검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
Patterns in solute chemistry of six inlet streams to Lake Hovsgol,Mongolia
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
Patterns in solute chemistry of six inlet streams to Lake Hovsgol,Mongolia
KEYWORD
dissolved organic matter , grazing , Lake Hovsgol , permafrost , watershed
  • INTRODUCTION

    Mongolia has one of lowest population densities in the world (2 individuals/km2) (United Nations Population Division 2006). Lake Hovsgol is one of the most important sources of freshwater in Mongolia, holding about 70 percent of its surface freshwater. Lake Hovsgol is a large and deep tectonic lake (surface area = 2,760 km2, zmax = 262 m)and is part of the Baikal Rift system (Goulden et al. 2006).The lake’s watershed occupies an area of 4,920 km2; the outflow from the lake, the Eg River, flows eastward into the Selenge River and into Lake Baikal. An important historical characteristic of Lake Hovsgol and its watershed has been the general absence of anthropogenic impacts, resulting in pristine water quality. Recently, however, there has been increasing concern regarding the impacts of livestock grazing and climate change in the watershed. More than 90 streams enter Lake Hovsgol, but only between 20 and 25 of these have substantial discharge (Myagmarjav and Davaa 1999). Further details on Lake Hovsgol and its watershed are in Goulden et al. (2006).

    The Lake Hovsgol watershed is at the southern edge of the Central Asian continuous permafrost zone (Brown et al. 1995). The major biomes in the watershed are taiga forest and steppe grassland. Permafrost commonly occurs in the watershed but varies spatially. Trends in climate and changes in permafrost in the watershed are similar to results from other studies showing warming and thawing of permafrost in northern latitudes (Osterkamp and Romanovsky 1999, Osterkamp and Jorgenson 2006).

    Compared to the western side of the basin, the streams on the east side of the lake are larger and have more continuous flow into the lake. As part of a comprehensive long-term biogeochemistry research program, we selected six stream valleys on the eastern shore of Lake Hovsgol in which to monitor stream solute chemistry. This paper summarizes some patterns in spatial variation in stream chemistry and the influence of watershed characteristics that may affect patterns in solute chemistry of inlet streams to Lake Hovsgol. Understanding patterns in other watershed attributes and whether they are related to differences in livestock grazing pressure is an important focus of ongoing research in the watershed. Thus increased understanding of the biogeochemistry of Lake Hovsgol and continued monitoring are needed to better evaluate the effects of climate change and other anthropogenic disturbances.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

      >  Study area

    The Lake Hovsgol watershed (Fig. 1) is located in a remote region of Mongolia and hence there were considerable challenges for conducting all aspects of this study including sample collection and analyses. However, the importance of this region, not only to Mongolia but also to East Asia as a whole, and its unique situation with respect to nomadic grazing and climate change, make it imperative to continue the ongoing efforts in research, training, establishing an ecological database, and begin-

    ning to understand hydrology and biogeochemistry of this watershed (Tsogtbaatar and Goulden 2000).

    There is considerable variation in size and grazing intensity among the six sub-watersheds we studied (Table 1). The stream valleys ranged from the heavily grazed northern valleys, Turag and Shagnuul; central Noyon and Sevsuul with moderate grazing; and southernmost Dalbay and Borsog with little or no grazing pressure. Forest cover in this area is composed almost exclusively of larch (Larix sibirica), with very few other tree species present. Shrubs are abundant in the downstream area of each valley and the river channels are not always well defined while the upper areas of the sub-watersheds have steeper slopes and well defined stream channels. Mosses and cool season sedges such as Kobresia sibirica and K. Bellardii, which are characteristic of Mongolia’s alpine tundra (Hilbig 1995), contributed most of the plant biomass in the riparian zone of the ungrazed Borsog and Dalbay valleys. Carex duriuscula, Leymus chinensis, Potentilla anserine, and Plantago depressa, indicators of overgrazing, are dominant species in plant communities in Sevsuul, Shagnuul and Turag valleys (Ariuntsetseg personal communication). Percent cover values for total lichens, moss, and plants varied among the sites, and ranged between 70 and 95 percent, but decreased with increased grazing intensity. The estimated bare ground cover generally showed the opposite pattern, and ranged from 60 to 6 percent.

    Common bedrock types in the Lake Hovsgol region include Pliocene basalts and Devonian granosyenite (Batkhishig 2006). The soils in the study watersheds have a range of pH values, from 5.1 to 7.0, a wide range of cation exchange capacities (9.3-70.8 meq/100 g), and a wide range of percent base saturation (38.3-82.9) (Table 2).

      >  Climate

    The Lake Hovsgol watershed receives more than 70 percent of its annual precipitation from May to October, with winters being dry and very cold (typical mid-winter temperature < -20°C). The total annual precipitation during 2003 to 2005 ranged from 241 to 412 mm (average 308 mm), with most of the precipitation occurring during July and August. There is evidence that climate change may be occurring more intensively in northern Mongolia than in other regions of Mongolia (Namkhaijantsan 2006). For example, the number of precipitation days (at

    [Table 1.] Descriptive characteristics of sub-watersheds in the Lake Hovsgol watershed: latitude longitude catchment area (km2) forested area in watershed (km2) elevation of upper reach sampling station (m) stream length (km) and grazing intensity

    label

    Descriptive characteristics of sub-watersheds in the Lake Hovsgol watershed: latitude longitude catchment area (km2) forested area in watershed (km2) elevation of upper reach sampling station (m) stream length (km) and grazing intensity

    [Table 2.] Selected mineral soil characteristics for each sub-watershed (Data from Batkhishig 2006)

    label

    Selected mineral soil characteristics for each sub-watershed (Data from Batkhishig 2006)

    least 2 mm of precipitation) has increased, but the average annual precipitation has not increased significantly. There has been a significant decrease in the number of frost days, indicating significant winter warming, and a significant increase in extremely hot days (Nandintsetseg et al. 2007). The overall increase in ambient temperatures and the longer growing season is potentially increasing evapotranspiration rates in the Hovsgol watershed.

      >  Livestock inventory

    Livestock numbers in the sub-watershed during the study period are shown in Table 3, and were used as the basis for assigning grazing intensity categories. Livestock in the grazed portions of the watershed included sheep, goats, yaks, cows, and horses. The number of livestock in the sub-watersheds decreased from north to south and provided a gradient of grazing intensity (highest in Turag and Shagnuul, moderate in Noyon and Sevsuul, and lowest in Dalbay and Borsog) that we examined the relationships to other variables including vegetation cover, permafrost, or indices of human activity in the sub-watersheds (Ariuntsetseg unpublished). The livestock survey also showed a general increasing trend in the

    [Table 3.] Number of livestock during 2003 to 2005 for each sub-watershed (sheep units)

    label

    Number of livestock during 2003 to 2005 for each sub-watershed (sheep units)

    [Table 4.] Number of families herding livestock during 2003 to 2005 for each sub-watershed

    label

    Number of families herding livestock during 2003 to 2005 for each sub-watershed

    number of livestock from 2003 to 2005, although not in every sub-watershed. Estimates of the number of families living in each sub-watershed based on on-site interviews are shown in Table 4. For example, during 2004, the number of families in each sub-watershed ranged from 17 to 22 for Turag (high grazing intensity) and from 0 to 2 for Borsog (low grazing intensity).

      >  Sampling sites

    Sub-watersheds were chosen to study the gradient of grazing intensity based upon livestock density (0-3,330 sheep units) (Table 3) and number of families (0-22) (Table 4) living within each sub-watershed. The number of livestock in each sub-watershed was obtained from results of surveys conducted of local families. For each sub-watershed stream, water samples from three locations, designated as upper, middle, and lower reach stations, were sampled for chemical analysis. Stream solute concentrations were compared among the sub-watersheds. Because grazing intensity at the upper elevation stations was minimal in all sub-watersheds, these sampling stations represented reference areas with respect to grazing impacts within each sub-watershed.

    Comparisons were also made using combined results from middle and lower reach stations in each sub-watershed to evaluate the effects of watershed characteristics such as grazing intensity (low, moderate, high) on solute chemistry. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons and linear regressions were performed on untransformed data using SAS ver. 8.2 (SAS 2002) and Statistica ver. 7 (StatSoft 2000).

      >  Chemical analyses

    Grab samples of streamwater were collected in pre-cleaned bottles during the summer period from 2003 to 2005 at the three stations in each stream valley. The upper stations in the upper part of each valley were selected above areas where livestock grazing might impact the streams. The middle and lower stations (near the lake) were selected in the grazing areas of each valley (Fig. 1). Water samples were filtered using 0.45 ㎛ membrane filters and shipped to the analytical laboratories by international courier. Stream pH was measured in the field with a TOA 20P pH meter (DKK-TOA, Tokyo, Japan). Water samples were collected once in 2003 and twice in 2004, and analyzed by the Research Center for Environmental Changes, Taiwan. Major anion concentrations (Cl-, SO42-, NO3- ) were determined using a Dionex ICS-90 ion chromatograph (Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) equipped with an AS9-HC column (Dionex Corp.). Major cation concentrations (NH4+, Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+) were measured using a Dionex ICS-1500 (Dionex Corp.) ion chromatograph equipped with a heated CS12A column (Dionex Corp.). Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration was measured using an O.I. Analytical 1010 TOC analyzer (O.I. Analytical, College Station, TX, USA). Laboratory QA/QC protocols were used such as blanks and duplicate sample analysis. A certified reference river water sample (NRC SLRS-4) was used as an independent reference sample with each batch of water samples. Total dissolved phosphorus (TDP) concentration was measured only during 2004 using persulfate digestion and the procedure of Menzel and Corwin (1965).

    In 2005 water samples were collected three times ? once each during early June, July, and August and were analyzed at the SUNY-ESF Biogeochemical Laboratory in Syracuse, NY. Prior to analyses, samples were refrigerated. Anion concentrations were measured using ion chromatography (DX-120; Dionex Corp.). Cation concentrations were determined using inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrophotometer (ICPOES, Perkin Elmer 3500DV; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). DOC was analyzed with a TOC analyzer (Dohrman Phoenix 8000; Teledyne-Tekmar, Mason, OH, USA). Total dissolved nitrogen (TDN) was measured using persulfate oxidation (Ameel et al. 1993) with an Auto Analyzer 3 using methods described by Mitchell et al. (2001). Dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) was calculated by subtracting the concentrations of NH4-N and NO3-N from that of TDN. The Biogeochemical Laboratory at SUNY?ESF follows extensive QA/QC procedures. Every analytical sample batch included calibration QC samples, detection limit QC samples, an analytical blank, and replicate analysis. The laboratory participates in the United States Geological Survey (USGS) audit program (Branch of Quality Systems, Standard Reference Sample Project) to ensure data quality.

    RESULTS

      >  Upper sampling station stream chemistry

    Among the stations with little to no grazing (upper stations), we found some differences in solute concentrations in the six streams. Average concentrations of Cl- tended to be higher in Turag and Sevsuul and ranged from 9.8 to 51.3 ㎛mol/L (Table 5). The average SO42- concentration at these stations ranged from 66 to 294 ㎛mol/L; Turag had the highest average SO42- concentration and Borsog and Noyon showed the next highest average SO42- concentrations of 150.5 and 139.9, respectively (Table 5). Average NO3- concentrations were low and ranged from undetectable to 2.6 ㎛mol/L (Table 5). Ammonium (NH4+) concentrations were also low and ranged from below 1.0 ㎛mol/L (near detection limit) to 9 ㎛mol/L. The distribution of NH4+ concentrations was highly skewed with 23 values out of 30 samples having NH4+ concentrations below the detection limit.

    Base cation concentrations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, and K+) were also variable among the upper stations; the average concentrations are summarized in Table 5. None of the differences among the upper stations in base cation concentration were statistically significant using Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison tests (P > 0.05).

    The northernmost and central streams (Turag and Shagnuul, Noyon and Sevsuul, respectively) showed generally higher DOC concentrations, although this difference was not consistent (Table 5). Average DOC concentrations ranged from 642 ㎛mol/L at Borsog to 1,180 ㎛mol/L at Shagnuul. Similar to the pattern for DOC, DON concentrations tended to be higher in the northern and central streams (Table 5). Overall, DON concentrations ranged from 16 to 46 ㎛mol/L (Table 5).

      >  Stream chemistry at the middle and lower stations

    We also found differences in stream chemistry among the streams at the middle and lower sampling stations (grouped by grazing intensity) (Table 6). Using Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparison tests, we found significant differences in nutrient concentrations for only a few solutes. For example, concentrations of Cl- were higher in streams with the highest grazing pressure (Turag and Shagnuul) (Table 6). Average concentrations of Ca2+, Mg2+, and SO42- were also highest in streams with the highest grazing intensity (Table 6). Average stream pH did not vary among the sites, and ranged from 7.7 to 8.0. Although we found some higher solute concentrations

    [Table 5.] Three-year average streamwater chemistry (μmol/L) at the upper sampling stations during 2003 to 2005 (mean ± standard error)

    label

    Three-year average streamwater chemistry (μmol/L) at the upper sampling stations during 2003 to 2005 (mean ± standard error)

    [Table 6.] Three-year average stream chemistry (μmol/L) at the lower and middle stations grouped by grazing intensity during 2003 to 2005 (mean ± standard error)

    label

    Three-year average stream chemistry (μmol/L) at the lower and middle stations grouped by grazing intensity during 2003 to 2005 (mean ± standard error)

    in the streams with the highest grazing intensity (Turag and Shagnuul), there were no large differences in average solute concentration between the low and moderate grazing sites. This was especially apparent in our results for DON and TDN (Table 6), where concentrations varied little among the streams grouped by grazing intensity. We did not find a statistically significantly difference in DOC concentration among sites with high, moderate, or low grazing intensity, but the average DOC concentration was highest at the high grazing intensity sites (Table 6). The average stream DOC concentrations were 847 ± 62, 868 ± 49, and 946 ± 88 (standard error) ㎛mol/L in the low, moderate, and high grazing intensity sites, respectively. The fraction of total dissolved N as DON ranged from 0.53 to 0.99, and showed no apparent pattern with grazing intensity or active layer thickness (Fig. 2).

    The correlation matrix between stream nutrient concentrations at the upper stations is shown in Table 7. At the least grazing-impacted sites (i.e. upper stations only), some of the more interesting relationships between nutrients included our finding that DOC concentrations were strongly correlated with DON and TDN concentrations (Fig. 3). We also found that DOC concentrations were negatively correlated to SO42- concentrations (P = 0.019), TDP concentrations were negatively correlated to

    [Table 7.] Correlation coefficients (r) between solute concentrations at the upper stations (only statistically significant relationships are shown; P-values in parenthesis)

    label

    Correlation coefficients (r) between solute concentrations at the upper stations (only statistically significant relationships are shown; P-values in parenthesis)

    pH (P = 0.030), and that TDP concentrations were positively correlated to DOC concentrations (P = 0.004). We found strong positive correlations between SO42- and Cl- concentrations (P < 0.001) and also between SO42- and NO3- concentrations (P < 0.001). Concentrations of base cations Mg2+, Na+, and K+ were generally positively related to each other (Table 7).

    DISCUSSION

      >  Differences among streams

    Many watershed attributes have been related to variation in stream chemistry such as geology (Dillon and Kirchner 1975, Newton et al. 1987, Holloway et al. 1998), influence of riparian zones (Lowrance et al. 1984), soil characteristics (Ka?a and Ka?a and Kopa?ek 2006), vegetation cover (Cronan et al. 1987, Lovett et al. 2004), topography and elevation (Lawrence et al. 2000, Sueker et al. 2001), and other variables. A wide variety of disturbances, including forest cutting (Bormann et al. 1968), agricultural activity (Lowrance et al. 1984), and livestock grazing (Schepers and Francis 1982, Belsky et al. 1999) are also known to affect stream chemistry. The small number of samples

    limited our ability to fully evaluate all the factors affecting the stream chemistry of these six sub-watersheds, but our results allow us to speculate that the most important factors affecting spatial patterns in stream chemistry in the Lake Hovsgol watershed likely include, in addition to livestock grazing, geologic characteristics, soil type, and thickness of the active layer above permafrost.

    Carey (2003) compared soil water DOC concentrations between a north-facing area with permafrost and a south-facing area with only seasonal frost in the Granger Basin (Yukon) and found higher DOC concentrations in the area with permafrost. The suggestion of a decreasing trend in stream DOC concentration from the northern to the southern sub-watersheds in the Lake Hovsgol watershed is consistent with the patterns found in Alaskan forests underlain by permafrost (MacLean et al. 1999, Petrone et al. 2006). This pattern results from differences in hydrological flowpaths between areas with more extensive permafrost cover and areas with less extensive permafrost. In areas with less permafrost, water can infiltrate deeper into the soil profile; DOC adsorption occurring in the soil reduces the amount of DOC that can be moved to streams. Although we did not have access to data on active layer depths at each study site, short-term monitoring of permafrost in the six valleys showed that active layer thickness varies from 1.4 m in Dalbay valley in the south to 4.8 m in Turag valley in the north (Sharkhuu et al. 2007).

    Average stream DOC concentrations did not vary in a consistent pattern from the northern sites (such as in Turag and Shagnuul) to the southern sites (except Borsog, where we found the lowest DOC conentrations) in the Lake Hovsgol sub-watersheds. If grazing activity leads to lower vegetation cover and increased bare soil in riparian areas, there is the possibility of higher losses of dissolved organic matter from soil to the streams. Thus, we cannot ignore the possibility of livestock grazing influencing stream DOC or other solute concentrations in the Lake Hovsgol sub-watersheds where livestock are present. Certainly, further studies of the Hovsgol ecosystem, including impacts of animal grazing and permafrost thickness on streamwater chemistry, are needed.

    The impacts of animal grazing on stream temperature, sediment yield, and water quality have been well documented (e.g. Li et al. 1994). If livestock grazing were directly affecting solute concentrations in the streams, we would most likely expect increases in concentrations of TDP, NH4+, NO3- and Cl- (Schepers and Francis 1982). In the present study, we did not focus on riparian zone processes or possible differences in sediment deposition among streams with differing grazing intensities. Vegetation surveys, however, showed large differences in vegetation cover and bare ground exposure among the sub-watersheds. The role of bare ground exposure in affecting stream solute concentrations could be a focus of future research in the watershed. The suggestion that future work in the Lake Hovsgol watershed should include the quantification of sediment deposition processes in the streams also warrants further investigation.

    Our study has provided the first estimates of DON concentration in streams in the Lake Hovsgol watershed. The TDN pool in these streams was made up of mostly organic nitrogen, while inorganic N accounts for a small fraction of total N. On average, the proportion of total N as organic N did not seem to vary among the sub-watersheds, and ranged from 58% to 99% of the total dissolved N (Fig. 2). This measure of the importance of organic N is similar to results from other regions (McHale et al. 2000), especially in regions with little anthropogenic input of N (Perakis and Hedin 2000). Fig. 3 compares the relationship between DOC and DON for the sampling stations with minimal or no livestock (upper stations), and the relationship between DOC and DON in the streams with livestock. Between the data sets, there was no difference in the slope of this relationship (P > 0.05), indicating that the source of dissolved organic matter may not differ between the potentially least impacted upper stations and the middle and lower sampling stations.

    Moreover, research on the dynamics of DOC and DON transport in this watershed would be especially useful in helping to identify patterns related to climate change and possible effects of human activities in this region. One implication of our study is that as air temperature increases and permafrost active layer depths increase in this watershed, recently-thawed soils may act as a source of both dissolved inorganic and organic N to streams (Petrone et al. 2007). Understanding the relationship between soil C/N ratios and surface water chemistry will be required in future studies of the Lake Hovsgol watershed. Other studies have shown that soil characteristics, including soil C/N ratio, are a key variable in understanding differences in retention and export of nutrients, especially C and N (Currie et al. 1996, Aitkenhead-Peterson et al. 2005).

    CONCLUSION

    Lake Hovsgol is among the most pristine freshwater ecosystems in temperate regions. Our stream chemistry monitoring results show that more research is needed to better understand the patterns in dissolved solute concentrations in the study area. We can speculate that differences in solute concentrations among these streams can possibly be affected by livestock grazing, and also affected by the thickness of the permafrost active layer and general soil characteristics in the sub-watersheds. Our finding that stream DOC concentrations did not consistently vary from the northern (Turag and Shagnuul) to the southern sites (Dalbay and Borsog) demonstrates the importance of initiating further studies on soil and stream water chemistry and hydrological processes at Lake Hovsgol in this remote region in central Asia. Specifically, our results show that more research on characterization and dynamics of DOC and DON in soils, soil solution, stream water, and their hydrological linkages in this watershed will be especially useful in helping to identify important indicators and understand patterns in dissolved organic matter transformations, retention, and export related to climate change in this region.

참고문헌
  • 1. Aitkenhead-Peterson JA, Alexander JE, Clair TA 2005 Dissolved organic carbon and dissolved organic nitrogen export from forested watersheds in Nova Scotia: identifying controlling factors [Global Biogeochem Cycles] Vol.19 P.GB4016 google
  • 2. Ameel JJ, Axler RP, Owen CJ 1993 Persulfate digestion for determination of total nitrogen and phosphorus in low-nutrient waters [Am Environ Lab] Vol.1 P.1-11 google
  • 3. Batkhishig O, Goulden CE, Sitnikova T, Gelhaus J, Boldgiv B 2006 Soils of the Lake Hovsgol area and its watershed. In: The Geology Biodiversity and Ecology of Lake Hovsgol (Mongolia) P.93-114 google
  • 4. Belsky AJ, Matzke A, Uselman S 1999 Survey of livestock influences on stream and riparian ecosystems in the western United States [J Soil Water Conserv] Vol.54 P.419-431 google
  • 5. Bormann FH, Likens GE, Fisher DW, Pierce RS 1968 Nutrient loss accelerated by clear-cutting of a forest ecosystem [Science] Vol.159 P.882-884 google cross ref
  • 6. Brown J, Farrians OJ Jr, Heginbottom JA, Melnikov ES 1995 Circum-Arctic Map of Permafrost and Ground Ice Conditions. USGS Circum-Pacific Map Series Map CP-45 google
  • 7. Carey SK 2003 Dissolved organic carbon fluxes in a discontinuous permafrost subarctic alpine catchment [Permafrost Periglacial Process] Vol.14 P.161-171 google cross ref
  • 8. Cronan CS, Conlan JC, Skibinski S 1987 Forest vegetation in relation to surface water chemistry in the north branch of the Moose River Adirondack Park N.Y [Biogeochemistry] Vol.3 P.121-128 google cross ref
  • 9. Currie WS, Aber JD, McDowell WH, Boone RD, Magill AH 1996 Vertical transport of dissolved organic C and N under long-term amendments in pine and hardwood forests [Biogeochemistry] Vol.35 P.471-505 google cross ref
  • 10. Dillon PJ, Kirchner WB 1975 The effects of geology and land use on the export of phosphorus from watersheds [Water Res] Vol.9 P.135-148 google cross ref
  • 11. Goulden CE, Sitnikova T, Gelhaus J, Boldgiv B 2006 The Geology Biodiversity and Ecology of Lake Hovsgol. google
  • 12. Hilbig W 1995 The Vegetation of Mongolia google
  • 13. Holloway JM, Dahlgren RA, Hansen B, Casey WH 1998 Contribution of bedrock nitrogen to high nitrate concentrations in stream water [Nature] Vol.395 P.785-788 google cross ref
  • 14. Ka?a J, Kopa?ek J 2006 Impact of soil sorption characteristics and bedrock composition on phosphorus concentrations in two Bohemian forest lakes [Water Air Soil Pollut] Vol.173 P.243-259 google cross ref
  • 15. Lawrence GB, Lovett GM, Baevsky YH 2000 Atmospheric deposition and watershed nitrogen export along an elevational gradient in the Catskill Mountains New York [Biogeochemistry] Vol.50 P.21-43 google cross ref
  • 16. Li HW, Lamberti GA, Pearsons TN, Tait CK, Li JL, Buckhouse JC 1994 Cumulative effects of riparian disturbances along high desert trout streams of the John Day Basin Oregon [Trans Am Fish Soc] Vol.123 P.627-640 google cross ref
  • 17. Lovett GM, Weathers KC, Arthur MA, Schultz JC 2004 Nitrogen cycling in a northern hardwood forest: Do species matter? [Biogeochemistry] Vol.67 P.289-308 google cross ref
  • 18. Lowrance RR, Todd RL, Fail J Jr, Hendrickson O Jr, Leonard R, Asmussen L 1984 Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds [BioScience] Vol.34 P.374-377 google cross ref
  • 19. MacLean R, Oswood MW, Irons JG III, McDowell WH 1999 The effect of permafrost on stream biogeochemistry: a case study of two streams in the Alaskan (U.S.A.) taiga [Biogeochemistry] Vol.47 P.239-267 google cross ref
  • 20. McHale MR, Mitchell MJ, McDonnell JJ, Cirmo CP 2000 Nitrogen solutes in an Adirondack forested watershed: importance of dissolved organic nitrogen [Biogeochemistry] Vol.48 P.165-184 google cross ref
  • 21. Menzel DW, Corwin N 1965 The measurement of total phosphorus in seawater based on the liberation of organically bound fractions by persulfate oxidation [Limnol Oceanography] Vol.10 P.280-282 google cross ref
  • 22. Mitchell MJ, McHale PJ, Inamdar S, Raynal DJ 2001 Role of within-lake processes and hydrobiogeochemical changes over 16 years in a watershed in the Adirondack Mountains of New York State U.S.A [Hydrol Process] Vol.15 P.1951-1965 google cross ref
  • 23. Myagmarjav B, Davaa G 1999 Surface Water of Mongolia google
  • 24. Namkhaijantsan G, Goulden CE, Sitnikova T, Gelhaus J, Boldgiv B 2006 Climate and climate change of the Hovsgol region. In: The Geology Biodiversity and Ecology of Lake Hovsgol (Mongolia) P.63-76 google
  • 25. Nandintsetseg B, Greene JS, Goulden CE 2007 Trends in extreme daily precipitation and temperature near Lake Hovsgol Mongolia [Int J Climatol] Vol.27 P.341-347 google cross ref
  • 26. Newton RM, Weintraub J, April R 1987 The relationship between surface water chemistry and geology in the North Branch of the Moose River [Biogeochemistry] Vol.3 P.21-35 google cross ref
  • 27. Osterkamp TE, Jorgenson JC 2006 Warming of permafrost in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Alaska [Permafrost Periglacial Process] Vol.17 P.65-69 google cross ref
  • 28. Osterkamp TE, Romanovsky VE 1999 Evidence for warming and thawing of discontinuous permafrost in Alaska [Permafrost Periglacial Process] Vol.10 P.17-37 google cross ref
  • 29. Perakis SS, Hedin LO 2000 Nitrogen loss from unpolluted South American forests mainly via dissolved organic compounds [Nature] Vol.415 P.416-419 google cross ref
  • 30. Petrone KC, Jones JB, Hinzman LD, Boone RD 2006 Seasonal export of carbon nitrogen and major solutes from Alaskan catchments with discontinuous permafrost. [J Geophys Res] Vol.111 P.G02020 google cross ref
  • 31. Petrone KC, Hinzman LD, Shibata H, Jones JB, Boone RD 2007 The influence of fire and permafrost on sub-arctic stream chemistry during storms [Hydrol Process] Vol.21 P.423-434 google cross ref
  • 32. 2002 Statistical Analysis System for Windows google
  • 33. Schepers JS, Francis DD 1982 Chemical water quality of runoff from grazing land in Nebraska: I. Influence of grazing livestock [J Environ Qual] Vol.11 P.351-354 google cross ref
  • 34. Sharkhuu A, Sharkhuu N, Etzelmuller B, Heggem ESF, Nelson FE, Shiklomanov NI, Goulden CE, Brown J 2007 Permafrost monitoring in the Hovsgol mountain region Mongolia [J Geophys Res] Vol.112 P.F02S06 google cross ref
  • 35. 2000 Statistica google
  • 36. Sueker JK, Clow DW, Ryan JN, Jarrett RD 2001 Effect of basin physical characteristics on solute fluxes in nine alpine/subalpine basins Colorado USA [Hydrol Process] Vol.15 P.2749-2769 google cross ref
  • 37. Tsogtbaatar J, Goulden CE, Gosz JR, French C, Sprott P, White M 2000 Mongolia long term ecological research. In: The International Long Term Ecological Research Network P.28-29 google
  • 38. 2006 World population prospects: the 2006 revision google
OAK XML 통계
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Fig. 1. ]  Map showing location of the Lake Hovsgol watershed and streams in this study.
    Map showing location of the Lake Hovsgol watershed and streams in this study.
  • [ Table 1. ]  Descriptive characteristics of sub-watersheds in the Lake Hovsgol watershed: latitude longitude catchment area (km2) forested area in watershed (km2) elevation of upper reach sampling station (m) stream length (km) and grazing intensity
    Descriptive characteristics of sub-watersheds in the Lake Hovsgol watershed: latitude longitude catchment area (km2) forested area in watershed (km2) elevation of upper reach sampling station (m) stream length (km) and grazing intensity
  • [ Table 2. ]  Selected mineral soil characteristics for each sub-watershed (Data from Batkhishig 2006)
    Selected mineral soil characteristics for each sub-watershed (Data from Batkhishig 2006)
  • [ Table 3. ]  Number of livestock during 2003 to 2005 for each sub-watershed (sheep units)
    Number of livestock during 2003 to 2005 for each sub-watershed (sheep units)
  • [ Table 4. ]  Number of families herding livestock during 2003 to 2005 for each sub-watershed
    Number of families herding livestock during 2003 to 2005 for each sub-watershed
  • [ Fig. 2. ]  Box plot of the fraction of total dissolved nitrogen as dissolved organic nitrogen (DON/Total N) for the middle and lower sampling stations by grazing pressure. For each box whiskers and box outline represent the 5th 25th 75th and 95th percentiles. The median is shown as a solid line and the mean is shown as a dashed line.
    Box plot of the fraction of total dissolved nitrogen as dissolved organic nitrogen (DON/Total N) for the middle and lower sampling stations by grazing pressure. For each box whiskers and box outline represent the 5th 25th 75th and 95th percentiles. The median is shown as a solid line and the mean is shown as a dashed line.
  • [ Fig. 3. ]  (a) Relationship between concentration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in streamwater at the upper sampling stations. Equation for the best-fit regression line shown (r2 = 0.457). (b) Relationship between concentration of DOC and DON in streamwater at the middle and lower sampling stations. Equation for the best-fit regression line shown (r2 = 0.670).
    (a) Relationship between concentration of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) in streamwater at the upper sampling stations. Equation for the best-fit regression line shown (r2 = 0.457). (b) Relationship between concentration of DOC and DON in streamwater at the middle and lower sampling stations. Equation for the best-fit regression line shown (r2 = 0.670).
  • [ Table 5. ]  Three-year average streamwater chemistry (μmol/L) at the upper sampling stations during 2003 to 2005 (mean ± standard error)
    Three-year average streamwater chemistry (μmol/L) at the upper sampling stations during 2003 to 2005 (mean ± standard error)
  • [ Table 6. ]  Three-year average stream chemistry (μmol/L) at the lower and middle stations grouped by grazing intensity during 2003 to 2005 (mean ± standard error)
    Three-year average stream chemistry (μmol/L) at the lower and middle stations grouped by grazing intensity during 2003 to 2005 (mean ± standard error)
  • [ Table 7. ]  Correlation coefficients (r) between solute concentrations at the upper stations (only statistically significant relationships are shown; P-values in parenthesis)
    Correlation coefficients (r) between solute concentrations at the upper stations (only statistically significant relationships are shown; P-values in parenthesis)
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.