검색 전체 메뉴
PDF
맨 위로
OA 학술지
Hazardous Air Pollutants Emission Characteristics from Cement Kilns Co-burning Wastes
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
  • 비영리 CC BY-NC
ABSTRACT
Hazardous Air Pollutants Emission Characteristics from Cement Kilns Co-burning Wastes
KEYWORD
Bag filter , Cement kiln dust , Hazardous air pollutants , Heavy metals , Waste co-burning , Volatile organic compounds
  • 1. Introduction

    Cement manufacturing is an energy- and resource-intensive process requiring large amounts of raw materials and fuel. A cement plant consumes from 3,000 to 6,500 MJ of fuel per ton of clinker produced (electricity and transportation together add about 10% more to the total energy) depending on the raw materials and the process used.1) Cement production involves the burning of the intermediate clinker product in a kiln at higher temperature. The process requires temperatures of 2,000℃ in the main burner, 1,450℃ for the materials to make clinker, and 1,000℃?1,200℃ in the pre-calciner.

    In order to reduce the high-cost energy requirements for the decomposition of waste and by-products with high calorific value can be used as fuel in cement kilns (CKs). Some waste and by-products containing useful minerals such as calcium, silica, alumina, and iron can be used as raw materials in the kiln.2) Cement kilns offer the easiest option for destruction of unwanted organic wastes due to their high incineration temperature, large furnace area, longer residence time, and the alkaline environment inside the kiln.3) Burning of waste in CKs has various benefits such as destruction of waste from other industries, energy recovery, conservation of non-renewable resources and reduction of cement production cost.4,5) Wastes have long been used as alternative fuels and raw materials in CKs in Europe, Japan, USA, Canada, and Australia, and more recently in Korea. Fuel substitution in the European Union (EU) cement plants use an average of 12% wastes as alternative fuels and raw materials.6) The cement industry in Korea began burning waste from used tires since 1995, following which CKs were recognized as waste disposal facilities.7) The CKs in Korea use coal as the primary fuel also use waste as an auxiliary fuel to economize production.8) After a shift in waste management policy from landfill to reduction, recycling and safe and sanitary treatment of wastes have been a priority in Korea, and large amount of combustible waste has been burned in incinerators and CKs.

    Cement manufacturing causes environmental impacts at all stages, including emissions of airborne pollution (dust, gases), noise and vibrations, and damage to the countryside from quarrying. Various initiatives have been taken in the EU and USA to regulate the emission of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from CKs. The co-incineration of waste (hazardous and non-hazardous) in CKs is encouraged in the EU, and is currently regulated by the EU Directive2000/76/EC.9) U.S. EPA regulates HAPs from CKs by maximum achievable control technology regulation (MACT). In addition, CKs burning hazardous waste are regulated separately.10,11) The Asia-Pacific partnership (a government program including the cement industry in the USA, Japan, China, South Korea, Australia, and India) is working together on various issues, including emission management in the cement industry.12)

    In spite of worldwide efforts to reduce emissions from CKs, there exist limited literatures on HAP emissions from CKs burning wastes. This paper summarizes the HAP emission characteristics, transformation within the system, and the control efficiency achieved by the existing air pollution control devices (APCDs) in CKs co- burning waste. In addition, heavy metal speciation in cement kiln dust (CKD) and its potential fate in the environment are discussed.

    2. Experimental Methods

    Emission tests were carried out at three commercially-operating CKs co-burning waste as an auxiliary fuel. CKs tested consisted of a rotary kiln, spray tower, and bag filter (BF) arranged in a series for flue gas cleaning. The APCDs configuration is shown in Fig. 1. Dust, heavy metals (beryllium [Be], cadmium [Cd], chromium [Cr], arsenic [As], lead [Pb], nickel [Ni], zinc [Zn], mercury [Hg], and Hg speciation) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured. All parameters were sampled and analyzed before the BF and stack of each facility. Dust sampling and analysis were carried out according to the Korean standard test method. Heavy metals were sampled using the Korean standard test method and analyzed by U.S. EPA M-3050B, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS), method.

    Mercury and its speciation were sampled and analyzed by the Ontario hydro method. Isokinetic samplings were performed, and the flue gas withdrawn was passed through the filtration system followed by a series of impingers in an ice bath. Hgp was collected on the filter; Hg2+ was collected in three impingers with 1 N potassium chloride solution; and Hg0 was collected in an impinger containing 5% nitric acid and 10% peroxide solution and in three impingers containing a solution of 10% sulfuric acid and 4% potassium permanganate. Any remaining moisture was removed in the last impinger in a series containing silica gel. Samples were recovered, digested and analyzed using cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy Hg analyzer (RA915+, Lumex). Volatile organic compounds were sampled by U.S. EPA TO-17 (volatile organic sampling train [VOST] and carbon trap) and analyzed by U.S. EPA TO-17 (automated thermal desorption gas chromatography/mass spectrometry [ATD GC/MS]) method. Sampling and analysis methods are summarized in Table 1. All sampling tests and analyses were carried out several times at the same point to ensure their reliability.

    3. Results and Discussion

       3.1. Raw Materials, Fuel and Waste

    In addition to primary fuel-coal and oil; auxiliary fuel burned in the examined CKs included petroleum coke, fly ash, waste derived fuel (WDF), refuse plastic fuel (RPF), tire, rubber and textile. Ferrous material, pumice stone, molding sand, fly ash, sludge, and slag were used as auxiliary materials. Gypsum from desulphurization and slag mixture were also used during the clinker production process. The composition of major raw materials, fuel, and waste used in the CKs is shown in Table 2. Coal and oil were fed at the rotary kiln, and waste was fed at the preheater.

    The measured concentrations of heavy metals in the raw material, fuel, and waste are shown in Table 3. As shown in the table, auxiliary materials, fuels contained a higher concentration of heavy metals than the primary materials and fuels did. Arsenic was not detected in any of the sample types tested in CK #1 and CK #2. In general, waste ash, sludge, and slag contained higher concentrations of heavy metals. The heavy metals concentrations in the waste vary between the CKs tested. For example, Pb was higher in the sludge and slag mixture in CK #1, in ferrous materials in CK #2, and in the slag mixture in CK #3. The input concentrations of metals vary according to variations in composition of the fuel, waste, auxiliary material, and auxiliary fuel.

       3.2. Heavy Metals Emission (except Hg)

    Heavy metals introduced in the CK may either incorporate in the cement clinker, be removed by APCDs, or emitted from the stack. Increasing heavy metal input by fuel and waste increases its content in cement and in the environment (directly by emission, or by leaching to ground water when CKD is land filled). On average, 0.45 mg/Sm3 of dust was emitted from the stack, and removal efficiency was above 99.99%, since it was filtered efficiently by BF. On average, removal of heavy metals (except Hg) efficiency?was above 98.5%; this was due to the operation of a high-efficiency BF. The bag filter had removal efficiencies in the range of 99?99.9% for most trace elements such as Pb, Cd, Ni, and manganese (Mn).13)

    Heavy metal emission measurements before BF and stack are shown in Table 4. The measured concentration of heavy metals emitted from CK stacks ranged as follows: Zn 5.8 μg/Sm3 to 18.2 μg/Sm3, Ni 1.6 μg/Sm3 to 4.8 μg/Sm3, Cr 1.0 μg/Sm3 to 6.7 μg/Sm3, Pb 0.8 μg/Sm3 to 3.5 μg/Sm3, Cd 0.01 μg/Sm3 to 0.02 μg/Sm3, and As (CK#3: 0.01 μg/Sm3). The greatest emissions from CK #3 were Zn, Cr, Ni, Cd; from CK #1: Zn, Pb, Ni; and from CK #2: Pb. Zn enters a CK through lime, clay, and fuel. In addition, co-incineration of waste such as oil and tires can increase its concentration noticeably.14,15) Higher Zn emissions from CKs #1 and #3 may be

    [Table 1.] Sampling and analytical methods

    label

    Sampling and analytical methods

    [Table 2.] Composition of raw material, fuel, and waste

    label

    Composition of raw material, fuel, and waste

    [Table 3.] Concentration of heavy metals in raw materials, fuels, and wastes (mg/kg)

    label

    Concentration of heavy metals in raw materials, fuels, and wastes (mg/kg)

    due to the higher portion of rubber and tires in the waste burned. Pb is mainly introduced into CKs by conventional fuels or burned waste.16) Carrasco et al.17) reported that when scrap tires are used as a fuel substitute in CKs, the rate of emission for metals increased 487% for Zn, 127% for Pb, and 339% for Cr. The German Cement Works Association (in German, Verein Deutscher Zementwerke)18) reported that As, Cd, Cr are associated with ironworks waste that are frequently burned in CK, while vanadium (V) and Ni are higher in oil coke. As was not detected in the raw materials and waste or in the flue gas emission of CKs #1 and #2, whereas As was detected in the slag mixture and in the flue gas of CK #3. Total-Cr (T-Cr) was present in all the raw materials, fuel and wastes tested (except tires). Cr was highest in wastes burned in CK #3, and in flue gas emissions from CK #3. Pb concentration was highest in waste (waste ash, sludge, and slag mixture) and its concentration in flue gas in CK #2. Since Cd had a low concentration in waste, its concentration in emission flue gas was correspondingly small. Thus, emission variations of metals in tested CKs were related to raw materials, fuel, and waste fed.

    Distribution of metals within the CK varies depending on its boiling and melting temperatures. Trace elements during combustion have been classified into three classes.19) Class I elements do not volatilize during combustion, and are distributed in bottom ash and fly ashes. Class II elements vaporize but are found in fly ashes after condensation on particulates and by a nucleation mechanism due to decreasing temperature. A significant proportion of these fine particles are in the sub-micron size class where the duct control system is less effective. Class III elements vaporize and condense partly within the system.20) Among the measured heavy metals in this study, Hg is in Class III, easily passing through pollution control devices and speciating in the gaseous phase. Zn, Ni, Pb, Cd, Be, and Cr fall in class II and are

    [Table 4.] Heavy metal and dust emissions from cement kilns

    label

    Heavy metal and dust emissions from cement kilns

    mostly removed by pollution control devices. Earlier studies show that non-volatile metals entering CK process are mainly (55?70%) distributed in clinker,21-23) a minor portion is distributed in CKD, and a very small portion (0.1%) is emitted from stack.24) The major portion of semi-volatile metals are distributed in CKD (66?98%)25) less in clinker (34?2%) and the emissions were less than 0.75%.

    Heavy metals have also been classified according to toxicity.24,26) Class I includes highly toxic metals (Cd, Hg, titanium [Ti], and As), Class II includes metals of medium toxicity (Pb, cobalt [Co], Ni, selenium [Se], and tellurium [Te]) and Class III includes metals of low toxicity (Cr, copper [Cu], platinum [Pt], V, tin [Sn], palladium [Pd], Mn, and rhodium [Rh]). On average, 3.3% of the heavy metals of medium and low toxicity (Pb, Ni, Cr) entering BF were released into the atmosphere. Among the toxic heavy metals measured, 0.14% of Cd, 0.01% of As, and 40% of Hg entering the BF were released into the atmosphere.

       3.3. Mercury Emission and Speciation

    Mercury speciation into particulate, elemental, and oxidized form in the flue gas is important since the overall efficiency of the control system depends on speciation. Hg speciation, its removal within APCDs, and emission concentrations are affected by type of fuel or waste, operating conditions, and flue gas composition. In addition, the use of fly ash from coal-fired power plants in cement manufacturing as an additive increases Hg emission. On average, concentrations of Hg ranged from 13 μg/Sm3 to 58 μg/Sm3 at the BF inlet and 3 μg/Sm3 to 42 μg/Sm3 in stack emissions. Removal efficiency ranged from 77% to 28%. Fig. 2 shows the variations in Hg speciation before the BF and stack in the tested CKs. Among the heavy metals measured in this study, transformation of Hg within APCDs was more complex due to its high volatility, interaction with flue gas components, and presence of fly ash. Due to the typical features of the kiln temperature gradient, there is an inherent recycling of Hg within the system, and thus it may take a long time for it to reach a steady state.27)

    Mercury speciation and removal efficiency was similar between CK #1 and CK #2 but was somewhat different in CK #3. Mercury speciation before BF was predominantly in elemental form (ranging 75.1%, to 98.8%). By passing through the BF portion, the proportion of oxidized Hg in all cases increased (5.6% to 80.4%). Earlier studies have also shown the oxidation tendency of elemental Hg across BF.28) The oxidation and speciation variations between the facilities may be related to the chlorine content in fuel, acidic gas composition in flue gas, fly ash, and residence time of flue gas within the system. The variation of Hg speciation and

    emission concentration may be related to chlorine concentration, flue gas components, and efficiency of APCDs.29-32)

    There is no well-established technology that can control Hg emissions across the entire utility industry. Various methods are being studied, and emerging control technologies are relatively new and have not yet been tested on a commercial scale. Sorbent injection, elemental Hg oxidation, and multipollutant control technologies have been extensively studied so far. Air pollution control devices installed for removing nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, and particulate matter (PM) can achieve co-benefits of Hg capture. Higher co-benefits of Hg control in CKs can be achieved in facilities equipped with PM control devices and wet APCDs, since oxidized Hg is soluble in water and can be removed in a wet scrubber solution.

       3.4. Cement Kiln Dust

    One of the major concerns with CK operation is to manage CKD-alkaline waste removed from APCDs with high concentrations of heavy metals. The higher alkali content in CK and in the scrubber favors retention of metals and its compounds in clinker and CKD.21) The U.S. EPA classifies CKD as a “special waste,” and it has been temporarily exempted from federal hazardous waste regulations under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.33) Depending upon the pollutant levels, some CKD can be reused directly, and some requires treatment before reuse. The U.S. EPA is in the process of developing standards for the management of CKD and has published a set of proposed subtitle D (i.e., non-hazardous, solid waste) regulations to govern CKD management. To control the release of CKD into the air, the U.S. EPA has proposed a performance standard to prevent release from landfills, handling conveyances, or storage areas. As an alternative to the performance-based standard, technology-based standards are proposed.

    Sixty percents of Hg and nearly all of Be, Cd, and As entering BF are distributed in CKD (Fig. 3). The cycling of volatile metals as a result of CKD recycling (metals accumulate in CKD through repeated pass through kiln) must be handled properly to meet all the environmental management standards.

    Here, it is worthwhile to note that when emission limits become stringent, cement plants are forced to install more efficient APCDs, and a larger proportion of metals are thereby captured in CKD along with particulate removal. Recycling of CKD, a common practice during cement production, increases the metal content in cement, the final product. Metals in concrete are low-leachable

    and are long-term stable.34,35) However, allergic contact dermatitis, a potentially serious condition, can result to permanent disability when wet cement containing Cr (VI) comes in contact with skin. Thus, proper recycling and management of CKD is essential. The European Union directive 2003/53/EC prohibits the use or sale of cement or cement preparation with higher soluble Cr (VI).36)

       3.5. Volatile Organic Compounds Emission

    The presence of VOCs in the emission of the combustion unit indicates an inefficient process. Benzene, acrylonitrile, and toluene were the major VOCs emitted from CKs tested (Table 5). Here, it is notable that few VOCs increased in concentration in the stack emission, because the samplings at these points were taken at different time. The other VOCs tested?vinyl chloride, chloroethane, cis-1,2-dichloroethylene, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene,?chlorobenzene, ethylbenzene,?m,p-xylenes, and o-xylene?were not detected before BF and stack emissions. Volatile organic compounds such as benzene, toluene, chloroform, trihalomethane and di-, tri-, and hexachlorinated benzene are usually present in the combustion flue gas. Trihalomethane, for instance, comes from process water rather than the combustion process, and carbon tetrachloride and chlorobenzene are often used for spiking feed material during performance testing in order to increase destruction and removal efficiency, so they also may appear as a product of incomplete combustion.37) The characteristic residence time of combustion gases in CK is more than five seconds at temperatures higher than 1,000C, whereas it is only two seconds in the typical incineration process. This favors a highly efficient environment for destruction of the organic components of fuel and waste used. Other VOC compounds, of higher concentrations, from other incineration facilities such as municipal waste incinerator (MWI) have been measured in Korea.38)

    [Table 5.] VOC emissions before BF and stack of cement kilns (μg/Sm3)

    label

    VOC emissions before BF and stack of cement kilns (μg/Sm3)

    Here, it is notable that all the VOCs species (toluene, acrylonitrile, benzene, styrene, 1,3-butadiene, methylene chloride) present in the flue gas are among the 187 listed HAPs by U.S. EPA. Thus, in spite of their low concentrations, proper consideration is required to minimize its emission.

    4. Conclusions

    The major heavy metals emitted from CKs co-burning waste were Hg, Zn, Ni, Cr, Pb, Cd, and As. Removal efficiency of heavy metals (except Hg) was above 98.5%; the higher removal efficiency was due to the use of high-efficiency BF in all the kilns tested. The average Hg removal efficiency of BF was above 60%. On average, 3.3% of the medium- and low-toxicity heavy metals (Pb, Ni, Cr) entering the BF were released into the atmosphere. 0.14% of the Cd and 0.01% of the As entering BF were released into the atmosphere, while 40% of the Hg-one of the highly toxic metals?was emitted in the atmosphere. Emission variations of metals among the CKs tested were related to raw materials, fuel, and waste-feed and operating conditions. The cycling of volatile metals as a result of CKD recycling must be handled properly to ensure that all of the environmental management standards are met. Volatile organic compounds emissions from CKs were smaller, but all the VOC species (toluene, acrylonitrile benzene, styrene, 1,3-butadiene, methylene chloride) detected in emission gas are HAPs. So, in spite of their low concentration, proper attention is required to minimize their emissions.

참고문헌
  • 1. 0 Alternative fuels in cement manufacture: technical and environmental review D/1997/5457/April google
  • 2. 2005 Guidelines for the selection and use of fuels and raw materials in the cement manufacturing process google
  • 3. Mokrzycki Eugeniusz, Uliasz-Bochenczyk Alicja, Sarna Mieczys 2003 Use of alternative fuels in the Polish cement industry [Applied Energy] Vol.74 P.101-111 google cross ref
  • 4. Van Oss Hendrik G, Padovani Amy C 2002 Cement Manufacture and the Environment Part I: Chemistry and Technology [Journal of Industrial Ecology] Vol.6 P.89-106 google cross ref
  • 5. Vigon B 2002 Toward a sustainable cement industry substudy 5559: Industrial ecology in the cement industry google
  • 6. Lemarchand D Nov 2004 Waste treatment in Europe and co-processing [4th Proceedings of VI FIMAI (Feira Internacional de Meio Ambiente Industrial)] google
  • 7. Lee S.D 2003 Waste reduction and recycling law in Korea [Int Environ Law Comm Newsl] Vol.5 google
  • 8. Choi Sang-Min, Im Jong-Kwon, Hong Ji-Hyoung, Lee Sue-Been, Zoh Kyung-Duk 2007 The estimation of emission factor of N2O and CH4 by measurement from stacks in the waste incinerators and cement production plants [Korean Journal of Environmental Health] Vol.33 P.217-226 google
  • 9. 2000 Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December on the incineration of waste [Off J Eur Communities] Vol.43 P.91-111 google
  • 10. 2005 National emission 1111standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP): Final standards or hazardous air pollutants for hazardous waste combustors (phase I final replacement standards and phase II) [Fed Regist] Vol.70 P.59402-59579 google
  • 11. 2006 National emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) from the Portland cement manufacturing Industry (Final rule and proposed rule) [Fed Regist] Vol.71 P.76518-76552 google
  • 12. 2007 Asia-Pacific partnership on clean development and climate google
  • 13. Ruth Lawrence A 1998 Energy from municipal solid waste: a comparison with coal combustion technology [Progress in Energy and Combustion Science] Vol.24 P.545-564 google cross ref
  • 14. Bhatty J.I 1995 Role of minor elements in cement manufacture and use Research and Development Bulletin RD109T google
  • 15. Achternbosch Matthias, Brautigam Klaus-Rainer, Hartlieb Nicola, Kupsch Christel, Richer Ulf, Stemmermann Peter 2005 Impact of the use of waste on trace element concentrations in cement and concrete [Waste Management & Research] Vol.23 P.328-337 google cross ref
  • 16. Sprung S 1985 Technological problems in pyroprocessing cement clinker: cause and solution google
  • 17. Carrasco F, Bredin N, Heitz M 2002 Gaseous contaminant emissions as affected by burning scrap tires in cement manufacturing [Journal of Environmental Quality] Vol.31 P.1484-1490 google
  • 18. 2002 VDZ Verein Deutscher Zementwerke e V Dusseldorf google
  • 19. Meij R 1989 Tracking trace elements at a coal-fired power plant equipped with a wet-flue-gas desulphurization facility [KEMA Sci Tech Rep] Vol.7 P.267-355 google
  • 20. Meij R 1997 Behavior control and emissions of trace species by coal-fired power plants in Europe 83428SP08 97P0107B google
  • 21. Sarofim A.F, Pershing D.W, Dellinger B, Heap M.P, Owens W.D 1994 Emissions of metal and organic-compounds from cement kilns using waste derived fuels [Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials] Vol.11 P.169-192 google
  • 22. Guo Qizhong, Eckert James O. Jr 1996 Heavy metal outputs from a cement kiln co-fired with hazardous waste fuels [Journal of Hazardous Materials] Vol.51 P.47-65 google cross ref
  • 23. Ract P.G, Espinosa D.C.R, Tenorio J.A.S 2003 Determination of Cu and Ni incorporation ratios in Portland cement clinker [Waste Management] Vol.23 P.281-285 google cross ref
  • 24. Giannopoulos D, Kolaitis D.I, Togkalidou A, Skevis G, Founti M.A 2007 Quantification of emissions from the co-incineration of cutting oil emulsions in cement plants - Part II: Trace species [Fuel] Vol.86 P.2491-2501 google cross ref
  • 25. Owens W.D, Sarofim A.F, Pershing D.W 1993 The use of recycle for enhanced volatile metal capture [Fuel Process Technol] Vol.39 P.337-356 google
  • 26. Technische Anleitung zur Reinhaltung der Luft (TA Luft): erste allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschrift zum Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetz google
  • 27. Senior C, Sarofim A, Eddings E 2003 Behavior and measurement of mercury in cement kilns [IEEE-IAS/PCA 45th Annual Cement Industry Technical Conference] P.233-248 google
  • 28. Park K.S, Jang H.N, Lee J.H, Lee S.H, Seo Y.C 2006 Speciation and Mass distribution of Mercury emitted from waste incinerators and cement kilns [4th International Conference on Combustion Incineration/Pyrolysis and Emission Control (4th i-CIPEC)] google
  • 29. Seo Y.C, Park K.S, Kim J.H, Jeong T.Y 2006 Selected from the 17th Annual Conference of the Japan Society of Waste Management Experts (JSWME); A study on behavior of mercury speciation from waste combustion facilities [Waste Recycl Manage Res] Vol.11 P.19-21 google
  • 30. Pudasainee Deepak, Kim Jeong-Hun, Seo Yong-Chil 2009 Mercury emission trend influenced by stringent air pollutants regulation for coal-fired power plants in Korea [Atmospheric Environment] Vol.43 P.6254-6259 google cross ref
  • 31. Pudasainee Deepak, Lee Sung-Jun, Lee Sang-Hyeob, Kim Jeong-Hun, Jang Ha-Na, Cho Sung-Jin, Seo Yong-Chil 2009 Effect of selective catalytic reactor on oxidation and enhanced removal of mercury in coal-fired power plants [Fuel] Vol.89 P.804-809 google cross ref
  • 32. Kim Jeong-Hun, Pudasainee Deepak, Yoon Young-Sik, Son Seung-Uk, Seo Yong-Chil 2010 Studies on speciation changes and mass distribution of mercury in a bituminous coal-fired power plant by combining field data and chemical equilibrium [Ind Eng Chem Res] google cross ref
  • 33. 0 Cement kiln dust waste google
  • 34. Collivignarelli Carlo, Sorlini Sabrina 2002 Reuse of municipal solid wastes incineration fly ashes in concrete mixtures [Waste Management] Vol.22 P.909-912 google cross ref
  • 35. Kolovos K.G 2006 Waste ammunition as secondary mineralizing raw material in Portland cement production [Cement and Concrete Composites] Vol.28 P.133-143 google cross ref
  • 36. 2003 Directive 2003/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2003 Amending for the 26th time Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations (nonylphenol no [J Eur Communities] Vol.46 P.24-27 google
  • 37. Sidhu Sukh, Kasti Nabil, Edwards Phil, Dellinger Barry 2001 Hazardous air pollutants formation from reactions of raw meal organics in cement kilns [Chemosphere] Vol.42 P.499-506 google cross ref
  • 38. Jang H.N, Seo Y.C, Lee J.H, Kim J.H, Pudasainee D, Park J.M, Song K.J, Mun Y.H, Park K.S 2007 Implementation of US MACT regulation to Korean municipal waste incinerators [Waste Recycling and management Research] Vol.12 P.31-33 google
OAK XML 통계
이미지 / 테이블
  • [ Fig 1 ]  Configuration of air pollution control devices in cement kilns (CKs) tested. The temperature condition of one of the CKs is shown as an example.
    Configuration of air pollution control devices in cement kilns (CKs) tested. The temperature condition of one of the CKs is shown as an example.
  • [ Table 1. ]  Sampling and analytical methods
    Sampling and analytical methods
  • [ Table 2. ]  Composition of raw material, fuel, and waste
    Composition of raw material, fuel, and waste
  • [ Table 3. ]  Concentration of heavy metals in raw materials, fuels, and wastes (mg/kg)
    Concentration of heavy metals in raw materials, fuels, and wastes (mg/kg)
  • [ Table 4. ]  Heavy metal and dust emissions from cement kilns
    Heavy metal and dust emissions from cement kilns
  • [ Fig. 2 ]  Variation in mercury (Hg) speciation before and after bag filter in cement kilns (CKs). BF: bag filter.
    Variation in mercury (Hg) speciation before and after bag filter in cement kilns (CKs). BF: bag filter.
  • [ Fig3 ]  Distribution of heavy metals in cement kiln dust (CKD) and flue gas emission. Be: beryllium, As: arsenic, Cd: cadmium, Zn: zinc, Pb: lead, Ni: nickel, Cr: chromium, Hg: mercury.
    Distribution of heavy metals in cement kiln dust (CKD) and flue gas emission. Be: beryllium, As: arsenic, Cd: cadmium, Zn: zinc, Pb: lead, Ni: nickel, Cr: chromium, Hg: mercury.
  • [ Table 5. ]  VOC emissions before BF and stack of cement kilns (μg/Sm3)
    VOC emissions before BF and stack of cement kilns (μg/Sm3)
(우)06579 서울시 서초구 반포대로 201(반포동)
Tel. 02-537-6389 | Fax. 02-590-0571 | 문의 : oak2014@korea.kr
Copyright(c) National Library of Korea. All rights reserved.