검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
Lithothamnion steneckii sp. nov. and Pneophyllum conicum: new coralline red algae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) for coral reefs of Brazil
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
Lithothamnion steneckii sp. nov. and Pneophyllum conicum: new coralline red algae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) for coral reefs of Brazil
KEYWORD
biodiversity , Brazil , coralline algae , coral reefs , Lithothamnion sp. nov. , Pneophyllum conicum
  • INTRODUCTION

    The Orders Corallinales and Sporolithales represent an evolutionary clade of red algae (Rhodophyta) that are characterized by the deposition of calcite in cell walls (e.g., Johansen 1981). Due to the natural calcification of the members of this clade, they are common in the fossil record (e.g., Aguirre et al. 2010). Species of coralline red algae are widely distributed around the world from the poles to the tropics and from intertidal areas to deep in the oceans (e.g., Steneck 1986). Because of their wide range in ecological and geographical distribution, this clade has several growth forms (e.g., Woelkerling et al. 1993), from endoparasites to free living forms (e.g., Johansen 1981), making the taxonomic delimitation in this clade complex.

    Twelve genera and 42 species of coralline red algae have been identified in coastal and offshore areas of the continental shelf of Brazil (reviewed by Creed et al. 2010). From this list of taxa 10 genera and 14 species are cited for the Brazilian reefs. However, many of these species are poorly known and recent taxonomic analyses have

    shown that Brazilian coralline flora is more diverse than was previously considered (e.g., Villas-Boas et al. 2009, Da Nobrega Farias et al. 2010, Bahia et al. 2011, Horta et al. 2011, Henriques et al. 2012). Furthermore, most ecological studies were not carried out using rigorous taxonomic evaluation. During the course of ecological studies at Parque Municipal Marinho do Recife de Fora (e.g., Mariath et al. in press) two species of nongeniculate coralline red algae were found as the major species cover on the reef. When vegetative and reproductive anatomies of the species were analyzed we found a new species of the genus Lithothamnion and a major range extension for Pneophyllum conicum in the area. Here we present a morphological and taxonomic evaluation of these coralline algae.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    The work was carried out within the limits of the Municipal Marine Park of Recife de Fora in Porto Seguro, southeastern Brazil, which is the first Conservation Unit in this area, established in 1997. The protected area is of approximately 17.5 km² (Fig. 1). The depth surrounding this reef varies from 6 to 8 m near shore, and may reach up to 15 m in the northeast offshore area (e.g., Costa et al. 2002). The Ponto Oeste site (16º24′36″ S, 038º59′08″ W) was visited more than 6 times between Feb 27, 2007 and Jan 28, 2008.

    This site located in a portion of the reef flat ranging from 0.5 and 3 m depth and separated from most reefs flat by crevices, reaching 6 m at the reef base. This area inconstantly submerged and distant from reef edge therefore more protected compared to reef slope which is directly exposed to waves. Here the coral colonies are larger than on the reef flat near the reef edge, with coralline algae growing under the sediment, and among and on top of some of the coral colonies.

    All material was collected by SCUBA or snorkel diving and maintained in tanks with sea water in a flow through system. Fragments with reproductive structures were fixed in 4% formalin in seawater. For light microscopy, formalin preserved specimens were first decalcified in 10% nitric acid, dehydrated in 30, 60, and 96% alcohol. Three to ten μm sections were cut with a microtome Shandon Hypercut. Individual sections were removed and stained with 1% toluidine blue as described by (e.g., Moura et al. 1997 modified where the alcoholic series was reduced to concentrations of 30, 60, and 95%).

    For scanning electron microscopy we follow the methods proposed by Garbary (1978) and Garbary and Johansen (1982) which consist in the use of air-dried material was fractured using finger nails, forceps, diagonal cutters, or a small hammer and cold chisel. The fractured pieces were mounted on stubs, using adhesive tabs double sided carbon tape and colloidal silver liquid, stored in a desiccators for at least 24 h prior to examination, coated with gold for 4-6 min in an Emitech K550X (Quorum Technologies Ltd., Kent, UK), and examined with a Zeiss EVO 40 scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) with an accelerating voltage of 15.34 kV. Description of the new species is following the new botanical code of nomenclature (McNeil et al. 2006) in where latin descriptions are no longer require for new species.

    Growth form and terminology follows the concepts explained in Woelkerling et al. (1993) along with their related references. All the material used in the present study are deposit in the Herbaria of Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden (RB according to Holmgren et al. 1990).

    RESULTS

    Family Hapalidiaceae Subfamily Melobesioideae

      >  Lithothamnion steneckii Mariath and Figueiredo (Figs 2 & 3)

    Holotype specimen. Recife de Fora, Bahia, Feb 27, 2007 (RB 475146, Feb 27, 2007), Rodrigo Mariath and Marcia Figueiredo collectors.

    Isotype specimens. Recife de Fora, Bahia, Feb 27, 2007 (RB 475147, RB 475148, RB 517938, RB 517939), Rodrigo Mariath and Marcia Figueiredo collectors.

    Type locality. The Municipal Marine Park of the Recife de Fora, situated in the municipal district of Porto Seguro, Bahia.

    Etymology. The name of this species is to honor Dr. Robert Steneck’s work on coralline red algae and his particular interest in Brazilian coral reefs.

    Description. Plants non-geniculate with an encrusting to fruticose growth form (Fig. 2A); thalli thickness 200- 315 μm. Epithelial flared cells 4-5 μm long and 6-8 μm in diameter (Fig. 2B & C) and monomerous construction in a system of a single group of filaments with cell fusions (Fig. 2D) that are parallel to the substrate and giving rise to groups of vertical cells (Fig. 2E). Cells in the central area

    are 5-10 μm long and 5-20 μm in diameter and perithallial cells measuring 5-10 μm long and 3-7 μm in diameter.

    Multiporate tetrasporangial conceptacles (Fig. 3A), high and rounded, with external diameter size measuring 300-335 μm (Fig. 3B & C), rosettes in surface view formed by six or seven cells that lie around the pores (Fig. 3D). The chambers of conceptacles measure 90-200 μm long and 195-330 μm in diameter, showing no collumela with 4-6 cell layers above them and with the presence of apical plugs in pores with 2 cell layers lining the pore (Fig. 3B).

    Ecological distribution. L. steneckii was found in Ponto Oeste in the subtidal zone to 2 m depth, typically on the skeletons of the stony coral Mussismilia hartii.

    Family Corallinaceae Subfamily Mastophoroideae

      >  Pneophyllum conicum (Dawson) Keats, Chamberlain and Baba (Figs 4 & 5)

    Basionym. Hydrolithon conicum E. Y. Dawson 1960, p. 27.

    Holotype specimen. (E. Y. Dawson, Nov 19, 1953, Dawson 12148). This material was listed by Dawson (1960) as being in the herbarium of the Baudette Foundation, with an isotype in the herbarium of the A. Hancock Foundation but all the material are now housed in the Herbaria of UC Berkeley.

    Type locality. Intertidal reef at Binners Cove, Isla Socorro, Revillagigedo Archipelago, Mexico.

    Specimens examined. Recife de Fora, Bahia, Feb 27, 2007 (RB 475144, RB 517933, RB 517934, RB 517935, RB 517936).

    Description. Plants non-geniculate with an encrusting

    growth form (Fig. 4A); crust up to 100 mm in diameter, thalli thickness 90-560 μm that do not seem to build up in layers. Dense trichocytes present in surface view (Fig. 4B) and germination disc composed of eight cells (Fig. 4C). Monomerous organization with a central area consisting of a thick layer of filaments (Fig. 4D) with cells 2-3 times as long as they are wide, 15-30 μm long and 10-15 μm in diameter and peripheral cells of 5-15 μm long and 6-10 μm in diameter. Epithelial cells are elliptical to rounded and measure 5-10 μm long and 6-10 μm in diameter, abundant cell fusions and secondary pits absent. Trichocytes are arranged in circular patches at the surface and appear as horizontal fields in vertical section, 20-35 μm long and 10-20 μm in diameter.

    Uniporate tetrasporangial conceptacle chambers are elliptical, 65-90 μm long and 230-390 μm in diameter, with the roof 5-11 cells thick (Fig. 5A). The floor of the conceptacle chamber is 3-4 cells below the level of the surrounding thalli. The conceptacle roof is formed from filaments that are both interspersed among the sporangial initials and peripheral to them. The pore canal is lined by papillae cells which project slightly into the canal, and a broad central collumela is present in mature conceptacles. Tetraspores are zonately arranged, 55-60 μm long and 25-40 μm in diameter. They are restricted to the conceptacle periphery.

    Female (Fig. 5B & C) and carposporangial conceptacles (Fig. 5D) are small and inconspicuous, 45-90 μm long and 90-125 μm in diameter; carposporangonial conceptacle roofs are formed only from filaments located peripheral to the fertile area. The initiation of a carpogonial conceptacle begins when groups of subepithellial initials elongate, forming a small disc of cell sat the thalli surface, which begin to shed an epithelial layer (Fig. 5B). Cells

    at the centre of the disc elongated less than those at the periphery, and are more densely staining. These are the carpogonial branch initials. The cells at the periphery of the disc elongate, divide, and produce filaments that form the walls and roof of the conceptacle. The filaments forming the first few layers adjacent to the carpogonial branch initials curve inwards, and continue dividing to form the roof of conceptacle. Carpogonial branches occur across the chamber floor. Trichogynes often form a tangled mass that protrude from the pore of the female conceptacle (Fig. 5C). Carposporangia develop in carpogonial conceptacles after presumed karyogamy. Conceptacles containing carposporangia have chambers that are half dumb-bell shaped, and measure 95-110 μm long and 195-215 μm in diameter (Fig. 5D). The pore canal is limited with small filaments that projected as papillae into the pore canal. The fusion cell is discoid and curved upwards near its edge. Gonimoblast filaments are borne peripherally, and originate from the lower edge of the fusion cell. Male plants were not seen.

    Ecological distribution. This is the first report of the occurrence of this species in the Atlantic Ocean. The samples were collected to a depth of 4 m. This species grows over live coral (Mussismilia hartii e Millepora sp.) or, less commonly, on other live corals, rocks and dead coral skeletons.

    DISCUSSION

    The taxonomic history of the genus Lithothamnion (subfamily Melobesioideae) is full of conflicts in their delimitation from other genera in the same subfamily (Harvey et al. 2003). However, modern anatomical analyses along with molecular data have delimited this genera and other related (Harvey et al. 2003). Anatomically, is characterized by the presence of flared cells (Fig. 2B), adjacent filament cells united by cell fusions, absence of secondary pit connections and multiporate tetra / bisporangial conceptacles, with plugs in the pores (e.g., Wilks and Woelkerling 1995, Harvey et al. 2003). Lithothamnion is distinguished from other genera of Melobesioideae by the absence of arborescent or unconsolidated growth forms, and absence of haustoria. The thallus has a monomerous construction, and flared epithelial cells. Initial vegetative cells equal in height and width or elongated in their immediate inward thallus derivates and tetra / bisporangial conceptacles develop from the initial cells (e.g., Wilks and Woelkerling 1995).

    There are 429 species (and infraspecific) names in the database at present, of which 84 have been flagged as currently accepted taxonomically (Guiry and Guiry 2012). Only few new species of the genus, such as Lithothamnion carpoklonion Athanasios et Ballentine has been recently described (Athanasiadis and Ballantine 2011); review their taxonomic status, like in Lithothamnion crispatum

    [Table 1.] Comparison of features of Lithothamnion steneckii with closely related species reported in recent studies

    label

    Comparison of features of Lithothamnion steneckii with closely related species reported in recent studies

    Hauk (Basso et al. 2011) or represents a range extension (Henriques et al. 2012). There are a group of features reliable to delimit species within the genus.

    The characteristics used to determine the species (e.g., Wilks and Woelkerling 1995, Harvey et al. 2003, Woelkerling et al. 2005, Wynne 2005, Da Nobrega Farias et al. 2010, Athanasiadis and Ballantine 2011, Basso et al. 2011, Table 1 in Henriques et al. 2012), do not allow our material of Lithothamnion to be assigned to any known species. Nonetheless, Lithothamnion muelleri Lenormand ex Rosanoff and L. crispatum known for Brazilian shores are discussed here for comparative purposes to delimit our new species. L. steneckii is characterized by sunken pores forming a rosette composed of 6-7 cells at the surface of conceptacles. In L. crispatum the pores of the tetrasporangial conceptacles are marked by areas with depressions seen around the region of the pores. These depressions do not occur on the pores of the tetrasporangial conceptacles of L. muelleri which possess pores aligned with the surface of the conceptacle. Besides this, L. steneckii, has both elongated and short cells along the margins of the pore canal, as seen in L. crispatum, which contrasts with L. muelleri, where the cells along the margin of the pore canal do not differ in size and shape from the other filament cells of the roof of the conceptacle. Characteristics such as the diameter of the conceptacles reinforce the differences between these species. As such L. steneckii has the least variation in the size of the conceptacle than other species (Table 1).

    Pneophyllum is segregated from Fosliella and Spongites by the 8-celled sporeling and by trichocytes that are intercalary in first-order filaments. However, studies are needed to verify the discreteness of these genera, and additional data may come from studies of reproductive features. There are 26 species (and infraspecific) names in the database at present, of which 18 have been flagged as currently accepted taxonomically (Guiry and Guiry 2012). However, in many of the known species ontogenetic and molecular studies are urgently needed to evaluate the limits between species and related genera. The material collected in Brazil represents a range extension of P. conicum from the Eastern Pacific into the Atlantic Ocean who is more than 6,000 km in distance. This is consistent with the series of new records and species that have been recently found along the coast of Brazil (e.g., Nunes et al. 2008, Villas-Boas et al. 2009, Amado-Filho et al. 2010, Da Nobrega Farias et al. 2010, Bahia et al. 2011, Henriques et

    [Table 2.] Comparison Pneophyllum conicum vegetative and reproductive anatomical features from recent studies

    label

    Comparison Pneophyllum conicum vegetative and reproductive anatomical features from recent studies

    al. 2012) when a proper and detailed analysis is made of the coralline algae flora (Creed et al. 2010).

    According to Keats et al. (1997), P. conicum is identifiable by the following characteristics: 1) monomerous thallus; 2) trichocyte arranged in circle at surface level and horizontal fields; 3) pore canal of the tetrasporangial conceptacles aligned by cells that are orientated more-orless parallel to the surface of the roof; 4) roof of the elevated conceptacles, slightly conical; 5) diameter of the chamber of the tetra / bisporangial conceptacles measuring 220-400 μm; 6) senescent conceptacles are not found buried in the thallus. The specimens collected in Arrecife de Fora have all the features of P. conicum studied and clearly show that this is a species with a very wide geographical distribution. The data of vegetative and reproductive anatomy of this alga were compared with other species of Pneophyllum: P. fragile (type species), Spongites fruticulosus (type species) and Paragonoiolithon conicum (Dawson) Adey, Townsend and Boykins (Table 2) and found consistent with the original description and very different from the other species and genera. However, in the present paper we describe the vegetative and reproductive anatomy of P. conicum and found some inconsistencies with the generic circumscription of the species because the position of the filaments near the pore seems to be more similar to what is described for Spongites than for Pneophyllum. But, positions of gonimoblast filaments are consistent with the generic circumscription. Analyses of the origin of tetrasporangial and carposporangial conceptacles are not clearly known and more research is needed in addition to records to support a transfer of this species to Spongites.

참고문헌
  • 1. Adey W. H., Townsend R. A., Boykins W. T. 1982 The crustose coralline algae (Rhodophyta: Corallinaceae) of the Hawaiian Islands. [Smithson. Contrib. Mar. Sci.] Vol.15 P.1-74 google
  • 2. Aguirre J., Perfectti F., Braga J. C. 2010 Integrating phylogeny, molecular clocks, and the fossil record in the evolution of coralline algae (Corallinales and Sporolithales, Rhodophyta). [Paleobiology] Vol.36 P.519-533 google
  • 3. Amado-Filho G. M., Maneveldt G. W., Pereira-Filho G. H., Manso R. C. C., Bahia R. G., Barros-Barreto M. B., Guimaraes S. M. P. B. 2010 Seaweed diversity associated with a Brazilian tropical rhodolith bed. [Cienc. Mar.] Vol.36 P.371-391 google
  • 4. Athanasiadis A., Ballantine D. L. 2011 Lithothamnion carpoklonion sp. nov. (Melobesioideae, Corallinales, Rhodophyta) from Puerto Rico, Caribbean Sea: an epiphytic encrusting coralline alga producing conceptacle protuberances. [Bot. Mar.] Vol.54 P.403-410 google
  • 5. Bahia R. G., Riosmena-Rodriguez R., Maneveldt G. W., Amado Filho G. M. 2011 Research note: first report of Sporolithon ptychoides (Sporolithales, Corallinophycidae, Rhodophyta) for the Atlantic Ocean. [Phycol. Res.] Vol.59 P.64-69 google
  • 6. Basso D., Rodondi G., Bressan G. 2011 A re-description of Lithothamnion crispatum and the status of Lithothamnion superpositum (Rhodophyta, Corallinales). [Phycologia] Vol.50 P.144-155 google
  • 7. Costa O. S., Attrill M. J., Pedrini A. G., De-Paula J. C. 2002 Benthic macroalgal distribution in coastal and offshore reefs at Porto Seguro Bay, Brazilian Discovery Coast. In Moosa, M. K., Soemodihardjo, S., Soegiarto, A., Romimohtarto, K., Nontji, A., Soekamo & Suharsono (Eds.) [Proc. 9th Int. Coral Reef Symp., Indonesian Institute of Sciences] P.499-507 google
  • 8. Creed M.,, Fujii M. T., Barreto M. B. de B., Guimaraes S. M. P. de B., Cassano V., Pereira S. M. B., Carvalho M. de F. de O., Khader S. 2010 Rhodophyceae. In Forzza, R. C. (Ed.) Catalogo de plantas e fungos do Brasil. Vol. 1. P.416-436 google
  • 9. Da Nobrega Farias J., Riosmena-Rodriguez R., Bouzon Z., Oliveira E. C., Horta P. A. 2010 Lithothamnion superpositum (Corallinales; Rhodophyta): first description for the Western Atlantic or rediscovery of a species? [Phycol. Res.] Vol.58 P.210-216 google
  • 10. Dawson E. Y. 1960 Marine red algae of Pacific Mexico. Part 3. Cryptonemiales, Corallinaceae subf. [Melobesioideae. Pac. Nat.] Vol.2 P.3-125 google
  • 11. Garbary D. J. 1978 An introduction to the scanning electron microscopy of red algae. In Irvine, D. E. G. & Price, J. H. (Eds.) Modern Approaches to the Taxonomy of Red and Brown Algae. P.205-222 google
  • 12. Garbary D. J., Johansen H. W. 1982 Scanning electron microscopy of Corallina and Haliptilon (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta): surface features and their taxonomic implications. [J. Phycol.] Vol.18 P.211-219 google
  • 13. Guiry M. D., Guiry G. M. 2012 AlgaeBase. google
  • 14. Harvey A. S., Woelkerling W. J., Millar A. J. K. 2003 An account of the Hapalidiaceae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) in south-eastern Australia. [Aust. Syst. Bot.] Vol.16 P.647-698 google
  • 15. Henriques M. C., Villas-Boas A., Riosmena-Rodriguez R., Figueiredo M. A. O. 2012 New records of rhodolith-forming species (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) from deep water in Esp?rito Santo State, Brazil. [Helgol. Mar. Res.] Vol.66 P.219-231 google
  • 16. Holmgren P. K., Holmgren N. H., Barnett L. C. 1990 Index Herbariorum. 8th ed. Part 1: The Herbaria of the World. Regnum Vegetabile. Vol. 120. P.704 google
  • 17. Horta P. A., Scherner F., Bouzon Z. L., Riosmena-Rodrigues R., Oliveira E. C. 2011 Morphology and reproduction of Mesophyllum erubences (Foslie) Me. Lemoine (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) from Southern Brazil. [Rev. Bras. Bot.] Vol.34 P.125-134 google
  • 18. Johansen H. W. 1981 Coralline algae: a first synthesis. P.239 google
  • 19. Keats D. W., Chamberlain Y. M., Baba M. 1997 Pneophyllum conicum (Dawson) comb. nov. (Rhodophyta, Corallinaceae), a widespread Indo-Pacific non-geniculate coralline alga that overgrows and kills live coral. [Bot. Mar.] Vol.40 P.263-279 google
  • 20. Mariath R., Riosmena-Rodriguez R., Figueiredo M. A. de O. Succession of non geniculate coralline red algae (Corallinales and Peyssonneliales, Rhodophyta) in coral reefs exposed to physical disturbance in the southwestern Atlantic. google
  • 21. McNeill J., Barrie F. R., Burdet H. M., Demouline V., Hawksworth D. L., Marhold K., Nicolson D. H., Prado J., Silva P. C., Skog J. E., Wiersema J. H., Turland N. J. 2006 International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code). Adopted by the Seventeenth International Botancial Congress Vienna, Austria, July 2005. P.568 google
  • 22. Moura C. W. N., Kraus J. E., Cordeiro-Marino M. 1997 Metodologia para obtencao de cortes histologicos com historresina e coloracao com azul de toluidina O para algas coralinaceas (Rhodophyta, Corallinales). [Hoehnea] Vol.24 P.17-27 google
  • 23. Nunes J. M. de C., Guimaraes S. M. P. de B., Donnangelo A., Farias J., Horta P. A. 2008 Aspectos taxonomicos de tres especies de coralinaceas nao geniculadas do litoral do estado da Bahia, Brasil. [Rodriguesia] Vol.59 P.75-86 google
  • 24. Steneck R. S. 1986 The ecology of coralline algal crusts: convergent patterns and adaptive strategies. [Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.] Vol.17 P.273-303 google
  • 25. Villas-Boas A. B., Riosmena-Rodriguez R., Amado-Filho G. M., Maneveldt G. W., Figueiredo M. A. de O. 2009 Rhodolith-forming species of Lithophyllum (Corallinales: Rhodophyta) from Esp?rito Santo State, Brazil, including the description of L. depressum sp. nov. [Phycologia] Vol.48 P.237-248 google
  • 26. Wilks K. M., Woelkerling W. J. 1995 An account of southern Australian species of Lithothamnion (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta). [Aust. Syst. Bot.] Vol.8 P.549-583 google
  • 27. Woelkerling W. J., Gustavsen G., Myklebost H. E., Prestø T., Sasted S. M. 2005 The coralline red algal herbarium of Mikael Foslie: revised catalogue with analyses. [Gunneria] Vol.77 P.1-625 google
  • 28. Woelkerling W. J., Irvine L. M., Harvey A. S. 1993 Growthforms in non-geniculate coralline red algae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta). [Aust. Syst. Bot.] Vol.6 P.277-293 google
  • 29. Wynne M. J. 2005 A checklist of benthic marine algae of the tropical and subtropical western Atlantic: second revision. [Nova Hedwigia] Vol.129 P.1-152 google
OAK XML 통계
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Location of the protected area of Parque Marinho do Recife de Fora, Bahia, Brazil, the rectangle delimits the park’s area.
    Location of the protected area of Parque Marinho do Recife de Fora, Bahia, Brazil, the rectangle delimits the park’s area.
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Lithothamnion steneckii. (A) Holotype material of Lithothamnion steneckii sp. nov. (arrow) found on the skeleton of the coral Mussismilia hartii. (B) Transversal section showing flared epithaliall cells (arrow) and cell fusions. (C) Close up of the flared epithelial cells (arrow) and cell fusions. (D) Longitudinal section showing the edge or the plant and monomerous arrangement (arrow). (E) Longitudinal section showing the middle area of the plant and monomerous arrangement. Scale bars represent: A, 1 cm; B, D & E, 100 μm; C, 16 μm.
    Lithothamnion steneckii. (A) Holotype material of Lithothamnion steneckii sp. nov. (arrow) found on the skeleton of the coral Mussismilia hartii. (B) Transversal section showing flared epithaliall cells (arrow) and cell fusions. (C) Close up of the flared epithelial cells (arrow) and cell fusions. (D) Longitudinal section showing the edge or the plant and monomerous arrangement (arrow). (E) Longitudinal section showing the middle area of the plant and monomerous arrangement. Scale bars represent: A, 1 cm; B, D & E, 100 μm; C, 16 μm.
  • [ Fig. 3. ]  Lithothamnion steneckii. (A) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showing tetrasporangial multipore conceptacle in surface view (arrow). (B) Longitudinal section of roof structure showing the pore plug delimited by two cells different from cell layers in size and shape (arrow). (C) SEM of a chamber of multiporate conceptacle (arrow). (D) SEM showing surface view of pore of a multiporate tetrasporangial conceptacle with rosettes formed (arrow). Scale bars represent: A-C, 80 μm; D, 30 μm.
    Lithothamnion steneckii. (A) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) showing tetrasporangial multipore conceptacle in surface view (arrow). (B) Longitudinal section of roof structure showing the pore plug delimited by two cells different from cell layers in size and shape (arrow). (C) SEM of a chamber of multiporate conceptacle (arrow). (D) SEM showing surface view of pore of a multiporate tetrasporangial conceptacle with rosettes formed (arrow). Scale bars represent: A-C, 80 μm; D, 30 μm.
  • [ Fig. 4. ]  Pneophyllum conicum. (A) Specimen with encrusting growth form (arrow). (B) Superficial view showing one tricocysts field (arrows). (C) Superficial view showing one germination disc (arrow). (D) Longitudinal section showing monomerous growth (arrow). Scale bars represent: A, 1.5 cm; B, 1 cm; C & D, 200 μm.
    Pneophyllum conicum. (A) Specimen with encrusting growth form (arrow). (B) Superficial view showing one tricocysts field (arrows). (C) Superficial view showing one germination disc (arrow). (D) Longitudinal section showing monomerous growth (arrow). Scale bars represent: A, 1.5 cm; B, 1 cm; C & D, 200 μm.
  • [ Fig. 5. ]  Pneophyllum conicum. (A) Tetrasporangial conceptacle showing tetraspores (arrow). (B & C) Early stage of development of the female conceptacle (arrows). (D) Carposporphyte conceptacle (arrow). Scale bars represent: A-D, 80 μm.
    Pneophyllum conicum. (A) Tetrasporangial conceptacle showing tetraspores (arrow). (B & C) Early stage of development of the female conceptacle (arrows). (D) Carposporphyte conceptacle (arrow). Scale bars represent: A-D, 80 μm.
  • [ Table 1. ]  Comparison of features of Lithothamnion steneckii with closely related species reported in recent studies
    Comparison of features of Lithothamnion steneckii with closely related species reported in recent studies
  • [ Table 2. ]  Comparison Pneophyllum conicum vegetative and reproductive anatomical features from recent studies
    Comparison Pneophyllum conicum vegetative and reproductive anatomical features from recent studies
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.