference/compatibility. Various canonical structures of slotted conductors are used for illustration; moreover, Fourier transform, Hankel transform, Mellin transform, KontorovichLebedev transform, and Weber transform are presented. Starting from each integral transform definition, the general procedures for solving Helmholtz’s equation or Laplace’s equation for the potentials in the unbounded region are reviewed. The boundary conditions of field continuity are incorporated into particular formulations. Salient features of each integral transform technique are discussed.

KEYWORD
BoundaryValue Problems , Electromagnetic Scattering , Integral Transforms.

I. INTRODUCTION
Various integral transforms have been extensively used in the formulation of electromagnetic scattering, radiation, antennas, and electromagnetic interferencerelated problems. The integral transform technique [1,2] is an indispensable tool for representing the fields in the unbounded (open) region. This technique is often combined with the modematching method to solve electromagnetic boundaryvalue problems. The purpose of the present paper is to review the integral transforms that are applied in conjunction with the modematching method.
In the paper, we will limit our discussion to the canonical slotted conductors, which will enable us to use the technique of variable separation. The use of Fourier transform, Hankel transform, Mellin transform, KontorovichLebedev transform, and Weber transform is discussed. We will show how these integral transforms can be incorporated into the pertinent electromagnetic boundaryvalue problems, which are formulated in terms of Helmholtz’s equation or Laplace’s equation. Depending on the problem geometries, a certain type of integral transforms must be chosen to facilitate the solutions to Helmholtz’s equation or Laplace’s equation for the potentials. From the integral transform definitions, we will show how the potentials in the unbounded region can be obtained. In the next section, we begin with Fourier transform. The time convention exp(
iωt ) is used throughout the analysis.II. FOURIER TRANSFORM
The Fourier transform pair is as follows:
The Fourier transform technique has long been used for electromagnetic scattering, diffraction, and antenna applications. We will discuss the formulation of Fourier transform by considering radiation from slotted circular waveguides. Fig. 1 shows a circular waveguide with a narrow circumferential slot array. The circular waveguide is infinitely long in the
z direction. An incident field is assumed to propagate within the circular waveguide (ρ <a ) from below. In region I (ρ <a ), the scattered electric and magnetic vector potentials in the zdirection are needed for the field description.The
z component of the scattered electric vector potential satisfies Helmholtz’s equation, (▽^{2} =k ^{2})F_{z} (ρ ,Φ ,z ) = 0, wherek is the wave number in region I. Helmholtz’s equation in the cylindrical coordinates (ρ ,Φ ,z ) is as follows:We will represent the scattered electric vector potential
F_{z} (ρ ,Φ ,z ) based on the Fourier transform and Fourier series. Since the problem geometry is open (–∞ < z <∞ ) in thez direction and periodic in theΦ  direction with 2π periodicity, we let:We substitute Eq. (4) into Eq. (3) to obtain Bessel’s differential equation:
Since the field is finite at the origin, the Bessel function of the first kind,
J_{n} (Kρ ), is chosen as where Hence:A complete radiation analysis using the boundary conditions is available in [3].
III. HANKEL TRANSFORM
The Hankel transform pair is as follows:
The Hankel transform is useful for the analysis of scattering from circular apertures. Consider electromagnetic scattering from a circular aperture in an infinitely extended, perfectly conducting plane, as shown in Fig. 2.
Assume that a uniform plane wave is incident on a circular aperture from below. The transmitted field in region I, which is above the slotted conducting plane, can be written in terms of the
z component of the transmitted electric and magnetic vector potentials. Thez component of the transmitted electric vector potential in region I,F_{z} (ρ , (Φ ,z ), satisfies Eq. (3). Since region I is open (ρ > 0) in the direction and periodic in theρ direction withΦ 2 periodicity, it is expedient to use the Hankel transform and Fourier series representations simultaneously as:π Substituting Eq. (9) into Eq. (3) yields:
where Since the transmitted field must vanish when
z goes to infinity, we choose Hence:The field representations and some computations are available in [4].
IV. MELLIN TRANSFORM
The Mellin transform pair is:
Consider the twodimensional (
ρ,Φ ) electrostatic boundaryvalue problem of a slotted conducting wedge, as shown in Fig. 3. The electrostatic potentialV is applied across the conducting wedge. The electrostatic potential Փ(ρ,Φ ) in region I (Φ _{0} <Φ < 2π Φ _{0}) is given by the twodimensional Laplace equation as:We will determine Փ(
ρ, Φ ) in region I, assuming:Substituting Eq. (15) into Eq. (14) gives:
Since the electric field at
Φ =π exists only in the radial direction , it is possible to represent the potential as Thus:ρ A complete solution to the potential problem is provided in [5].
V. KONTOROVICHLEBEDEV TRANSFORM
The KontorovichLebedev transform pair is as follows:
where is the Hankel function of the first kind. The incident wave impinges on the structure, as shown in Fig. 4. Assume that the scattering problem is twodimensional (
ρ, Φ ) and thez component of the scattered magnetic vector potentialA_{z} (ρ, Φ ) solely describes the scattered field. Helmholtz’s equation forA_{z} (ρ, Φ ) is:We express
A_{z} (ρ, Φ ) in region I (0 <Φ <γ ) as:Substituting Eq. (21) into Eq. (20) yields:
Hence, the solution is:
Finally, we obtain:
A complete wedgescattering analysis using the boundary conditions can be found in [6].
VI. WEBER TRANSFORM
The Weber transform pair is [7]:
where
Z_{v} (ςρ ) =J_{v} (ςρ )N_{v} (ςa ) N_{v} (ςρ )J_{v} (ςa ). Note thatJ_{v} (ςρ ) andN_{v} (ςa ) are the Bessel functions of the first and second kinds of order , respectively. Consider the electrostatic boundaryvalue problem in Fig. 5. The electrostatic potentialv V is applied between the infinitely long conducting cylinder of radiusa and a perforated thick conducting plane of infinite extent. Based on the superposition, we decompose the original problem of Fig. 5 into equivalent ones [8].We wish to determine the electrostatic potential for the equivalent problem. The electrostatic potential Փ(
ρ, z ) in region I, which is above the slotted plane and exterior to the cylinder (z > 0,a < ρ < ∞), is given by:If the boundary condition for the equivalent problem requires Փ(
a, z ) = 0, it is possible to let:Substituting Eq. (28) into Eq. (27) gives:
If the boundary condition is such that the potential is zero when
z → ∞, we choose Hence, the electrostatic potential is [7,8]:A complete potential analysis is given in [8].
VII. CONCLUSION
In this paper, the integral transform technique in electromagnetic boundaryvalue problems was shown. Fourier transform, Hankel transform, Mellin transform, KontorovichLebedev transform, and Weber transform were introduced. Starting from Helmholtz’s equation or Laplace’s equation, pertinent potential expressions for the open regions were derived. The integral transform technique can be adequately applied to electromagnetic scattering and radiation problems, in particular when the scattering geometries have canonical cylindrical shapes.

[Fig. 1.] A perfectly conducting circular waveguide of inner radius ( ρ = a ) with a narrow circumferential slot array.

[Fig. 2.] A circular aperture of radius a in an infinitely extended, thick perfectly conducting plane.

[Fig. 3.] A slotted twodimensional conducting wedge, where the wedge is symmetric with respect to Φ = 0.

[Fig. 4.] A multiply slotted, twodimensional, perfectly conducting wedge.

[Fig. 5.] An infinitely long conducting cylinder of radius a piercing a thick conducting plane of infinite extent.