Application of Transformation Electromagnetics to Cloak Design and Reduction of Radar Cross Section
 Author: Mittra Raj, Zhou Yuda
 Organization: Mittra Raj; Zhou Yuda
 Publish: Journal of electromagnetic engineering and science Volume 13, Issue2, p73~85, 30 June 2013

ABSTRACT
In this paper we present an alternative approach to addressing the problem of designing cloaks for radar targets, which have been dealt with in the past by using the transformation optics (TO) algorithm. The present design utilizes realistic materials, which can be fabricated in the laboratory, and are wideband as well as relatively insensitive to polarization and incident angle of the incoming wave. The design strategy, presented herein, circumvents the need to use metamaterials for cloak designs that are inherently narrowband, dispersive and highly sensitive to polarization and incident angle. A new interpretation of the TO algorithm is presented and is employed for the design of radar cross sectionreducing absorbers for arbitrary targets, and not just for canonical shapes, e.g., cylinders. The topic of performance enhancement of the absorbers by using graphene materials and embedded frequency structure surfaces is briefly mentioned. The design procedure for planar absorbing covers is presented and their performance as wrappers of general objects is discussed. A number of test cases are included as examples to illustrate the application of the proposed design methodology, which is a modification of the classical TO paradigm.

KEYWORD
Cloaking , EMI , Microwave Absorber , RCS Reduction , RFI , Transformation Optics

Ⅰ. Introduction
The objective of this paper is twofold. The first of these is to review the basic principles of the transformation optics (TO) approach, also known as transformation electromagnetics algorithm, which has recently surfaced as one of the most innovative techniques for designing a wide variety of electromagnetic devices. Our second goal is to present an alternative approach for designing absorbing blankets for scattering reduction, which differs from that used to design TObased cloaks, and avoids the problems of narrow bandwidth and sensitivity to polarization and incident angle associated with the TObased cloaks.
The list of TObased devices is very expansive indeed. The list covers a wide range of devices, including cloaks, flat lenses, black holes, to name just a few. What separates the TO from other algorithms is that it provides a systematic approach to designing these devices, which is very innovative, as well as elegant, and is markedly different from the techniques that have been employed heretofore prior to the advent of the TO, to design radar cross section (RCS)reducing absorber and flat lenses, for example.
Furthermore, the TO is rigorous and is based on the simple concept that Maxwell’s equations are invariant under coordinate transformation.
Ⅱ. Basic Principle
To elaborate on the concept a little more, let us consider two objects belonging to physical and virtual domains, and shown in Fig. 1(a) and (b), respectively. The medium parameters surrounding these objects, namely (
ε _{1},μ _{1}) and (ε _{2},μ _{2}), are also shown in Fig. 1. Now we pose the question: How can we relate the medium parameters in the two domains (physical and virtual) when we transform the geometry of object #1 in the physical domain into that of object #2 in the virtual domain via coordinate transformation. The answer to this question is surprisingly simple; in fact, the principle upon which the answer to it is based has been enunciated in a number of papers, dating back to almost fifty years ago, that have examined the behavior of Maxwell’s equations in a generalized curvilinear coordinate system. More recently, a number of authors, prominent among them Pendry et al. [1], Leonhart [2], Yang et al. [3], and Kwon and Werner [4], as well as several others [514], have presented the relationship between the material parameter (ε _{2},μ _{2}) and (ε _{1},μ _{1}), under the physical constraint that the electric and magnetic fields in the two domains remain “invariant” to the transformation between the two systems. The relationship can be explicitly stated as:where
Λ represents the Jacobian matrix relating the two domains (x ,y , andz can be arbitrary and curvilinear coordinates in general),ε andμ represent the permittivity and the permeability of the corresponding mediums, respectively. Eq. (1) enables us to navigate between the two systems and relate their material parameters in a unique, systematic and rigorous way.Pendry et al. [1], Schurig et al. [15], and a number of other workers [214,1618] have leveraged the fact that the medium parameters can be related via (1), in order to lay the foundations of designing cloaks, which render a target invisible when covered by using materials whose parameters are dictated by the TO. We will now explain the basic principles of TObased cloaking, which, in principle, can render an object totally invisible. Towards this end, we return to Fig. 1 and define the following task for ourselves: design the cloak (i.e., a cover or a blanket) for the perfect electric conductor (PEC) object in Fig. 1(a) such that it is invisible to an arbitrary incident field that impinges upon it. Note that no restriction is being placed on the frequency, polarization or the angle of incidence of the illuminating field in connection with this task.
To solve the problem, posed above, we begin with a coordinate transformation, which morphs the object #1, which is located in the physical domain, and for which we are trying to design the cloak, into the object #2 residing in the virtual domain. Although this transformation is not obvious when the geometries of both the objects are totally arbitrary, it is nonetheless doable, at least theoretically. The caveat, though, is that the procedure provides us no guarantees that the materials parameters dictated by the transformation are physically realizable, and/or that they can be fabricated in practice to achieve cloak designs which satisfy the desired specifications, such as small thickness, wide bandwidth, polarization insensitivity, etc.
The realizability issue, alluded to above, becomes even more critical when we attempt to design an “invisible” cloak, the socalled ‘holy grail’ of cloak designers. We will now explain why this is the case with a simple example shown in Fig. 2.
Let us assume, for the sake of convenience, that the target we wish to cloak is a sphere and that we are going to follow the TO paradigm for this task. This problem has been extensively studied by a number of authors [122] and they have derived the material parameters for the cloak by invoking the TO, and using the Jacobian of the transformation (Eq. (1)), which makes the cloaked object totally disappear (become invisible). In Fig. 3 we plot the material parameters, presented in [18], which makes the cylinder (Fig. 3) invisible, at least in principle. We discuss this cylinder problem first, because the observations we make about the inherent difficulties encountered in the process of realizing a TObased cloak for this twodimensional (2D) geometry are also applicable, by and large, for the sphere problem, with only slight modifications.
We observe several things from Fig. 3. First, we see that the material parameters are anisotropic, and this in of itself can be problematic when we attempt to realize them in practice, because there is no systematic method available for synthesizing them. The second thing we observe about the
μ andε values is that they vary over a wide range, tending to0 in some regions and ∞ in others. Once again, this type of inhomogeneous behavior and a wide swing in the required material parameters as functions of the radial distance make it very difficult to realize them. In fact, we must resort to using metamaterials (aka artificiallyengineered materials) that are notoriously narrowband, dispersive and lossyundesirable attributes that degrade the performance of the cloak and render it unsuitable for most applications. What exacerbates the problem even more is the fact that the thickness of the cloak is comparable to the wavelength, rather than being a small fraction of the same. As we well know, a thin wrapper is desired in most applications, e.g., when designing stealth targets for the radar world.At this point we return to the TO paradigm for cloak designs and scrutinize it carefully to see if we can thresh out the root causes of the difficulties that we have just identified with the TObased design, namely anisotropy, high degree of inhomogeneity, dispersive nature, and large thickness. Although we have not mentioned this before, it is worthwhile to add dependence on the polarization and sensitivity to the incidentangle to the list above, which further aggravate the situation.
Towards our quest to identify the problem areas with the TObased cloak designs, we turn to an alternate derivation of the material parameters in the context of transformation electromagnetics. Rather than relying directly on the Jacobian of the transformation, which relates the Physical domain to the corresponding virtual domain, we turn to the integral forms of Maxwell’s equations appearing below:
Initially, we consider the relatively simple case where the two domains are simply related by scaling, say by a factor ‘
γ ’, as has been done in the previous TObased cloak designs [18]. The method we propose to relate the material parameters in the two domains is very general and is applicable to the case where the two geometries have arbitrary shapes, and are not simply related to each other by a scale factor, as we will discuss later in Section III.To derive the material properties of the physical domain, from the assumed parameters in the virtual domain (
ε _{0},μ _{0} for freespace in this example), we turn to Fig. 4 and Eq. (2). The next step, which is key to the TObased algorithm, is to impose the condition that the fields ( ,E _{1} ) in the physical domain be “identical” to those in the virtual domain, i.e., (H _{1} ,E _{2} ). To facilitate the imposition of this condition, we now discretize the two domains, as shown in Fig. 5, by setting up a mesh to discretize the regions 2 and 3 in both domains. We take advantage of the circular symmetry of the geometries in the two domains, and of the fact that the geometry of the PEC cylinder, located in region2 in the virtual domain is simply a scaleddown version of the one in the physical domain (region1), and note that this transformation preserves the azimuthal symmetries of the two domains. In view of this, we use the same angular increments of Δ？ in both domains, although we follow a different strategy in the radial direction, along which we impose the following three conditions:H _{2}(i) The number of radial cells be identical in region2 of the domains, which spans the radial distance b
(ii) The cell size in the outermost boundaries of region 2 is to be identical in the twodomains;
(iii) The cell sizes in region3 in both domains be identically equal in the radial direction, not only between c’
There are logical reasons for imposing the above constraints, as we will now explain, before we proceed to derive the relationships between the material parameter distributions in the two domains. First, the TO must be applied to entire regions external to the PEC targetcylinder in this casewhen relating the material parameters in the two domains, viz.,
b <r <∞ in the physical domain anda <r <∞ in the virtual model. Specifically, we cannot truncate the regions as we transform from one domain to another, without introducing discontinuities in the fields, and thus violating the premise of TO under which we are operating. If we use condition (iii), in Eq. (2), we immediately see that if the two fields as well as the mesh sizes would be identical in the two domains. It follows then, that the material parameters must be exactly the same in region3 in the two domains. Since we have chosen the material parameters in the virtual domain in region3 to be freespace, i.e., these parameters areε _{0} andμ _{0}, then region3 in the physical domain must correspond to freespace as well, as would the parameters of the external regionc’ <r <∞. This is a crucial point, and it implies that the cloak in the physical domain has but a finite thickness, spanning the regionb <r <c’ . This is obviously necessary in order for the cloak design to be practical, since we cannot accept a cloak design whose thickness is infinite, as it would be if we did not impose the equalmeshsize condition in the two domains in region3 and beyond, i.e., forr >c’ .where we are considering only the
E_{z} andH_{？} components for this 2D geometry, namely a cylinder, for whichz is along the axis of the cylinder, andε andμ in Eq. (3) are the appropriate elements of thetensors.
Let us now turn to the regions2 in the two domains, i.e., physical and virtual. Recall that we have imposed the condition that the cell size at the outermost boundary of this region be identical in the two domains, which guarantees that the transition of the material parameters would be smooth as we transition from region 2 to region3 (recall region3 and beyond is freespace in both domains). So, all that remains to do now is to determine the material parameters of the cloak region in the physical domain, which spans from
b <r <c’ , by invoking the condition that the fields ( ,E _{1} ) of the physical domain be identical to the fields (H _{1} ,E _{2} ) in the virtual domain (which we have chosen to be free space), as well as condition (i) on the number of cells in the two domains associated with region2, namely that this number be identical in the two domains. At this point, we impose an additional condition, without loss of generality, that the cell sizes in region2 in the physical domain be identical in the radial direction, as we go fromH _{2}r =b tor =c’ . Also, for the sake of discretization we choose the cell size in the radial direction to beλ /20, though there is no hard and fast rule that says that we must adhere to this last condition, which is dictated more by the numerical discretization of the integral forms of Maxwell’s Eq. (3), than by anything else. At this point, we note that since the dimensions of region2 in the physical and virtual domains are different, we typically choose the radiusa such thata <<b , in order to ensure that the scattering from the small cylinder in the virtual domain would be smallin fact vanishingly small in the ideal casein order to render it invisible asa →0 in the limit. Note that we must choose a nonuniform mesh in the virtual domain, so that we can simultaneously satisfy condition (iii), as well as the constraint on the number of cells in the radial direction in the two domains, namely that they be equal. Though we have some flexibility in terms of the variation of the cell size in the radial direction in the virtual domain, we choose this variation in Δr to be smooth, and monotonically increasing in terms of the cell size as we go fromr =a tor =c’ , so that the summation of all the Δr ’s equal (c’ ？a ). An example of such a mesh is shown in Fig. 6.Having defined the meshes in the two domains, we finally turn to the task of determining the material parameters of the cloak in the physical domain. Since we wish to impose the criterion that the two sets of fields, namely (
,E _{1} ) and (H _{1} ,E _{2} ) in the two domains, respectively, be identical. Eq. (2) tells us that the (H _{2}ε _{1},μ _{1}) values in the physical domain, must beε _{0}/γ_{n} andμ _{0}/γ_{n} whereγ_{n} is the ratio of the areas of the nth cell in the physical and virtual domains, respectively. It is evident that, under these conditions, theε _{1} andμ _{1} must start out atε _{0}/γ _{1} andμ _{0}/γ _{1}, whereγ _{1} the ratio of the dimensions of the first cell (atr =b ) in the physical domain to that of the dimension of its counterpart (atr =a ) in the virtual domain. Also, we recall from our previous discussion, thatε andμ values are identical in both domains when we reachr =c’ , and that they are both just (ε _{0},μ _{0}).We now make two important observations. First, the cloak we have designed by following the procedure just described, which is based on the TO algorithmthough implemented differently than via the use of the Jacobian has an inhomogeneous characteristic in the radial direction, albeit smooth. Second, the
ε andμ values in the physical domain are larger, by a factor of 1/γ _{1}, than their freespace counterparts. This factor is the bane of the TOdesigned cloaks, since it calls for metamaterials to fulfill the requirements on the material parameters if we insist that the cloak must render the target totally “invisible”, since we can fulfill that condition if and only ifa →0, in the strictest sense, and this implies thatγ _{1} must also follow suit and tend to zero.We should mention that although we chose the simple geometry of the cylinder to identify the fundamental difficulties with the implementation of the TO paradigm, the problem with the realization of material parameters persists regardless of the geometry of the target, as long as we insist that it becomes invisible, which in turn requires that the scale factor (equivalent to
γ ) tends to0 .Before we discuss our strategy for overcoming this fundamental roadblock, we examine another fundamental limitation posed by the TO paradigm when we attempt to reduce the thickness of the cloak
t (=c’ ？b ), to realistic values, e.g., a small fraction of the wavelength. We note that the material values (ε _{0},μ _{0}) near the outer boundary of the cloak, located atr =c’ , do not change, regardless of whetherr is large or small, and, for that matter neither do the behaviors of (ε ,μ ) of the cloak in the neighborhood ofr =b , where the above parameters →∞. While we can attempt to partially mitigate this problem by imposing a cap on the values of these parameters, we cannot change the fact that the relativeε_{n} andμ_{n} must reduce from very large values at the surface of the cylinder to unity within a relatively short distance; and this, in turn, again poses realizability problems in practice. For this reason, practical realizability of thin invisibility cloaks have not met with too much success in the past, and is unlikely that the thickness issue will be resolved anytime soon if we continue to impose the above invisibility criterion on the TObased cloak designs. Fig. 7 shows the deterioration of the performance of the cloak (Fig. 7(c) when we design a thin threelayer cloak by using discretized values of the cloak parameters, which vary continuously fromr =b tor =c’ ). It is evident that the wavefront of the field becomes considerably distorted when we compare the performance of the thin cloak with the ideal one the results for which are included in Fig. 7(b) for comparison.We now proceed to outline a strategy for designing coatings for radar targets which circumvent the various problems identified above, when attempting to realize realistic cloak designs.
Ⅲ. RCS Reduction for Practical Targets by Using the Concepts of TO
Our strategy is to follow a threestep process, which we will now outline below. Our first step is to design wideband layered absorbers for infinite, planar, conducting ground planes. We note that this is also the basic approach to designing coating for radar targets to render them stealthy, regardless of their shapes and that it is relatively easy to carrying out this design by using optimization algorithms to determine the material properties and the layer thicknesses to reduce the reflection from the coated PEC plane, say, below ―10 dB level, and over a wide frequency band, say covering the radar frequencies from 2 to 18 GHz, as typical examples (note that this is in contrast to 2%3% bandwidth of cloaks designed by using the legacy TO algorithm).
A typical cost function to be minimized, which is suitable for optimizing the layer thicknesses and material parameters can be defined as follows:
where
d_{i} represents the thickness for each layer of the absorber;R_{L} stands for the reflection level at the airabsorber interface and is a function of the material parameters and thicknessesd_{i} of the absorbing layers (Fig. 8); andm is the weight of the reflection level in the optimization, signifying the importance of the reflection level over the collective thickness of the layered absorber,m =1 corresponds to the case where the total thickness is predetermined, and only the reflection coefficient is minimized. Note that the material parameters are dispersive, and hence the optimization to determine the thicknesses should be carried out over the entire desired frequency band.Besides the wide bandwidth, there are two other important attributes which distinguish this type of blanket design from the traditional TO cloaks. The first of these is that the proposed blankets are relatively insensitive to polarization as well as the incident angle of the impinging radar signal interrogating the target. This is in contrast to the TOdesigned cloaks [18], which become rapidly ineffective if either the polarization or the incident angle deviates from that of the combination of the two parameters for which the TOcloak was designed.
The second attribute of the present design is perhaps even more crucial than the first one we mentioned above, and this concerns the availability of the materials needed to design the blanket, which, as we might recall, posed serious realizability problems, owing to the unrealistically large (or small) parameter values (Fig. 3) demanded by the TO algorithm.
As is well known, the radar absorbing materials (RAMs) have been around for a very long time, some for many decades, dating back to when stealth aircrafts came into vogue in the sixties, and perhaps even before. Although information on these RAM materials is not available openly because of their “classified” or “secret” nature, understandably so because they are used in military applications to design stealth aircrafts and missiles, a plethora of information about similar absorbing materials is nonetheless available in the open literature, including the details of their fabrication, which have been described in [23,24], for instance.
Here we will use two different types of materials namely CoFe nanoflakes (NF) and CoF enanoparticles (NP), whose frequency variations are shown in Fig. 9. We point out that these materials can be realized with relative ease, as is evident from [27,28], where the details of their fabrication can be found.
We note that the
ε andμ values of these materials are both complex and that they do vary with frequency; hence they are dispersive. We hasten to point out, however, that unlike the metamaterials, which typically have variations with frequency because of resonant inclusions they use to achieve effectiveε andμ values that are very high, very low, or even negative, the material parameters of the NP and NF materials vary relatively smoothly with frequency, and this is crucial for realizing wideband performance, as we will soon see.To illustrate the fact that we can indeed achieve wideband performance in terms of reflection reduction over a wide frequency band with relative small thicknesses of 2, 4, 6 and 7 layer absorbers we refer to Fig. 10. Although not shown here, the results for the reflection coefficient reduction are also satisfactory when either the polarization, or the incident angle is varied and this is also true when both are changed simultaneously.
The performance characteristics of several multilayered absorbers, designed by using the above materials, are presented in Fig. 10 for a 10 dB (or better) reduction in the reflection coefficient over the frequency range of 218 GHz.
We now move to the second step in our design procedure, which is to adapt the blanket designed for the infinite PEC plane to an arbitrarily shaped object. Initially we consider an object with a smooth surface whose radius of curvature is moderatetolarge everywhere. We will generalize the procedure in the third step, using the principles of the TO when the above assumption regarding the smoothness of the object is not valid, as for instance when the object has sharp edges or bumps, as a general target would in practice.
When the object has a relatively smooth geometry, we initially wrap the multilayer absorbing blanket, which we have designed earlier for the planar surface around the PEC target whose scattering crosssection we are attempting to reduce, and test the effectiveness of the blanket for the new object. For a wide variety of targets we have examined, a number of which are shown in Fig. 11, we have found that the blanket does reduce the monostatic as well as the bistatic RCS in the “reflection” region near the surface of the object for different angles of incidence and polarizations of the incoming wave. The results for a twolayer absorber are shown in Figs. 12 and 13 for a rectangular cylinder of finite length, which we have studied as a test case.
A simple test, which is typically applied to cloak designs, is to examine the wavefront of the total (incident+ scattered) field, and see how the level of distortion of the wavefront decreases when the scatterer is covered by the layered absorbing blanket. We present the plots of these wavefronts of the total fields for normal and oblique incidence cases in Figs. 12 and 13, respectively.
We observe that the object, which is a finite cylinder of height 18 cm, generates distorted wavefronts owing to the contribution of the scattered field from the object, even when covered by a twolayer blanket, designed for the infinite planar PEC object, for the nominal frequency range of 4.618 GHz, with a nominal reflection coefficient of ―10 dB or less. However, we also note from Fig. 12 that the distortion in the phase front is relatively small once we got above the lowend of the design frequency range, viz., 4.6 GHz for the planar geometry, confirmingplanar design performs reasonably well even though we are dealing with a rectangular cylinder now. We hasten to point out that the results presented in Fig. 12 are not for a blanket which has been optimized for the object at hand, and we expect some compromise in the performance of the cloak. However, we can improve this performance by optimizing the parameters of the twolayer design, specifically the relative thicknesses of the twolayer, even as we maintain the total thickness intact. We expect the changes to be relatively minor, however, except for the corner regions and, hence, the optimization process should be realistic as well as numerically feasible. The above remarks are also applicable to the oblique incidence case, for which some sample results are presented in Fig. 13.
It is important to point out that the strategy for designing the absorbing blanket, presented herein, is very different from that employed for ideal traditional TO cloak, since the latter is designed to render the (object+cloak) composite to have a zero scattering crosssection in
all directions, whereas the blanket design introduced here seeks to reduce both backscattering and bistatic scattering scenarios but only in thereflection region, and not in the forwardscattering direction. We hasten to point out, however, that this type of performance is perfectly well suited for modern radar systems, symbolically depicted in Fig. 14 above, where only the scattering in the reflection region is of concern.For the final step, we consider the problem of absorber design when a shape perturbation is introduced in an object. Let us say that our modified target is the same rectangular cylinder we just considered above, except for a bump on the top surface. The extra corners introduced by the perturbation, be they smooth or sharp, would obviously introduce distortions in the planar phase front, and potentially increase the scattering level. Our objective here is to restore the field behaviour so that it is close to that of the original object that we had prior to the introduction of the perturbation.
We now outline the procedure for the blanket design for the new object, shown on the left in Fig. 15, i.e., Fig. 15(1), which is in the physical domain, and is a modified version of the one shown in the right side of the same figure; i.e., Fig. 15(2), which corresponds to the virtual domain. Note that unlike the cylinder example we discussed earlier, the medium in the virtual domain, surrounding the object, is no longer freespace, as was the case shown in Fig. 6. Note also that the dimensions of the objects in the two domains are comparable, and are totally different from the legacy TOdesign case, in which the scale factor between the dimensions of the object in the physical and virtual domains tends to infinity to render the target invisible.
To find the parameters of the cloak for the modified geometry in Fig. 15, we revisit the integral forms of Maxwell’s Equations, presented earlier in Eq. (2), to relate the material parameters associated with the two systems shown in the figure. Fig. 15(1) shows the physical system with locally modified medium parameters for the perturbed object, while Fig. 15(2) depicts the virtual system with the original medium parameters covering the unperturbed object. The field distribution near the perturbed object would obviously be different from that of its unperturbed counterpart, since the perturbation introduces additional scattering to the incoming wave. We link the change in the field with the modification in the geometry, and then compensate it by the changing the medium parameters. Given the specific profile of the perturbation and the simulated field distributions, the only unknowns, namely the medium parameters, can be derived as follows:
and
where, once again, for the sake of simplicity, we have used scalar quantities in Eq. (5) as though the geometry under consideration is twodimensional, which it is in the present example, and we would need to replace the field quantities with vectors and the material parameters with tensors for the general 3D case.
The field behaviors for the perturbed object with locally modified material parameters can be seen from Figs. 16 and 17. Fig. 16 shows that the amplitude of the scattered Efield is reduced, and that the phase front of the total Efield is approximately restored as well in the reflection region.
Fig. 17 compares the amplitudes of the scattered electric fields for five different scenarios listed below:
(a) The flat slab
(b) Flat slab + absorber
(c) Perturbed slab
(d) Perturbed slab + initial absorber
(e) Perturbed slab + modified absorber
We should clarify the fact that although we are referring to this geometry as a slab, what we are really dealing with is a wide rectangular cylinder, with a small thickness.
We note that the modified slab does introduce additional scattering, and that the absorber does help reduce the same. We also note that the modified absorber improves the performance over the initial one, but only slightly, which shows that the planar version of the cloak is not all that inferior to the one modified for this type of geometry. Additional optimization of the modified cloak is expected to improve the performance even further, if so desired.
For an arbitrary target, we can first decompose the geometry of the target in a manner illustrated in Fig. 18, and wrap each part of the target with an absorber, designed by using the approach based on shape perturbation of a related smooth object, and then follow the methodology we have described above to determine the material parameters of the shroud. It should be evident that this is a far more realistic approach than transforming the geometries of these complex objects into an infinitesimally smallsize target, as called for by the TO algorithm for cloak designs, and following the TO recipe corresponding to such a geometry transformation, which is bound to lead to unrealistic and impractical designs.
Finally, we mention that we need to extend the procedure outlined above when dealing with an arbitrary target, though the basic philosophy of the design procedure remains the same.
1. Reduction of Radio Frequency Interference (RFI)
Reduction of RFI, another important application for the absorberwrapping is to mitigate the problem of antenna blockage in a sharedplatform environment, as shown in Fig. 18, in which the introduction of the aggressor antenna can raise the farend sidelobe levels of the parabolic dish significantly. To mitigate this effect, we can wrap the monopole by using a multilayer absorber which has been optimized for a planar geometry, as we have done in the past, or we can optimize the layer thicknesses and material parameter for the circular cylinder geometry. Alternatively, we can use a conducting saucerlike structure wrapped around the monopole, as proposed in [2527]. Figs. 19 and 20 show the model used to construct the alternative cloak with the monopole as the cloaked target. Fig. 21 shows the far field patterns of a parabolic dish antennathe victim antenna when a monopole, which is the aggressor antenna, is placed in the vicinity of the dish. The patterns of the dish/monopole composite are also included in the figure for two treatment plans applied to the aggressor antenna. We note that the introduction of the absorber treatment reduces the sidelobe levels of the dish antenna, as compared to the case for the farend antenna combination without the treatment.
However, we also note that an elaborate cloak design, shown in Fig. 20, which is apparently inspired by the TO, isn’t really needed, and that we can do just as well with a thin absorber type of wrapper.
Recent advances in material engineering and research in graphenebased absorbing materials also broadens the choice of the materials used for the absorber designs discussed in this paper. Graphenebased absorbing materials generate sufficient level of magnetic loss without the need to introduce magnetic metals like Co, Fe, and Ni. These new materials also have the advantage of being lightweight, and thin, that are highly desired attributes for airborne applications. There have been reported cases of achieving below ―70 dB reflection level shielding with 2.09 mm of grapheme nanoplateletsynthesized material [28], as well as below ―20 dB reflection level over the entire 4.518 GHz with 8 mm of multilayered carbon nanotube fabric [29].
The performance of the absorbers can also be enhanced by introducing frequency structure surface (FSS)type structures within the layers, which add virtually no extra thickness to the composite structure. The FSS structures can be tailored to enhance the absorbance in target frequency bands [30] or to broaden the working bandwidth [29] of the initial layered absorber.
Ⅳ. Conclusion
In this paper we have presented a strategy for designing cloaks and absorbing blankets for scattering reduction which deviates from the classical TO algorithm. We have discussed the limitations of the Transformation Opticsbased algorithm, which typically calls for metamaterials for cloak designs, that are not available in nature and suffer from problems of narrow bandwidths, high losses, unacceptable levels of polarization and incident angle sensitivities, etc., when synthesized artificially. We have provided an alternative approach to TO for relating the material parameters of the physical and virtual domains, by using the integral forms of Maxwell’s equations. We have used this new perspective to identify the root cause of the difficulty that arises when designing cloaks by using the TO, namely inability to realize extreme values of the material parameters called for by the TO algorithm
Following this we have shown how we can use the technique of Impedance Transformation, as a first step, to develop absorbing blankets for infinite structures, and then use it as a stepping stone for designing absorbing blankets for objects of arbitrary shape.
Finally, we have detailed an algorithm for deriving the material parameters of absorbing blankets, for arbitrarily shaped objects, to reduce their scattering levels in the reflection region, over a wide frequency band, and for wave incidences with arbitrary polarization and incident angles. A number of examples have been included to illustrate the performances achieved by the absorbing blankets designed by using the developed technique. The interested reader may refer to the publications appearing in [3135] for related information on the topic discussed in this work.

[Fig. 1.] (a) Physical and (b) virtual domains used in the transformation optics algorithm.

[Fig. 2.] Transformation opticsbased cloak schematics and corresponding materials in the (a) physical geometry and (b) virtual geometry. PEC=perfect electric conductor, EM=electromagnetic.

[Fig. 3.] (a) Schematics for a cloaked perfect electric conductor cylinder with R2=2R1, (b) material parameters for an allangle, allpolarization cloak, and (c) material parameters for an normalincident, transverse electric (TE)polarization cloak. Adapted from [18].

[Fig. 4.] Transformation opticsbased cloak schematics and corresponding materials in the (a) physical geometry and (b) virtual geometry. PEC=perfect electric conductor, EM=electromagnetic.

[Fig. 5.] Cloak problem with mesh schematics: (a) physical and (b) virtual domains.

[Fig. 6.] Cloak problem with mesh schematics: (a) physical and (b) virtual domains. PEC=perfect electric conductor.

[Fig. 7.] Field distribution for a perfect electric conductor cylinder in (a) an ideal transformation optics (TO) cloak, (b) an ideal, thin TO cloak, (c) a 3layered TO cloak in which the medium parameters at each layer correspond to those of the ideal thin cloak.

[Fig. 8.] Model schematics of the optimization problem for the multilayer absorber. PEC=perfect electric conductor.

[Fig. 9.] Real and imaginary parts of the (a) permittivity and (b) permeability for the two types of absorbing materials used in the multilayer absorbing blanket design.

[Fig. 10.] Reflection coefficient of multilayer absorber backed by a perfect electric conductor plate for different number of layers.

[Fig. 11.] Backscattering radar cross section of perfect electric conductor objects: (a) plate, (b) pyramid, and (c) cylinder covered with 2 and 7layer absorbers.

[Fig. 12.] Phase behavior of the Efield near the rectangular perfect electric conductor cylinder, which is wrapped around by an absorber blanket, normally incident on the cylinder.

[Fig. 13.] Phase behaviors of the Efield near the rectangular perfect electric conductor cylinder, which is wrapped around by an absorber blanket, for an obliquely incident plane wave.

[Fig. 14.] Target detection in conventional radar scenarios: monostatic and bistatic schemes.

[Fig. 15.] (a) Original 2layer absorber wrapped around a rectangular cylinder with shape perturbation (left); (b) 2layer absorber with transformation optics (TO) modified material properties around regions with the shape perturbation (left); and (c) 2layer absorber with TO modified material properties for all regions (left) and 2layer absorber wrapped around a rectangular cylinder (right).

[Fig. 16.] Phase behavior of scattered Efield for (a) perturbed object wrapped by blanket with original medium parameter, (b) perturbed object wrapped by blanket with locally modified medium parameter.

[Fig. 17.] Comparison of the amplitudes of electric fields scattered by different objects.

[Fig. 18.] Possible domain decomposition of two aircrafts: F 16 Falcon fighter jet (left) and Predator Drone UAV (right) for scatteringreduction treatment.

[Fig. 19.] Model schematics for the blockage problem: (left) side view and (right) isometric view of the victim antenna (parabolic dish) and the aggressor antenna (monopole) sharing the same platform.

[Fig. 20.] Model schematics for the alternative cloak.

[Fig. 21.] Radiation patterns for the antenna blockage problem: (blue line) dish antenna, (green line) dish antenna and the monopole antenna in the vicinity, and (red line) dish antenna with absorbertreated monopole antenna.