Stable carbon isotope signatures of zooplankton in some reservoirs in Korea

  • cc icon
  • ABSTRACT

    Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations and zooplankton and particulate organic matter (POM) δ13C values were measured in five reservoirs in Korea. Zooplankton δ13C and POM δ13C showed large range from -33‰ to -22‰ and a significant difference among the reservoirs. One eutrophic reservoir, Lake Masan, showed unique characteristics with the highest zooplankton density, the highest δ13C, and the highest DOC. Zooplankton δ13C was similar to POM δ13C, implying that zooplankton occupies substantial portion of POM or that zooplankton isotopic composition is related to selective grazing and assimilation of food sources from bulk POM. Except Lake Masan zooplankton δ13C values were negatively correlated to DOC concentration in four reservoirs with mostly forest land use. This pattern can be probably attributed to intensive agricultural land use in the watershed of Lake Masan compared to the mostly forest land use in the other watersheds. Understanding the relationship between zooplankton δ13C values and the origin of organic matter associated with watershed characteristics will be valuable to better understand trophic relationships in reservoirs in the summer monsoon region.


  • KEYWORD

    DOC , POM , stable carbon isotopes , watershed , zooplankton

  • INTRODUCTION

    Small reservoirs are important for use as agricultural water supplies, flood control and power generation in many areas throughout the east-Asia monsoon region. These reservoirs provide opportunities for comparative studies of patterns and processes in small lake ecosystems in a variety of climatic and landscape settings. Perhaps the most distinctive characteristic in the typical seasonal pattern in lakes and reservoirs in Korea is the input of large amounts of allochthonous nutrients and organic matter during the summer monsoon (Lee et al. 2013). In Korea, monsoon rainfall can occur from July to September, with the other seasons generally being much drier. During intense monsoon rain events, the nutrient and organic matter inputs to reservoirs from watersheds increases dramatically with increases in stream discharge. The input of large amounts of allochthonous nutrients and organic matter can greatly impact the biology and chemistry of reservoirs, even for a substantial period following the summer monsoon (here referred to as postmonsoon) (Kim et al. 2000, Li et al. 2008, Lee et al. 2013). The elevated inputs of nutrients and organic matter often results in post-monsoon cyanobacteria blooms (especially Microcystis spp.) and high chlorophyll-a concentrations (Kim et al. 2000, Lee et al. 2010).

    In general, phytoplankton is a preferred food source for zooplankton, but zooplankton may not be able to directly use only phytoplankton as a food source because some cyanobacteria are inedible and the elevated POM concentration likely results from the increase in input of terrestrial organic matter during the monsoon season (Lee et al. 2013, De Kluijver et al. 2012). Some cyanobacteria can be unsuitable as a food source for herbivorous zooplankton and inhibit not only feeding ability but also zooplankton growth (Chen et al. 2005).

    Seasonal changes in the zooplankton community in some temperate lakes are associated with increases in Microcystis abundance (Kim et al. 2000, Lee et al. 2010). The typical temporal pattern in zooplankton dominance is a sudden change from cladocerans to small zooplankton such as copepods or rotifers with the appearance of Microcystis (Kim et al. 2000, Lee et al. 2010). In some lakes, the seasonal variation in zooplankton δ13C values can be explained by changes in the relative proportions of phytoplankton and terrestrial organic matter in zooplankton diets (Grey et al. 2000, Gu et al. 2006). In lakes where a significant fraction of the organic matter originates from the watershed, zooplankton isotopic composition provides information about the contribution of carbon from allochthonous sources to the lake versus carbon derived via primary production in the lake. Studies using stable isotopes have shown that zooplankton production is supported by both allochthonous and autochthonous sources of carbon, with the higher fraction of carbon from autochthonous sources in more eutrophic lakes (Del Giorgio and France 1996, Schindler et al. 1997, Grey et al. 2000). Some studies have concluded that zooplankton production in temperate lakes may acquire a large fraction of their energy from allochthonous inputs through heterotrophic activity (Pace et al. 2004, Rautio et al. 2011, Cole et al. 2011). Therefore, we can gain some insight to the pathways of carbon transfer by comparing differences in zooplankton grazing activity, which probably plays an important role in mediating the transfer of terrestrial carbon to higher trophic levels.

    The zooplankton community regulates energy flow from producers to upper trophic levels in lake ecosystems (Jeppesen et al. 2003, Hessen 2008, Santana et al. 2009). Analysis of zooplankton stable isotope composition can be useful because zooplankton have short turnover times and respond rapidly to environmental changes (Browne 1981, Schindler et al. 1997).

    Using carbon stable isotopes to follow the flow of carbon in food webs has two advantages over other methods. First, the ratio of 13C and 12C in a consumer’s tissue reflects relatively long-term diet because stable isotopes effectively integrate the consumer’s feeding history. Second, consumer tissue stable isotope composition reflect only materials actually assimilated and incorporated into tissue, as opposed to the total material ingested, as long as the gut contents are removed before analysis.

    In this study, we compared zooplankton and POM δ13C values with DOC concentration in five reservoirs which are impacted by the elevated loads of nutrients and organic matter received during the summer monsoon season in Korea. In reservoirs with large inputs of nutrients and organic matter during summer monsoon storms, zooplankton δ13C values are likely most closely controlled by selective zooplankton grazing in the post-monsoon season (Kankaala et al. 2010, De Kluijver et al. 2012). The reservoirs selected for this study commonly experience cyanobacteria blooms following the monsoon season (post-monsoon). The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in zooplankton δ13C and POM δ13C values and the relationship between zooplankton δ13C values and DOC concentration among five reservoirs with different proportions of agricultural land use in their watersheds.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

      >  Study sites

    We surveyed five reservoirs, including oligo-mesotrophic (BG, Byeokgye; JY, Jinyang; KP, Keumpung) and eutrophic reservoirs (JS, Jusan; MS, Masan) (Fig. 1). The reservoirs are largely (greater than 70%) surrounded by hardwood forest except for MS (Table 1). MS is located in an agricultural area. The watershed of JS is mostly forested, without major anthropogenic activity. MS has about 42% of the total watershed as forest land, compared with the other watersheds having <20% of their watershed area used for agriculture (Table 1).

      >  Field sampling and analysis

    Water samples for nutrient analysis were collected at the surface (0.1 m depth) during the post-monsoon season (September through October 2009). At each site, the following water quality parameters were measured in situ: pH meter (Denver Instrument Company, Arvada, CO, USA), YSI 55 dissolved oxygen meter (YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH, USA), and 2100P turbidimeter (Hach Co., Ames, IA, USA). Dissolved organic carbon (DOC), total

    phosphorus (TP) and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations were measured in the laboratory on unfiltered samples. Samples for determination of TP and TN concentrations were acidified with 18N H2SO4 and refrigerated until analysis. TP concentration was measured using the ascorbic acid method according to APHA (1998). TN concentration was measured by cadmium reduction after digestion with persulfate (APHA, 1998). DOC concentrations were measured using a TOC-5000A analyzer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). Chlorophyll-a concentrations (Chl-a) were measured

    after extraction with 90% acetone on GF/F filters (Whatman, Kent, UK).

      >  Stable isotope analysis

    Samples for zooplankton analysis were collected near the center of each reservoir using a net for a Schindler- Patalas trap with a 63μm Nitex mesh (Wildco, Yulee, FL, USA) for zooplankton. A separate sample was collected for phytoplankton analysis using a Van Dorn sampler (Wildco) at the surface (0.1 m). To separate zooplankton from suspended particulate matter, samples were kept refrigerated and separated by gravity in a 3 L cylinder for 12 hours and filtered using a 200 μm mesh sieve and a distilled water rinse.

    POM samples were collected using a Van Dorn sampler at discrete depths. Samples were pre-filtered through a 45 μm mesh net to remove zooplankton and then filtered using pre-combusted (450℃) GF/F filters. Phytoplankton samples were concentrated in the field using the plankton net with a 63 μm mesh (Wildco). The bulk phytoplankton which settled to the bottom of a cylinder was separated from suspended particulate organic matter and zooplankton with 200 μm and 45 μm mesh nets. Samples for stable isotope analysis were freeze dried and pulverized with a mill. Sediment samples were fumigated in desiccator (1 N HCl) for 4 hours and dried at 45 ℃ to remove inorganic carbon.

    Carbon stable isotope composition was analyzed using an Isoprime (GV Instruments) Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer (IRMS) coupled with an Elementar Vario EL Cube Elemental Analyzer (EA) (Isoprime Ltd., Cheadle, UK). The stable isotope results are presented as the difference between the sample and an international standard (VPDB, Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite): X (‰) = [Rsample/Rstandard - 1] × 103, where X is the parts per thousand (‰) difference from a standard. R is the ratio of heavy (13C) to light isotope (12C). The precision for repeated sample measurement was better than ±0.3‰.

      >  Statistical analyses

    SigmaPlot ver. 11.0 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Regression analysis was used to test the relationships between DOC and isotopic composition of POM and zooplankton.

    RESULTS

      >  Reservoir chemistry

    The surface water pH of the study reservoirs ranged from 6.0 to 9.1 and DO concentrations ranged from 2.2 mg/L to 14.3 mg/L (Table 2). The range of surface water pH in KP and JS (pH 6.0-6.7) was slightly lower than in the other reservoirs (pH 6.8-9.1). These two reservoirs also had the low DO concentrations (2.2-8.5 mg/L). DOC concentrations varied from 2.2 mg C/L to 5.2 mg C/L, with JS and MS having the high DOC concentrations (Table 2).

    The Chl-a concentrations of surface waters ranged from 6 mg/L to 26.5 mg/L, except in MS showing 95.2 ± 12.0 (mean ± SD) mg/L in Table 2.

      >  Zooplankton and phytoplankton communities

    Zooplankton and phytoplankton density was mainly composed of rotifera and blue-green algae (cyanobacteria), respectively (Fig. 2) in all reservoirs. The dominant zooplankton species in JS, BG, and KP were the copepods (Cyclops vicinus, Thermocyclops sp., and Mesocyclops sp.). The zooplankton community in MS and JY were dominated by a kind of rotifera (Asplanchna sp.) and copepoda (Eodiaptomus sp.), respectively. The dominant phytoplankton were cyanobacteria species such as Chroococcus minutus (sites BG and JY), Phormidium sp. (site MS), Microcystis sp. (site JS) and Coelosphaerium sp. (site KP). The predominant feature of seasonal succession in the phytoplankton community is the occurrence of cyanobacteria blooms after summer monsoon.

      >  Relationship of zooplankton δ13C and POM δ13C among reservoirs

    Zooplankton δ13C values and POM δ13C values ranged from -33.2‰ to -22.6‰, from -32.4‰ to -22.6‰, respectively (Fig. 3). There was a positive relationship between zooplankton δ13C values and POM δ13C values (Fig. 3). For the four reservoirs with relatively higher proportion of forested land use (BG, JY, JS and KP), zooplankton δ13C values were negatively related to DOC concentration. Zooplankton δ13C values differed between MS and JS despite having similar DOC concentrations (Fig. 4).

    DISCUSSION

      >  Relationship between zooplankton δ13C and POM δ13C

    This general difference we found in zooplankton δ13C values is similar to the results of previous studies showing higher zooplankton δ13C values in reservoirs affected by agricultural inputs than in reservoirs surrounded by forested land (Gu et al. 1994, Yoshioka et al. 1994). Zooplankton δ13C values were significantly higher in MS with the major land use as agricultural land than in the other reservoirs with mostly forested land use (Figs. 2 and 3). Bacterial utilization of allochthonous organic matter derived from the watershed introduces a carbon source for zooplankton production, which may replace carbon sources such as phytoplankton production as a carbon source for zooplankton in reservoirs with forested land use (Salonen and Hammar 1986). Jones et al. (1999) reported that zooplankton δ13C showed a significant trend towards greater 13C enrichment with increasing Chl-a concentration in the forest oligotrophic lakes in southern Finland. This is because phytoplankton δ13C values are a effected by primary production, the isotopic composition of CO2 and pH. Phytoplankton δ13C values are high in lakes with high Chl-a concentration compared to others with low Chl-a concentration and thus zooplankton in these lakes have higher δ13C values reflecting the isotopic composition of phytoplankton which zooplankton feed.

    Our findings support the idea that zooplankton δ13C values are useful indicators of food source and watershed land use (Del Giorgio and France 1996, Jones et al. 1999). Studies from other regions provide examples of the relationship between the stable isotopic composition of lake and reservoir biota and trophic conditions. For example, in several subarctic lakes, zooplankton δ13C values were lower than in urban eutrophic lakes (Rautio and Vincent 2007).

    In our study, zooplankton δ13C values and POM δ13C values were positively correlated (Fig. 3). The difference between zooplankton δ13C values and POM δ13C values in the five reservoirs was small, indicating that zooplanktons directly utilize POM as a food source. Hou et al. (2013) investigated the relationship between zooplankton δ13C values and POM δ13C values in eighteen lakes in China and found a positive correlation, also indicating the dependence of zooplankton on POM in their diet.

    The phytoplankton community in our study reservoirs is dominated by blue-green algae (cyanobacteria) (Fig. 2). If inedible cyanobacteria are dominant in the phytoplankton community, then zooplankton need to selectively graze for other edible food sources. During cyanobacteria blooms, POM δ13C values may be higher than other phytoplankton δ13C values (Vuorio et al. 2006). Lee et al. (2010) showed that after an increase in Microcystis abundance, macrozooplankton such as Daphina galeata and C. vicinus disappeared and the microzooplankton (Bosmina longirostris) and rotifer populations were significantly reduced in eutrophc lakes (Kim et al. 1999, Lee et al. 2013). In our study, the small difference between zooplankton δ13C values and POM δ13C values might be explained by differences in the proportion of autochthonous and allochthonous inputs and the isotopic composition of phytoplankton which zooplankton feed on (Cole et al. 2011).

    The lower zooplankton δ13C values compared to food sources such as bulk POM in these reservoirs is similar to the pattern found for lakes worldwide and reflects the importance of allochthonous inputs (Del Giorgio and France 1996, Grey et al. 2000). Some studies have indicated that the relative depletion in 13C of pelagic consumers compared to their POM as food source in lake ecosystems reflects the food selectivity of zooplankton for phytoplankton rather than the bulk POM, which has higher δ13C values due to the presence of terrestrial detritus (Del Girogio and France 1996, France et al. 1997). Most allochthonous organic matter is more refractory compared to autochthonously produced POM (Tranvik 1989).

    In our study, the values of zooplankton δ13C and POM δ13C values between two reservoirs, MS and JS clearly showed different patterns (Fig. 3). This pattern is similar to the results from Jones et al. (1999) showing that zooplankton δ13C values differed with the trophic conditions of the lakes they studied.

    In reservoir JS, we found that zooplankton δ13C values and POM δ13C values were low even though Chl-a concentrations in JS were higher than in the other reservoirs with mostly forest land use. POM can include phytoplankton, allochthonous organic matter, protozoa and bacteria. Phytoplankton δ13C values are affected by CO2 availability, the isotopic composition of CO2 and growth rate (Doi et al. 2006, Gu et al. 2006). Some studies have found that elevated dissolved CO2 concentrations and low pH resulted in a low phytoplankton and zooplankton δ13C values (Rau 1978, Yoshioka et al. 1994, Lee et al. 2011). Lakes with a high proportion of forest land use in their watersheds such as the four of the reservoirs (JS, BG, JY and KP) in this study are likely to be more heterotrophic ecosystems, receiving considerable inputs of allochthonous organic matter. Other studies have shown that the biomass and productivity of heterotrophic plankton (bacteria and zooplankton) are often much greater than that of phytoplankton (Hessen et al. 1989, Del Giorgio et al. 1997). Many lakes can have high respiration rates of zooplankton and low P/R ratios (the ratio between gross production and community respiration) (Del Giorgio and Peters 1994, Lee et al. 2011). Del Giorgio and Peters (1994) have reported that plankton community respiration was larger than productivity in oligo- and mesotrophic lakes, indicating the importance of external sources of organic matter. Low plankton P/R ratios show the overwhelming contributions of watershed-derived particulate organic matter as a source of CO2 (Cole et al. 2011). CO2 produced from the decomposition of terrestrial organic matters might also be expected to have lower plankton δ13C values.

    In general, a high rate of CO2 uptake by primary producers will result in an increase in pH and a switch in inorganic C speciation from aqueous carbon dioxide, as a dissolved gas (CO2(aq)) to HCO3- (Gu et al. 2006). Uptake of respired CO2(aq) will cause phytoplankton δ13C values to become isotopically depleted in 13C (lower phytoplankton δ13C values) compared to it of phytoplankton using inorganic carbon which has not been previously assimilated (Keough et al. 1996, Lee et al. 2011). Rautio and Vincent (2007) showed that regional differences in POM δ13C values could be also explained by pH, with primary producer δ13C values showing higher values in lakes with high alkalinity and pH than in others. This mechanism could provide a clue for the low zooplankton δ13C values in reservoir JS in our study.

    Our finding that zooplankton δ13C values are negatively related to DOC concentration agrees with results of other studies in humic lakes. Zooplankton δ13C values decrease with increasing DOC concentration and increase with increasing productivity and phytoplankton biomass (France et al. 1997, Lennon et al. 2006). Li (2007) also showed that zooplankton δ13C values decreased with increasing DOC concentration. This is explained by zooplankton utilization of 13C-depleted food sources such as methanotrophic bacteria, and therefore, less consumption of phytoplankton and/or POM with higher δ13C values. Methanotrophic bacteria can be an important carbon source for filter feeders feeding zooplankton in agricultural reservoirs (Cry 1998). However, in our study, copepods dominated in four agricultural reservoirs, though not in Lake Masan (MS), and utilized preferable particulate organic matter (e.g., phytoplankton).

    Some of the methane is oxidized to CO2 at the metalimnetic oxic-anoxic interface and is partly incorporated into microbial biomass. Phytoplankton can utilize inorganic carbon derived from methanotrophic bacteria, with lower δ13C values (as mentioned above). Allochthonous inputs of POM and DOC to reservoirs can be mineralized and affect zooplankton δ13C values through the food web. In our study reservoirs, MS, unlike the other reservoirs, is most likely to have a high proportion of DOC derived from autochthonous sources (phytoplankton production).

    CONCLUSION

    In our study of five agricultural reservoirs (JS, BG, JY, KP and MS), zooplankton δ13C showed large variation from -33‰ to -22‰. One eutrophic reservoir, Lake Masan, had a pattern different from the other reservoirs, showing that zooplankton δ13C decreased with increasing DOC concentration. With this exception, the results of this study are consistent with results of other studies showing an inverse relationship between zooplankton δ13C values and DOC concentrations (France et al. 1997, Jones et al. 1999, Lennon et al. 2006, Persaud et al. 2009). In this study, the difference in zooplankton δ13C values between Lake Jusan and Lake Masan is most likely caused by differences in sources of organic matter related to the difference in the land use in the watershed (Jones et al. 1999). Future studies on reservoirs in Korea should further investigate carbon sources and elemental stoichiometry together with stable isotope techniques to understand the relationships between watershed characteristics and trophic conditions.

  • 1. 1998 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater google
  • 2. Browne RA 1981 Lakes as islands: biogeographic distribution, turnover rates, and species composition in the lakes of central New York. [J Biogeography] Vol.8 P.75-83 google doi
  • 3. Chen FZ, Xie P, Tang HJ, Liu H 2005 Negative effects of Microcystis blooms on the crustacean plankton in an enclosure experiment in the subtropical China. [J Environ Sci] Vol.17 P.775-781 google
  • 4. Cole JJ, Carpenter SR, Kitchell J, Pace ML, Solomon CT, Weidel B 2011 Strong evidence for terrestrial support of zooplankton in small lakes based on stable isotopes of carbon, nitrogen, and hydrogen. [Proc Natl Acad Sci USA] Vol.108 P.1975-1980 google doi
  • 5. Cyr H 1998 Cladoceran- and copepod- dominated zooplankton communities graze at similar rates in low-productivity lakes. [Can J Fish Aquat Sci] Vol.55 P.414-422 google doi
  • 6. Del Giorgio PA, Cole JJ, Cimbleris A 1997 Respiration rates in bacteria exceed phytoplankton production in unproductive aquatic systems. [Nature] Vol.385 P.148-151 google doi
  • 7. Del Giorgio PA, France RL 1996 Ecosystem-Specific patterns in the relationship between zooplankton and POM or microplankton δ13C. [Limnol Oceanogr] Vol.41 P.359-365 google doi
  • 8. Del Giorgio PA, Peters RH 1994 Patterns in planktonic P:R ratios in lakes: influence of lake trophy and dissolved organic carbon. [Limnol Oceanogr] Vol.39 P.772-787 google doi
  • 9. De Kluijver A, Yu J, Houtekamer M, Middelburg JJ, Liu Z 2012 Cyanobacteria as a carbon source for zooplankton in eutrophic Lake Taihu, China, measured by 13C labeling and fatty acid biomarkers. [Limnol Oceanogr] Vol.57 P.1245-1254 google doi
  • 10. Doi H, Zuykova EI, Kikuchi E, Shikano S, Kanou K, Yurlova N, Yadrenkina E 2006 Spatial changes in carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes of the plankton food web in a saline lake ecosystem. [Hydrobiologia] Vol.571 P.395-400 google doi
  • 11. France RL, Del Giorgio PA, Westcott KA 1997 Productivity and heterotrophy influences on zooplankton δ13C in northern temperate lakes. [Aquat Microb Ecol] Vol.12 P.85-93 google doi
  • 12. Grey J, Jones RI, Sleep D 2000 Stable isotope analysis of the origins of zooplankton carbon in lakes of differing trophic state. [Oecologia] Vol.123 P.232-240 google doi
  • 13. Gu B, Chapman AD, Schelske CL 2006 Factors controlling seasonal variations in stable isotope composition of particulate organic matter in a soft water eutrophic lake. [Limnol Oceanogr] Vol.51 P.2837-2848 google doi
  • 14. Gu B, Schell DM, Alexander V 1994 Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis of the plankton food web in a subarctic lake. [Can J Fish Aquat Sci] Vol.51 P.1338-1344 google doi
  • 15. Hessen DO, Andersen T, Lyche A 1989 Differential grazing and resource utilization of zooplankton in a humic lake. [Arch Hydrobiol] Vol.114 P.321-347 google
  • 16. Hessen DO 2008 Efficiency, energy and stoichiometry in pelagic food webs; reciprocal roles of food quality and food quantity. [Freshw Rev] Vol.1 P.43-57 google
  • 17. Hou W, Gu B, Zhang H, Gu J, Han BP 2013 The relationship between carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes of zooplankton and select environmental variables in lowlatitude reservoirs. [Limnology] Vol.14 P.97-104 google doi
  • 18. Jeppesen E, Jensen JP, Jensen C, Faafeng B, Hessen DO, Sondergaard M, Lauridsen T, Brettum P, Christoffersen K 2003 The impact of nutrient state and lake depth on top-down control in the pelagic zone of lakes: a study of 466 lakes from the temperate zone to the arctic. [Ecosystems] Vol.6 P.313-325 google doi
  • 19. Jones RI, Grey J, Sleep D, Arvola L 1999 Stable isotope analysis of zooplankton carbon nutrition in humic lakes. [Oikos] Vol.86 P.97-104 google doi
  • 20. Kankaala P, Taipale S, Li L, Jones RI 2010 Diets of crustacean zooplankton, inferred from stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses, in lakes with varying allochthonous dissolved organic carbon content. [Aquat Ecol] Vol.44 P.781-795 google doi
  • 21. Keough JR, Sierszen ME, Hagley CA 1996 Analysis of a Lake Superior coastal food web with stable isotope techniques. [Limnol Oceanogr] Vol.41 P.136-146 google doi
  • 22. Kim B, Choi KS, Lee UH, Kim UH 2000 Effects of the summer monsoon on the distribution and loading of organic carbon in a deep reservoir, Lake Soyang, Korea. [Water Res] Vol.14 P.3495-3504 google doi
  • 23. Kim B, Kim JO, Jun MS, Hwang SJ 1999 Seasonal dynamics of phytoplankton and zooplankton community in Lake Soyang. [Korean J Limnol] Vol.32 P.127-134 google
  • 24. Lee J, Kim J, Jung Y, Kim B 2010 Isotopic differences among zooplankton taxa and seasonal variation of zooplankton community coexisting with Microcystis. [Kor J Ecol Environ] Vol.43 P.1-10 google
  • 25. Lee J, Yoshioka T, Ra K, Owen J, Kim B 2011 Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope composition of co-existing herbivorous zooplankton species in an oligo-dystrophic lake (Shirakoma-ike, Japan). [N Z J Mar Freshw Res] Vol.45 P.29-41 google doi
  • 26. Lee JY, Kim JK, Owen JS, Choi Y, Shin K, Jung S, Kim B 2013 Variation in carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes in POM and zooplankton in a deep reservoir and relationship with hydrological characteristics. [J Freshw Ecol] Vol.28 P.47-62 google doi
  • 27. Lennon JT, Faiia AM, Feng X, Cottingham KL 2006 Relative importance of CO2 recycling and CH4 pathways in lake food webs along a dissolved organic carbon gradient. [Limnol Oceanogr] Vol.51 P.1602-1613 google doi
  • 28. Li L 2007 Variation in zooplankton diets in contrasting small lakes, inferred from stable isotope analyses. google
  • 29. Li W, Wu F, Liu C, Fu P, Wang J, Mei Y, Wang L, Guo J 2008 Temporal and spatial distributions of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in two small lakes on southwestern China Plateau. [Limnology] Vol.9 P.163-171 google doi
  • 30. Pace M L, Cole JJ, Carpenter SR, Kitchell JF, Hodgson JR, Van de Bogert MC, Bade DL, Kritzberg ES, Bastviken D 2004 Whole lake carbon-13 additions reveal terrestrial support of aquatic food webs. [Nature] Vol.427 P.240-243 google doi
  • 31. Persaud AD, Dillon PJ, Lasenby D, Yan ND 2009 Stable isotope variability of meso-zooplankton along a gradient of dissolved organic carbon. [Freshwater Biol] Vol.54 P.1705-1719 google doi
  • 32. Rau G 1978 Carbon-13 depletion in a Subalpine Lake: carbon flow Implications. [Science] Vol.201 P.901-902 google doi
  • 33. Rautio M, Vincent WF 2007 Isotopic analysis of the sources of organic carbon for zooplankton in shallow subarctic and arctic waters. [Ecography] Vol.30 P.77-87 google
  • 34. Rautio M, Mariash H, Forsstrom L 2011 Seasonal shifts between autochthonous and allochthonous carbon contributions to zooplankton diets in a subarctic lake. [Limnol Oceanogr] Vol.56 P.1513-1524 google doi
  • 35. Salonen K, Hammar T 1986 On the importance of dissolved organic matter in the nutrition of zooplankton in some lake waters. [Oecologia] Vol.68 P.246-253 google doi
  • 36. Santana ARA, Lansac-Toha FA, Benedito E 2009 Variability of δ13C and δ15N in three zooplankton species from the upper Parana River floodplain. [Zoologia (Curitiba)] Vol.26 P.725-732 google doi
  • 37. Schindler DE, Carpenter SR, Cole JJ, Kitchell JF, Pace ML 1997 Influence of food web structure on carbon exchange between lakes and the atmosphere. [Science] Vol.277 P.248-251 google doi
  • 38. Tranvik LJ 1989 Bacterioplankton growth, grazing mortality and quantitative relationship to primary production in a humic and a clearwater lake. [J Plankton Res] Vol.11 P.985-1000 google doi
  • 39. Vuorio K, Meili M, Sarvala J 2006 Taxon-specific variation in the stable isotopic signatures (δ13C and δ15N) of lake phytoplankton. [Freshwater Biol] Vol.51 P.807-822 google doi
  • 40. Yoshioka T, Wada E, Hayashi H 1994 A stable isotope study on seasonal food web dynamics in a eutrophic lake. [Ecology] Vol.75 P.835-846 google doi
  • [Fig. 1.] Location of the study sites. JS, Jusan; BG, Byeokgye; JY, Jinyang; KP, Keumpung; MS, Masan.
    Location of the study sites. JS, Jusan; BG, Byeokgye; JY, Jinyang; KP, Keumpung; MS, Masan.
  • [Table 1.] Location and land use in the watersheds of study reservoirs
    Location and land use in the watersheds of study reservoirs
  • [Fig. 2.] Phytoplankton and zooplankton populations in the study reservoirs.
    Phytoplankton and zooplankton populations in the study
reservoirs.
  • [Table 2.] Water chemistry of the study reservoirs (SD, Secchi disc transparency; DO, dissolved oxygen; DOC, dissolved organic carbon; Chl-a, chlorophyll a; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus concentration)
    Water chemistry of the study reservoirs (SD, Secchi disc transparency; DO, dissolved oxygen; DOC, dissolved organic carbon; Chl-a, chlorophyll a; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus concentration)
  • [Fig. 3.] Comparison of zooplankton δ13C and POM δ13C in the study reservoirs.
    Comparison of zooplankton δ13C and POM δ13C in the study
reservoirs.
  • [Fig. 4.] Relationship between zooplankton δ13C and DOC concentration in the study reservoirs.
    Relationship between zooplankton δ13C and DOC concentration
in the study reservoirs.