검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
The effect of simulated acid rain on microbial community structure in decomposing leaf litter
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
The effect of simulated acid rain on microbial community structure in decomposing leaf litter
KEYWORD
acid rain , litter decomposition , microbial biomass , PLFA
  • INTRODUCTION

    Acidification of precipitation caused by human activities has become one of the most serious problems in natural ecosystems (Berg and Laskowski 2006). Acid rain influences on terrestrial plants performances include cation-loss or nutrient-loss from leaves (Proctor 1983, Liu et al. 2007), change in the gas-exchange rate through stomata on leaves (Evans et al. 1982, Hermle et al. 2007), germination (Lee and Weber 1979, Raynal et al. 1982), and plant growth (Wood and Bormann 1974, Neufold et al. 1985, Reich et al. 1987). In addition, acid rain is known to change the soil chemical status and function of the decomposer community, often leading to imbalances in nutrient cycling, litter decomposition, and productivity of the ecosystem (Pennanen et al. 1998). It resulted in poor soil fertility, and the harmful effects on plant growth by leaching of toxic soluble Al (Wood et al. 1984, Matzner et al. 1986, Osonubi et al. 1988), and releases such as Ca, Mg, and K from the solid phases of soil into soil solution (Batty and Younger 2007, Zhang et al. 2007).

    In terrestrial ecosystems, the litter decomposition carried out by microorganisms is one of the most important processes in decomposer subsystem. In particular, strong reductions in microbial activity are easily detected when low pH acid rain is applied (Bååth et al. 1979, Bewley and Parkinson 1985, Fritze 1992, Myrold and Nalson 1992, Rousk et al. 2009). The essential nutrient (K and Mg) released from plant litter were found to be affected by low pH (Holvland et al. 1980, Batty and Younger 2007, Berg and Laskowski 2006), while decomposition of plant litter showed no significant effect of the acid rain. In addition, Ouyang et al. (2008) suggested the mineralization of soil organic C was not related to pH level. On the other hand, Berg and Laskowski (2006) demonstrated that such changes in litter, leaving larger recalcitrant remains, may lead to changed decomposition patterns, which should decrease the extent of organic matter decomposition in ecosystems and cause a higher humus accumulation rate.

    Most studies on the effect of acid rain noted that the species of acid-tolerant fungi and bacteria have shown increased activity in plant litter decomposition in terrestrial environments (Gross and Robbins 2000, Reith et al. 2002), and the effects of the pH gradient on microbial community structure and the patterns were demonstrated (Frostegård et al. 1993, Bååth and Arnebrant 1994, Bååth et al. 1992, 1995, Pennanen et al. 1998, Bååth and Anderson 2003, Stemmer et al. 2007, Högberg et al. 2007, Rousk et al. 2009).

    Several techniques have been used to identify fungal and bacterial groups in soil. One of the most commonly used methods is the selective inhibition technique (Anderson and Domsch 1973) based on inhibition of the substrate-induced respiration (SIR) using antibiotics that inhibit bacterial and fungal respiration (Bååth and Anderson 2003), thymidine incorporation technique (Bååth and Arnebrant 1994), and by analysis the ester-linked phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs) composition of the soil, since different subsets of the community have different PLFA patterns (Bååth et al. 1995). Frostegård and Bååth (1996) suggested that a fungal/bacterial biomass ratio could be estimated by using the PLFA 18:2v6,9 as a measure of fungal biomass and the sum of 13 bacteria specific PLFAs as a measure of bacterial biomass (Bååth and Anderson 2003, Frostegård et al. 1993).

    The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of simulated acid rain on plant litter decomposition processes in a microcosm environment. The leaf litter samples were treated periodically with simulated acid rain, which was made using sulfuric acid, and retrieved for the determination of weight loss and microbial biomass, microbial community structure, and microbial activities on the decomposing litter. Microbial biomass and microbial community structures on the leaf litter were determined by SIR and PLFA methods.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

      >  Microcosm Design and Litter Decomposition

    Sorbus alnifolia is known to have a wide tolerance range to atmospheric pollution and has a trend of increasing distributional area near big cities in Korea (You et al. 1998). We collected freshly fallen leaf litter of S. alnifolia at autumn, dried at 60℃ dry oven, and cut to 2 cm width for easy use in the microcosm.

    The study used 1 L colorless glass bottles with detachable lids which have 9 mm diameter holes filled with 300 g of clean quartz sand. The quartz sand contained 90% water holding capacity by adding deionized water to maintain constant moisture in the microcosm bottles. Approximately 4 g of litter samples were soaked in distilled water for 1 h, and then placed on top of the sand in the microcosm glass bottle, and incubated at constant 23℃ and 40% relative humidity.

    The simulated acid rain of pH 3, pH 4, and pH 5 were made by dilution of sulfuric acid in deionized water. After 16 days of 10 ml fresh soil suspension solution addition, 10 ml of simulated acid rain of each pH level applied to each experimental treatment group, and additional artificial acid rain water supplied at twice a week as much as the same amount of evaporated water from the microcosm until the end of experiment. The four replicated litter samples were carefully retrieved from microcosm after 80 and 160, and 290 experimental days. Retrieval fresh litter samples from microcosm use to measure the mass loss measurement and microbial biomass and microbial community analysis.

      >  Microbial Biomass

    Fungal, bacterial and total microbial biomass C (Cmic) were determined by the SIR technique of Anderson and Domsch (1978) with modifications by Beare et al. (1990). Four subsamples (0.5-1.0 g dry weight equivalent) of each litter sample were weighed into 100 ml serum bottles and incubated at 4℃ for 12 h with 2.5 ml microbial respiration inhibitor per gram of litter sample. Cycloheximide (16.0 g/l) and streptomycin (3.2 g/l) for fungal and bacterial respiratory inhibitors were used, respectively. Deionized water was added instead of microbial inhibitors for control treatment. All treatments had 2.5 ml/g glucose solutions (16.0 g/l) added as a substrate and were immediately flushed with CO2-free gas, sealed tightly, and incubated at 23℃ for 2 h. The CO2 concentrations in the bottles were measured by infrared gas analyzer (IRGA) after incubation.

    Microbial biomass-C was calculated according to the equation of Beare et al. (1990) as follows:

    Fungal biomass (μg C/g dry weight) = 231.5+ 17.3 (μg CO2-Cfungal g-1 dry weight h-1)

    Bacterial biomass (μg C/g dry weight) = 188.3+15.5 (μg CO2-Cbacterial g-1 dry weight h-1)

    Total microbial biomass-C (μg C/g dry weight) = -765.1 + 14.3 (μg CO2-Ctotal g-1 dry weight h-1)

      >  Microbial Community Structure

    PLFAs were extracted and analyzed according to the procedure described by Wilkinson et al. (2002). Fresh litter samples were freeze-dried and ground to less than 10 μm by blender. 250 ± 1 mg of freeze-dried litter sample was extracted by addition of 1.6 ml of potassium phosphate (50 mmol/l, pH 7.4), methanol (4 ml) and chloroform (2 ml) in 25 ml glass tubes. The tubes were vortexed for 30 s and sonicated for 2 min prior to incubation in a water bath at 37℃ for 30 min. The tubes were shaken for 2 h horizontally, and then the supernatant liquid transferred to a 50 ml separatory funnel, and chloroform (4 ml) and water (4 ml) were added to the separating funnel. The chloroform phase was collected, reduced in volume by rotary evaporation, and fractionated by chromatography on silicic acid (mesh size 200–400). Neutral lipids and glycolipids were eluted with chloroform (3 ml × 2) and acetone (3 ml × 2), respectively. Polar lipids were eluted with 3 ml × 2 methanol and collected in glass test tubes. The solvent was evaporated under a stream of oxygen-free N2, and the residue subjected to alkaline methanolysis by vortexing for 30 s in a mixture of 2 ml of 0.2 M methanolic KOH and toluene:methanol (1:1, v/v) solution, and followed by incubation at 37℃ for 30 min. After cooling, the mixtures were neutralized with 1 mol acetic acid and fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) extracted twice by 2 ml of chloroform:hexane (1:4, v/v). After evaporation of the solvent under oxygen-free N2, the FAMEs were re-suspended in chloroform:hexane (1:4, v/v) containing 15 μg nonadecanoic acid methyl ester (Sigma Chemical, Poole, UK) as an internal standard. FAMEs were quantified by gas chromatography mass spectrometry& Hewlett Packard HP6890 Gas Chromatograph (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a DB-5MS column (0.2 mm [inner diameter] by 25 m& 0.25 μm film thickness). A splitless injection was employed (injector at 300℃), and the oven was maintained at 60℃ for 1 min after injection. The oven temperature was then increased to 150℃ at 30℃/min and maintained for 4 min, followed by an increase to 250℃ at 4℃/min and held for 15 min. Finally, the oven temperature was increased to 300℃ at 25℃/min and held for 6 min. The transfer line was held at 280℃ throughout. Helium was used as the carrier gas (0.8 ml/min). FAMEs were identified by retention time and/or electron ionization mass spectrometry, HP6890 Mass Selective Detector (Hewlet Packard).

    Bacterial biomass was estimated from the summed concentrations of the following PLFAs: i15:0, a15:0, 15:0, i16:0, 16:1ω9, 16:1ω7t, i17:0, a17:0, 17:0, cy17:0, 18:1ω7 and cy19:0 (Frostegård and Bååth 1996, Pennanen et al. 1998, 1999, Bååth and Anderson 2003). Fungal biomass was estimated from concentrations of the marker 18:2ω6,9 (Federle 1986, Frostegård and Bååth 1996, Pennanen et al. 1998, 1999, Bååth and Anderson 2003).

      >  Microbial Diversity

    The Shannon–Wiener index (Shannon 1948), Simpson’s diversity (Simpson 1949) and Evenness were generally defined as follows: where H was Shannon–Wiener index, J was Evenness, Ds was Simpson Diversity, s was the total number of FAMEs in each sample and pi was the percentage of the peak area of FAMEi to the total area of each sample.

    image

      >  Statistical Analysis

    Differences between samples, in regard to litter mass loss, and microbial biomass were analyzed statistically using a one-way ANOVA followed by a Turkey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test. For each value, linear correlations of coefficients were provided. All statistical work was performed with SPSS ver. 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

    RESULTS

      >  Litter Mass Loss

    The litter decomposition was the slowest at pH 3 treatment, and the most rapid at pH 5 treatment in the early and mid-stage of decomposition (Fig. 1). In the early stage of litter decomposition, mass loss at pH 5 was 38.5%, and 26.7% at pH 3. The decomposition rate between pH 3 and pH 5 showed significant difference (P = 0.001); however, there is no significant difference in the late stage between each pH treatment.

      >  Microbial Biomass Determined by SIR

    The microbial biomass, determined by SIR method, of decomposing litter samples treated with different acidity of artificial rain are presented in Fig. 2. The microbial biomass decreased with increasing acidity, showing the smallest at pH 3 and the largest at pH 5 treatment. The microbial biomass increased with decomposition proceeds and showed peaks at mid-stage decomposition and decreased at the late stage.

    After 160 days decomposition, the mid-stage of decomposition, total microbial biomass-C was measured as 12.97 mg Cmic/g litter at pH 3, 17.39 mg Cmic/g litter at pH 4, and 23.25 mg Cmic/g litter at pH 5. Bacterial biomass increased from 4.95 mg Cmic/g litter to 8.94 mg Cmic/g litter from pH 3 to pH 5 at 80 days, and 4.88 mg Cmic/g litter to 11.57 mg Cmic/g litter at pH 3 to pH 5 at 160 days after treatment. Fungal biomass increased from 5.69 to 6.92 mg Cmic/g litter from pH 3 to pH 5 at 80 days, and then, after 80 days from 8.38 to 11.85 mg Cmic/g litter from pH 3 to pH 5. Unlike fungal biomass, bacterial biomass sharply increased at the initial decomposition stage, and slowly decreased or plateaued after the early stage of decomposition in low pH treatments.

    Consequently, in the early decomposition period, the fungal biomass was the same as the bacterial biomass, especially at low pH; however, the fungal biomass dominated on the decomposing litter at the mid-decompositional stage. Although bacterial and fungal biomass decreased with decreasing acidity, the simulated acid rain affected bacterial biomass more than it did fungal biomass. In other words, fungal biomass was more stable in acidic conditions than bacterial biomass.

      >  Microbial Community Structure on the Decaying Leaf Litter

    Microbial PLFA profiles of decomposing S. alnifolia leaf litter that were treated with different pH of artificial acid rain are shown in Table 1. Changes of the fungal, bacterial, and total microbial PLFAs on the decomposing litter samples are presented in Fig. 3. The changes in PLFAs of fungi showed similar patterns to the change of microbial biomass determined by SIR technique. The bacterial and fungal PLFAs concentration decreased remarkably with increasing acidity of artificial rain, and showed peak concentration at the mid-stage of litter decomposition at all microbial groups. The concentration of bacterial PLFAs was 1.4 to 2.9 times greater than that of fungal PLFAs.

    Each PLFA marker showed a different pattern of responses at different pH treatments and decomposition stages. PLFAs of gram positives almost linearly increased with increasing pH; however, the PLFAs of gram negatives also showed increasing patterns at the early and midstages of decomposition then rapidly decreased at the late stage (Fig. 4).

    As the process of S. alnifolia litter decomposition, the PLFAs, such as i17:0, 16:1ω7c, 16:1ω7t, 10Me18:0, and 20:4, markedly increased at mid and late-stages in the early stage, and the i15:0, i16:0, a17:0, and 15:0 showed increases. However, the PLFA of 16:1ω5 and 24:0 decreased as decomposition proceeded. Most PLFA markers showed peaks at mid-stage of decomposition, and then decreased at the late-stage decomposition. In late stage of litter decomposition, the 10Me17:0, 16:1ω7c, 18:1ω7, 15:0 PLFAs increased with increasing pH value, while 24:0 showed the opposite pattern.

      >  Microbial Diversity

    The number of PLFAs on the decomposing leaf litter samples was increased with decomposition processed

    (Table 2). Fourteen kinds of PLFAs were presenting the initial decomposition litter sample just before the artificial rain treatment. The number of PLFAs was increased to 22 after 80 days, 27 after 160 days, and 26-27 after 290 days. However, the diversity indices and evenness indices at different pH treatment and between litter decomposition stages showed no significant differences although Simpson diversity indices slightly increased with decomposition time elapsed. These results suggested that there were large amounts of displacement of microbial taxa according to pH treatment and proceeds of litter decomposition.

    DISCUSSION

    Litter decomposition mainly performed by soil microbial activities plays very important roles such as nutrient cycling in the natural ecosystems. In addition, many processes of litter decomposition were influenced by physicochemical environments and chemical contents of leaf litter (Heal et al. 1997, Zimmer 2002, Sariyildiz and Anderson 2003).

    The result of this study showed a remarkable decrease of leaf litter mass loss especially at early and mid-stages of decomposition with artificial acid rain treatment, confirming

    [Table 1.] PLFA profiles of the decomposing S. alnifolia litter samples treated with simulated acid rain in the microcosm. Values are means of total PLFA concentrations (nmol/g), standard deviation in parentheses, and n.m is not measurable

    label

    PLFA profiles of the decomposing S. alnifolia litter samples treated with simulated acid rain in the microcosm. Values are means of total PLFA concentrations (nmol/g), standard deviation in parentheses, and n.m is not measurable

    [Table 2.] Shannon?Wiener index, Simpson’s Diversity and Evenness (J) of PLFAs in microbial community on the decomposing S. alnifolia leaf litters. Values are means of four replicates, standard deviation are in parentheses

    label

    Shannon?Wiener index, Simpson’s Diversity and Evenness (J) of PLFAs in microbial community on the decomposing S. alnifolia leaf litters. Values are means of four replicates, standard deviation are in parentheses

    the results of Rechcigl and Sparks (1985), and Wolters (1991a, 1991b). These decreased litter mass losses suggested that acidification inhibits the growth or activities of micro-decomposers, Berg and Laskowski (2006) reported that acidification may affect the decomposition process directly through the effect of H+ ions on some decomposers and deterioration of soil conditions for others.

    The microbial community structure on the decomposing litters is very complicated and highly sensitive to physico-chemical environmental changes; in addition, there are many methods for identifying soil microbial taxonomic groups and community structures. SIR and PLFAs were comparatively simple methods of quantifying microbial groups. Bååth and Anderson (2003) found good linear correlation between the total microbial biomass estimated with SIR and total amount of PLFAs, indicating that 1 mg biomass-C was equivalent to 130 nmol of total amount of PLFAs. The present results also showed that the

    concentration of PLFAs had positive relationships with microbial biomass of SIR (Fig. 5). Total microbial biomass of SIR and total amount of PLFAs has R2 = 0.7509, and P < 0.001 significant positive relationship, and the 1mg total microbial biomass estimated with SIR was equivalent to 175 nmol of total PLFAs.

    The fungal and bacterial composition determined by SIR and PLFA at the decomposing litter changed by acid treatment and litter decomposition stage (Fig. 6). The fungi/bacteria ratio by SIR and PLFA showed different pattern. These results might be due to the microbial state, for example sporulation, another nonliving deliberation such as humic acid (Nielsen and Petersen 2000), and the ability of response to the nutrient such as glucose (Bailey et al. 2002).

    The SIR fungi/bacteria ratio increased throughout the decomposition process; however, at pH 4 the ratio decreased at the late decomposition process. On the other hand, the fungi/bacteria ratio by PLFA was below 1 at low pH treatments and decomposition stages, though the ratio dramatically decreased at the late stage of decomposition at pH 4 and 5 treatment.

    The fungi/bacteria ratio by SIR was higher than that by PLFA which was always below 1. Especially in low pH treatment, the fungi/bacteria ratio increased dramatically. Bååth and Anderson (2003) argued that the fungi/bacteria ratio measured using the selective inhibition technique decreased significantly with increasing pH from about 9 at pH 3 to approximately 2 at pH 7. These results indicate that low pH facilitates respiration or growth of microbial groups that are not inhibited by fungal inhibition agent. On the other hand, the fungi/bacteria ratio by PLFA showed smaller differences between pH treatments as decomposition proceeded. This result demonstrates the fungal predomination at early stage of litter decomposition and bacterial predomination at later decomposition stages.

    Bååth et al. (1995), Bååth and Arnebrant (1994), Pennanen et al. (1999), and Arao (1999) also reported that

    [Table 3.] The relationships between litter decomposition and three microbial biomass parameters present in the decaying leaf litter from the different simulated acid rain pH treatments, taken at 23℃ and at constant humidity

    label

    The relationships between litter decomposition and three microbial biomass parameters present in the decaying leaf litter from the different simulated acid rain pH treatments, taken at 23℃ and at constant humidity

    when they increased the pH of soil by treatment with lime and ash, bacterial biomass and fungal biomass were decreased at higher pH levels while the fungal biomass decreased by a comparatively larger amount than bacteria at higher pH levels.

    In addition, the PLFAs of each microbial group in the study differed in response to varied pH, similarly to in previous studies (Bååth et al. 1979, Mancinelli 1986, Bewley and Parkinson 1985, Esher et al. 1992, Fritze et al. 1992). Frostegård et al. (1993) found a three-fold increase in the fatty acid 16: 105 in the plots with the highest pH. An increase was also found for the fatty acids i14:0, 16:lω9, 16:lω7c, cy17:0, 18:107, i17:0, a17:0, cy19:0, 18:lω7, and 10Mel8:0 and no effect on 18:2ω6. In the present study, the PLFA of 16:lω7c, 18:107, i17:0, a17:0, 18:lω7, and 10Mel8:0 were also increased as pH increased.

    The mass losses of S. anifolia leaf litter by decomposition in a microcosm treated with simulated different pH acid rain corresponded with decreased of amounts of total microbial biomass, bacterial biomass, and fungal biomass measured by SIR (Lim et al. 2011) and PLFA. The decreased litter decomposition at low pH was due to the decreased microbial biomass by acidification (Table 3). However, because the decomposer community changes during decomposition stages (i.e., microbial succession), and some microbial groups are supplanted by other groups according to the environmental changes, the decomposition processes are more complicated (Abrahamsen et al. 1980).

    There were complementary relationships among microbial groups in the changing environment. Even though the microbial biomasses in the decomposing litter were the same among the different pH treatment, the microbial species composition (e.g., bacteria to fungi) could be different. Moreover, there is functional redundancy of microbial groups with the changes in environment (Rousk et al. 2009). Changes in species composition within community occurred by environmental changes because each species has its own tolerance range, the acid rain did not significantly change soil pH, and little impact on soil microorganisms and mineralization rate was found (Stemmer et al. 2007). However, most studies reported that there are complementary microbial shifts between bacterial and fungal groups (Rousk and Bååth 2007).

    Consequently, the active microbial population dominating in a given soil system is adapted to the conditions of that system, including its pH (Berg and Laskowski 2006). The conditions of that decomposition subsystem are easily changeable by anthropogenic activities. Acid rain effects soil biotic processes such as CO2 production, microbial biomass in the organic layer, and leaching of NO3- (Wolter 1991a, 1991b, Lim et al. 2011); consequently, the soil acidification due to anthropogenic activities may be too fast for microbial communities to adapt to new, changed conditions (Berg and Laskowski 2006).

참고문헌
  • 1. Abrahamsen G, Hovland J, Hagvar S, Hutchinson TC, Havas M 1980 Effects of artificial acid rain and liming on soil organisms and the decomposition of organic matters. In: Effects of Acid Precipitation on Terrestrial Ecosystems P.341-362 google
  • 2. Anderson JPE, Domsch KH 1973 Quantification of bacterial and fungal contributions to soil respiration [Arch Microbiol] Vol.93 P.113-127 google
  • 3. Anderson JPE, Domsch KH 1978 A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soil [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.10 P.215-221 google cross ref
  • 4. Arao T 1999 In situ detection of changes in soil bacterial and fungal activities by measuring 13C incorporation into soil phospholipid fatty acids from 13C acetate [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.31 P.1015-1020 google cross ref
  • 5. Baath E, Anderson TH 2003 Comparison of soil fungal/bacterial ratios in a pH gradient using physiological and PLFA-based techniques [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.35 P.995-963 google
  • 6. Baath E, Arnebrant K 1994 Growth rate and response of bacterial communities to pH in limed and ash-treated forest soils [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.26 P.995-1001 google cross ref
  • 7. Baath E, Frostegard A, Fritze H 1992 Soil bacterial biomass, activity, phospholipid fatty acid pattern, and pH tolerance in an area polluted with alkaline dust deposition [Appl Envir Microb] Vol.58 P.4026-4031 google
  • 8. Baath E, Frostegard A, Pennanen T, Fritze H 1995 Microbial community structure and pH response in relation to soil organic matter quality in wood ash fertilized, clear-cut or burned forest soils [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.27 P.229-240 google cross ref
  • 9. Baath E, Lundgren B, Soderstrom B 1979 Effects of artificial acid rain on microbial activity and biomass [Bull. Environ. Contam Toxicol] Vol.23 P.737-740 google cross ref
  • 10. Bailey VL, Peacock AD, Smith JL, Bolton H Jr. 2002 Relationship between soil microbial biomass determined by chloroform fumigation extraction, substrate-induced respiration, and phospholipid fatty acid analysis [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.34 P.1385-1389 google cross ref
  • 11. Batty LC, Younger PL 2007 The effect of pH on plant litter decomposition and metal cycling in wetland mesocosms supplied with mine drainage [Chemosphere] Vol.66 P.158-164 google cross ref
  • 12. Beare MH, Neely CL, Coleman DC, Hargrove WL 1990 A substrate induced respiration (SIR) method for measurement of fungal and bacterial biomass on plant residues [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.22 P.585-594 google cross ref
  • 13. Berg B, Laskowski R 2006 Litter decomposition: a guide to carbon and nutrient turnover, Advances in ecological research 38 google
  • 14. Bewley RJF, Parkinson D 1985 Bacterial and fungal activity in sulphur dioxide polluted soils [Can J Microbiol] Vol.31 P.13-15 google cross ref
  • 15. Esher RJ, Marx DH, Ursic SJ, Baker RL, Brown LR, Coleman DC 1992 Simulated acid rain effects in fine roots, ectomycorrhizae, microorganisms, and invertebrates in pine forests of the southern United States [Water Air Soil Pollut] Vol.61 P.269-278 google cross ref
  • 16. Evans LS, Gmur NF, Mancini D 1982 Effects of simulated acidic rain on yields of Raphanus sativus, Lactuca sativa, Triticum aestivum and Medicago sativa [Environ Exp Bot] Vol.22 P.445-453 google cross ref
  • 17. Federle TW 1986 Microbial distribution in soil: new techniques. In: Perspectives in Microbial Ecology (Megusar F, Gantar M, eds) P.493-498 google
  • 18. Fritze H 1992 Effects of environmental pollution on forest soil microflora [Silva Fennica] Vol.26 P.37-48 google cross ref
  • 19. Fritze H, Kiikkila O, Pasanen J, Pietikainen J 1992 Reaction of forest soil microflora to environmental stress along a moderate pollution gradient next to an oil refinery [Plant Soil] Vol.140 P.175-182 google cross ref
  • 20. Frostegard A, Baath E 1996 The use of phospholipids fatty analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil [Biol Fertil Soils] Vol.22 P.59-65 google cross ref
  • 21. Frostegard A, Baath E, Tunlio A 1993 Shifts in the structure of soil microbial communities in limed forest as revealed by phospholipid fatty acid analysis [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.25 P.723-730 google cross ref
  • 22. Gross S, Robbins EI 2000 Acidophilic and acid-tolerant fungi and yeasts [Hydrobiologia] Vol.433 P.91-109 google cross ref
  • 23. Heal OW, Anderson JM, Swift MJ 1997 Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. In: Driven by Nature: Plant litter Quality and decomposition(Cadisch G, Giller KE, eds) P.3-30 google
  • 24. Hermle S, Vollenweider P, Gunthardt-Goerg MS, McQuattie CJ, Matyssek R 2007 Leaf responsiveness of Populus tremula and Salix viminalis to soil contaminated with heavy metals and acidic rain water [Tree Physiol] Vol.27 P.1517-1531 google cross ref
  • 25. Hovland J, Abrahanmsen G, Ogner G 1980 Effects of artificial acid rain on decomposition of spruce needles and on mobilisation and leaching of elements [Plant Soil] Vol.56 P.365-378 google cross ref
  • 26. Hogberg MN, Hogberg P, Myrold DD 2007 Is microbial community composition in boreal forest soils determined by pH, C-toN ratio, the trees, or all three? [Oecologia] Vol.150 P.590-601 google
  • 27. Lee JJ, Weber DE 1979 The effects of simulated acid rain on seedling emergence and growth of eleven woody species [Forest Sci] Vol.25 P.393-398 google
  • 28. Lim SM, Cha SS, Shim JK 2011 Effects of simulated acid rain on microbial activities and litter decomposition [J Ecol Field Biol] Vol.34 P.401-410 google cross ref
  • 29. Liu J, Zhou G, Zhang D 2007 Simulated effects of acidic solutions on element dynamics in monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest at Dinghushan, China. Part 1: dynamics of K, Na, Ca, Mg and P [Environ Sci Pollut Res Int] Vol.14 P.123-129 google cross ref
  • 30. Mancinelli RL 1986 Alpine tundra soil bacterial responses to increased soil loading rates of acid precipitation, nitrate, and sulfate Front Range, Colorado, USA [Arctic Alpine Res] Vol.18 P.269-275 google cross ref
  • 31. Matzner E, Murach D, Fortann H 1986 Soil acidity and its relationship to root growth in declining forest stands in Germany [Water Air Soil Pollut] Vol.31 P.273-282 google cross ref
  • 32. Myrold DD, Nalson GE 1992 Effect of acid rain on soil microbial processes. In: Environmental Microbiology (Mitchell R, ed) P.59-81 google
  • 33. Neufold HS, Jernstedt JA, Haines BL 1985 Direct foliar effects of simulated acid rain I. Damage, growth, and gas exchange [New Phytol] Vol.99 P.389-405 google cross ref
  • 34. Nielsen P, Petersen SO 2000 Ester-linked polar lipid fatty acid profiles of soil microbial communities: a comparison of extraction methods and evaluation of interference from humic acids [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.32 P.1241-1249 google cross ref
  • 35. Osonbui O, Oren R, Werk K, Schulze ED, Heilmeier H 1988 Performance of two Picea abies (L.) Karst stands at different stages of decline Ⅳ. Xylem sap concentration of magnesium, calcium, potassium, and nitrogen [Oecologia] Vol.77 P.1-6 google cross ref
  • 36. Ouyang XJ, Zhao GY, Huang ZL, Liu JX, Zhang DQ, Li J 2008 Effect of Simulated acid rain on potential carbon and nitrogen mineralization in forest soils [Pedosphere] Vol.18 P.503-514 google cross ref
  • 37. Pennanen T, Fritze H, Vanhala P, Kiikkila O, Neuvonen S, Baath E 1998 Structure of a microbial community in soil after prolonged addition of low levels of simulated acid rain [Appl Environ Microbiol] Vol.64 P.2173-2180 google
  • 38. Pennanen T, Liski J, Baath E, Kitunen V, Uotila J, Westman CJ, Fritze H 1999 Structure of the microbial communities in coniferous forest soils in relation to site fertility and stand development stage [Microbiol Ecol] Vol.38 P.168-179 google cross ref
  • 39. Proctor JTA 1983 Effect of simulated acid sulfuric rain on apple tree foliage, nutrient content, yield, and fruit quality [Environ Exp Bot] Vol.23 P.167-174 google cross ref
  • 40. Raynal DJ, Roman JR, Eichelaub WM 1982 Response of tree seedlings to acid precipitation II. Effect of simulated canopy throughfall on sugar maple seedling growth [Environ Exp Bot] Vol.22 P.385-392 google cross ref
  • 41. Rechcigl JE, Sparks DL 1985 Effect or acid rain on the soil environment: a review [Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal] Vol.16 P.653-680 google cross ref
  • 42. Reich PB, Scholettle AW, Stroo HF, Troiano J, Amundson RG 1987 Effects of ozone and acid rain on white pine (Pinus strobes) seedlings grown in five soils. I. Net photosynthesis and growth [Can J Bot] Vol.65 P.977-987 google cross ref
  • 43. Reith F, Drake HL, Kusel K 2002 Anaerobic activities of bacteria and fungi moderately acidic conifer and deciduous leaf litter [FEMS Microbiol Ecol] Vol.41 P.27-35 google cross ref
  • 44. Rousk J, Baath E 2007 Fungal biomass production and turnover in soil estimated using the acetate-in-ergosterol technique [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.39 P.2173-2177 google cross ref
  • 45. Rousk J, Brookkes P, Baath E 2009 Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization [Appl Environ Microbiol] Vol.75 P.1589-1596 google cross ref
  • 46. Sariyildiz T, Anderson JM 2003 Interactions between litter quality, decomposition and soil fertility: a laboratory study [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.35 P.391-399 google cross ref
  • 47. Shannon CE 1948 A mathematical theory of communication [Bell Syst Tech J] Vol.27 P.379-423 google cross ref
  • 48. Simpson EH 1949 Measurement of diversity [Nature] Vol.163 P.688 google cross ref
  • 49. Stemmer M, Watzinger A, Blochberger K, Haberhauer G., Gerzabek MH 2007 Linking dynamics of soil microbial phospholipid fatty acids to carbon mineralization in a 13C natural abundance experiment: Impact of heavy metals and acid rain [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.39 P.3177-3186 google cross ref
  • 50. Wilkinson SC, Anderson JM, Scardelis SP, Tisiafouli M, Taylor A, Wolters V 2002 PLFA profiles of microbial communities in decomposing conifer litters subject to moisture stress [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.34 P.189-200 google cross ref
  • 51. Wolters V 1991a Effects of acid rain on leaf-litter decomposition in a beech forest on calcareous soil [Biol Fertil Soils] Vol.11 P.151-156 google cross ref
  • 52. Wolters V 1991b Biological processes in two beech forest soils treated with simulated acid rain - a laboratory experiment with Isotoma tigrina (Insecta, Collembola) [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.23 P.381-390 google cross ref
  • 53. Wood M, Cooper JE, Holding AJ 1984 Aluminum toxicity and nodulation of Trifolium repens [Plant Soil] Vol.78 P.381-391 google cross ref
  • 54. Wood T, Bormann FH 1974 Effects of an artificial acid mist upon the growth of Bestula alleghaniensis. [britt. Environ Pollut] Vol.7 P.256-298 google cross ref
  • 55. You YH, Lee CS, Kim JH 1998 Selection of Tolerant Species among Korean Major Woody Plants to Restore Yeocheon Industrial Complex Area [Korean J Ecol] Vol.21 P.337-344 google
  • 56. Zhang JE, Ouyang Y, Ling DJ 2007 Impacts of simulated rain on cation leaching from the Latosol in South China [Chemosphere] Vol.67 P.2131-2137 google cross ref
  • 57. Zimmer M 2002 Is decomposition of woodland leaf litter influenced by its species richness? [Soil Biol Biochem] Vol.34 P.277-284 google cross ref
OAK XML 통계
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Changes in mass loss of Sorbus alnifolia leaf litter at 23℃ and constant humidity microcosm in the different pH of simulated acid rain treatments. Vertical lines indicate standard deviation (n = 4).
    Changes in mass loss of Sorbus alnifolia leaf litter at 23℃ and
constant humidity microcosm in the different pH of simulated acid rain
treatments. Vertical lines indicate standard deviation (n = 4).
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Total microbial biomass C (mg Cmic/g), bacterial biomass, and fungal biomass measured by substrate induced respiration (SIR) method at different pH levels of artificial acid rain treated decomposing leaf litter of Sorbus alnifolia. The error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 4).
    Total microbial biomass C (mg Cmic/g), bacterial biomass, and fungal biomass measured by substrate induced respiration (SIR) method at different
pH levels of artificial acid rain treated decomposing leaf litter of Sorbus alnifolia. The error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 4).
  • [ Fig. 3. ]  Total, bacterial, fungal PLFAs in each artificial acid rain treatment of Sorbus alnifolia litter samples during decomposition in microcosm condition. The error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 4).
    Total, bacterial, fungal PLFAs in each artificial acid rain treatment of Sorbus alnifolia litter samples during decomposition in microcosm condition.
The error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 4).
  • [ Fig. 4. ]  Changes in PLFAs of Gram positives and Gram negatives according to the Sorbus alnifolia litter decomposition in the microcosm. The error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 4).
    Changes in PLFAs of Gram positives and Gram negatives according to the Sorbus alnifolia litter decomposition in the microcosm. The error bars
indicate standard deviation (n = 4).
  • [ Table 1. ]  PLFA profiles of the decomposing S. alnifolia litter samples treated with simulated acid rain in the microcosm. Values are means of total PLFA concentrations (nmol/g), standard deviation in parentheses, and n.m is not measurable
    PLFA profiles of the decomposing S. alnifolia litter samples treated with simulated acid rain in the microcosm. Values are means of total PLFA concentrations (nmol/g), standard deviation in parentheses, and n.m is not measurable
  • [ Table 2. ]  Shannon?Wiener index, Simpson’s Diversity and Evenness (J) of PLFAs in microbial community on the decomposing S. alnifolia leaf litters. Values are means of four replicates, standard deviation are in parentheses
    Shannon?Wiener index, Simpson’s Diversity and Evenness (J) of PLFAs in microbial community on the decomposing S. alnifolia leaf litters. Values are means of four replicates, standard deviation are in parentheses
  • [ Fig. 5. ]  The relationship between microbial biomass-C (mg Cmic/g) by SIR and PLFAs (μmol/g) during litter decomposition in the microcosm.
    The relationship between microbial biomass-C (mg Cmic/g) by SIR and PLFAs (μmol/g) during litter decomposition in the microcosm.
  • [ Fig. 6. ]  Changes in fungal-to-bacterial biomass ratio measured by SIR(left) and PLFA(right) during S. alnifolia leaf litter decomposition at different pH treatments in the microcosm environment. The error bars indicate standard deviation.
    Changes in fungal-to-bacterial biomass ratio measured by SIR(left) and PLFA(right) during S. alnifolia leaf litter decomposition at different pH
treatments in the microcosm environment. The error bars indicate standard deviation.
  • [ Table 3. ]  The relationships between litter decomposition and three microbial biomass parameters present in the decaying leaf litter from the different simulated acid rain pH treatments, taken at 23℃ and at constant humidity
    The relationships between litter decomposition and three microbial biomass parameters present in the decaying leaf litter from the different simulated acid rain pH treatments, taken at 23℃ and at constant humidity
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.