Cost-Effectiveness of Converting Fish Waste into Liquid Fertilizer
- DOI : 10.5657/FAS.2011.0230
- Author: Kim Joong Kyun
- Organization: Kim Joong Kyun
- Publish: Fisheries and aquatic sciences Volume 14, Issue3, p230~233, 30 Sep 2011
To determine the cost-effectiveness of converting fish waste into liquid fertilizer, this study analyzed the production of 3 L of liquid fertilizer from the fermentation of fish waste. The total product cost of the fertilizer was calculated to be $165.26 for a one-batch operation. If the seed culture was repeated five times, the total product cost could be reduced to $36.39/L. According to this analysis, the reutilization of fish waste as liquid fertilizer was not particularly economically attractive at present, and plant-scale production would be necessary for commercialization. This is the first cost-effectiveness analysis of the bioconversion of fish waste into liquid fertilizer.
Cost-effectiveness , Bioconversion , Fish wastes , Liquid fertilizer
Fish consumption continues to increase steadily worldwide and seafood is gaining in popularity because of its health benefits. At the same time, large amounts of fish waste are being generated, mostly from the industrial processing of fish. These large quantities of fish waste have not been utilized efficiently, and the disposal of fish waste can have large negative impacts on local environments. Unutilized fish waste is often disposed of by landfill or incineration, or by dumping into the sea. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find ecologically acceptable means for reutilizing fish waste.
Conventional methods for reutilization include ensilation and the production of high-protein meal used in animal feeds (Faid et al., 1997). Composting has also been suggested as a viable solution to the problem of fish waste disposal (Liao et al., 1997), and fermentation has been studied as a means of producing fish protein for use in animal feed (Hassan and Heath, 1986; Faid et al., 1997). Yeasts and/or lactic acid bacteria are used to ferment fish waste and to remove odor. Furthermore, shrimp waste ensilation is conducted as a preservation method and to allow for the recovery of value-added byproducts such as chitin (Cira et al., 2002) and cartenoids (Sachindra et al., 2007). In recent years, the use of the acid hydrolysis of fish waste has been studied to produce low-cost nutrients for the production of lactic acid (Gao et al., 2006), and low-cost protein sources have been produced by ensiling hydrolyzed fish viscera to obtain an adequate medium for lactic acid bacteria (Vazquez et al., 2008).
Some fish waste is also reutilized for fishmeal production (Keller, 1990; Hall, 1992); however, this process is costly and the heat required for drying makes the fish meal less digestible (Yamamoto et al., 2005). Therefore, new biological-fermentation techniques have been proposed to process fish waste inexpensively (Yamamoto et al., 2004, 2005), since some additional waste can be generated during the fishmeal manufacturing process (Yano et al., 2008). Yamamoto et al. (2004) presented a new low-cost fermentation technique using
Aspergillus awamorithat could be applicable to fish waste processing, and Yano et al. (2008) reported a fermentation technique that improves the quality of fishmeal from lipid-rich fish waste. The fast fermentation of squid-processing by-products for low-salt fish sauce production has been also reported (Xu et al., 2008).
Organic wastes have been found to contain compounds capable of promoting plant growth (Day and Katterman, 1992) and seafood processing wastewater does not contain known toxic or carcinogenic materials, unlike other types of municipal and industrial effluents (Afonso and Borquez, 2002). Considering these findings, the fermented broth of fisheries waste could be a valuable resource for agriculture. Recently, some studies have examined the reutilization of biodegraded fisheries-waste products as liquid fertilizer (Kim and Lee, 2009; Kim et al., 2010; Dao and Kim, 2011). In Korea, many restaurants specialize in sliced raw fish, and large amounts (approximately 2,100 t/day) of fish waste are generated every day (Kim et al., 2010). For practical reutilization of this fish waste as liquid fertilizer, the feasibility of commercialization must be evaluated. Therefore, in this study, the cost-effectiveness of the bioconversion of fish waste into liquid fertilizer in a 5-L reactor was demonstrated.
This study used five potential fish-waste-degrading bacteria isolated from the viscera of earthworms:
Brevibacillus agri, Bacillus cereus, two species of Bacillus licheniformis, and Brevibacillus parabrevis(Kim et al., 2010). Each strain was separately cultivated and combined on a 1:1 even weight basis, and the mixed cells were used as an inoculum for the 5-L reactor experiment. Each pure strain was maintained on a 1.5% nutrient agar plate at 4℃ until used and was transferred to a fresh agar plate every 2 weeks. At the same time, the potential degrading ability of each pure culture was also examined on 1% skim milk agar for proteolysis and on 3.215% spirit blue agar for lipolysis. All agar plates were incubated at 45℃ until a change in color or a clear zone around each colony appeared explicitly.
The scale-up characteristics of fish-waste biodegradation were examined in a 5-L ribbon-type reactor using six ribbon-type blades for better mixing effect, as described in a previous study (Dao and Kim, 2011). The fish waste used in this study was collected from a local restaurant specializing in sliced raw fish. The mixture of viscera, heads, tails, and bones was cut to a size of 1 cmΧ 1 cm or less and autoclaved at 121℃ for 20 min. After autoclaving, fish oil was removed from the fish wastes by flowing hot water over the fish wastes under a clean bench. A 2 kg wet weight portion was introduced into a 5-L reactor after the supernatant was decanted.
The mixed microorganisms (5,000 mg/L) were inoculated into the reactor filled with sterile fish wastes (2 kg) and 1 L distilled water (DW) under aseptic conditions. The reaction temperature and agitation speed of the reactor were maintained at 45±0.5ºC and 75±2 rpm, respectively. Air (1 L/min) was passed through a 0.2-μm membrane filter paper prior to being introduced into the reactor. Ten-fold diluted ‘Antifoam 204’ was used when severe foaming occurred during biodegradation. Discharging air was passed through two consecutive 1-L flasks containing 10-N NaOH to avoid contamination from outer foreign microorganisms. To collect the evaporated water loaded in the discharging air, the two flasks were placed in ice. At each sampling time, the flasks filled with the condensed water were exchanged with fresh ones, and the same amount of sterile DW was supplemented into the reactor to maintain the moisture content of the fish waste (45 to 60%) during the bioconversion. Samples were taken periodically from three different locations.
The cost of production of liquid fertilizer in a 5-L reactor was assessed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the bioconversion of fish waste for reutilization. Estimation was based on the preparation of microorganisms and fish waste, the biodegradation of fish waste for 96 h, the packing and preservation of the biodegraded product, and a waste-treatment credit. Costs of the transportation of fish waste, electricity, water, labor, bottling, and packing were based on current prices in Korea. The costs of chemicals for culture and preservation were estimated according to the prices offered by Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA).
The greater part of the suspended fish waste was degraded during the biodegradation in a 5-L reactor, and the most active biodegradation of fish waste occurred at around 96 h with the appearance of a pleasant smell. This reaction rate would be retarded without the autoclave pretreatment, since the preservation of fish waste in the restaurant was not adequate to prevent the process of putrefaction. In a previous study (Dao and Kim, 2011), the following results were obtained: a 96-h culture of fish waste medium had comparable fertilizing ability to commercial fertilizers and could be prevented from putrefying for 6 months at room temperature by the addition of 1% lactate. These findings were based on the estimation of the cost of producing liquid fertilizer from fish waste.
The cost of the liquid fertilizer production was calculated and is tabulated in Table 1. To degrade 2 kg of fish waste, 15 g of mixed microorganisms were prepared, and 1.68 L of liquid fertilizer was finally produced after 96-h biodegradation. The costs of packing and preservation of the culture medium of fish waste as a final product were calculated to be $0.24 and $0.05, respectively. In this calculation, the period of circulation in the market for liquid fertilizer was assumed to be 6 months (Kim et al., 2010). The total cost of a one-batch operation was calculated to be $165.26. In this calculation, installation (e.g., air compressor, reactor, probes) fees were not con-
sidered with running costs, since such machinery can be used semi-permanently. As shown in Table 1, the costs ($130.16) of the preparation of seed microorganisms accounted for 78.8% of the total cost. In actual operation, the final culture medium containing mixed microorganisms would be used as the seed culture for successive biodegradation under conditions of no contamination, since there was no bacterial antagonist among the five microorganisms used in this study (Kim et al., 2010). Under this situation, the change in the mixed-cell population was reflected by the specific growth rate of each species. As a result, significant changes in cell population would not occur in five successive uses. If the prepared cells are used five times, the total cost is reduced to $36.39/L. In addition, labor charges can be reduced remarkably when an automatic cell-culture system is used, as would be required for plant-scale production. Currently, the prices of the high-quality liquid fertilizers circulated in the domestic market are in the range of $16.7-41.7/L. This indicates that the production of liquid fertilizer from fish waste is not particularly economically attractive. However, this study did not consider the economic effects of the overall environmental improvement resulting from the treatment of fish waste. Additionally, the cost of disposing of fish waste will increase remarkably after 2012, when the dumping of waste into the sea will be prohibited in Korea according to the London Convention (International Maritime Organization, 2006). As a result, the economic effects are greater than those calculated. Also, large-scale production can further reduce the total cost, since larger installations have advantages resulting from economies of scale (Amigun and von Blottnitz, 2007). For practical commercialization, plant-scale production has to be undertaken.
[Table. 1] Calculation of average costs for one-batch bioconversion of fish wastes into liquid-fertilizer in a 5-L reactor